10pm Curfew? Time For Bed, Prime Minister
Our hopeless, busted flush of a Prime Minister is going to announce today that pubs and restaurants will have to close by 10pm from Thursday, with table-only service for the foreseeable future. Exceptions to the “rule of six” for weddings and funerals will be eliminated, too. Needless to say, this is to fend off a wholly imaginary “second wave”. The Mail does its best to relay Downing Street’s spin on this nonsense, although its heart isn’t in it.
In July, Mr Johnson urged staff to “go back to work if you can” in a bid to prevent city centres becoming ghost towns.
But a source told the Mail that employees will be advised to “work from home if you can” during the coming weeks.
The restrictions have divided the Cabinet, with Chancellor Rishi Sunak and Business Secretary Alok Sharma both warning about the potential impact on the economy. But a senior Government source insisted all ministers accepted the move was needed to bring the R-rate, which measures how fast the disease is spreading, back under control.
“The aim is to cause maximum damage to the R and minimal damage to the economy,” the source said. “Unless we act now, there will be greater economic damage later on.”
Businesses and schools will be allowed to stay open, with Government sources insisting the measures do not amount to a second lockdown.
The Two Ronnies of Doom
Richard Littlejohn has a cracking piece in the Mail about Chris Whitty and Sir Patrick Vallance’s apocalyptic press conference.
Sitting 6ft apart behind a newsreader-style desk, The Two Ronnies of Doom delivered an alarmist prognosis of a rising death toll, backed up by speculative graphs based on ‘the science’ — what most of us would call ‘guesswork’.
They could have looked at another graph, from Monday’s Daily Mail, which showed that cancer kills around 450 people a day, compared to just 21 from – or should that be with? – coronavirus.
Five people die daily in traffic accidents. In fact, for those under 50, you’re more likely to be hit by a bus than contract a fatal dose of Covid.
But using the Government’s better-safe-than-sorry approach to the corona pandemic, that would be enough to justify closing every road in Britain.
Hang on. Come to think of it, that’s exactly what they are doing.
During Monday’s dismal YOU’RE ALL GOING TO DIE! diatribe, Vallance and Whitty even managed to invert the language, talking about Britain ‘turning the corner’ – and not in a good way. When normal folk speak of turning the corner, it usually means things are getting better.
Worth reading in full.
Many people have ridiculed Whitty and Valance’s prognosis – 49,000 new cases a day by October 13th if cases continue to double every seven days, not least because the killer graph the Two Ronnies used to illustrate this risk showed cases declining in the last seven days.
If cases haven’t doubled between September 9th and 15th, given that the “rule of six” was only introduced on the 14th, why should we believe they’ll start doubling from now on? And, of course, the lion’s share of the new blue cases – the actual cases – are based on Pillar 2 community testing carried out by PHE, so ~91% of them will be false positives.
Sir Patrick Vallance said that if cases do climb to 49,000 on October 13th we could expect to see 200 people a day dying from Covid in November. Sounds grim, right? But hang on a minute. That’s a case fatality rate of 0.4%. Given that the CFR is usually 10 times higher than the infection fatality rate, that’s an IFR of 0.04% – or less than half that of seasonal flu.
Remind me why we need a second lockdown for at least six months, Chief Science Officer?
Sir Patrick pointed to rising cases in Spain to illustrate the danger, claiming we were lagging Spain by a couple of weeks. But cases in Spain aren’t actually rising, according to Carl Heneghan, Jason Oke and Tom Jefferson, who produced a quick response to the press conference.
In a press briefing today Professors Chris Whitty and Patrick Vallance showed epidemic curves for Spain and France – demonstrating how cases numbers have been growing rapidly, possibly exponentially, since August. As is often done when using case numbers by publishing date, the raw numbers are smoothed with a seven-day moving average. Drawn this way, the data shows a continued upward trend.
But drawing the epidemic curve for Spain using cases by symptom onset produces a different result. We have put these two methods together on a single graph so that they can be compared:
The epidemic curve based on the symptom onset date does not show the same continued growth – it appears to show cases stalling in late August.
Everyone I know is completely baffled by the smoke-and-mirrors press conference conducted by Whitty and Valance – and, of course, they refused to take any questions so no journalist was permitted to interrogate their data. Do they believe the nonsense they’re peddling or have they been put up to it by the Triumvirate? 49,000 cases a day would put the UK right at the top of the list of world’s countries affected by COVID-19. David Paton, Professor of Industrial Economics at Nottingham University Businesses School, told the Telegraph he would “take a dim view” if his students presented similar data.
So what’s going on? Why have they embarrassed themselves in the way?
If they’re just stooges for Caesar, Pompey and Crassus (Boris, Dom and Gove), what’s their agenda? Why does a Tory Government want to completely destroy the British economy – predicted to lose £250 million a day while the 10pm curfew remains in place? Won’t that just propel Mr Woodentop into Downing Street?
Even senior politicians are perplexed. An ex-Minister WhatsApped me yesterday evening:
What am I missing here? I seem to be in a parallel universe. Deaths are in single digits. So what if young people are getting it? That’s good. They then become immune. All we have to make sure is they keep away from old people. We can’t shut down the f***ing country again on a false analysis of the problem. In March and April cases were high and deaths were high. In September cases are high but deaths are low. I don’t understand the hysteria in Govt at the moment. They aren’t stupid. They can see the same as me. I really don’t get it.
My best guess is that the Triumvirate know, in their heart of hearts, that they made a colossal cock-up in March and are desperately clinging to Neil Ferguson’s doom-laden prognosis as the rationale for all the terrible damage they’ve done. Rather than admit they got it wrong, they have to remain faithful to their original hypothesis which, if you follow Ferguson’s logic, means we’ve only succeeded in postponing the apocalypse, not averting it. So if we don’t lock down again and “protect the NHS” – i.e. turn it into a Covid-only service again – the Government will be buried under half a million corpses. No, the restrictions must continue until we have a vaccine.
“They are running around like headless chickens, seemingly fearful of being blamed for killing people,” said one veteran Tory MP, quoted in the Telegraph.
Brutus, it’s time to start sharpening your knife.
What’s Really Happening to Cases?
A numerate reader has done some number crunching based on PHE’s weekly data and discovered that in most parts of England cases have fallen in the past week.
Meanwhile, in Sweden…
Sebastian Rushworth, who’s been working as an emergency physician in Sweden, has written an interesting blog post about what it’s like working on the front line in Stockholm. Answer: it’s an absolute breeze. This is a follow-up to a piece he wrote in August, in which he speculated about whether Sweden had achieved herd immunity.
In my earlier article in August, I mentioned that after an initial peak that lasted for a month or so, from March to April, visits to the Emergency Room due to covid had been declining continuously, and deaths in Sweden had dropped from over 100 a day at the peak in April, to around five per day in August.
At the point in August when I wrote that article, I hadn’t seen a single covid patient in over a month. I speculated that Sweden had developed herd immunity, since the huge and continuous drop was happening in spite of the fact that Sweden wasn’t really taking any serious measures to prevent spread of the infection.
So, how have things developed in the six weeks since that first article?
Well, as things stand now, I haven’t seen a single covid patient in the Emergency Room in over two and a half months. People have continued to become ever more relaxed in their behaviour, which is noticeable in increasing volumes in the Emergency Room. At the peak of the pandemic in April, I was seeing about half as many patients per shift as usual, probably because lots of people were afraid to go the ER for fear of catching covid. Now volumes are back to normal.
When I sit in the tube on the way to and from work, it is packed with people. Maybe one in a hundred people is choosing to wear a face mask in public. In Stockholm, life is largely back to normal. If you look at the front pages of the tabloids, on many days there isn’t a single mention of covid anywhere. As I write this (19th September 2020) the front pages of the two main tabloids have big spreads about arthritis and pensions. Apparently arthritis and pensions are currently more exciting than COVID-19 in Sweden.
In spite of this relaxed attitude, the death rate has continued to drop. When I wrote the first article, I wrote that covid had killed under 6,000 people. How many people have died now, six weeks later? Actually, we’re still at under 6,000 deaths. On average, one to two people per day are dying of covid in Sweden at present, and that number continues to drop.
In the hospital where I work, there isn’t a single person currently being treated for covid. In fact, in the whole of Stockholm, a county with 2,4 million inhabitants, there are currently only 28 people being treated for covid in all the hospitals combined. At the peak, in April, that number was over 1,000. If 28 people are currently in hospital, out of 2,4 million who live in Stockholm, that means the odds of having a case of covid so severe that it requires in-hospital treatment are at the moment about one in 86,000.
Oh Boris! If only you’d had the courage to follow your instincts!
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: The Swiss Doctor has compiled some data about Covid in Belarus. In spite of the fact that it was the least locked down country in Europe – even less locked down than Sweden – it has had a grand total of 785 deaths to date. Can this official death toll be trusted? Probably not, but all-cause mortality figures show that deaths are about three times higher than the official data – no worse than a bad bout of seasonal flu.
Sensible Scientists Write to Boris Urging Rethink
A group of sensible medical experts led by Prof Sunetra Gupta, Prof Carl Heneghan and Prof Karol Sikora have written an open letter to Boris urging him to rethink his Covid strategy. (Does he have one? Who knew!)
Dear Prime Minister,
We are writing with the intention of providing constructive input into the choices with respect to the COVID-19 policy response. We also have several concerns regarding aspects of the existing policy choices that we wish to draw attention to.
In summary, our view is that the existing policy path is inconsistent with the known risk-profile of COVID-19 and should be reconsidered. The unstated objective currently appears to be one of suppression of the virus, until such a time that a vaccine can be deployed. This objective is increasingly unfeasible (notwithstanding our more specific concerns regarding existing policies) and is leading to significant harm across all age groups, which likely offsets any benefits.
Instead, more targeted measures that protect the most vulnerable from Covid, whilst not adversely impacting those not at risk, are more supportable. Given the high proportion of Covid deaths in care homes, these should be a priority. Such targeted measures should be explored as a matter of urgency, as the logical cornerstone of our future strategy.
In addition to this overarching point, we append a set of concerns regarding the existing policy choices, which we hope will be received in the spirit in which they are intended. We are mindful that the current circumstances are challenging, and that all policy decisions are difficult ones. Moreover, many people have sadly lost loved ones to COVID-19 throughout the UK. Nonetheless, the current debate appears unhelpfully polarised around views that Covid is extremely deadly to all (and that large-scale policy interventions are effective); and on the other hand, those who believe Covid poses no risk at all. In light of this, and in order to make choices that increase our prospects of achieving better outcomes in future, we think now is the right time to ‘step back’ and fundamentally reconsider the path forward.
The list of signatories is impressive. You can read the letter and see the full list in the Spectator.
Round-Up
- “Matt Hancock: Obstinate or Innumerate?” – I reworked one of my blog posts on Lockdown Sceptics for the Critic
- “Whitty and Vallance’s attempt to dress down the lockdown sceptics was unconvincing” – Janet Daley wasn’t convinced by the Two Ronnies
- “A ‘circuit-breaker’ lockdown is no strategy at all” – Ross Clark on fine form in the Telegraph
- “We can beat Covid without lockdowns, says top German virologist” – Hendrik Streeck has some advice for countries contemplating a second lockdown: hold your nerve, and don’t succumb to the pervasive mood of mass hysteria
- “Lockdown is too extreme if the second wave is set to be no more deadly than winter flu” – Patrick O’Flynn says Boris needs to show some leadership. Some hope
- “REVERSAL: CDC Removes Guidelines Saying Coronavirus Can Spread From Tiny Air Particles” – Good news from across the pond
- “Spain deploys army to Madrid to help enforce lockdown” – Is this the next arrow in Matt Hancock’s quiver?
- “Daily ‘moonshot’ tests for COVID-19 will not be given out by NHS – the public will have to pay” – Dido Harding says the tests should be seen as a “cost of doing business” for people who want to attend conferences or go to the theatre. Is she really earmarked to succeed Simon Stevens?
- “Supermarkets warn public against another spate of panic buying” – Supermarket bosses have warned the public against embarking on another spate of panic buying, according to the Grocer
- “Boris Goes Full Fascist Against Lockdown Protests – But Not BLM or XR” – Delingpole lets rip in Breitbart
- “We Need a Radically Different Approach to the Pandemic and Our Economy as a Whole” – Interesting piece in Jacobin, based on interviews with Katherine Yih and Martin Martin Kulldorff, two sceptical public health experts, in which the left-wing magazine comes out against shut downs
- “Is it time we learned to live with the virus?” – Has Nick Triggle, the BBC’s Health Correspondent, finally seen the light?
- “James Ferguson: How bad data is driving fear of a second wave of COVID-19” – Listen to Lockdown Sceptics contributor talking to my old mate Merryn Somerset Webb in the Money Week podcast
Theme Tunes Suggested by Readers
Three today: “Long Slow Suicide” by the Divine Comedy, “Masked Hysteria” by BeastTheButcher and “Why?” by Bronski Beat.
Love in the Time of Covid
We have created some Lockdown Sceptics Forums, including a dating forum called “Love in a Covid Climate” that has attracted a bit of attention. We have a team of moderators in place to remove spam and deal with the trolls, but sometimes it takes a little while so please bear with us. You have to register to use the Forums, but that should just be a one-time thing. Any problems, email the Lockdown Sceptics webmaster Ian Rons here.
Woke Gobbledegook
We’ve decided to create a permanent slot down here for woke gobbledegook. But today we thought we’d tell you about an antidote to woke virtue-signalling – QPR’s decision not to take a knee at last Friday’s 12.45pm fixture against Coventry. Or rather, we thought we’d let Les Ferdinand, QPR’s Director of Football, tell you.
The taking of the knee has reached a point of ‘good PR’ but little more than that. The message has been lost. It is now not dissimilar to a fancy hashtag or a nice pin badge.
What are our plans with this? Will people be happy for players to take the knee for the next 10 years but see no actual progress made? Taking the knee will not bring about change in the game – actions will.
You tell ’em Les. Is it too much too hope that this rare injection of common sense into the national debate on how best to tackle racism will put an end to the absurd displays of BLM fealty in the Premier League?
The Guardian has more.
Stop Press: Free Speech Union Advisory Council member Doug Stokes, Professor of International Relations at the University of Exeter, has a terrific piece in Conservative Home on why the Conservative Government needs to stop standing on the sidelines in the culture war.
“Mask Exempt” Lanyards
We’ve created a one-stop shop down here for people who want to buy (or make) a “Mask Exempt” lanyard/card. You can print out and laminate a fairly standard one for free here and it has the advantage of not explicitly claiming you have a disability. But if you have no qualms about that (or you are disabled), you can buy a lanyard from Amazon saying you do have a disability/medical exemption here (takes a while to arrive). The Government has instructions on how to download an official “Mask Exempt” notice to put on your phone here. You can get a “Hidden Disability” tag from ebay here and an “exempt” card with lanyard for just £1.99 from Etsy here. And, finally, if you feel obliged to wear a mask but want to signal your disapproval of having to do so, you can get a “sexy world” mask with the Swedish flag on it here.
Don’t forget to sign the petition on the UK Government’s petitions website calling for an end to mandatory face nappies in shops here. (And while you’re about it, sign this one, too, calling for the repeal of the Coronavirus Act.)
A reader has started a website that contains some useful guidance about how you can claim legal exemption.
And here’s a round-up of the scientific evidence on the effectiveness of mask (threadbare at best).
Stop Press: London Mayor Sadiq Khan is pushing for face masks to be work in all public spaces in London, not just shops, according to the Mail. Remind me who elected this clown? That’s right, nobody did. His term of office expired on April 20th this year.
The Care Home Scandal – A Call For Evidence
Lockdown Sceptics has asked an award-winning investigative journalist, David Rose, to investigate the high death toll in Britain’s care homes. Did 20,000+ elderly people really die of COVID-19 between March and July or were many of them just collateral lockdown damage? With lots of care homes short-staffed because employees were self-isolating at home, and with relatives and partners unable to visit to check up on their loved ones because of restrictions, how many elderly residents died of neglect, not Covid? How many succumbed to other conditions, untreated because they weren’t able to access hospitals or their local GP? After doctors were told by care home managers that the cause of death of a deceased resident was “novel coronavirus”, how many bothered to check before signing the death certificate? The risk of doctors misdiagnosing the cause of death is particularly high, given that various safeguards to minimise the risk of that happening were suspended in March.
David Rose would like Lockdown Sceptics readers to share any information they have that could help in this investigation. Here is his request:
We are receiving reports that some residents of care homes who died from causes other than Covid may have had their deaths ascribed to it – even though they never had the disease at all, and never tested positive. Readers will already be familiar with the pioneering work by Carl Heneghan and his colleagues at the Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine, which forced the Government to change its death toll counting method. Previously, it will be recalled, people who died of, say, a road accident, were being counted as Covid deaths if they had tested positive at any time, perhaps months earlier. But here we are talking of something different – Covid “deaths” among people who never had the virus at all.
In one case, where a family is deciding whether to grant permission for Lockdown Sceptics to publicise it, an elderly lady in reasonable health was locked in her room for many hours each day in a care home on the south coast, refused all visitors, deprived of contact with other residents, and eventually went on hunger strike, refusing even to drink water. She died in the most wretched circumstances which were only indirectly a product of the virus – and yet, her death certificate reportedly claims she had Covid.
I’m looking for further examples of 1) elderly people who died as a result of the lockdown and associated measures, but whose deaths were wrongly attributed to “novel coronavirus”, and 2) those elderly people who clearly died from other causes but whose deaths were still formally ascribed to Covid because they once tested positive for it, even after the counting method change.
If you have relevant information, please email Lockdown Sceptics or David directly on david@davidroseuk.com.
Samaritans
If you are struggling to cope, please call Samaritans for free on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch. Samaritans is available round the clock, every single day of the year, providing a safe place for anyone struggling to cope, whoever they are, however they feel, whatever life has done to them.
Shameless Begging Bit
Thanks as always to those of you who made a donation in the past 24 hours to pay for the upkeep of this site. Doing these daily updates is hard work (although we have help from lots of people, mainly in the form of readers sending us stories and links). If you feel like donating, please click here. And if you want to flag up any stories or links we should include in future updates, email us here.
And Finally…
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
There has been a fair bit of criticism of the term “institutional” in the context of that report, by interviewees on some recent GBN programmes. It could be that the term will become meaningless, if it is overused. After all, in any large organisation, all policies are institutional (by definition), and as some said, the use of the term as Casey did was meaningless. Just “racist” on it’s own would be enough, rather than attempting to add a word to emphasise a pejorative attitude to something.
“The War on the West”———-Not with tanks but with Wokery.
I love the idea that the NHS is “institutionally racist”.
It has to be the most ethnically diverse employer on the planet.
One wonders HOW “Instituional xxxxxism” is measured, and what metrics are used to assess this? Is every member of the institution/service interrogated? Or? Ref John K below, the use of the “term” institutional in this context is indeed entirely meaningless now. Just another means of telling us how awful we all are.
Jam and marmalade are institutionally racist. Jury’s out on Marmite though!
“Jam and marmalade are institutionally racist.”
But they got rid of the golliwogs.
The human race is institutionally racist.
And thats natural !!!
Indeed, though it depends what exactly is meant by “racism”. The term is now IMO meaningless as it’s used to mean so many different things. I tend to think it gets used to mean “noticing there are differences between races”, “thinking race is not just a social construct”, “by default tending to prefer certain races over certain others, while still judging people by their actions”, “making assumptions based on race (even if you freely admit they are just provisional assumptions which you may need to revisit)”. All of those things seem natural, generally neither negative nor positive, and things that almost everyone does and has done since time immemorial. But the reaction it’s mean to trigger is more like you’re advocating for the return South African apartheid, slavery, mass deportations, lynching. It’s similar to any criticism of Israel or comment about Jews is construed as you want to return to the Holocaust.
Yep, look at any schoolyard. Birds of a feather flock together.
What I find surprising is that fact that some expected something different to the content of this report, from the person who wrote it. We have seen before when balanced reports are published what an abundance of wailing that causes, this will be accepted because it is what they wish to hear.
Lets face it, the primary purpose of all these reports is some kind of declaration of sin and the accompanied self-flagellation. It is absurd…
“the collective failure of an organisation to provide an appropriate and professional service to people because of their colour, culture, or ethnic origin”
All government and public sector organisations are inefficient, frustrating and annoying and so fulfil the first part of that definition. Tell ethnic minorities they are victims and you are ensuring they will always infer the “because” part of the definition. Also of course you have made it in the interest of all who can make the claim to perpetuate the “because.” It provides a bit of additional power for free. They are not going to give it up. Given the standard for making the assertion need be based on nothing more than feelings, this is a doom loop hurtling towards arrant absurdity and all politicians are too weak to escape it. Every. Single. One.
All government and public sector organisations are inefficient, frustrating and annoying and so fulfil the first part of that definition.
The same is true for pretty much all organisations which are sufficiently large that individual performance or rather, lack thereof, tends to get lost in the general hullaballo if it isn’t consistently abysmal. It seems to be especially true in England where everything must always happen in accordance with some rule book and what’s not in the rule book doesn’t happen.
Anecdote illustrating that: Once upon a time in the past, I was in the Reading M&S and saw a loaf of bread in passing I wanted to buy. But it was too large for me to eat it all before some of it would have gone bad, hence, I asked the lady behind the counter if I could buy half of the loaf. To me that was something perfectly normal which can be done in every German bakery. They’ll just cut the loaf in half, you’ll pay half of the price and someone else will buy the other half. Here, the reaction was a bit as if I had just proposed to marry her underage daughter. The woman was completely taken aback and seemed to be genuinely shocked by this unspeakable transgression. It took her maybe half a minute to regain enough of her composure to tell me – with a voice clearly bereft of air – We have no labels for somthing likes this! Thus, I was dismissed in disgrace.
A more serious example would be the Grenfell tower fire. A lot of people died avoidable deaths. That’s too bad. But everything was done according to the letter of the regulations and nobody is responsible for anything.
Yes I agree with this, though I do think civic services such as those provided by the local council are consistently worse, central government services a little better and large companies, such as banks or telephony providers a little better again (though still pretty abysmal). I personally like Apple devices. Not everyone does. Apple are a large company and far from perfect. In my estimation they are just mediocre. Just acceptable. But this is paradoxical because they are, compared with other companies a similar size, top of the table. Nearly every large company has simply abysmal customer service as compared with, for example, the service you would get from a good small local bike shop. So a large company being mediocre means you are in the top 1 percent.
Recently, our local waitrose had no sandwiches on offer that I wanted to have with my coffee. There were prepacked sandwiches in the chiller counter in the store.
I said to the waitress, I will grab one of those and have it with my tea.
Apparently that was impossible. It couldn’t go through her till and I couldn’t pay at another till and eat it in the cafe.
It broke the VAT laws. Needless.to say I left with neither tea nor sandwich
That’s one of Tim Martin’s favorite talking points: Supermarkets don’t have to pay VAT on food but hospitality must. Hence, you can’t legally buy a VAT-free sandwhich in the supermarket area of a supermarket and consume it in the hospitality area. That’s another nice example of bureacracy gone literally cracy.
Institutionally racist just means It’s racist despite there’s no reason to assume it actually is. That’s just another variant of the original sin nobody can escape. Whatever you are and whatever you do, it don’t matter (to these people). They’re going to keep sticking the label on you in the hope that they can extort more of whatever they’re trying to extort.
The little cafe I am sitting in, drinking my tea and eating a cheese scone, must, by the above definitions, be both institutionally racist and sexist.
All the staff are white, young women.
Mind you, we are in a very rural market town. So maybe it is the town that is the problem!!!
Same goes for a lot of the rural towns and villages in England. We must be institutionally racist by default. Naughty us.
Institutional racism is institutionally racist.
Indian British Prime Minister, a Pakistani London Mayor, an Indian Home Secretary, a Pakistani Scottish First Minister, an Indian Irish Prime Minister.
It’s racism, but not as we know it
Stand in the Park Make friends & keep sane
Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
Elms Field
near Everyman Cinema & play area
Wokingham RG40 2FE
“Black Britons are over-represented in the England football team. Does this mean that England Football is discriminating against non-blacks? Obviously not.”
Let me correct the last sentence – “obviously not” should read ‘probably.’
Also…
The climate ‘crisis’ is racist
The Wuhan Flu pandemic was racist.
// To most people’s ears, “institutional racism” is a serious allegation. Yet the term has been applied to practically every major institution in Britain, which suggests it’s being thrown around far too lightly. //
Nonsense. The whole “racism” thing is absurd. It does not deserve even such pro forma endorsement as you give it here. Spit it out and get on with living in the real world.
Last time I looked the country was still predominantly white Anglo-Saxon. That is not racist, that is just how it was and, I believe, still is. The term ‘institutionally racist’ is simply another attempt, in my view, to subvert society and destroy it by introducing levels of guilt and blame due to non-inclusion and perceived lack of equity and diversity. Now, almost every advert I see has either mixed race families or black or Asian families in it. This is not the norm by a long chalk. It exists, of course, but it is not the norm although the advertisers would have you believe it is. If you question the authenticity of the portraval, you are deemed racist.
Everyone is falling over backwards to try and deflect any criticism of being a racist. Look what happened to the Queen’s Lady in Waiting of 40 years. A simple mistake in being able to hear properly and an interest in a woman’s ethnic attire attaches a label of racist and suddenly this woman is gone because the snowflake Royals can’t bear the idea of being considered racist – which is Meghan Markle’s entire raison d’être. The same thing is happening everywhere.
We are being played and, I believe, softened up to accept more immigration and not complain about it because to do so would be ‘racist’. If Labour get into power, which I think they will, they are going to open the floodgates. Destruction of Western civilisation is in full swing but of course we are not allowed to say anything about it.
You only have to recall the new SNP leader’s “White” speech, within the context of Scotland being a White Western nation, to see the truly horrible direction civilization is being taken.
The vast majority of people in prisons are male.
Does that mean that the legal and prison/gaol systems are sexist?
Should no more males be put into prison until there is a roughly equal ratio between men and women?
It’s an industry – the victimization industry.
They must find more victims of bigotry (racism etc.) to justify its existence.
Without more ‘victims’ those involved in the industry would be without jobs and grant money.
So there will always be findings of some type of bigotry/discrimination to keep their perks in this never-ending industry.
Some people who sctream racism are the same as those who say that race is a social construct?