This is the 11th of the regular round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the 10th one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr Tess Lawrie recently wrote an open letter to Dr June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been “fact checked” here.) We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.
- Public Health Scotland is reporting deaths (from all causes) within 28 days of a vaccine. So far, 5,523 deaths have been reported since February.
- The Times of Israel reports that 14 Israelis who have received both vaccines and a third booster shot have later been infected with Covid.
- Professor Peter Schirmacher, the Director of the Pathological Institute of the University of Heidelberg, has expressed deep concerns after conducting over 40 autopsies on people who have died within two days of their Covid vaccination. These concerns, particularly regarding damage to the brain and organs, are further echoed by pathologist Dr Ryan Cole in this presentation.
- The Jerusalem Post reports on a multicentre Israeli study led by Professor Zohar Habot-Wilner from Tel Aviv’s Sourasky Medical Center, which finds Covid vaccines may be linked to specific eye inflammation disorders, specifically anterior uveitis and Multiple Evanescent White Dot Syndrome.
- A study from the U.S. CDC shows 9,246 adverse events reported among adolescents aged 12 to 17, including 863 serious events, 14 deaths and 397 reports of myocarditis. Vaccine has published a report on six cases of myocarditis post-vaccination.
- Associate Professor Michael Palmer and Professor Sucharit Bhakdi explain the dangers of the spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 and its implications in the development of vaccines.
Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.
According to an updated report published on August 6th, the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,120,009 events based on 337,064 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 1,547.
- Pfizer (20.5 million first doses, 13.8 million second doses) now has one Yellow Card in 208 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 42,803 people vaccinated (478).
- AstraZeneca (24.8 million first doses, 23.6 million second doses) has one Yellow Card in 110 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 24,219 people vaccinated (1,024).
- Moderna (1.3 million first doses, 0.4 million second doses) has one Yellow Card in 118 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 162,500 people vaccinated (8).
Key events analysis:
- Acute Cardiac = 13,531
- Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure = 705
- Anaphylaxis = 1,272
- Blood Disorders = 17,119
- Headaches = 105,289
- Migraine = 10,406
- Eye Disorders = 18,434
- Blindness = 368
- Deafness = 532
- Psychiatric Disorders = 22,911
- Spontaneous Abortions = 407 + 9 (figures imply 12 related maternal deaths)
- Vomiting = 14,729
- Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy = 1,513
- Nervous System Disorders = 226,745
- Strokes and CNS haemorrhages = 2,421
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome = 418
- Dizziness = 32,872
- Tremor = 10,925
- Arthralgia, Myalgia & Muscle Spasms = 68,901
- Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis = 3,170
- Thrombocytopenia = 1,350
- Nosebleeds = 2,937
- Seizures = 2,578
- Paralysis = 1,006
- Haemorrhage (All types) = 7,221
- Vertigo/Tinnitis = 8,852
- Reproductive/Breast = 32,337
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
All those deaths and still the jabs are being promoted. Beyond belief how sick that is.
I am hoping that someone can explain ‘General Disorders’. They comprise about a third of fatalities yet have cryptic titles of ‘Death’, ‘Sudden death’ etc with no explanation.
See my forum post here.
Interesting that Scotland applies the same 28 day period as the virus given the numbers it yields !
Are they rowing back now though after that C4 interview I wonder???
Odd theory here, but just give it a listen:
What if there is deliberate over-reporting of damaging vaccine induced health effects by UK and other governmental sources?
Why might they do that?
Why might they want people scared of vaccines, even if the vaccines aren’t that risky really?
Well, what they want is submission from the population, and people aren’t really submitting if they do something they don’t fear. What if someone in power wants to make sure that in their effort to introduce an ID card scheme that they can really break people’s spirits. So, it begs the question, could there be a deliberate campaign of amplifying fear of the vaccine in an effort to make sure that people submitting to the vaccine passport scam really do feel that they are submitting, rather than just getting a jab they needn’t fear? Making sure people bowing down to the new normal feel they are making an initiation sacrifice? Many cults have had some sort of ritual upon entry to make people feel that they will suffer through anything for the sake of the cult, what if this is the same kind of logic, but the vaccine is safe enough really that they are having to amplify fears about it to make the submission more submissive?
I’ll be getting the vaccine, but only when all the coercion and pasport plotting has been brought to an end, and the political perpertrators given jail sentences.
This doesn’t hold water. The fear that has been cultivated is that of covid. That was not enough, so they added fear of loss of freedom. Running to the jab is confirmation of submission to these fears. Why would they not want that submission confirmed?
And what makes you think that the ‘vaccine’ is going to serve you any better if you get it in the absence of coercion? Your research into it should be from a medical and scientific viewpoint.
The experimental biologicals do not work. Do you usually agree to take something that does not work. That is very odd
Could I recommend a quick visit to a psychiatrist: if you are lucky he may be able to help.
The question remains as to whether so-called adverse reactions are events that would have happened anyway. Many of those listed cannot in my view be vaccine related but are coincidence. Even those that are clearly related need to be put into context against the likelihood of the same thing happening from Covid itself.
A question that can never be answered properly given the methodology in use, rather than conventional long-term analysis for any new product in the drug trade.
It’s interesting to look at the 28 days figure from Scotland, as there you are comparing like with like. In the same period that 5200 died within 28 days of the jab, approx 3500 died within 28 days of a positive test.
Both figures combined are in line with natural churn over the period, so no noticeable excess deaths from either. Which makes you wonder what’s the point, but then that’s the case for everything done over the last 12 months.
It’s more interesting when you consider that natural churn usually involves a large number of those who are very old and sick – the kind of people you’d expect to die. They are also the kind of people who aren’t given the vaccine, so not only is the number of deaths after jab higher than deaths after test it’s also likely to be younger and healthier people dying.
If we take the German pathologists autopsy results as an indicator, even his lower figure would suggest at least 1500 quite possibly healthy Scots who would not otherwise have died had been killed by the vaccine. Entirely unnecessary killings, as the contemporaneous Covid death data shows.
The vaccine adverse reporting system is characterised by a huge underreporting of adverse affects. Probably only 1 in 10 events or less are reported, it’s possible it is less than that.
As a result you can’t look at adverse effects and write them off as mainly events that would have ‘happened anyway’. The events that would have happened anyway are likely hugely outnumbered by adverse affects that have happened and not been reported through the yellow card system.
So if an adverse reaction leads to 5x the normal incidence of a common condition then if only 1 in 10 events are reported through the yellow card system it will look like the vaccine is 50% protective against that condition rather than creating a 5X greater risk. In fact even 5X understates the effect because there are the normal events (not vaccine related) that correctly aren’t reported through the yellow card system.
So it is only the very rare and unusual conditions such as CVST (cerebral veinous sinus thrombosis) which occur shortly after vaccination that get picked up because their incidence is multiple times higher than normal population incidence and can’t get hidden in the data.
The difficulty is that the yellow card system hide adverse affects because it doesn’t enable any reasonable comparison of adverse affects. So the best you can do is to compare adverse affects between different vaccines hoping that the under-reporting is consistent between the two. And any such comparison with these experimental vaccines really starts the alarm bells ringing.
What they should have done is checked for prevalence of subsequent conditions (including death) in everyone who was experimentally vaccinated and looked at the temporal associations between the date of vaccination and the occurrence of the condition.
They should also have take a sample of people and done tests on them both before and after each vaccination. For example a D dimer test before and after vaccination would indicate if there might be blood clotting issues. This sort of analysis hasn’t been done as far as I am aware.
Autopsies on those dying in the weeks after vaccination should also have been done to more forensically get at what caused the death.
In summary even if as much as half of the yellow card reported events are events that would have happened anyway, if only 1 in 20 say adverse events are reported that leaves you with the yellow card only picking up a fraction of the real adverse events.
A paper I read yesterday looking at prion disease post vaccine, stated that 95% of harms go unreported on the Yellow Card system. So the numbers are even more scary.
We might all have an opinion, but it’s best if it’s founded on facts…right? What we can do is look at like-for-like data, for instance the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) recently produced a list of adverse vaccine reactions (ADR) comparisons.
There were several different tables but this one stood out in relation to reporting of vaccine adverse effects in the UK:
In 2018 there were in total 3,926 ADR in relation to ALL vaccines
In 2019 there were in total 3,360 ADR in relation to all vaccines
In 2020 there were in total 2,739 ADR in relation to all vaccines
In 2021 there were a total of 337,064 in relation to the COVID vaccine….
sound like coincidence to you….?
While I agree with most of the respondents to Wryobserver, I have to ask how many vaccinations were carried out in each of the years 2018 to 2021. Only then can we show that the C-19 “vaccines” are more dangerous; if, say, there were 100 times more vaccinations in 2021 than in 2019 then the case would not be made. Let’s be sure of our facts before we try to convince the misguided.
I agree entirely, but am not sure how to find accurate statistics for the number of vaccinations performed annually.
However, an order-of-magnitude, back-of-the-envelope kind of calculation might run as follows:
A typical pre-school child receives (say) 10 vaccinations between birth and primary school.
Adolescents get BCG. Girls get HPV as well.
During a normal lifetime, an adult will normally have 3 hepatitis-B and 3 tetanus vaccinations.
Flu vaccinations are most commonly taken in the 65+ age group; annually until average age of death at (say) 81. That makes 16 jabs, but only around 45% take them, so let’s count 7 per head.
That comes to a total of 25 per person in a lifetime (rounding off the odd 0.5 for the HPV).
Multiply that by the number of people born in a single year, currently around 660k, and you should have a good estimate of the total number of vaccine injections annually. It comes to 16.5 million. The actual number is probably not that, but I’d expect it to be right to within ±10%.
Adding up the numbers of COVID “vaccines” shown in the article gives around 94 million shots. That is, of course, for 8 months, not 12, which may or may not affect the grand totals.
So approximately 6 times as many COVID jabs have been given as normal vaccinations would be in a normal year. If the rate of ADRs were the same as for normal vaccinations, one would expect around 18,000 ADRs for the COVID shots.
Instead, we have 337,000. Or approximately 19 times as many ADRs as would be expected.
I think the Government and the pharmaceutical companies have some explaining to do…
An observer who’s gullible rather than ‘wry’!
Yes, of course it is just a coincidence that under 30’s vaxxed are being diagnosed with inflammation of their hearts. Happens all the time.
Two other recent articles that highlight the risks of these jabs.
– 25 year old male in the US developed myocarditis after his first jab – https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/25-year-old-christopher-brenner-myocarditis-moderna-vaccine/
– Dr Mike Yeadon: Covid Vaccine Spike Proteins Damage Placenta Protein in Vaccinated Women – https://dailyexpose.co.uk/2021/08/05/dr-mike-yeadon-the-covid-vaccine-spike-proteins-damage-placenta-protein-in-vaccinated-women/
Could you check the totals for the number of people vaccinated with each vaccine, please? They don’t seem to add up.
Those figures will be from the latest government report on the .gov website. Some folk have not returned for the second dose for whatever reason.
I mean the figures for Pfizer and AstraZeneca look like they’ve been switched.
If there have been 5523 deaths within 28 days of a jab from Dec 2020 to June 2021 in Scotland and (according to Google), 8003 deaths with the virus there since the beginning of the pandemic, wouldn’t that imply that the vaccine has been killing people at a faster rate than the virus did?
Public Health Scotland point out that the vaccine was given to much older people in the earlier stages of the programme (so a lot of deaths would be naturally expected), but during the first and biggest wave of the pandemic, testing in the UK was much rarer and targeted the vulnerable too. To quote the Department of Health and Social Care in April 2020:
‘In line with our strategy, the majority of this testing has been for those with a medical need – for example, identifying coronavirus sufferers amongst the most unwell people in hospital’.
I also recall that for quite a while at the beginning of the pandemic a death from coronavirus was defined as any death following a positive test, so a more open definition than for the vaccine.
Of course, the vaccine has probably been saving a lot of lives too, but I think this 5523 figure is worth thinking about.
Extract from trialsitenews
“Hawaii shouldn’t be here given conventional wisdom promulgated from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and other federal health-related agencies. Why? Hawaii follows strict masking mandates and is heavily vaccinated with at least 54% of the state’s population fully vaccinated and approximately 70% of the state’s 1.4 million receiving at least one dose of either Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna or the Johnson and Johnson COVID-19 vaccine. Yet the State is now experiencing the worst stage of the COVID-19 pandemic since the onset of the entire crisis over a year-and-a-half ago. New cases by Thursday August 5 the state experienced an all time record of 655 new cases and by August 7th another 600 were recorded. The good news is deaths are incredibly low confirming that the Delta’s variant’s transmissibility is muted by its far lower mortality rate. But the premise that heavily vaccinated societies are the key to non-disease transmission have been shattered by the Delta variant and waning vaccine strength, perhaps or other data not discovered as of yet.
People were crying in the streets when one person was dying of/with Covid. One life is one too many they shouted in the papers, on the tv and no more so on social media. Yet, we have on average since January 2021 55 people dying a week of this poison but not a peep out of the bleeding hearts and the pro lockdown zealots. Seems the only deaths worth wailing over are people who die of/with Covid. The rest can f8ck off!
People are now dead because of an injection they may not have needed in the first place, that turns out not to protect you anyway. How many of them were healthy individuals? My childhood friend died two days after receiving her second jab. 51 and healthy, now dead because she was coerced in to it by her scumbag employer!! The guilty pushing this shit should be brought to justice! I won’t be holding my breath though.
“The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety.”
Spot the errors.
1. The vaccine trials were deliberately curtailed – thus eliminating any prospect of good data. Observational data is no substitute – by definition.
2. There is no long-term data – absolutely essential to any judgment.
3. Such safety data as has emerged is not encouraging at all. Even at the basic level of the observed instances of immedate reactions, it’s extremely concerning.
4. There was no ’emergency’ requiring panic authorization.
Sorry, William – but you’re far from neutral in your asessment. You have an instinctive desire to see the vaccines as useful.
Bluntly, there is no coherent case for the current stmpede to jabbing, and the conflicting interests adds a significant circumstantial need for caution, even if the possibility of serious immediate adverse events is limited.
On Neil Oliver’s section of GB News at the weekend, a doctor argued in favour of injecting children with the gene altering poison, using the argument that they have learned from reported adverse effects on people up to this point, therefore have a better understanding of how to treat side effects.
An open admission that the general public are the lab rats. Everyone who has died or been severely damaged by this injection were mere fodder.
But another chink in their pro-jab argument for injecting children never gets mentioned – ever. Their ONLY argument for injecting children is to protect older generations from transmission, that it’s a community (communism) obligation. No one ever points out that even Keir Starmer admits the poison doesn’t stop transmission.
not to mention…
This is Nuts, Moderna and Pfizer Intentionally Lost The Clinical Trial Control Group Testing Vaccine Efficacy and Safety – The Last Refuge
and same news from a “trusted” site for the believers
Moderna And Pfizer Vaccine Studies Hampered As Placebo Recipients Get Real Shot : Shots – Health News : NPR
Knowing the adverse events and deaths, who in their right mind would want to take one of these experimental biologicals?
I’m confused by the numbers here.
The article says 1,120,009 events based on 337,064 reports, but the HMRC site that’s linked and referred to says “From 1 September 2022 to 22 February 2023, the MHRA received and analysed 4,096 UK Yellow Cards from people who have received the bivalent COVID-19 Vaccine Pfizer/BioNTech“, and similar numbers for the other vaccines.
Were there hundreds of thousands before Sep 22? Where does the 337,064 figure come from.
The article above also says there have been 1,547 fatalities.
I quite prepared that there have been many more than that, but I just looked at the ONS data set which gives a total of 63
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/monthlymortalityanalysisenglandandwales
Maybe I’m looking at the wrong thing?