There follows a guest post by the academic economist who regularly contributes to the Daily Sceptic.
We have known for some time that the vaccines can lead to myocarditis, a condition that causes the heart muscle to swell. Myocarditis is typically a serious illness and in its worst cases can cause cardiac arrest and death. There are also some indications that the risk for myocarditis from the vaccine may be higher in younger people and especially in younger men – a group that is not seriously at risk from COVID-19.
This was clearly not an effect picked up by the clinical trials. We already know that the clinical trials have proved misleading when it comes to protection against infection – and there are also indications that the trials may have been misleading on how well the vaccine prevents hospitalisation and death. Since the vaccine was launched, independent macro-level data has consistently proved more scientifically reliable than micro-level trial data.
So, can we get any numbers on macro-level heart failure? Yes, in fact, we can – and the results are disturbing. The Government publishes a weekly report on excess mortality in England and it includes a breakdown by cause. One of these causes of death is heart failure. Usefully, the data also tells us how many of the deaths from heart failure were due to COVID-19. Using this data, we can calculate excess deaths from heart failure not caused by COVID-19. Let us compare the period in which the vaccine has been active, to the period in which it was not.
Here we see that excess deaths from heart failure that were not caused by COVID-19 are more than 12 times higher in 2021 than they were in 2020. Could these be myocarditis deaths induced by the vaccine? Possibly. There is no way to be totally sure. But the results are worrying and merit further investigation.
One statistical trick we might use to tease out causality is to take the ratio of COVID-19-induced excess heart failures to non-COVID-19-induced excess heart failures and compare this to the number of people vaccinated under-30 – i.e., the group most vulnerable to vaccine-induced myocarditis. (Note: there is no age-specific data on non-Covid-related heart attacks.)
This correlation is concerning. As more young people are getting vaccinated, the ratio of excess non-COVID-19-induced heart failures rises. Something is causing this rise in mysterious heart failures, and it seems like this ‘something’ is correlated with the number of under-30s getting vaccinated.
Finally, we can compare the data we have generated with the reported number of heart failures in the Government’s Yellow Card vaccine-effect reporting system. This will give us a nice test case for how accurate this system might be. The Yellow Card system tracks deaths from both “cardiac arrest” and “cardiac disorders”. We are more interested in cardiac arrests, but let’s look at both.
In the last line we have an estimate of how much the Yellow Card system might be missing deaths from vaccine-induced heart failure. As we can see, our numbers suggest that vaccine-induced heart failure deaths are over ten times higher than the Yellow Card system is capturing. Even if we are very conservative and we use the Yellow Card’s “cardiac disorders” categorisation, we are still detecting almost three times as many deaths as the reporting system.
This raises a final question: if the Yellow Card reporting system is missing so many heart failure deaths, is it missing lots of other potential vaccine-induced deaths in other categories?
Stop Press: An Ontario Civil Liberties Association researcher and several Canadian academics have written “A Letter to the Unvaccinated” to support those who turn down the Covid vaccine, reports Mercola.
In the letter, the group addressed the “29% of Canadians who have not received a Covid vaccine, and an additional 14% who have received one shot”. The group emphasised that the unvaccinated are “not alone” and said medical treatment should be voluntary with informed consent.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/new-report-young-people-dying-of-cancer-at-explosive-rates-uk-government-data-show/
Somewhat related.
Horrifying, how the hell does this get put into widespread reporting so that it can’t be ignored?
And this- “The Trainwreck of all Trainwrecks”.
https://www.rintrah.nl/the-trainwreck-of-all-trainwrecks-billions-of-people-stuck-with-a-broken-immune-response/
From Igor Chudov’s article yesterday.
SV40 – surely tptb cannot bring themselves to acknowledge the jabs are “somewhat related” to turbo charged cancers – Hallett and her Inquisitor in chief will swerve around this as being “ not in the remit” just as they brushed aside Gove’s cat out of the bag revelation.
But….they did not deny the veracity of his statement ……did they ?
Fiasco? Reasoning? God give me strength. Enough with the cock-up theory.
Naked greed on display in so many instances.
Cock-up is single incident – what we saw was serial, intensifying abuse of Rights, civil liberties, of children, of We The People.
The man is a dyed in the wool Corbynista, the actual question is why are the pretend Tories appointing such abject ppl.
Two hundred mill to come their own pre-set conclusions. Hume or Homer aside, we all know where this is going. No one to hold them to account. No proper, meaningful delving into the actual science and the actual facts that could lead us to the unravelling of this diabolical fiasco and the demand for trials and justice. Nothing like that. What have we done to deserve such feckless, dishonest leaders? How has the entire political, medical, legal world etc become so completely corrupted seemingly so quickly? We took our eye off the ball and never for one second imagined that TPTB would commit such traitorous acts against us. We trusted that these people had our best interests at heart. How wrong one can be.
“We trusted that these people had our best interests at heart.”
Herewith lies the problem…
Since when has our government been our friend…
I think Thatcher governed with the best intentions of improving the lives of the British people.
Apart from any working class people…
She created the greed /yuppism I am alright jack, attitude that haunts society to this day.
Yeah all them working class ppl who could actually own their own home really hated her. Wake up she’s the only time there was any in charge faintly in touch with ordinary ppl as she was one. As for greed I suppose you try to earn as little as possible. The good Samaritan could help because he had money.
She also crushed the Miners !! The last large group of indigenous MEN who could have given the Government lots to think about had they risen up on masse !
How many pits were shut by a Labour administration? Now tell us all how many Thatcher’s administration closed?
Rubbish- as ever. Just as Oct 7th has exposed a dangerous predisposition to rampant antisemitism, the period from the 70’s onwards exposed how greedy and gullible large sections of this country already were – THATS what infected society – and yes that did exist – and continues today.
Exactly. Personally, I haven’t trusted a politician in aeons, I was thinking of the main voting public who go out every four years or so hoping that things will get better if they vote for that nice man with the big smile…
I doubt that ‘Humeric’ would be the natural adjective from Hume. Vallance’s correction seems correct, but the logic that people only believe what is in front of them now is surely Homer Simpson’s, not the Greek bard’s.
I think it’s exactly the type of made-up word Johnson would have used in reference to David Hume. And it’s clear from the context that he was referring to Hume, as this article demonstrates.
‘Humeric’ is not in the Oxford English Dictionary, whereas ‘Homeric’ is.
The adjective from’ Hume’, in the dictionary, is ‘Humean”.
A wordsmith like Johnson isn’t going to be confining himself to any dictionary when he’s reaching for an adjective.
Humean doesn’t echo homeric, and has been used approx one ten millionth as often.
I can understand why the KC agreed and moved on immediately.
“First of all, Homer is not known for his logic. He was a poet, not a philosopher. ”
Man, if you can read Homer and NOT see the philosophy underscoring his work – especially The Iliad, on man’s propensity for endless violence – why bother?
Scheesh. Homer was WAY ahead of his time. His subject in The Iliad was mankind at war, and is as pertinent today as it was at the time of writing.
All I can assume and hope is that the author has not read Homer. Fix that. The Iliad and The Odyssey are both astonishing.
Good analysis.
“Nothing is more certain than that men are, in a great measure, governed by interest, and that even when they extend their concern beyond themselves, it is not to any great distance; “
In recent times explained in Public Choice Theory.
We live in bigger times. In a sense it behoves us to look at bigger things. We were always a wholly inadequate society on many levels and we know that, as well as being highly accomplished as well. I am just telling you straight there are plenty of clever people in our country. I wouldn’t keep them excluded for much longer. It won’t just be intelligence it will be toughness and stoicism.
Very interesting article. “Hume goes on to argue that since human nature cannot be altered…” But isn’t that the ultimate aim of mRNA and human augmentation? To change human nature? No more hate and no more love mean an end to free will and all war. I prefer our imperfect condition.
Splendid piece, and more important than it first appears in the battle with the technocratic mindset.