There follows a guest post by the academic economist who regularly contributes to the Daily Sceptic.
We have known for some time that the vaccines can lead to myocarditis, a condition that causes the heart muscle to swell. Myocarditis is typically a serious illness and in its worst cases can cause cardiac arrest and death. There are also some indications that the risk for myocarditis from the vaccine may be higher in younger people and especially in younger men – a group that is not seriously at risk from COVID-19.
This was clearly not an effect picked up by the clinical trials. We already know that the clinical trials have proved misleading when it comes to protection against infection – and there are also indications that the trials may have been misleading on how well the vaccine prevents hospitalisation and death. Since the vaccine was launched, independent macro-level data has consistently proved more scientifically reliable than micro-level trial data.
So, can we get any numbers on macro-level heart failure? Yes, in fact, we can – and the results are disturbing. The Government publishes a weekly report on excess mortality in England and it includes a breakdown by cause. One of these causes of death is heart failure. Usefully, the data also tells us how many of the deaths from heart failure were due to COVID-19. Using this data, we can calculate excess deaths from heart failure not caused by COVID-19. Let us compare the period in which the vaccine has been active, to the period in which it was not.

Here we see that excess deaths from heart failure that were not caused by COVID-19 are more than 12 times higher in 2021 than they were in 2020. Could these be myocarditis deaths induced by the vaccine? Possibly. There is no way to be totally sure. But the results are worrying and merit further investigation.
One statistical trick we might use to tease out causality is to take the ratio of COVID-19-induced excess heart failures to non-COVID-19-induced excess heart failures and compare this to the number of people vaccinated under-30 – i.e., the group most vulnerable to vaccine-induced myocarditis. (Note: there is no age-specific data on non-Covid-related heart attacks.)

This correlation is concerning. As more young people are getting vaccinated, the ratio of excess non-COVID-19-induced heart failures rises. Something is causing this rise in mysterious heart failures, and it seems like this ‘something’ is correlated with the number of under-30s getting vaccinated.
Finally, we can compare the data we have generated with the reported number of heart failures in the Government’s Yellow Card vaccine-effect reporting system. This will give us a nice test case for how accurate this system might be. The Yellow Card system tracks deaths from both “cardiac arrest” and “cardiac disorders”. We are more interested in cardiac arrests, but let’s look at both.

In the last line we have an estimate of how much the Yellow Card system might be missing deaths from vaccine-induced heart failure. As we can see, our numbers suggest that vaccine-induced heart failure deaths are over ten times higher than the Yellow Card system is capturing. Even if we are very conservative and we use the Yellow Card’s “cardiac disorders” categorisation, we are still detecting almost three times as many deaths as the reporting system.
This raises a final question: if the Yellow Card reporting system is missing so many heart failure deaths, is it missing lots of other potential vaccine-induced deaths in other categories?
Stop Press: An Ontario Civil Liberties Association researcher and several Canadian academics have written “A Letter to the Unvaccinated” to support those who turn down the Covid vaccine, reports Mercola.
In the letter, the group addressed the “29% of Canadians who have not received a Covid vaccine, and an additional 14% who have received one shot”. The group emphasised that the unvaccinated are “not alone” and said medical treatment should be voluntary with informed consent.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If a mod sees this, please delete 🙂
They don’t call it the clot shot for nothing
Ryan Cole, MD: “COVID-19 Vaccines and Autopsy” (bitchute.com)
because the ‘vaccines’ bring on heart attacks – as well as other things
stay safe
why did ‘cos of covid’ coincidence deaths go through the roof when the vaxeeeens landed in Gibraltar???
Spike proteins, fritzed by gain-of-function if wild, or the synthetic ones via the vaxxes… both mess with blood systems….
If the operative delivering the jab is careless and the snake oil goes straight into a vein…. oh dear. Even if the y get the sighting right… the percentage of proteins that don’t stay just in the muscle zone…
Too many…. BINGO
Only around 25% of the jab contents stays near to the site of injection. The other 75% goes on a rampage around the rest of the body killing many of the injected in short order, though strangely these people are likely the lucky ones. Those that survive the initial spike protein onslaught upon their bodies have been turned into a ticking time bombs and they will spend the rest of their lives, waiting for what has become inevitable, over the coming months and years.
The right place this time
Dire Warning from Dr. Charles Hoffe [mirrored] (bitchute.com)
micro blood clots explained.
Two thirds of recently jabbed people developed blood clots within a week.
Covid “vaccine” is clot shot and gets worse with every successive shot? Do you mind if I opt out? How many people are likely to die in “threes years” then?
(I suppose they won’t try and blame this on the “unvaccinated” will they?
“We already know that the clinical trials have proved misleading when it comes to protection against infection”
Well – not necessarily. The proper (or as proper as anything under a producer aegis can be) trials did show up the poor absolute risk reduction – which got swept under the carpet in the stampede to manufacture the narrative. But you had to dig to uncover the facts. To those of us that did, none of the recent ‘disappointments’ have come as a surprise.
The caveat is very, very big here.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-96879-3
Booster marketing study here…
Antibodies fall off over time…. EEK! (Hands off to other immune system area)
MSM reporting on this study even more misleading says you need jabs even if you’ve been properly vaccinated (by catching SARS2) which is a total lie.
Of course doing postmortems might reveal a thing or two, so I wont hold my breath.
no, that would make you a ‘cos of covid’ death
Good to see you starting to question the safety of the so-called vaccines, Michael. Better late than never!
The numbers are unfortunately unavailable ATM, but I’d try something else here: Compare the vaccination rate (# of vaxxed/ # of people) and the heart failure rate.
Also I’d like to see a breakdown by age. Normally heart failure is a part of ageing but if more young people are suffering that points strongly to the “vaccines”.
It could possibly due to COVID vaccine side effects, but it could just as easily be down to the longer term effects (18 months of lockdown instead of 6) of reduced general health due to people not going out and getting exercise, fresh air, sun and the stress of the lockdown periods, being alone, scared of catching COVID, etc. That and people not getting access to diagnosis and/or treatment of heart problems.
Or a combination of more than one cause.
I suspect after the recent fall in general death rates, things will get a LOT worse over the next year as missed diagnoses of many other ailments comes home to roost, plus the detrimental health (including mental health) of the financial consequences of the government’s actions on COVID.
I just hope that it doesn’t give certain groups the ‘opportunity’ to reclassify such deaths as COVID to justify yet more lockdowns, etc.
This is still very early stages in the experiment. What if the risk is permanent? What if the risk increases with each shot? We could be turning everybody into ticking time bombs and reducing life expectancies dramatically.
…and imagine if everyone gets ‘vaccinated’ with this experiemental jab and a serious side effect effects a large percentage of receipiants? That could be game over for the human race.
All to stop 0.2% of the population (95% of whom would likely die within 1-3 years anyway – that’s not to say they shouldn’t be cared for [locking them up isn’t, BTW]) from dying.
I think that FAR more people are going to die of treatable diseases/illnesses because the lockdowns and GPs/hospitals refusing to see in person for diagnosis or treat patients than ‘COVID’ (I still don’t believe the figures, probably inflated by 3x and more) over the next 5 years.
I suspect long term effects of the lockdowns etc. and the “vaccines” will kill far more than the virus.
I used to assume heart failure and heart attack were the same thing and I can’t tell whether the writer is making the same assumption.
I’m sure he is. He refers to “vaccine-induced heart failure” but he surely means “heart attack” (myocardial infarction). The vaccines will probably cause congestive heart failure (heart failure) is some people who get vaccine-induced heart inflammation, but that’s likely to be a longer-term consequence of the acute adverse reaction.
If the data really does relate to congestive heart failure then the higher numbers probably arise from the effects of lockdown – physical decline and lack of health care.
Dr Kendrick is very, very good on this. In the older, he points out, heart events are so commonplace that they are unlikely to be Yellow Carded even if shortly after a jab, and any rise will go unproven and unnoticed.
For quite a while.
Cardiologists must be noticing this though,
And if side effects get worse with the young… what effect are the jabs having on embryos?
We don’ need no steenking embryos” (except for Boris of course, how I would laugh if Carrie gave birth to something horrendously deformed. Oh wait that could be from Boris’ sperm).
The vaccine kills. It doesn’t stop transmission. It only partially protects.
The Government is desperate to hide that fact.
And it appears that the manufacturers are immune to legal action, for the time being.
I don’t think it does provide any protection and is a vehicle towards ill health, sooner or later.
I think this is what we’d expect to see if a cytotoxic fusogenic protein inducing genetically engineered chimeric self replicating biological weapon were being injected into the arms of millions of people.
Anecdotally, about 90% of the double jabbed victims among my friends and family have had side effects ranging from concerning to very serious with one death. My unjabbed wife and I seem to be the only healthy ones among the people we know right now. I can’t believe this is atypical, but would expect to be seeing excess deaths in the national stats if, as I suspect, large numbers of people are dying as a result of ‘vaccination’. We were discussing this only this morning…. Then this article popped up.
Let’s see how many coincidental heart attacks occur in 12-16 year olds in the coming weeks. Because of course teenagers are always having heart attacks.
I would love to know how many anti-vaxxers this episode has created. I had no opinions on them either way before this started. Now I know for certain I will never take a vaccine again in my life, and neither will my children or anyone else in my entire family. And I no longer trust hospitals, the NHS, doctors, nurses or anyone else in ‘healthcare’ industry who hasn’t spoken up. They are accessories to the crime and I truly hope they one day face justice.
Understood. It’s likely that the entire effect is negative, with an overall loss of confidence. They have shot themselves in the foot if that is the outcome, but will also have failed to deliver what is really of value to the general public for quite a while.
Most simple explanation is just patients who went undiagnosed with their heart condition for a prolonged time because they were afraid of catching Covid in the hospital. It makes no sense to compare with Yellow Cards because you have no idea how many of these excess heart deaths were in vaccinated people, but of course, “sceptically” suit yourself as usual.
“There are also some indications that the risk for myocarditis from the vaccine may be higher in younger people and especially in younger men – a group that is not seriously at risk from COVID-19. This was clearly not an effect picked up by the clinical trials.”
This is further supported by yesterday’s Myopericarditis following COVID-19
vaccination: Updates from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from the CDC, available here: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-08-30/03-COVID-Su-508.pdf
“• 18 still hospitalized (5 in ICU)”. Trying to figure out how this jives with the “the vaccines are perfectly safe!” statements those 5 individuals (or their parents) were regaled with?
If I was half the lawyer I was 20 years ago, I’d sue the shit out of all of them.
Oh just what I was looking for, thank you! I wonder how many of the “cases” are actually deaths.
Just a guess… maybe it’s the ‘clot-shots’?… ‘Vaccine’, ‘Vaccinated’, ‘Vaccination’ NO. NO. NO. – anyone who tries to jab me, my family and my loved ones with that *monkey gunk* will learn the ultimate lesson. This is the hill I die on: FIGHT. BACK. BETTER. – Updated information, resources and useful links: https://www.LCAHub.org/
duh…why do you think?
Because of side-effects of the “vaccine” roll-out, and some probably because of all the extra stress caused by the shit-show that has ensued for the last 1 year, 5 months, 1 week and 2 days (or 527 days) since the “three weeks to flatten the curve” began.
If the excess deaths were due to vaccines then presumably they took place among the younger members of the population as they are the people supposedly at risk. However, the total excess deaths from all causes in 0-24 age group in the period 27/3/21 to 13/8/21 was -28 i.e. 28 less than expected. So it seems almost certain that the excess deaths due to heart failure in this period fell almost entirely among older members of the population.
Great article in the conservative woman today regarding dr. Tess Lawrie’s findings. Another great article in Dr Mercola’s daily email today about the Melinda and bill gates foundation. Both articles explain so much.
Thanks for the information. I’ve signed up for the daily Dr Mercola emails.