This is the tenth of the regular round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the ninth one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This has been done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr Tess Lawrie recently wrote an open letter to Dr June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been “fact checked” here.) We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.
- There have been international reports of adverse events following COVID-19 vaccines in Indonesia (reporting the deaths of 131 health care workers post Sinovac vaccine), India and Canada (reporting 22 cases of heart inflammation).
- Further reports of Bell’s Palsy developing following vaccination, including a featured case report in the BMJ. Immunologist Dr. J. Bart Classen has written in the Journal of Medical – Clinical Research & Reviews on the risk of Parkinson’s disease following Covid vaccination, especially AstraZeneca (summarised here).
- A study in the Lancet suggests that antibody responses wane rapidly and are low within two months of vaccination (though the authors note that protection via cellular immunity may remain).
- A report on ‘breakthrough’ cases from NBC Boston, reporting 5,100 cases in Massachusetts and 80 subsequent deaths.
- The Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health has said that it supports the recommendations of the JCVI on not vaccinating children below the age of 18 unless they have underlying health conditions.
- The inventor of mRNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, has spoken of his fear that current data shows a worrying trend of possible ADE (Antibody-Dependent Enhancement) as the vaccine may cause the virus to be more dangerous in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated.
- Lawyers have warned that ‘ethical veganism’ is a protected belief that would be among those that would have to respected in any effort to introduce mandatory vaccination in workplaces, the Telegraph reports.
- Chief Midwife for England, Jacqueline Dunkley-Bent, has penned a letter to midwives, obstetricians and GP practices, asking them to recommend COVID-19 vaccines to pregnant women. This follows some surveillance data that suggests some increased risk to pregnant women from the Delta variant. A study interim report published in the New England Journal of Medicine concludes that while 13% of the 827 vaccinated women in the study suffered a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage), this is not an elevated number. Dr. Peter McCullough has written in TrialSiteNews detailing some serious concerns with the study, stating: “The effect of the vaccines on early pregnancy losses (<20 weeks) is concerning and remains to be determined.” To date the Yellow Card system has reported 600 adverse events relating to pregnancy conditions including 10 deaths and 381 spontaneous abortions.
- A Spanish preprint study in the Lancet suggests that the safety profiles of Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines are similar in terms of blood clotting. It also suggests that the risk of blood clotting is greater for those infected with SARS-CoV-2.
- A preprint study in Medrxiv reports no difference in viral loads when comparing unvaccinated people to those who have ‘breakthrough’ infections post-vaccine, suggesting “that if vaccinated individuals become infected with the Delta variant, they may be sources of SARS-CoV-2 transmission to others”.
- Report in the Telegraph that AstraZeneca may end its future development of vaccines after offering its COVID-19 vaccine at cost to contribute to the pandemic effort. Pfizer, on the other hand, has reported record profits and is discussing increasing the costs of booster shots, according to the Guardian.
- Statistician Mathew Crawford has argued that the CDC’s definition of a safety signal prevents it from picking up safety problems with the Covid vaccines, essentially because it compares the Covid vaccines to one another rather than to an established baseline.
- VAERS – the American version of the Yellow Card reporting system – released new data on July 23rd bringing the total to 518,581 reports of 2,426,531 adverse events following Covid vaccines, including 11,940 deaths.
- EudraVigilance – the equivalent of the Yellow Card reporting system in the EU – has logged (up to July 31st) 779,048 reports of 1,940,012 adverse events, including 20,595 deaths.
- Suspected adverse events in the U.K. as reported in the media: Gemma O’Shea (35); Natalie Simpson (38).
Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.
According to an updated report published on July 21st, the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,102,228 events based on 331,240 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 1,517.
- Pfizer (20.4 million first doses, 12.9 million second doses) now has one Yellow Card in 215 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 43,777 people vaccinated (466).
- AstraZeneca (24.7 million first doses, 23.2 million second doses) has one Yellow Card in 110 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 24,263 people vaccinated (1,018).
- Moderna (1.3 million first doses, 0.3 million second doses) has one Yellow Card in 118 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 162,500 people vaccinated (8).
Key events analysis:
- Acute Cardiac = 13,184
- Myocardial Infarction & Heart Failure = 692
- Anaphylaxis = 1,258
- Herpes = 3,933
- Headaches = 104,255
- Migraines = 10,244
- Blindness = 359
- Deafness = 519
- Spontaneous Abortions = 381 + 11 still birth
- Vomiting = 14,511
- Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy = 1,465
- Strokes and CNS haemorrhages = 2,378
- Guillain-Barré Syndrome = 407
- Dizziness = 32,440
- Tremor = 10,859
- Pulmonary Embolism = 1,800
- Deep Vein Thrombosis = 1,299
- Seizures = 2,524
- Paralysis = 978
- Vertigo/Tinnitus = 8,667
- Reproductive/Breast = 30,747
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Activists armed with empirical evidence show the vaccines cause unprecedented damage.
The manufacturers of the vaccines and governments promoting them say they are safe.
Who is correct?
The one who controls the media.
“Tomorrow Never Dies” (or The Vaccine Never Dies”.
Like I said. (And yes, I realise the Bond films are CIA propaganda).
That’s about it.
All vaccines will have adverse effects. In some cases, deaths.
The Covid vaccines seem to have a large number of deaths – but then again, they have been given to a lot of people in a short time.
I would like to know how the Covid vaccines compare to other vaccines, such a those for measles or flu. There does not appear to be a standard figure for declaring a medical treatment ‘safe’ or not. But no one seems able to make such a comparison….
You have a point.
But that point suggests that crucial evidence is being actively hidden.
Any real safety monitoring (and proper journalism) would be all over this comparative data like a rash.
And what is the recent history of partial/absent/distorted data in this shit show? You’ve got it : concealment and lies.
“they have been given to a lot of people in a short time”
… and on the basis of lies about a non-existent ’emergency’; with immunity from prosecution for harms; with insufficient testing – amazingly so for a novel technology.
The obscene rush to achieve maximum justification for prior sales speaks volumes.
And, of course, they aren’t very good (ARR ~1%).
‘Nuff said.
what could possibly go wrong giving a brand new, untested drug to a lot of people in a short time?
I guess we’ll find out soon. Probably won’t stop the restrictions though.
“I would like to know how the Covid vaccines compare to other vaccines, such a those for measles or flu. There does not appear to be a standard figure for declaring a medical treatment ‘safe’ or not. But no one seems able to make such a comparison….”
The numbers are difficult to pin down (probably intentionally so), but Tucker Carlson has come in for a lot of stick for saying in May that:
“Every flu season, we give influenza shots to more than 160 million Americans. Every year, a relatively small number of people seem to die after getting those shots. To be precise, in 2019, that number was 203 people. The year before, it was 119. In 2017, a total of 85 people died from the flu shot.
…….
We checked today. Here’s the answer, which comes from the same set of government numbers that we just listed: Between late December of 2020, and last month, a total of 3,362 people apparently died after getting the COVID vaccines in the United States.”
(As noted above, the US VAERS number for the covid vaccines is now 11,940).
Most of the “fact checker” howling about Carlson’s words focuses on the fact that VAERS results are just voluntary reports of deaths after vaccines, not necessarily caused by it. but it appears the same would apply to the flu vaccine deaths he quotes, assuming he took them from VAERS and not from more definitive data sets (that appears to be the case, based on his wording: “comes from the same set of government numbers that we just listed”).
“The total number and the nature of Yellow Cards reported so far is not unusual for a new vaccine for which members of the public and healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any suspected adverse reaction.” [1]
The UK is pleading reporting bias. Possibly, there is some element of this, but I’m suspicious of the claimed encouragement. From what I’ve seen, the public, and health care professionals, alike, are continuously assured that the “vaccines” are “safe and effective”.
Maybe what was meant is that the stats, for the CoViD-19 “vaccines” are similar to those for a new vaccine for which reporting is, by contrast, encouraged.
Most members of the public are oblivious to the yellow card reporting system.
My family members who got jabbed didn’t even know that it was still in trials.
More deaths in the US than all other vaccines combined in the last 20 years.
There have been more deaths and injuries from C1984 injections than for ALL other LICENSED vaccines in the last 30 years.
Its been widely reported with charts etc that at a level of 6,000 deaths ( now its over 11,000) in the US these vaccines have caused more deaths than all previous vaccines in the last 20 years.
VAERS states it may represent only 1% of cases, which means deaths from SARS2 vaccines might now have reached 1 million.
It is hard work to understand the relevant degree of risk with various products. From my (retired) pro position working on modern electronic/software kit for safety systems, the language used is somewhat simplistic, or potentially fraudulent. I did come across a little ‘death graph’ (in Sweden & Norway) that gives a comparison between different C-19 brands, and a typical anti-flu one. The left hand column (almost zero) is the flu one.
I’ve found it very hard to find data on other vaccinations and numbers of adverse effects and deaths. It seems no one thought it was a good idea to count once the vaxx had approval! However, what I have found suggests the numbers are very low for most vaccines used in developed countries. Certainly a lot lower than for covid.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236284/
This is not a vaccine. It is an EXPERIMENTAL RNA genetic therapy. It is under emergency use authorisation only. There is no long term safety data. So who knows what the outcome of having this jab will be in 1, 2, or 3 years time. Thalidomide a drug used to prevent nausea in pregnancy caused irreversible damages to the fetus and thousands of children were born with severe congenital malformations. It took three years for the authorities to realise what this drug was doing to the unborn foetus.
Many of the steps to declare the safety of a vaccine such as animal testing have been by passed and omitted. A new vaccine would have to go through probably ten years or more clinical trials before approval for use. This poison has already caused more deaths and life changing injuries than all the other conventional vaccines put together.
The swine flu vaccine 1976 was removed from use after only 32 deaths were reported.
As of 22 July 2021 1517 deaths have been reported on the UK Gov MHRA Yellow Card scheme.
Let’s put it this way, 50 deaths has always been the threshold at which experimental medicines are pulled from the trials. So at 50 deaths under andy other trial, the programme would be stopped no questions asked. That was when the human race still had ethics guiding it, but this is no longer the case, as is very clear with this current genocide. These injections are very much in the experimental stage, most under phase 3 clinical trials until 2023 as a minimum.
So in the UK we have a minimum of 1517 deaths (you can at least mulitply this by 5 or 10 to get the true figure). They are not publicly monitoring this stuff or doing proper open scrutiny of the harms and deaths, which considering these are still under trial, is a crime in and of itself. Add to the deaths the disgusting level and severity of thousands of adverse events, paralysis, blindness, Bell’s palsy, strokes, clots, tremor……the list is right there in the article and they are all under-estimates of the true numbers by factors of at least 5 or 10 – and you have an evil scam of immense proportions. And that is just the UK – there are 10s of thousands more deaths and hundreds of thousands and millions more injuries, many of which are lifechanging, and not in a good way.
So there’s your answer, the reality is that under any other circumstances other than this blatantly evil agenda, there are no conditions under which these injections would have been allowed to carry on and remain being administered, taking into account the harms being caused by them. Simply put, with this much harm being created, no medical licencing authority could ever licence products which cause so much harm, so you will not find a registered vaccine anywhere on Earth that produces anywhere near as much harm as this, because it would be illegal and unethical in the extreme to ever licence such products in the first place.
Here is a presentation which answers some of your questions:
Safe and Effective – A COVID-19 Vaccine Risk Presentation – Steve Kirsch (June 16, 2021)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BX7nZDDH6vEJ/
Acute Cardiac = 13,184.
What’s not to like?
At least it’s quick
As opposed to Long Cardiac?
“10 deaths and 381 spontaneous abortions”. So 391 deaths then?
“CDC doesn’t pick up safety problems with vaccines”.
Oh, are they connected to the CCP as well?
Joel Smalley produced a nice graph showing the difference. It’s a few weeks old now and so the covid19 numbers now stand at 1,517.
The data for years prior to 2021 was obtained from a FOI request.
We can see that for ALL (non-covid) vaccines administered to over 18’s for the 10 years prior to 2020 there were 83 deaths reported. To put this in context, for just flu jabs alone, there were about 15 million doses administered in the UK in 2019.
One of the main arguments used against the notion that these new covid19 vaccines are causing problems is to suggest that the deaths are entirely coincidental – these people would have died anyway had they not had the jab. Apart from the fact that this ignores the strong temporal profile (deaths peak and fall off with time after jab – not a behaviour associated with a random background rate) it also suggests that all previous vaccines had a remarkable “coincidence” suppression effect.
The deaths attributed to covid19 vaccines are 18 times higher than deaths attributed to the sum total of reported deaths for ALL other vaccines administered to adults in the UK for the last 10 years.
Another way of stating this is that covid vaccine deaths are reported at 180 times the yearly average rate for all other vaccines.
A picture’s worth a thousand words – a bit like the Sweden/Norway one I sent a little bit further down today. They both tell the same story, I’m afraid.
Two essential items of context.
Makes me laugh that they continue to call this a ‘Vaccine Safety Update’. Clearly there’s nothing safe about them.
Check out the Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium on https://www.ukcolumn.org.
Get the information from the people who know what they are talking about, not from some overpaid TV commentators.
I am curious to know whether the reported incidents/deaths relative to the vaccination rate is changing. The best I can find is the attached chart from Eurovigilance which shows the number of reports each month from March to May for the AZ vaccine were more or less constant for the EEA even though the vaccination rate was climbing sharply during those months. So presumably the reports relative to vaccination rate declined. Perhaps someone has better data?
My husband and I definitely had Covid symptoms recently although we didn’t get tested as nether if us would have tolerated the idiots from NHS track and trace phoning our mobiles all the time. Both of us are 61, unvaccinated and had fully recovered within 7 days. The symptoms were mild and the tiredness and loss of taste and smell were inconvenient but certainly not something we’d be seeking a vaccine for.