Countries that have permanently shut their borders in a misguided effort to reduce Covid infections to zero are heading for economic catastrophe, according to Matthew Lynn in the Telegraph.
Controlling Covid through lockdowns and closed borders was a triumph to start with. As the pandemic has dragged on, and borders remain sealed for years without end, it is going to take a huge economic toll. Australia is heading back into recession even as the rest of the world recovers. New Zealand is seeing investment flee.
In truth, in an increasingly globalised and networked world, countries cannot exist in semi-lockdown forever and borders cannot remain permanently closed without doing huge economic damage. They can turn themselves into hermits if they want to – but the price will be a very high one. …
After a record 30-year run without a single recession, the [Australian] economy shrank last year, and it is now expected to contract again over the next couple of quarters.
Huge swathes of the population are back in lockdown as Covid infections rise, and output is inevitably starting to fall. As the rest of the world recovers, and growth accelerates in the United States, Britain, and, even if slightly more sluggishly, across most of mainland Europe, both countries are illustrating the cost of ‘zero-Covid’ strategies.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Englishness is a bit like crap journalism: we can’t define it, but we know when we are in its presence.”
I love that phrase and will be using it in future.
A great article.
Yes.
I find that people on the Left yearn for rules by which other people should live their lives. They get angry when those people don’t follow those rules and remark that this is the source of all our problems – other people not following the rules. For these types, the role of government is to write rules and to enforce them.
The Left is generally unable even to contemplate the possibility that there are many shades of grey.
The Left is generally uncomfortable with the glorious ambiguity which is the human condition.
Last week in the office I asked a Lefty type (who proudly and haughtily told me that he voted Labour, apparently for the sole reason that he doesn’t like the nasty tories, yawn) how two people, a loaf to share between them, should ensure that neither side feels unfairly treated. He immediately suggested that they should employ a third party to decide the matter. When I suggested that the best way was for one to cut the loaf and the other to chose which of the two pieces to take, I watched his head explode. It seemed he had never considered the possibility that there may be a way for people to cooperate without external authority forcing them into an “accord”.
Ah well. I offered him some of my Quality Street. He hasn’t talked to me since.
At which point they had to split the loaf three ways.
40:30:30 I expect!
Who’s responsible for the slow-mo destruction of Britain, across all contexts, again? What does the evidence point to? Well it’s the same culprits who are pushing all of the insanely damaging agendas, and last time I looked these people come in more than one ‘flavour’;
”OBR data confirms that low-skilled immigration is destroying the UK economy
Each low-skilled migrant will cost the taxpayer £465k by age 81
Only 5% of migrants (1 in 20) are net contributors to the economy as high-skilled workers. They contribute £1 to the economy whereas low-skilled immigrants cost the economy £1.60.
Mass immigration is not boosting economic growth, it’s crippling it.
By every measure – economic, cultural and social – mass immigration has been the greatest act of harm in our long island story. It’s worse even than the cost of fighting the Second World War.
A generation of Quisling politicians of all stripes have betrayed Britain and are complicit in our nation’s civilisational decline.
Those who aided and abetted in the catastrophic events of the past quarter-century must be held to account.
This means not only the politicians & civil servants who pushed this false prospectus, but also their Lord Haw-Haw cheerleaders in the media.
And it includes those in the CBI and big business who, without any concern for the wider societal impact, selfishly lobbied government for a never-ending supply of cheap labour.
Importing cheap labour suppressed wages and enabled them to avoid the costly – but vital – investment in innovation, technology and capital infrastructure that would have reduced the need for low skill migrants in the first place. (Eg. Job mechanization/automation, robotics etc.)
Never forgive. Never forget.”
https://x.com/RafHM/status/1836078827476516942
Excellent 20min lecture and overview of this topic from Rafe here ( 2022 );
”Over the past 25 years, since the election of New Labour in 1997, Britain has undergone a profound demographic shift that has fundamentally changed the character of towns and cities across the kingdom. The fabric of many of these communities has been altered to such an extent that they are often unrecognizable to the generations who once called them home.
From the old mill towns of the North to the heart of our capital city, this demographic change has created parallel societies of segregated populations whose daily lives pass with little or no interaction with wider society. And, increasingly, they are becoming hotbeds for extremism, sectarianism and cultural crimes such as honour killings.
What is the solution? Historian and New Culture Forum Senior Fellow Rafe Heydel-Mankoo outlines the dire situation facing us in Britain and whether Denmark offers some practical solution to stop or at least slow our worsening predicament.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6a8BXzDPbw&ab_channel=TheNewCultureForum
It’s worth mentioning that the pygmy Tory minister who sacked Scruton by text! was none other than Action Man Tom Tugenhadt. That scion of the Tugenhadt family; uncle an EU Commissioner, father the country’s top judge on privacy & the media. I don’t hold these things against him but I’m sure an upbringing amongst such people colours your thinking.
As an aside, if you’re interested in how you set about building 300,000 houses a year in a non-disastrous fashion go & read Scruton’s report ‘Build Back Beautiful’ (I think the title was his little joke). It makes the radical suggestion that the houses, estates, new-towns, should be pleasant places to live. I know, it’ll never catch on.
Tugenhadt has also been a guest at the Bilderberg Group.
English identity is what evolved organically over millennia punctuated by very few significant influxes of foreigners – and those foreigners were white European Christians. Until recently.
Yup, pre Windrush is a good place to start. Coming back from hols on Air France the hostess was offering Tea & Coffee, when I asked for Tea she was like, ‘why an I not surprised’. Tea drinking is a good example of Britishness, not unique to Englishness though.
It is difficult to take any Tory seriously after they participated in 14 years of destruction and enabling for everything we, the people, want to remain.
I would go further and call them a bunch of lying scumbags. It was also Blair that removed the death penalty from the Treason Act. One of the first things he did in 1997 apparently, I wonder why!
I’m with you on that one.
They are a disgusting bunch the whole lot of them.
They need leaving in the gutter where they belong.
We need a bit more Trumpian spirit, fight fight fight!!!
They think it’s a “gotcha” but it’s really not. You don’t have to be able to define something exactly in order to think it is of value and to defend it – it just needs to be mean something to someone/enough people.
He doesn’t need “defending” – we should be entirely unapologetic when talking about National or Ethnic Identity. If the Sky bloke had been interviewing a brown person of some kind or a Jew or a person of some non-Christian religion, do you think he would have asked the same question.
Or a Monk from Tibet.
Excellent article. And yes the “journo” was previously with BBC, ITV and Ch 5. So, well tutored in the ‘gotcha’ skill set so prevalent these days.
Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. Jenrick and his Tory pals have been fooling us on immigration for 14 years. Far too little, far too late Jenrick. You Tories are finished.
“than a Catholic communicant … before she receives the Host”
Part of Englishness is sticking to traditional English Grammar and avoiding Americanisms (dove into the water; sped up; etc), and fads such as using female generic pronouns as above.
Sometimes they are entirely inappropriate:
’the drunk driver is a menace: she is young, she has no impulse control; she is reckless’
’the knife carrying person is despicable: she is irresponsible, hot-headed, proud and easily impressionable’.
English identity: that would be the Angelcynn – White, Angel, Saxon, Jute, Danish mix, English speaking, Judeo-Christian heritage, Common Law abiding, shared morals, values, manners, traditions, bones of our ancestors going back 1 500+ years resting in the soil of England.
True Englishness can be summed up in the film: The Lady Vanishes. The original!
Steyn in Jenrick:https://www.steynonline.com/14664/identity-and-evasion
Superb.
To (mis)quote Louis Armstrong, “if you gotta ask you’re never gonna know”.
Ironic that the same people who would question the existence of Englishness struggle with words that do have an essentialist definition, e.g. “woman”.
Many thanks for explaining this. I came across what Wittgenstein said about games years ago and thought “so what?” but I can see the point of it now.
Excellent article – I get the same jibe about Englishness from an Irish friend and former boss. Now all I have to do is remember the argument….
Nice to see the Conservative leadership hopefuls reforming their ideas, so to speak, although every move begs the obvious question.
The definition of Englishness