The last two weeks have brought three new studies finding negative efficacy for two vaccine doses, meaning the vaccinated are more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated. These are study findings, not raw data, so have been adjusted for various biases and confounders, making it harder to dismiss them as anomalous or skewed.
The first is a pre-print study from Denmark, published on December 23rd, which looked at nearly all PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infections in Denmark from November 20th to December 12th and investigated them to see if they were likely to be the Omicron variant. By comparing the vaccination status of those infected, the researchers found a vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant of minus-76.5% for Pfizer and minus-39.3% for Moderna three months after double vaccination (see chart above), meaning the double-vaccinated were considerably more likely to be infected than the unvaccinated. They found the vaccine effectiveness against Omicron was significantly lower than against Delta, with Pfizer vaccine effectiveness at 53.8% and Moderna at 65% against Delta after three months. They reported that a third dose of Pfizer got vaccine effectiveness against Omicron back up to 54.6%, at least for a month. The full results are in the table below.
The latest vaccine effectiveness study from the UKHSA confirms these results. Against Omicron, the UKHSA reports zero or negative vaccine effectiveness from a double-dose of all three vaccines (AstraZeneca, Pfizer and Moderna) after five months. The third dose takes it up again, but only into the 40-60% range, and dropping fast.
A new study in Eurosurveillance from Norway also backs up the observation of negative vaccine effectiveness against Omicron, with a higher proportion of those who tested positive in the particular outbreak in the study being double-vaccinated than those who did not test positive (98% versus 93%).
Some studies had already found negative vaccine effectiveness against Delta, in line with the unadjusted figures from the UKHSA, though many people had dismissed these results as anomalous or biased. With Omicron, the reports of negative efficacy are becoming impossible to ignore, with even the UKHSA publishing graphs showing it after three months on two doses. At some point, health authorities are going to need to grapple with what the data is showing on this and stop pretending it isn’t there.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
There have been many developments throughout this ‘pandemic’ where I’ve thought “surely this is the story that will destroy the mainstream narrative”, but it never does.
But surely this is the story that will destroy the mainstream narrative. Negative efficacy?!
They will say that “negative efficacy” is a positive outcome – words now mean what they want them to mean and definitions ( like “vaccine’ for example ) are simply changed at will to fit the ‘push the vax’ “narrative”.
“When I use a word”, Humpty Dumpty said in a rather scornful tone, “it means
just what I choose it to mean – neither more nor less.”
Obviously our betters have been reading ‘Through the Looking Glass’
In layman’s terms can someone explain if it’s because the majority of population has been vaccinated they are more likely to have an infection? I see this argument by pro vax people and it does kinda make sense, setting aside the bloody jab not doing the job fact.
No, I’m fairly certain that these are rates that are adjusted for population so it makes no difference what the relative populations are of vaccinated to unvaccinated. Basically, it’s the bloody jab not doing the job.
That’s insane. How is this not news. I get the spectator and they print some okay stuff with regards covid
Well, we have the Trusted News Initiative which ensures that anything that portrays masks, social distancing or vaccines in a bad light gets downplayed or not reported at all.
Yes just like Stalinist Russia – this is why Labour is so keen!
Not news because news is now censored by Ofcom to “fit the narrative”
Simple – this is what happens when MPs give a man like Johnson “Emergency Powers”.
It’s a preprint study – not published yet. Technically, I can upload my PDF today and it will be called a preprint study as well.
Yes. And if you look at many of the “evidence” papers the government release in certain issues they also use pre print studies.
It can take months for pre prints to be peer reviewed. Are you suggesting we just wait till then to discuss their data, or do we proceed with caution instead?
And the point you’re trying to make is? Please post studies, pre-print or otherwise, that dispute this study. The UKHSA data has said the same for several months now although that needed biases and confounders catered for. Which is pretty much what this study does.
So not doing the job they claimed it was designed to do…but there are other “jobs”!
This is corrected for population size.
Essentially it says that if you’re vaccinated with two doses you’re more likely to get infected than if you’d remained unvaccinated.
For now this simply means many more cases of covid (as most are vaccinated).
In the future this might mean many more people suffering with a nasty cold more often. Note that this isn’t just the vaccinated as they’ll each go on to infect others, including the unvaccinated. Hopefully the effect of the vaccines will wear off at some point…
I rather suspect the “vaccinated” are becoming ill as a result of ADE.
Yes ADE ..possibly .leading to an acquired ‘immune deficiency’ – a syndrome we are familiar with …. er..AIDS where the immune system cannot deal with any pathogenic challenge?
All very worrying stuff even though unproven either way. But until it is proven can we please stop vaccinating children!
The effect of the “vaccines will not “wear off at some point “- especially wit four jabs a year. They are working in in all the cells reproducing artificial Covid spike proteins, which will eventually ruin the immune system making individuals vulnerable to any stray pathogen around.
Making them vulnerable to every stray pathogen….
If this is evidence of original antigenic sin, might it be possible that the unvaccinated don’t suffer from recurring colds to the same extent as the vaccinated?
I think it’s too soon to say whether it’s OAS damaging the ability to mount a strong/broad/durable p immune response vs an improved immune response in the unvaccinated (repeated exposures to the virus building an ever stronger immune response) which is driving the negative efficacy. Possibly both are at play.
Then it could be ADE as well in some patients.
My suspicion is that all these factors are at work.
Dr Malone put this in writing of these injections for children, but the same can surely occur within adults:
So without being able to pinpoint the exact term for what is taking place, fundamental changes to the natural immune system are a side effect of these injections. Hes been coughing quite a lot himself, post jab, so he is potentially suffering from this himself. His colleague Geert Vanden Bossche spoke of how the jabs optimise the immune system to fighting off the spike protein, at the expense of other parts of the immune system. He said that specific antibodies are created to the spike protein, which out-compete the non specific antibodies which are essential for other functions.
Del Bigtree – Geert Vanden Bossche vaccine creator warns of vaccine disaster ahead
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NuI3rar7M4sg/
Then there is the issue of the AIDS effect, which is maybe a result of what Bossche describes plus maybe other factors like the spike protein constantly stimulating the immune system causing it to malfunction. Then there is the ADE issue, where the body is said to make bad antibodies which have a negative effect.
I just tell people that these jabs are like a trainwreck for the immune system, via multiple mechanisms.
Malone also said:
So creating genetically reset immune systems is a correct way to characterise what is happening here, from the horses mouth.
Malone quotes from this:
COVID Vaccines Are Irreversible And Permanently Damaging To Kids
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/12/20/covid-vaccines-are-irreversible-and-permanently-damaging-to-kids
Video of Malone delivering this speech. They should have done a take two because he says parents when he should have said children and someones mobile goes off mid speech. Still a great thing for him to do this. When the call came he stepped up and is doing what he can. Respect to that.
Robert Malone on why his technology Could Have Serious Harm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6HVAddC-lNY
Just think about what this negative efficacy means in terms of how we are supposed to understand how vaccines work. You expose the immune system to the enemy, and now it can recognise the invaders. That’s it. The immune system supposedly remembers. So how can it wear off? It doesn’t, because there is nothing to wear off. So something else must be happening separately to degrade the immune system. This conclusion is confirmed by the simple observation that if the immune system was simply forgetting what the enemy looked like, then effectiveness would drop down to the same level as before. But it doesn’t, it goes below. Therefore, as I said, something is degrading the immune system. Now I’m not a professor of epidemiology, nor do I pretend to be one on the internet, but this seems pretty obvious to me. So now, the worst possible thing that could be done is keep administering more of the same, over and over. I mean. What do you think is going to happen? Meanwhile, this.
I remember reading that there is such a thing as immune exhaustion. Namely, that when you repeatedly vaccinate someone against the same thing the immune system becomes exhausted and unable to function correctly, leaving you more vulnerable not only to the thing you were vaccinated against but also to any other infection that may come along.
This is high zone tolerance. I’m not sure this is what’s happening here — it looks more like an antibody mediated increased risk of infection.
But this is not a traditional ‘vaccine’ it is a ‘gene therapy’ as many have been saying from the beginning – it enters all your cells to reproduce a pathogenic artificial Covid Spike protein which attracts a response from your immune system – but the cells keep on producing the spike pushing your immune system to the limit in attempting to deal with them – consequences could be ‘cytokine storms’ and organ damage, plus a permanently very seriously weakened immune system.
But please look it up – there are so many full, authoritative explanations by concerned ( no-platformed) Senior virologists out there.
Isn’t this the tenant of “Do no harm” within the medical profession and why you don’t give medical procedures/interventions to those who don’t need them?
You don’t give medicine to the healthy. Drives the reluctance to hand out antibiotics like sweeties in case your body becomes immune to them when you really do need them.
Had an argument with a doctor friend around why he was happy to give novel vaccine to children who are are incredibly low risk from Covid. He even accepted that it didn’t have long term safety data but “believed” that the risk was worth it.
This was well before the debunking of the idea that the vaccine prevented infection and therefore you take it to help others. He might have changed his mind now as we’re sat here discussing negative efficacy.
Also, am I right in saying that the vaccines program your body to produce a limited number of different types of anti-bodies (targeted at alpha variant) but that your body takes a more scatter gun approach and produces many types of anti-bodies on the hope that one of them hits home? Therefore, your natural immune system is better placed to fight new variants as it might have already produced the anti-body to counter the variant? The inference being that the vaccine is “hobbling” your natural immune system so it’s not producing the anti-bodies to fight the Omicron variant?
As the post above, I don’t claim to be an expert but boy have I read a lot!
I note that this doesn’t typically happen with vaccines because they’re tested; if you find a candidate vaccine makes things worse it doesn’t get continued funding/testing because it is useless.
I note that we didn’t do the required testing with the covid vaccines.
One thing that really made me cross was the moronic ‘we didn’t need to do testing for so long, because there were so many in the trials’ — sure, the person-years was the same, but some problems only emerge with time. I suppose people will educate themselves about this when it is explained to them at some point. Bit late, though.
When the mortality rates start to surge the time for self education will be long past as you correctly note.
Haven’t they already started to surge?
It’s certainly on the rise in non-Covid illnesses. Statistically important increase in excess mortalities compared to 5-year average reported here recently. It’s not primarily in respiratory illness either…
Reminder. This is not a typical ‘vaccine ‘- it is totally untried technology.
Actually the numbers in the study compare ballpark similar to other vaccines for adults in development. I think Shingrix had about 30k patients in its Ph3 study.
You need a giant study to get a high enough event rate to get data, unless you want the study to last for years (which your shareholders won’t be happy with)
I’m not a professor of epidemiology either but I could see another argument that could be put forward. The vaccine does give you protection for a couple of months. During this period the unvaccinated are more likely to catch it, giving themselves natural immunity. Once protection from the vaccination reduces for the vaccinated then the vaccinated are more likely to catch it as they have less natural immunity. This would give the appearence of negative efficacy after a few months. This would peak at some point before tending towards zero as the vaccinated themselves get natural immunity from infection. Therefore it could be argued that the immune system is not being degraded. I tend to agree with your point though about potential damage to the immune system. It is definitely worth investigating. Just suggesting a counter argument, though not a very strong one!
We actually see something rather odd in the data.
During the early stages of each covid wave we do see more unvaccinated having symptomatic illness. This effect only appears for a few weeks — certainly nowhere near enough time to see any impact in terms of immunity. Later on in the wave the vaccinated ‘catch up’ — this may partly explain the apparent negative effectiveness of the vaccines.
But this doesn’t appear to be a large scale immunity effect. Instead it appears to be more related to delayed infections in the vaccinated — it looks as though at least a proportion of them become infected and then have either a latent (invisible) infection, or asymptomatic infection. These people then get fully symptomatic infection about 3-4 weeks later.
This also explains why we see relatively more unvaccinated individuals hospitalised and dying in the early stages of each covid wave — it is because it takes those few weeks for the progression of covid disease in many of the vaccinated to get to the point of hospitalisation. In the unvaccinated, disease progression for more recent variants appears similar to early variants (ie, symptomatic disease for about 7 days before serious covid symptoms start). It is important to note that serious covid is an immune disorder disease, and not a viral disease (that’s why early treatments for covid attack the virus, whereas later treatments act to suppress the immune system).
“Herd immunity” and building up a healthy immune system are now recognised as the most effective ways of dealing with the virus – any virus.
This policy could have been adopted from the start ….but there was by that time another ‘Agenda’ in play.
Either theoretical conspiracy, or just the old fashioned “money talks” factor, given the commercial background of those involved.
What exactly is this “herd immunity” of which you speak?
Surely it can only ever be obtained by vaccinating every living thing on the planet. This is true. Even the WHO agree.
(For the benefit of any Daily Mail reader this is sarc.).
I agree.
Interesting
Thanks for the important link- all should read it urgently.
Just like your memory wears off, so does immune system’s memory wear off. Philosophically it is perhaps a matter of scarce resource allocation (which is also often found in evolutionary context) – strongly remembering this particular invader might mean not being able to remember other (new) ones. So it wears off, changes, adjusts, however you want to call it, to make room for correct processing of new stimuli.
Not necessarily true for everything. E.g. those of us who dealt with measles during childhood will never be affected by it again. So for some things our T-cells do provide lifelong memory.
Which sadly means you’re not able to make any anti-narrative points according to the MSM or Twitterati/pro-vaccine. Which is rather offensive IMO. I said over a month ago “Double vaccinated and now I’m more likely to catch Covid. Yeah! Way to go…”. My friends almost defriended me except… one or two are now starting to open their eyes.
It is very very important to note that this isn’t a problem for the individual, it is a problem for society.
If each double vaccinated person is 50% more likely to catch the infection, it also means that they’re 50% more likely to pass it on to the next person — who, if vaccinated, is then 50% more likely to catch it and pass it on again.
Thus if you vaccinate nearly everyone, a 50% increase in likelihood of infection translates not to 50% more cases but maybe 2x or 3x the cases, compared with if we’d not vaccinated anyone.
We really should have vaccinated only the most vulnerable (obese plus over 65, at least). That would have given us nearly all of the benefits in terms of reduction in deaths and hospitalisations, but massively reduced the risks of vaccine escape, vaccine related health issues and, now, vaccine associated increases in risk of infection.
But we didn’t, and so we have to put up with 130,000 cases a day, with consequential risks to the vulnerable. I say we’re jolly lucky that Omicron appears to be rather benign compared with Delta — it could have been so much worse, and we appear to have gotten away with it due to luck, not judgement.
To use the govt/MSM terminology, the vaccinated should be categorised as ‘superspreaders’.
Indeed they should!
I still believe that covid is predominantly spread by superspreaders, not by each infected individual. The data just don’t support the infected-spreader model — which is one of the reasons that Ferguson’s models continue to not work (the SIR model).
I think that it is likely that vaccination increases the risk of becoming a superspreader by 2-3 times.
You have it! The disease has been spread by the vaccinated!
This was of course entirely unforeseen by those who developed both the virus and backed the experimental ‘gene therapy’ vaccine ( Fauci) but seems (by total accident of course), to have become the most effective means possible of spreading infection – as well as we now see observed with increasing alarm by leading virologists, (those not working for Big Pharma and Gates),potentially severely damaging the natural human immune system .
Well I never!
According my latest substack ‘research’ omicron is not benign at all compared to delta. And this comes from skeptics in general. The only difference that hospitalisation is 12 days instead of 7 as with delta. Also it seems that omicron is causing underlying damage (possible higher all cause mortality in the next year).
Although I really hope substack guys are wrong and you are right and everyone else who says omicron is the end.
I think by now that if Omicron was more deadly than Delta that we’d start to see it in the death rates which continue to drop. Leading more weight to the view that it’s milder?
Top line is deaths and bottom line is cases.
Its no surprise that vaxed people are catching Covid. But the numbers make me wonder if the vaxed are behaving differently to the non-vaxed, ie are both groups exposing themselves to the same risks. Do vaxed people take a more gung-ho approach. Are non-Vaxed more cautious.?
I’m certainly not cautious despite being unclean
Me too – however to be fair I do not mix and mingle as much as the vaxxed as where I live I’m not allowed to
Same here. I couldn’t give a toss. Restrictions are for Pampers.
This is a terrifically important point. I’d note that there might alternatively be a selective bias in who was vaccinated in the first place…
So, is it a behavioural effect, something to do with vaccine demographics or negative vaccine effectiveness?
The answer to that question is absolutely pivotal for forward planning of our covid response. If the vaccinated are less cautious we need to tell them to be more cautious; if we’ve vaccinated the wrong people we need to correct this; if the vaccines make things worse we need to stop using them immediately and the authorities need to apologise to the nation for their hubris driven mistake.
But where are the studies? The extensive research to identify the problem so that we can sort it out? They’re nowhere to be seen — we just have to accept being told that the vaccines are wonderful (and perhaps hand out a few knighthoods while we’re at it).
I’ve given up thinking that our response has been sub-optimal because of a need to respond to an emergency — the behaviour of the authorities very much looks like they’re trying as hard as they can to avoid any criticism of their actions during the past 2 years, and that includes the suppression of any information that appears to put the vaccines in a bad light.
Unfortunately, you still believe this is about a virus. It’s not. This is Agenda 2030. If Bill and the Davos Deviants manage to Build Back Better we face a future of technocratic transhumanism that will destroy humanity and ultimately the planet.
A real 1984 lies before us.
Time we broke up with those who’re still failing to see it.
https://ourdecisiontoo.com/Issue/there-s-nothing-left-to-do-but-go-our-separate-ways/320/
Keep saying it huxley – it has to be done!
Thank you Sir.
It may not be about a virus, but by making it about a virus – and showing how (1) useless the so-called vaccines are and (2) removing the fear of the virus – we destroy their plans.
Then we exact revenge.
If there’s any difference I suspect it is the other way round – I’ve done literally nothing to change my behaviour because from day one I’ve known the risk of Covid was ludicrously exaggerated. I suspect most unjagged feel the same
Indeed. Those who avoid situations where the virus might lurk are the bedwetters – who are mostly also first in the spiking queue!
Many of the jabbed people I know are still cautious about normal social interaction, even to the point of self-isolating after a positive swab result when they have had three of the injections. They also seem to be ill more frequently than their unjabbed peers.
The jabbed wear their masks in the bath!
It does not matter what you think of the risk, if you are not allowed to participate in society, you don’t participate. Some people would also sign out voluntarily in protest against the widespread discrimination (at least I hope so).
I imagine the vaxxed are far keener on testing themselves and reporting the results. My positive test (done out of curiosity as much as anything else) certainly didn’t make it into the national statistics.
I think this is right. But this would decrease the incidence of positives in the vaccinated, not increase it, because of all the negative results they’d find.
Would it? If 10 people test and there’s 1 positive, that’s 10%. If 100 test and there’s 10 positive, it’s still 10%
Of all the people I know the most cautious are the fully injected, some of them are a nightmare with masks on and off, antisocial distancing, avoiding crowds, public transport and so on and constantly parroting “stay safe” FFS.
Best avoided altogether.
More likely the opposite.
In my experience, the vaxed are the more cautious. The unvaxed have made their decision and are going about their normal lives knowing that they are either immune or not at all worried about catching Covid. The unvaxed may be taking vitamin D, Zinc etc, but I don’t believe any of us are anywhere near as paranoid as the vaxed crowd.
Completely agree. After the lie of the initial three weeks flattening the bloody sombrero I got stuck into serious research. I soon realised I was not at imminent risk of death and told the family I was not prepared to live my life frightened of something I could not see and have maintained such a stance ever since.
I refuse to comply with nonsensical restrictions and particularly the NPI’s which are categorically aimed at undermining my health.
I suspect a few things here:
1. Vaccinated people are compliant and therefore more likely to test themselves. Thus more cases in the vaccinated
2. Cold or ‘flu possibly giving a positive covid result
3. Vaccinated people with minor symptoms – believing it won’t be covid because they’re vaccinated – are more likely to continue socialising
I’m un-jabbed; early 60s, female, slim and healthy. I’ve lived as close to a normal life in a Dorset town as possible ….. socialising, pubs, cafes etc. I’ve not had the bug …. the only people I know around here who have are double jabbed (but then most around here are double jabbed).
I honestly believe that many of these jabbed people who think they have “it” are really just suffering from immune system malfunction. The tests are worthless unvalidated nonsense that tell you nothing about anything specific. They can test positive when all sorts of rubbish is swabbed – includinfg motor oil, coca cola, goat, fruit and water.
Our bodies are host to all kinds of things that can potentially get out of control. The immune system is responsble for regulating this and keeping us healthy. For example, if you dont brush your teeth for a week or two, youll probably start developing disease in the mouth, because the pathogens in there have a chance to get out of control. Inside the body this is also the case, but the immune system does the job of the toothbrush and paste (feel free to correct me on this but this is my basic understanding of what is going on). So when these people get jabbed, they harm the immune system and when the immune system is suffering, the respiratory area is one of the first things to show signs of illness. Where normally the immune system keeps everything balanced, a damaged immune system does the opposite. Its like a warning that things are going wrong. A guy in a town I visit spent a whole week getting smashed on the high street and sleeping rough. By the end of it he was coughing up all sorts of crap – he sounded like he had “it”. He coughed near me and I probably was exposed to his excretions. I was fine. He was suffering from immune system degradation through absolutely caning it for days on end non-stop and his body started waving a flag in the form of respiratory symptoms. The immune system takes a battering and things which are usually handled can take grip and cause illness.
The jabbed think they are improving their immune systems – because the liars in the government and NHS tell them this – but actually the opposite is true. These jabs decimate the immune system. This is a depopulation agenda – thats what these things are supposed to do – cause illness and death in otherwise healthy people. Its sick beyond belief. All for a virus which according to top and official sources 99.97 percent of under 70s survive naturally, if you believe there genuinely is a novel virus – which i dont – because in two years of this crap, apart from this guy coughing up gunk after a bender – I havent seen anything to suggest there is a novel virus.
I also think that the elderly die of this too – their immune systems weaken during the winter season due to lowered levels of vit D – then they start presenting with coughing and respiratory problems due to already being weak. If the government really cared about “saving lives” they would send all the elderly vitamin packs to boost their Vitamin D levels. But they dont – they inject them with gene therapy, then they die, then they say it was Covid wot done it. Its a total scam. Its depopulation courtesy of people who have openly admitted intentions to reduce the population.
Calcifediol Treatment and COVID-19–Related Outcomes
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/106/10/e4017/6294179
calcifediol is Vitamin D
Interesting vid here:
ENDTIMESWATCHMAN – THE ART AND SCIENCE OF MISINFORMATION, WHO CONTROLS THE MEDIA?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/pV2u2OydnTrl/
I think the opposite is true. The unvaxed are unafraid.
Surely the logical response as per govt logic is to deny freedoms to the vaccinated.
Yes.
There was an argument even at the start to allow people to get vaccinated but to restrict their freedoms in some way — this would have slowed the development of vaccine resistant variants, and would have slowed the progression of vaccine resistant variants moving through the population once they’d evolved.
This would also have ensured that as few people would have been vaccinated as we could have gotten away with — the right scenario for a ‘leaky vaccine’. As a result, care home residents could have been vaccinated with little impact on their freedoms (unlikely to go nightclubbing or go on a fancy holiday) but as you went down the age range people would have had to make a choice.
Instead we vaccinated everyone, resulting in extraordinarily high selective pressure for vaccine escape. And if that wasn’t bad enough, we then started to restrict the unvaccinated, the very ones that wouldn’t be creating escape variants and who would be less likely to import an escape variant into the country.
The amazing thing is, the vast vast majority of people still believe that we did the right thing by vaccinating everyone.
Here’s the NHS guidance. It’s really quite far short from everyone.
Obviously the last reason for “you should have the vaccine if….” can only be the reason so many sheep availed themselves of it.
And this what they said in March 2021. Minor changes, perhaps.
One problem. The vaccines don’t work.
‘Logic?’ We have been dealing with the crudest, cruelest propaganda serving the sociopathic Reset agenda – those running this sh*t show are Bat Crazy, Marxist Globalist, power crazed, money corrupted, Zero Carbon Mealey worm advocating loons….’ logic’ does not come into their manic misanthropic obsessions or anywhere near .
That about nails it.
Rather sadly, I think you’re right.
Logic left the building some time ago.
All we’ve got left is rhetoric and grammar, wielded by the sophists we’ve got in charge.
I don’t like this article, it’s just strengthening the official narrative for boosters, instead of the simple fact there is no evidence the “vaccines” were anything other than a cash cow for big pharma.
The vaccines are much more than cash cows – people are dropping dead after the shot all over the world . Many more are seriously damaged. Long term effects and eventual numbers are ‘unknown’ but it is feared the immune system could be ruined and numbers will be high.
The Japanese have now demanded full medical reports of all vaccine injury and put warnings of possible side effects, including myocarditis and heart attacks, on the vaccines, as well as demanding ‘fully informed consent’ be given before the shot and ruling that no-one -one is to be coerced into accepting a vaccination for their work.
How many sudden deaths does it have to be before notice is taken of what the shots are really doing to the body, bearing in mind that 97 % were never at risk of dying from the virus in the first place ?
In the meantime Johnson has the brazen nerve to tell us (on Christmas Day even) that Jesus wants us all to take the ‘boosters’!
97 percent – you mean 99.9 percent. The original Wuhan megadeath world stopping “gain of function” blood clot in the lungs for everyone strain had a survival rate of 99.97 percent in under 70s and 99.85percent overall. Just like the common flu, which miraculously disappeared. The WHO originally lied to everyone by saying the IFR of Convid was 3.4 percent, but that was always a lie designed to create fear. Once the real IFR was established and confirmed that this was a nothing burger – flu season rebranded, they never spoke about the IFR again.
BREAKING NEWS ! Prof Dr John Ioannidis Stanford University On Real Data On Coronavirus Pandemic – Apr 30, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=btvDL6kIDsA
Global perspective of COVID-19 epidemiology for a full-cycle pandemic – Professor John Ioannidis
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/eci.13423
The term ‘vaccinated’ is a complete misnomer – as these studies, raw data and anecdotal evidence clearly shows. Many do not even appear to be inoculated against the mildest cold, let alone coronavirus © 2019.
I actually feel sorry for those who have have been coerced, duped, threatened and tricked into taking the jab(s).
I don’t feel sorry for them – they are weak and deserve what they get
What was it Jesus said? “Let him who is without sin, cast the first stone?
There number of people who could have claimed completely informed consent when the jabbing started was infinitesimal, watch the interview with the inventor of Pfizer’s NLP cased mRNA claiming that he hadn’t had his own jab because he “wasn’t legally permitted to” aka “I’ll be fucked if I submit to that shit floating around my veins until you lab rats have ironed out all the side effects – including the ones we knew about after the truncated unblinded trials….suckers”
People had to take the jabs to work travel look after families etc etc, and they were constantly being assured that they were completely safe AND WOULD PROTECT THEM FROM CATCHING AND PASSING ON COVID. All the assurances they knew to be lies and that many of us now also know to be lies – the type of lies that got former leaders of Italy – Mussolini, Romania – the Ceaušescus, hanged when caught. Fingers crossed we have the opportunity to exact a similar penalty.
Minor correction. The leaflet back in March did not promise to protect against catching ad and passing it on. “We do not yet know whether it will stop you from catching and passing on the virus” – March 2021 issue from NHS.
It didn’t but the constant health messaging from the government and NHS said, and continues to say, it reduces your chances of catching it and passing it on and “is the best way to protect those you love” (puke).
They don’t give a timeframe, but if they did it would be “from 2 -12 weeks post vaccination, maybe”.
Also my best way of protecting those I love, who are my dependent children primarily, is by staying alive and continuing to provide for them. Which means not being disabled by an unnecessary, ineffective experimental vaccine with a horrendous short time side effect profile and unknown longer term one.
I don’t feel sorry for them either. These are the people who have been cajoling me into getting vaccinated and blaming me for the Covid spread. They can fuck off.
The reports of negative efficacy [against positive PCR test results] are perfectly easy to ignore as vaccine efficacy against infection is a totally ludicrous propaganda construct and the people who came up with this nonsense Will Jones, Noah Carl and presumably, a lot of other people have swallowed hook, line and sinker knew this when they invented it.
Vaccination is supposed to train the immune system of the body to stop an active infection from turning into a (possibly serious) disease by disabling and destroying pathogens. This doesn’t swipe every bit of their RNA (in this case) from the body immediately.
You clearly have no understanding of how an immune system that is the product of roughly 3,700,000,000 years of evolution functions.
Your trotting out of the nonsense word ‘train’ to explain that 3.7 billion year old process is sad in the extreme.
Maybe get a book and learn to read about the complex biological processes that are involved in safely presenting pseudopathogens/weakened pathogens to a functioning immune system in a way that does no permanent damage while ensuring that the immune system recognises any future assault by the ‘wild-type’ pathogen that is being mimicked and presented and rapidly prevents disease resulting.
You might also give a bit of thought to the phrase ‘unavoidably unsafe’ while you read Robert F Kennedy’s book ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ that covers what actually happens when some very wealthy criminals decide that we (usually children) need yet another vaccine to a disease that will never harm the vast majority of us.
You clearly understood neither the content nor the purpose of my text and you jumping to the conclustion that I therefore must be associated with a political camp you happen to opppose is odd, to say the least.
Kennedy has blown this genocidal scam apart- its defenders will be struggling to put their frauds and the bits back together.
As if Kennedy’s bombshell is not enough,’ “Pseudo Pandemic” New Normal Technocracy’ by Iain Davis, completes the case for the prosecution in chillingly comprehensive detail with full documentation- especially good on the midazolam scandal.
All we need now are the criminals in the dock!
The negative efficacy isn’t absolute — it is relative to the unvaccinated.
Both vaccinated and unvaccinated have the same post-infection levels of bits of RNA in their bodies. There shouldn’t be any differential in this factor between these two groups.
What?! negative efficacy is very much a thing, and not invented by Will Jones or anyone else.
Some forms of ADE will result in negative efficacy, as will OAS, both of which are long understood phenomena
Has any public health spokesman explained why vaccination should give you useful protection against an RNA respiratory virus like Sars2 that constantly mutates to something weaker, and which is contracted via the nasal cavity, the throat or the tear ducts? It‘s hard for a layman to understand why intravenous vaccination should give any reliable lasting protection against a virus that behaves in that way. So it doesn‘t. I’m amazed!
The orthodox theory is that vaccination will protect from serious disease (and the resulting consequences) because of antibodies circulating in the blood stream which would disable viruses should they manage to enter it. This obviously doesn’t provide any protection against upper respiratory tract infections but if the virus never manages to escape that, all will be well.
Anything beyond that is propaganda by this or that interested party. Eg, the SAGEs etc, who absolutely want to keep their beloved pandemic rolling. Or the political opponents of the American democrats who keep harping on about governments really seeking to kill people.
Sadly, “There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamed of in your philosophy”!
Common Sense beats their New Faux “Appropriate” Science ( not real science – that’s banned ) every time!
So when do we get the true picture of the massive level of damage now being caused by the Gene Therapy injections and the very grave threat now posed to our immune systems and our long term health?
Those who have died from blood clots, heart attacks, strokes and myocarditis reputably attributed to the jabs never get a mention,
Never…if they can help it!
So when do we get our unvaccinated passports?
Make your own. Declare that you’re exempt from the scam, and in your back pocket carry the option of threatening to sue whoever for refusing to provide a service for no good reason. “You can expect a letter from my solicitor” etc.
Thats the spirit!
Join the vaccine control group
I don’t recall offhand seeing this here so…
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356756711_Latest_statistics_on_England_mortality_data_suggest_systematic_mis-categorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
Neil, Fenton et al.:
“Latest statistics on England mortality data suggest systematic mis-categorisation of vaccine status and uncertain effectiveness of Covid-19 vaccination”
3rd December 2021
“….We examine the latest UK ONS vaccine mortality surveillance report which provides the necessary information to monitor this crucial comparison over time. At first glance the ONS data suggest that, in each of the older age groups, all-cause mortality is lower in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. Despite this apparent evidence to support vaccine effectiveness – at least for the older age groups – on closer inspection of this data, this conclusion is cast into doubt because of a range of fundamental inconsistencies and anomalies in the data. Whatever the explanations for the observed data, it is clear that it is both unreliable and misleading. While socio-demographical and behavioural differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated have been proposed as possible explanations, there is no evidence to support any of these….”
Somewhat barracking interview of Norman Fenton by Del Bigtree/Highwire:
https://www.spreaker.com/user/ubngo/mathematician-uncovers-disturbing-mortal
Of course none of this or any other dispute over (increasingly threadbare) pretext now matters, since it is clear the objective of the pseudo-vaxx and therefore vaxx-pass is plainly the implementation of individual Global ID which in turn will be linked to central bank (global bank?) digital currency and the new road to serfdom – if permitted to happen.
…
https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/12/29/triple-vaccinated-10-times-more-likely-to-catch-omicron/
So very HAPPY I never took the experimental biologicals. Happy and old.
Me too. I won’t judge those who did but would point out to them that if they’re healthy it would be better not to take any more. Why take a drug that is out of date and likely to do more harm than good? Take more care of your immune system and live life!
As usual with all this it’s just lies lies lies and more lies as it always has been and will be. I STRONGLY RECOMMEND EVERYONE WHO READS THE SCEPTIC TO READ IAIN DAVIS’S BOOK PSEUDOPANDEMIC. It will be THE MOST IMPORTANT BOOK YOU EVER READ.