Vaccine Boosters Needed Every Six Months for the Foreseeable Future, Says U.K. Government Health Agency

2 min read

Millions of Britons could need Covid boosters every six months for the foreseeable future, Dr. Jenny Harries, Chief Executive of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) said on Monday. She suggested the most vulnerable “relevant groups” in society will still need regular top-up jabs. MailOnline has more.

Britain is still in a “period of uncertainty”, she said, despite all restrictions being lifted more than a month ago. Experts are unable to predict when a new variant may occur and how it could affect immunity from vaccines, she said. 

Around eight million over-75s, care home residents and immunocompromised over-12s in England are eligible for fourth doses this spring. Fifth, and potentially even sixth jabs, will be rolled out to a wider group this autumn. 

Dr. Harries was asked at a Public Accounts Committee today whether boosters would continue to be dished out every six months. Refusing to deny they could be topped up again after this fourth round of doses, she said: “For relevant groups, as per the evidence we have. The spring booster campaign we have is for those who are over 75, care home residents and those who are immunocompromised.” 

Dr. Harries said: “The pandemic is not over so for the next 18 months, two years or so I think it will be a settling down period. There are a couple of issues about when we might get a new variant and we can’t predict that with any certainty. The Omicron wave was the fastest wave we have seen with a lot of uncertainty until our evaluative teams were able to assess how well vaccines were performing against it. The other issue is what [type of vaccine] we want to procure.”

Health advisers are currently in discussion over whether to invest in vaccines tailored specifically to new variants or buy more standard jabs.

Every six months? Better be sure there are no adverse effects from repeatedly taking this drug, then.

Worth reading in full.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

325 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
tpv
tpv
4 years ago

This article should surprise no one. The powerful have openly stated since the beginning of the covid era that:
1) the vaccines would probably last only 6 months, and,
2) biannual boosters would be our only way out of the “pandemic.”
I have known this since March of 2020, and have been watching it unfold.
See:
https://swprs.org/the-vaccine-passport-agenda/
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/963491/COVID-19_Response_-_Spring_2021.pdf
https://www.corbettreport.com/gatescontrol/
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=JDjw8-3VZp8

OldBaldGamer
OldBaldGamer
4 years ago

I keep telling you people it’s a war

Awake yet ?

David Walker
David Walker
4 years ago

Says an apparatchik with huge holding of shares in vaccine companies…

Susan
Susan
4 years ago

No profanity or abuse, really?

Newman20
Newman20
4 years ago

Tell the old biddy to bugger off and take her useless and dangerous ‘clotshots’ with her.

Life is a journey; are we there yet?
Life is a journey; are we there yet?
4 years ago

They really do want to kill people off. There is no other logical conclusion. More injections mean more variants and lower immunity. How on earth do we stop this insanity.

JXB
JXB
4 years ago

You clown! The ‘most vulnerable’ will likely be dead in 6 months as they are mostly beyond life-expectancy and have underlying conditions that will kill them.

Repeat, regular dosing with any vaccine degrades the immune system, already very weak in ‘the most vulnerable’ and is sure to kill them off.

Johnny Dollar
Johnny Dollar
4 years ago

PRISON

Mayflower
Mayflower
4 years ago

Just a look at Pfizer’s own 3 month trial results should frighten anyone from touching this rat poison.

JohnK
JohnK
4 years ago

Cash cow. Has she declared her interests?

PatrickF
PatrickF
4 years ago

Jenny Harries, f off now, tomorrow and into eternity.

RTSC
RTSC
4 years ago

Sounds like an experiment ….. how many times can we jab you with the monkey juice before you keel over?

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
4 years ago

She is obviously a fervent believer in the ‘precautionary principle’. What a shame her parents didn’t have the same belief

Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
4 years ago
Reply to  DevonBlueBoy

No face mask for ‘granny killer’ Harries in the article photo! She is certainly not acting as if “she has it”.

Go on, Jenny, Look Them in Their Eyes as they lay there in intensive care gasping for breath and tell them you didn’t wear a face mask!

maccone
maccone
4 years ago

This whole Covid business and those thinking they’re there to ‘promote’ it gets more and more outrageous by the day. In our choir, a ‘vulnerable group’ which has been free of masks etc for months and given concerts too, several members have recently reported a ‘heavy’ cold but LFTs showed Covid, because a cold is what Covid is now. I’ve got it too, so we’ll simply stay away until it clears up. No more testing, PLEASE! Jenny Harries and her ilk should be shown the door.
Masks are another stupidity. We went to a concert at the RNCM (Music College) in Manchester at the weekend and were handed masks at the door to be worn in all areas. We didn’t accept them and went mask-free.
Yesterday, the congregation were completely free of them at the memorial service in Westminster Abbey.
When is this madness going to end?!

SimCS
SimCS
4 years ago

If “Experts are unable to predict when a new variant may occur and how it could affect immunity from vaccines” then what use is any ‘booster’, as you don’t know what you are boosting against. It’s pure high-risk guesswork. Even the current (un)safe & (in)effective (non-)vaccines can’t protect against Moronic Omicron!

vivaldi
vivaldi
4 years ago

The Spanish flu pandemic lasted for 2 years, 1918-1920 ….yet this much milder WHO defined pandemic is now well over the 2 year mark and according to Ms Harries is going to run and on. What a disingenuous narrative they keep spinning. Common colds have been with us thousands of years, never eradicated, never requiring expensive and deadly pharmaceutical interventions, and they run on and on. Big Pharma think they have us where they want us….they and their cheerleaders are standing on platforms of sand. The MHRA are not auditing the Yellow Card reports….injury and death, mere bagatelle.

Banjones
Banjones
4 years ago

”Having damaged your immune system, I suppose we’d better just carry on doing it…”

HEZ
HEZ
4 years ago

I had my 2 jabs last year. I needed them for my job. I had Omicron in January very mildly. Last week I ended up with Erycipelas a bacterial infection which needed antibiotics to cure. Not nice. That was the first time I had consulted a doctor medically in 17 years for anything. I believe my immune system has been compromised by the vaccine and therefore my body which would normally have dealt with the bacteria couldn’t now. Also it started on the bridge of my nose and the only thing that had been near that was a swab from the LF test which I must do before going on duty.
So I believe the only reason they want to keep jabbing people every 6 months is because they know what they have done to their immune systems and are covering their backsides as long as they can. Before the poop hits the fan. Self preservation is what always motivates them not the best interests of others.

Bella Donna
Bella Donna
4 years ago
Reply to  HEZ

Greed is what motivates them.

hilarynw
hilarynw
4 years ago

How many are going to go along with this –
surely few but then I didn’t think anyone would be stupid enough to go for dose 3 – more fool
me I guess!

Aletheia of Oceania
Aletheia of Oceania
4 years ago
Reply to  hilarynw

More fool them…

conocido en valenciana
conocido en valenciana
4 years ago

I am very disturbed to read this. It is by now in the public domain and well known that these shots can cause serious harm, up to and including death, that (for example) twice as many people have died from these shots in one year as have died from all other shots combined in the preceding thirty years. I can understand to an extent that some among the “ordinary people”, us lot, are still willing to put this stuff in their bodies. It is after all a pretty big jump to realise, to understand, that much of what the MSM (do you hear me, BBC, Telegraph, Guardian, and many more) are lying to us through either omission or commission, are bought and paid for and so on. However, someone like Jenny Harries must know, at the very least, about the bad effects, yet is still going ahead, encouraging us to get more jabs. Either she is grossly ignorant and incompetent, and thus unfit for the position she holds, or she is guilty of cconspiracy to do harm. I can’t think of a third possibility

Bella Donna
Bella Donna
4 years ago

She is the stooge that will take the flak for this appalling government.

Human Resource 19510203
Human Resource 19510203
4 years ago

Erm, no. Sorry. No more of your injectable stuff.

marebobowl
marebobowl
4 years ago

Fascinating. And these “health” authorities, despite all the adverse events an deaths being reported think this is absolutely safe. If that doesn’t scare the living daylights out of you, nothing will. By the way, why would you inject anyone, who suffers from an autoimmune disease, when it has been shown, these injections cause autoimmune disease. Cdc VAERS, Dr Ryan Cole, Dr Peter McCullough. Fascinating.

Corky Ringspot
Corky Ringspot
4 years ago

We’re in a “period of uncertainty” just as long as people say so. If they stop saying so, we won’t be. “uncertainty” is the natural default condition of life of earth. We can be certain of that simple fact. People like this dreadful Harries woman are making monsters out of what is natural, and scaring people like my dopey mother, who now believes that something appalling is happening that wasn’t happening before. Fairies exist if you believe in fairies. If you don’t believe in fairies, they’ll cease to exist.

Roger Rogers
Roger Rogers
4 years ago

So this would be the booster to boost the booster, then? Will there be a booster to follow this booster? Apparently.

TheBigman
TheBigman
4 years ago

THIS WAS ALWAYS THE PLAN!

I doubt everyone got the real mRNA first three rounds so to make sure everyone gets at least one round they will force this on us. This also has the benefit of ensuring the threat of vaxx passes remains in public domain.

imp66
imp66
4 years ago

There’s loadsamoney to be made in culling the weak, infirm and elderly! Uncompromising “health” policies at their finest. Criminal.

tbskipper
tbskipper
4 years ago

If I were a variant of Covid then I would try to evolve to be with vaccinated people as their immunity is compromised. And also because there are lots more of them and they are allowed to travel and associate more freely and spread me. Oh, the UKMHA data shows just that, how weird!

Richard Noakes
Richard Noakes
4 years ago

I did these simple calculations and you can check them if you like:
“Vaccine efficacy is generally reported as a relative risk reduction (RRR). It uses the relative risk (RR)—ie, the ratio of attack rates with and without a vaccine—which is expressed as 1–RR. Ranking by reported efficacy gives relative risk reductions of 95% for the Pfizer–BioNTech, 94% for the Moderna–NIH, 91% for the Gamaleya, 67% for the J&J, and 67% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford vaccines.
“However, RRR should be seen against the background risk of being infected and becoming ill with COVID-19, which varies between populations and over time. Although the RRR considers only participants who could benefit from the vaccine, the absolute risk reduction (ARR), which is the difference between attack rates with and without a vaccine, considers the whole population. ARRs tend to be ignored because they give a much less impressive effect size than RRRs: 1·3% for the AstraZeneca–Oxford, 1·2% for the Moderna–NIH, 1·2% for the J&J, 0·93% for the Gamaleya, and 0·84% for the Pfizer–BioNTech vaccines.”
The Lancet Study Doctors for COVID Ethics On The accompanying chart:
Pfizer/BioNtech RRR 95.03%        ARR 0.84% From Jab
Moderna (NIH) RRR 94.08%          ARR 1.24% From Jab
Janssen          RRR 66.62%           ARR 1.19% From Jab
Astrazeneca/ Oxford RRR… Read more »

AHotston
AHotston
4 years ago

Surely people will start to question the safety of repeated doses of a gene therapy only licenced for emergency use? Now that there are negative excess deaths, the emergency must be over?

mojo
mojo
4 years ago

I did hear the pharmaceuticals intended to provide 8 jabs in total as that would complete the ‘death’ programme.

for myself, I cannot understand the levels of fear or indeed malleability that now grips worldwide society into believing that a flu vaccine needs so many boosters in order to ‘keep healthy’.

anyone who still buys into this is indeed confirming to the NWO that they are ready to be dehumanised. May God save those he can but the brainless need to be let go.

Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
4 years ago
Reply to  mojo

The gathering in Westminster Abbey yesterday, where no-one wore a face mask, should tell everyone there is no ‘pandemic’ and there is no need for any ‘vaccination’. The ‘vaccinations’ are a method of controlling populations, that is all. Jenny Harries knows this is going to go on forever, she just plucked 2 years more out of the air as she knows people will go along with this.
If she had said ‘forever’ then people may have thought enough is enough. Little by little – and it works. We still have people in face masks today for a ‘virus’ that allegedly turned up over 2 years ago.

There has been no real resistance, and there won’t be – with everyone under constant surveillance (cameras everywhere, your mobile phone as your tracker, everything you write on the Internet recorded, your text messages read by the Secret Police, etc.)

‘Covid’ has been a clever plan from the start – frighten people, lock them up, make money out of it. A nice little earner, as Arfur Daley would have said. We are prisoners and Jenny Harries is one of the prison guards. It’s a huge Stanford Prison Experiment, psychological abuse aided by physical restraint.

vivaldi
vivaldi
4 years ago
Reply to  mojo

The French vaxx pass….reported by others a while ago….had ‘spaces’ for 8 jabs to be recorded.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.