Contrary to the claims made by Dr. Rachel Clarke and Professor Stephen Powis last month and used to blame the unvaccinated for the mounting troubles of the NHS, new data out this week shows that the majority of Covid ICU admissions in October and November were among the vaccinated, not the unvaccinated.
The latest report from ICNARC shows that of Covid ICU patients in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 50.5% in October and 50.7% in November were double vaccinated. Add to that the 2.8% in October and 1.8% in November who were single-vaccinated and you get overall vaccinated proportions of 53.3% in October and 52.5% in November. That compares to 46.7% unvaccinated in October and 47.5% in November. Note that the unvaccinated here includes people who received a vaccine less than 14 days prior to the positive Covid test, so includes some (an unknown number) who are actually single vaccinated.
This is not what the public has been led to believe by some prominent medics and newspapers.
Two weeks ago, Professor Stephen Powis, the National Medical Director of NHS England, was quoted in the Sunday Times saying: “Data shows that the overwhelming majority of people admitted to intensive care with Covid are not fully vaccinated.” A source was not provided for this claim but the article implied that it meant right now, with an opening paragraph stating: “Hundreds of intensive care beds that could be used for life-saving surgery are instead occupied by unvaccinated Covid patients, one of NHS England’s top officials has said.”
The same day the Sunday Times also printed an article by Dr. Rachel Clarke with the subheading: “Some 75% of those suffocating in intensive care with the coronavirus are unvaccinated.” In it she states: “Of the Covid patients treated in intensive care in recent months, the majority – nearly 75% according to the latest data – have chosen not to be vaccinated.”
The Guardian published a piece in November headlined “ICU is full of the unvaccinated – my patience with them is wearing thin”, written by an anonymous medic who claimed that the ICU patient population “consists of a few vulnerable people with severe underlying health problems and a majority of fit, healthy, younger people unvaccinated by choice”.
Now that the data has been released it’s clear that the claim that ICUs are “full of” the unvaccinated is highly misleading. While the unvaccinated do currently appear to be over-represented (depending how many of them are misclassified), no one now can claim that ICUs are “full of” the unvaccinated or that the unvaccinated constitute the “overwhelming majority” of Covid ICU admissions. If you spot any newspapers still peddling this misinformation, particularly it if is being used to stigmatise and pressure the unvaccinated, you can complain to IPSO here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Yippee, we’ve found another variant, Oh come on give us a B****y break.
Covid warning as ANOTHER new variant discovered in France – scientists sound alarm (msn.com)
Russia is set to invade Ukraine
China is set to invade Taiwan
They have got the green light…
Russia may be about to inject some sense of reality into the arrogance of the Woke West.
And Israel wants to deliver a pre-emptive strike against Iran. Truly, the arms manufacturers are rejoicing this Xmas.
Impossible! France has mask mandates and strict vax passport enforcement!
Yes.. and now all nightclubs are to be closed because of new outbreaks.. funny that, the unjabbed aren’t allowed in nightclubs.. that’s only for those with a vax passport..
No data eminating from official sources can be believed. We do know that major problems occur, not only in respect of non-ICU admitted injuries but also people appearing to go down with ‘covid symptoms’ and even dying, shortly after after getting injected. It was Luc Montagnier who pointed out “the curve of death always follows the curve of ‘vaccination'”. If the first two weeks following injections were taken fully into account the story would be very different. All we know for certain is this….
How many of these supposed ‘covid patients’ in intensive care are actually in hospital for covid and not in hospital for other serious conditions and then happen to test fake positive with the PCR scam? The NHS is awash with liars like Rachel Clarke so how can anything coming from the NHS be believed? For all we know these woke psychos could be treating the injected with ivermectin and putting the uninjected on ventilators to blow out their lungs? And before anyone says thats crazy, these psychos actually murdered patients during the hydroxychloroquine trials just to ensure the trial would fail. If you dont believe me, look it up.
https://www.palmerfoundation.com.au/who-and-uk-trials-use-potentially-lethal-hydroxychloroquine-dose-according-to-who-consultant/
“The NHS is awash with liars like Rachel Clarke”
She’s very keen on going after people who besmudge her flawless reputation.
Buried in a recent BBC article is part of the answer is a telling graph that might well suggest C19 has little to do with this current hospital bed crisis. In fact December ’21 Covid admissions are around 1/5th of what they were at peak in January ’21 – the real problem today appears to be a massive surge in non-Covid admissions.
Counting people in hospital and dying less than 14 days after getting jabbed as COVID cases and not vaccine cases is probably the biggest medical fraud in history.
it is an outrageous whitewash of vaccine injuries.
There are many huge medical frauds, but two of the biggest were the WHO derived changes to death certificate registration that were used to miss-attribute cause of death, drive up the supposed covid death count and create a fake pandemic and the RT PCR test being used to generate the subsequent ‘casedemic’ now being deployed to maintain the hoax.
That definition of “unvaccinated” is totally, utterly, taking the piss.
Firstly, the vaccine was administered. Secondly, why 14 days, not 1, not 7, not 17? Complete hogwash.
Unmitigated scientific fraud. Only medics seem to think they can get away with this type of crap, ie change definitions and criteria to fit how they want the results to pan out. In any other science realm you’d be laughed out of the room.
“why 14 days, not 1, not 7, not 17?”
Because 14 days covers 3 standard deviations of the adverse events, in particular deaths, caused by the vaccine.
So in fact provides evidence that “side effects” are actually murder, and worse than that, pre-meditated murder.
Because the disease is not serious for all bar the extremely frail anyway, there is no balance of risk and benefit, people are being actively harmed for profit.
The jabs suppress your immune system for at least 2 weeks afterward.
Nope, it’s simply an outcome of the BILLIONS that this government has surreptitiously channelled into psy-ops against its own people – and a great way to bury vaxx deaths (the MHRA are right on board with this deception as well).
I don’t doubt the medical professionals are being played too, but this in no excuse as they are in a far better position to both access the real info and speak out. Some have, after all it is their sworn ethical duty, but not nearly enough (yet?) to seriously challenge government policy.
Two weeks ago a local person I know of had the flu and booster jab on the same day. He immediately collapsed and has been in intensive care ever since. ‘It’s not looking good’
He is 64 years of age and previously physically fit with no co morbidities
Presumably he will be recorded as unvaccinated
I managed to persuade my 2x jabbed elderly parents that both of them getting both the flu and booster jab on the same day would not be a good idea.
Pulling teeth would have been a less painful experience than the mother of all arguments I had to have with them to finally get them to understand I had their wellbeing and best interests at heart.
mother currently VERY ill with some kind of bug. Would imagine if she recovers she will be desperate to have her flu and booster jab on the same day because that is more convenient for the GP surgery.
More people have been vaccinated than haven’t. More patients have been vaccinated than haven’t. Maybe vaccination isn’t making a huge difference to hospital admissions…
Yes it is but you would have to look in the cardiac, stroke and pulmonary wards.
Spoke with my boss yesterday, community stroke team, they are seeing a spike in CVAs again more so than one would usually expect at this time of year & more than this time last year.
She is not a fan of the jabs.
Tony admits the PCR test is a fraud
Smoking gun: Lord Fauci states COVID PCR test has fatal flaw; confession from the “beloved” expert of experts « Jon Rappoport’s Blog (nomorefakenews.com)
The Moronic+ nonsense reminds me of the fall of Singapore to the Japs.
Singapore had massive defences. Huge, great, blasting,, powerful guns that could shatter a fleet. All pointing seawards.
The Japs came down through Malaya.
Natural immunity was always going to be far more robust, longer lasting and superior to jabbing yourself every couple of months – as Robert Malone said ‘ You are not going to vaccinate your way out of this pandemic‘ – Malone also stated that the reason for all these variants is because what we are seeing right now is an arms race between the vaccines and the viruses – the more we keep jabbing the more variants we are getting – its the viruses way of side-stepping the vaccines – because this is what viruses do and always have done … viruses do the same thing with unvaccinated but thats what they have always done – mutate – its basic evolution – but when you keep vaccinating everyone every month or so then the viruses just keep on mutating and this process is never ending.
You are not going to vaccinate yourself out of any pandemic. Prior to this casedemic, vaccination during any major outbreak of disease was considered to be a flawed, counterproductive strategy.
Actually, what is going to happen is that eventually everyone will get a high level of immunity from natural infection – jabbed and unjabbed equally.
But the politicians, the pharmas and the medical establishment will claim the jabs did it. They’ll claim the victory, discredit natural immunity and set the stage for the next time.
My concern is that there will not be a high level of immunity jabbed or unjabbed equally. My concern is that the jabs will be damaging the immune system of the jabbed.
I saw a video from one doctor who said that what he’s seeing from his lab results is that the killer T-cell counts in the jabbed are dropping after vaccination. Killer T-cells are very important not just in the prevention of infectious disease but also in preventing cancer and other problems caused by errors in cell replication. He said they didn’t know if this was something that drops briefly before it comes back up or what. But nobody’s really studying it.
So my concern is not only that the jabbed will never be immune (which is ideal for Big Pharma because it means you’ll have to keep taking their product forever and ever and ever) but that this could also, long term, lead to more serious consequences like a big increase in cancer deaths
I spoke on Tuesday evening with a number of medics from various countries, all of whom are reporting acutely ill patients with AIDS like symptoms. One patient’s white cell count was 0! After two full blood transfusions it had increased to 7…..
His immune system is absolutely buggered.
All of these patients are either double or triple jabbed.
I don’t believe that this is not being studied. In fact, I’d wager that pfisser has studies on this tucked away in a safe inside a safe inside another safer. My guess is those studies will be among the last 500 pages the FDA releases in 70 years or so.
They have said all along that the immune system is suppressed for 2 weeks after vaxxing, I’m with you, I’d like to know how long suppression lasts – and whether continued poking might make temporary suppression permanent. The fact that just asking what are quite reasonable questions like this is immediately set aside as ‘flat-earther, anti-vaxxer nonsense’ is shameless in the extreme.
Correct. These aren’t sterilising vaccines, they’re prophylactics. They encourage the virus to mutate to evade them.
No doubt that was the reason the WHO beginning of 2020 advised that the best remedy was to allow populations to gain herd immunity. If we had stuck with this strategy, the population would have acquired long-lasting natural immunity and the crisis would have been over. Variants, however generated, would have had little impact. The population would not, as now, been continually, like the Red Queen in Alice in Wonderland, running just to keep still, with the vaccines continually losing potency.
Is anyone surprised? Who is Dr Rachel Clarke? She needs to explain herself.
Where does the 90% unvaccinated figure come from?
Of course according to the media they are all fit and under 40 and they all beg for the holy vaccine but by then it’s too late.
I reckon it might come from the previous ICNARC report from July.
What these figures don’t cover are the numbers in ICU as a result of vaccine induced illness or complications. Apart from the immediate deaths, they are probably not even counted, but really ought to be added to the numbers of vaccinated in ICU.
With around a million yellow card reports the horror with which those who had the first vaccines and fear being killed off by being forced into having boosters is another angle in the hell we are living through. This appears not to have been even acknowledged by government.
The amazing vaccine roll out looks like a waste of time now and giving the pharma companies a non liablity clause looks positively bungling
It does rather suggest that the manufacturers had some idea that their product was going to cause a lot of damage.
They have known all along about the risk of ADE, it was listed in the list of possible side effects pfisser gave the FDA in October 2020. There are academic papers prior to December 2020 discussing how finding a vaxx for a coronavirus is a challenge precisely because of ADE, it was a problem they encountered when trying to create a vax for SARS 1 and MERS.
The desperate push to get that ‘booster’ into people suggests to me they are well aware that ADE or something similar is occurring and the only way they can think of preventing it is the booster – and eliminating the control group, which makes it too obvious something is wrong with the vaxx.
They certainly come across as desperate.
Chris Witty showed a slide in last weeks presser with Boris purporting to demonstrate that ICUs were filled with the unvaccinated. What is the story with that slide? I did notice that the scale on the left hand side was per 100,000, which suggested that they were using the trick of underestimating the true total population to determine the total number of unvaccinated. But still, those numbers seemed to look very different to the other graphs I’m seeing here and elsewhere. Can anyone comment on this?
Because they claim 80% of adults jabbed, they can say the unvaxxed take up a disproportionate number of of ICU beds. However, this is just shifting the goalposts. For if 50% of the beds are double vaccinated, 100% uptake won’t make much of a difference to volume going through the hospitals. So they are mandating this and soon to be throwing people out of jobs, all to save a few more % points.
If 100 people are in ICU, 55% vaccinated. When 80% of the overall population is vaccinated, you can work out how many beds can be saved. It looks like the jabs work to reduce ICU by about 25%.
So in this scenario, 100% jabbed would lead to around 11 or 12 less ICU.
So 100 would become 89 and what? Nothing changes. The whole costly policy to force everyone onto mrna vaccines hasn’t made a dent in volume
This is also not taking into account the fact there are jabbed people in the unvaccinated numbers as it stands, due to their definitions
So that 11 becomes even less of a saving.
Or just treat them with HCQ or ivermectin, there’s always that.
I’d also add this analysis.
https://orwell2024.substack.com/p/relation-between-the-percentage-of
Please spare a thought for those less fortunate than yourself this Christmas
I know of one family where the husband is about to lose his job. It’s made worse by the fact they have a new born baby and may lose their home
They are likely to be booted out without notice as the next occupants are keen to be in before Christmas
Not realising that they did not own the flat they lived in they have spent a fortune decorating it
Over the Christmas period they may end up spending their time trying to contact Social Services etc in an attempt to obtain emergency housing
As I say, spare a thought for those less fortunate than you this Christmas
On a lighter note. If Tiny Tim didn’t die then by my calculations he will be 191 years old on Sunday December 19th
Happy birthday Tim
sorry, ‘not realising they did not own the flat they lived in’ ?
Yeah I know, They are not that bright (He went to Eton)
Could happen to anyone. I lose track of the properties I own all the time. There’s the villa in France, the island in the Carribean, the bolthole in Bermuda, the London townhouse, the country pile of course. Gosh, I’m forgetting something I’m sure so maybe there’s another one or two. So I can understand your friend’s dilemma. Maybe he can stay in one of his other places though?
Took me a second
oh shit, i see what happened there, took me 30 minutes. more coffee, stat.
https://youtu.be/pyCp8GbM9o8
Why did they allow him to leave with that box of photos?
Well exactly. What could possibly have been in those boxes that he was entitled to cart out? Unless Dom’s been working for Boris all along and this is just theatre.
Conclusions:
1 The gunk works a little bit temporarily.
2. That is (more than) offset by its negative side effects, costing far more QALYS than it saves AND straining hospitals and ICUs far more otherwise than the unvaxxed strain it with Covid.
3. They (incl. doctors) are lying deliberately about all of this and are getting more and more aggressive, desperate and absurd instead of telling the truth and changing course.
Why? Certainly because of the sunk cost fallacy, more and more likely because the truth is even more shocking than even we think.
Yes, in a nutshell.
What pisses me off is that they could easily take the focus off trying to push this garbage into the unvaxxed. They could say we’re a lost cause anyways and they want to focus on getting the life-saving booster into the more deserving vaxxed who did what was right. They could save face and not subject even more people to their monumental mistake, but no, let’s go whole hog and damage the health of millions more people. Scum.
According to the UKHSA figures around 1 in 5 of the deaths within 28 days of a positive test in England and have been in the unvaccinated during November
And according to UKHSA around one third of the emergency care positive test admissions into hospital have been in the unvaccinated over the October/November period.
So it seems implausible that as much as 47% of the covid labelled ICU is made up of the unvaccinated in November. You’d expect it to be less than one third.
Perhaps the ICNARC figures are completely wrong. The real percentage of unvaccinated in ICU is much lower?
Can anybody explain how the UKHSA and ICNARC figures can be consistent?
Medical bias, possibly? Either in the testing process, or in the treatment offered.
ICNARC have been said to have dodgy numbers anyway. They are simply requesting the numbers from hospitals. I don’t believe they have direct access to the data. However it is the best we have publically
Thanks. Yes I agree
https://twitter.com/Dr_ScottMc/status/1469415527084867596
I wouldn’t trust the ICNARC audits – they ARE NOT AUDITS. They request data and having been on the inside I know most of the Trusts are not providing it. Where ICNARC think they are getting these numbers from is anyone’s guess… perhaps it’s madeyupium
What we do know is the ICU bed data hasn’t even been properly updated by the more direct channels since March/April this year. It’s all being hush hush. So ICNARC cannot possibly have the inside scoop on it
It’s a shame Will Jones did not pick up on this. Since most of the population is vaccinated, his reporting that only 53% of ICU patients are vaccinated gives more succour to the pro-vaccination lobby than is warranted.
The 2 week post jab defined as “unvaccinated “ is the key casino house advantage that these feckers use to rig the game.
I keep banging on about this but FFS where are the stats re the recovered/unjabbed?
How many of those are occupying ICU beds and risking the health of our Heroes in the NHS?
How many of those, must be tens of millions by now, actually get sick again?
One thing I do know for sure for sure though is that none of this group have died twice from it yet. (Probably occurred to them though – just think, double count the dead unjabbed).
The vast majority of kids have had it – Whitty said 50%plus about a couple of months ago), ditto the same re care workers and practically all NHS employees at the sharp end are exposed every day.
Proper herd immunity, the sterilising immunity from natural infection or the non sterilising immunity conferred, temporarily by the jabs?
It’s the jabbed that are prolonging this (GV. Bossche ).
But then again maybe that’s all part of the Plan.
Love your ‘died twice’ comment ! I can just imagine the reaction if I told my particularly gullible friends that I know someone who’s died twice from Omicron…..
I’ve been harping on about this for many months now, but why aren’t ICNARC including vaccination status in their patient characteristics? We know they have that data, but they insist on presenting it in the most basic, meaningless way. They tell us nothing about demographics, symptom severity, treatment received, length of stay, outcome etc etc. Take pregnancy status, for example – wouldn’t it help to clear up the debate around whether or not vaccinated pregnant women have better outcomes than the unvaccinated? I can only come to the conclusion that they aren’t giving us these finer details because they don’t show what they want them to. It hardly matters if people are more likely to end up in ICU if unvaccinated, if they are more likely to die if vaccinated, for example.
1) There’s no interest in knowing the truth OR
2) They know the truth but it doesn’t fit the narrative
Either way, it’s evil
Rachel Clarke really is a piece of work. Not content with just outright lying, she stresses that people aren’t just “in intensive care.” Oh no, they’re “suffocating in intensive care.”
It is very odd if you compare ICU admissions vs deaths.
For the unvaccinated during November there were a total of 1703 covid admissions and 695 deaths (or 41%). Now, you can’t simply say that 41% of those admitted died, because some people died without getting a chance to enter ICU, but that’s the percentage of deaths to ICU total admissions.
For the double vaccinated during November there were 1815 covid admissions and 2750 deaths — that’s 1.51%. Ie, There were half as many deaths again in the vaccinated as there were ICU admissions.
These data are rather difficult to square. How come ICU admissions are so high in the unvaccinated, compared with the number of death outcomes? Frankly, I find it impossible to believe that the NHS is simply ‘looking after’ the unvaccinated much much better than the double vaccinated. Perhaps the vaccinated are dying with covid much more rapidly than the unvaccinated, resulting in less time available for admission to ICU?
This has been noted in previous releases. There’s something really weird going on with ICU data that just isn’t explained.
Any journalist interested in the truth about covid should be reading comments like this.
I read somewhere can’t remember where and obviously don’t know if it is true but according to the poster if you have only had two injections but not the booster you are now counted as unvaccinated for data listing
I think the 1.51% here may have been a typo?
Maybe someone needs to inform Chris Witless & Martin
KempKunt.Seems something similar is happening in the USA.
Vaccine Efficacy | Real Climate Science
“Vermont is the most vaccinated state and has ten times as many COVID-19 cases as Wyoming – the least vaccinated state. Both states have about the same population.”
Yeah, but…
Safe and effective
Right?
I recently had an interesting discussion with a friend who works as an ICU nurse at a major Scottish hospital. I’ll be no more specific than that.
They work in the original ICU, while a separate ICU has been set up for Covid patients, very sensibly. Less sensibly, the new Covid ICU doesn’t have a proper supply chain, so nurses shuttle back to the main unit to grab items. No cross-infection risk there, then.
The accounts my friend hears from their colleagues in the covid ICU state that most of the patients there are indeed young and unvaccinated. However, they are very much not fit or healthy being overwhelmingly obese or diabetic. Both units are under massive pressure due to staffing issues, with bank or redeployed nurses making up numbers heaping pressures on trained staff. Many trained staff “f**k off to join NHS24” in search of an easier life.
I wonder if the mismatch between the competing claims may come down to the “nature of truth”, and specifically how critical cases are defined. Triaging is liable to lead to younger patients being directed to ICU, whilst older patients are given palliative care in a general unit. Given the age stratification of vaccine uptake, that could lead to a situation where most ICU inmates are indeed young and unvaccinated, whilst most critical patients overall are still old and vaccinated.
Similarly, the phrase “fit and healthy” has no accepted definition. A 20 year old with chronic diabetes and a BMI of 40 can’t truthfully be called fit and healthy when compared to most other 20 year olds, but could be described in that way if your reference point is 80 year olds with acute and terminal underlying conditions. Words mean exactly what we want them to mean, and just because you should never tell a lie doesn’t mean you have to tell the truth. You just choose the definition that suits, and don’t draw attention to it.
This is conjecture on my part. But in an unsympathetic world where the sceptical case is deemed false until proven true, while the mainstream can have any wild claim accepted by default we sceptics need to make our own claims very carefully.
I have been writing to my (Tory) MP about her position on vaccine passports. Her replies reveal how woefully ill-informed she (and probably most of her colleagues) are about the pandemic. In one email she said the Health Secretary had informed her this week that 90% of Covid hospitalisations were of the unvaccinated! I could weep at the mendacity/stupidity of these people.
Whilst there is no current data for England (why not?), both Northern Ireland and Scotland have published recent data on Covid hospitalisations by vaccination status:-
https://www.health-ni.gov.uk/sites/default/files/publications/health/doh-vaccination-status-weeks-43-46.pdf
https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/10758/21-12-08-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
They cover weeks in October and November, and show 72% (NI) and 71% (Scotland) of hospitalisations were vaccinated; 26% and 29% were unvaccinated; the rest were ‘not known’.
For deaths, the numbers were 81% and 85% vaccinated; 17% and 15% were unvaccinated.
Why aren’t the public told this? Why is the Health Secretary either misinformed or actually lying?
Brilliant post – thank you for the very helpful info. It will be of great use to me when I aim to make my case for non-mandatory jabbing if this is the outcome!!!
Will, there is plenty to shout about with regard to Covid-19 stats and vaccination stats. There are many deep, deep issues that need to be address. IMO Prof Norman Fenton hits the nail on the head and most succinctly. However these articles you keep writing on vaccination numbers make me cringe every time I read them.
I was a massive supporter of the Daily Sceptic, but the figures you are presenting show rank ignorance of statistics and fail to show due care to ensure fair representation. It seems to me you got off on the wrong foot with these stats, you were actually quite properly criticised for that, and since you have doubled down on your own deceptive narrative. You are running foul of Simpson’s paradox and zeroing in on completely the wrong figures. There is no value in comparing overall percentage vaccinated of “with Covid” hospital deaths when both groups are vastly different age groups and vulnerabilities. On our side of the debate we have to do better than the other side. Yes you can make a shallow propaganda point like the government have been doing. I see many are taken in by it because tribalism seems to trump rationality.
These articles repeatedly give ammunition to those on the other side who are intelligent, open to be persuaded but who will immediately write off our counter arguments because of the deep unfairness in the way you are making the comparisons. Yes you are presenting the data truthfully, but the message accompanying it is running as close to misleading as you can get. It’s propaganda just like the government churn out.
Please focus on the real issues and don’t try and create your own propaganda. It really makes me feel quite angry that the other side are being given such material to kick us with.
Did you even read the article? Note the 3 media sources that were basically LYING, or at best were talking about the situation from July.
Of course, a 50/50 split doesn’t mean the jabs are useless (at least in reference to keeping people out of IC), since if they were useless it would be more like a 90/10 split. But the article was addressing the media spin, not the effectiveness of the jabs.
For me there wasn’t enough substance in your post to be able to extract what you’re actually suggesting. Which is a shame as some of your criticisms seem to be on point. Can you give us an example of this done “the right way” please?
I’m trying to understand this
Figure 27 shows the % admissions of unvaccinated, one dose and two doses of vaccine
Clearly, the unvaccinated % is falling and the double vaccinated is climbing. Could this be because more people have been vaccinated as stated in the document?
Figure 26 seems to show the overall numbers of people being admitted to hospital for COVID is fairly steady for the vaccinated and falling for the unvaccinated
PFIZER… is this is what they wanted hidden for 55 years..
Go to page 30 of this 38 page PDF.. read the last 8 pages..
APPENDIX 1. LIST OF ADVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf
Hospitals in USA and in first world countries are refusing life-saving Ivermectin treatment even with court orders. Big Pharma doing everything they can to jab us no matter what, while alternative COVID cures EXIST! There happens to be heavy censorship who are looking for these treatments. The Research Is Clear: Ivermectin Is a Safe, Effective Treatment for COVID. Get your Ivermectin today while you still can! https://ivmpharmacy.com
Clarke and Powis appear to be heirs of Mengele and the Nazi party.