• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Legal Action Launched Against Ban on Trips for Older Care Home Residents

by Michael Curzon
2 April 2021 5:07 PM

A legal letter sent to the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) says that the blanket ban on older care home residents going on trips to see family or friends violates human rights legislation. Campaigners say that residents are being treated like “a different species”. The Telegraph has the story.

A ban on care home residents taking trips is facing a legal challenge amid claims they are being treated like “a different species” and denied “simple freedoms”.

Government guidance, updated on March 9th, says trips to see family or friends “should only be considered” for under-65s while national Covid restrictions apply.

Visits out for residents, whatever their age, “should be supported in exceptional circumstances such as a visit to a friend or relative at the end of their life”, it adds – but on returning to the home, the resident must self-isolate for two weeks.

The Government said its current guidance provides a “range of opportunities” for visitors to spend time with loved ones, however, John’s Campaign, which represents those lobbying for extended visiting rights of family carers in hospitals and care homes, argue that the ban is unlawful.

Julia Jones, co-founder of the John’s Campaign, has said that care home residents have been “comprehensively ignored” over the past year of lockdowns.

The 440,000 people living in care homes include some who moved in through their own volition, with full mental capacity, never guessing that this simple freedom, enjoyed by everyone else in the population, apart from prisoners, could so easily be denied them.

Those who cannot make their own choices have relatives and friends who would normally be glad to take responsibility but have been excluded choices.

Her campaign group has sent a legal letter to the DHSC urging it to change its guidelines.

John’s Campaign has now sent a legal letter to the DHSC saying the decision whether someone can go on a visit outside a care home should be based on individual risk assessments, and that to deny this contravenes equality and human rights legislation.

“The Department of Health, and particularly Public Health England, looks at care home residents as if they are a different species,” Ms Jones added. “These are people living in care homes and they have the range of morbidities, of problems, of disabilities and of capabilities.”

“The first point they did this was July last year, they said they are looking into guidance for visits out of care homes. And they have been looking into it ever since,” she added.

“People living in care homes are people very often living towards the end of their lives, or they are people living with a learning disability, for whom their wellbeing is dependent on their routines.

“These people have been comprehensively ignored.

“We understand this guidance was prepared very hastily, we sent a message back at the time, they have had almost a month to make it better, they haven’t done so. We’re just not going to wait – this is unlawful and wrong.”

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Care homesLegal Challenges

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

30 Blood Clot Cases Reported in UK After 18 Million AstraZeneca Jabs

Next Post

What Would a Focused Protection Strategy Have Looked Like?

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

Everything about the WHO is suspect.

72
0
civilliberties
civilliberties
3 years ago

it always makes me shake my head when you hear people and the media say “india has had more deaths than the UK and scare people with supposed high figures” well yes, but india has different factors, i.e. the population of at least 1.4 billion, india’s hygiene and sanitary conditions are considered worse than a lot of Weston countries and also the general health conditions and diseases are also poorer. When the Who and the media spout big figures and ignore the many other factors it really is disingenuous.

26
0
ACEexpat
ACEexpat
3 years ago
Reply to  civilliberties

Interestingly, you would think Covid would have had a bigger impact on California’s large homeless population.

4
0
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
Dave Angel Eco Warrior
3 years ago

Two articles on the WHO figures today. On one hand we are to take the data about Sweden seriously but not the data about India. Personally, I’m taking it all with a large pinch of salt.

22
-1
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Angel Eco Warrior

Indeed, we seem to be picking cherries and sour grapes somewhat arbitrarily.

11
-3
StoppingtoThink
StoppingtoThink
3 years ago
Reply to  Dave Angel Eco Warrior

Except that the data for Sweden is far more likely to be accurate than the guesstimates for India

25
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  StoppingtoThink

The Indian’s secret was vindaloo.
Vindaloo takes no prisoners.

12
-1
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago
Reply to  StoppingtoThink

More objectively likely, or more helpful to our preferred narrative?

1
-4
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

The deaths in India need to be adjusted in order to fit in with The Science (the computer models).
They are having similar problems with the recorded global temperatures, turns out the weather is a climate change denier, they will cancel the weather’s Twitter account asap.

35
0
StoppingtoThink
StoppingtoThink
3 years ago

The WHO seems like a bigger version of the EU – out of touch, irrelevant, and a law unto itself.

47
-2
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  StoppingtoThink

The WHO is significantly worse. It’s an unelected gremium of so-called public health experts with the ambition to dicate government policy globally down to the level of who is when allowed to talk to whom and how people must dress in public. This is based on the notion that globally acting health bureaucrats get to decide which human acitivies are essential and which aren’t and can thus be harmlessly prohibited. Considering that people’s lives are usually tighty coupled to there jobs, this basically means grouping people into essential and inessential ones. The essential ones are allowed to work. The others are supposed to remain at home on often meagre government handouts financed by printing money or accumulating debts.

And it gets more evil than that: The WHO would also like to see universal, mandatory COVID vaccination. Even in the best case (which is far from the actual case), a vaccine will always kill some people. Hence, forcing people to get vaccinated is equivalent to decreeing that some of them are so inessential that it’s ok to put them to death by injection.

23
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

Lead by a terrorist…
What could possibly go wrong?

17
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago

Still the most fundamental aspect of this is that no new pathogenic virus was properly isolated from any sick individuals in China, there was no proof of a new virus that caused a new disease.
When you look into the topic it turns out that virology is a complete joke of a science.
What they call isolation really is a fraud, they don’t isolate anything, they simply mix a sputum sample from a sick patient, mix it with monkey kidney cells as a cell culture host and then starve those cells and poison them with nephrotoxic antibiotics, when the kidney cells die they cliam that it but be virus wot done it.
From there they let a computer analyse all the gentic debris from the toxic soup and get the computer to piece together every possible combination that these bits could convievably make up, they then declare one of these made up sequences to be the new virus.
This is why they have an endless number of variants, the computers can generate endless different possible combinations and the virologists can keep claiming which ever ones they like as being significant.
The whole thing is a colossal fraud as are the vaccines that are claimed to combat these claimed viral infections.

29
-2
VeryLittleHelps
VeryLittleHelps
3 years ago
Reply to  MrTea

Don’t fall for the “viruses don’t exist” scam either. There is pathogenic contagion that we call viruses, they just understand very little about them. The part they really don’t like to talk about is “terrain”, the health of the individual plays a much bigger part in how successful a virus is than any vaccine.
When humans play god disaster often follows.

Last edited 3 years ago by VeryLittleHelps
3
-1
peyrole
peyrole
3 years ago

Matthew Syed has written an absolutely appalling article in the Sunday Times using the WHO estimates to ‘prove’ how reasonable the UK government’s actions were/are. He also has a swipe at this website and all who ‘sail in her’ ( calling it by its old name).
I commented, needless to say my comment has been removed. The Times doesn’t like the truth. Goodness knows what the interweb will be like with the ‘on-line harms’ legislation.

49
0
civilliberties
civilliberties
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

the online harms bill ensures access to100% state viewpoints at all times, no exceptions.

15
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  civilliberties

VPN.

7
0
Julian
Julian
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

I didn’t realise we had been namechecked. I always assumed we were too small for anyone to notice. Evidently not. Excellent – a swipe shows we’ve hit a nerve and got people worried.

14
0
D J
D J
3 years ago
Reply to  Julian

Yes, Syed accuses us of cherrypicking data!
Gave me a good chortle after what we have seen with government statistics.

11
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Mark Woolhouse, a senior government scientist wrote a book about the Covid debacle; appropriately titled “The Year the World went Mad”. He concludes that the lockdowns were not necessary.

9
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago

They’re just finishing the job.

They exaggerated the risk people were facing from a new pathogen and they are now exaggerating the total deaths. They are writing history, in preparation for the future and leaving no lose ends:

– The virus was super dangerous
– Lockdowns, masks, tests and vaccines saved us.
– Millions still died because we were slow to act.
– In the future we must act very quickly.so that we don’t have 15 million deaths.

That’s the story they are going with and they have the force of international institutions, the corporate media, national governments and major corporations to make sure their version is firmly established.

47
0
MrTea
MrTea
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Even with their bloated estimates of death the claimed virus was still a damp squib, but they have injected billions of people with their poisons so their work is done.

15
0
Alter Ego
Alter Ego
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

They have left an enormous number of loose ends, and they will unravel. We just have to keep pulling on them.

19
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

One of the best articles I’ve seen linked to by DS is this one which concerns itself with the Italians kick-starting the covid scam in the West.

If you read it, pay close attention to the section that talks about how the main mechanism of the fraud, the test kit, was developed in Italy in cooperation with the communist Chinese.

It wasn’t long ago MI5 admitted the communist Chinese has infiltrated Westminster.

8
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

“In the words of Neil Ferguson, architect of the wildly-inaccurate Covid models that sent the world into a tailspin:

It’s a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… And then Italy did it. And we realised we could…”

A single sentence said it all – I will never forget it.

The fact that Ferguson felt so secure in uttering it says it all really – that his position, and that of those he advised was unchallengeable, and that he can have had so little cop on to let the cat out of the bag like that in a televised interview – so what does that say about the quality of his modeling?

Great article BTW. You are right – one of the best DS has linked to

Last edited 3 years ago by Milo
3
0
Catee
Catee
3 years ago

‘The public sector scores high on petty corruption but low on efficiency. The public health service is risible’…
Are they talking about India or the UK?

Last edited 3 years ago by Catee
17
0
Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
3 years ago
Reply to  Catee

And where was the header picture taken – West Bromwich or Bethnal Green?

4
-1
JXB
JXB
3 years ago

Countries with reliable reporting systems, if not with reliable reporting, are showing mostly little above average, or even below.

Nobody in authority tells the truth.

Last edited 3 years ago by JXB
13
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago

What is also highly suspicious is that the evil cretinous scientists are claiming the spike in hepatitis in children may be linked to pet dogs.

Let’s ignore the fact the world has been forced to lockdown over the last two years while politicians (and undoubtedly the scientists themselves) partied and carried on with their lives as normal.

No they need a scapegoat and they want to destroy another joy we have in our lives.

23
0
RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

I’ve meanwhile read a couple of arguments that keeping of pets should be prohibited because it would be to damaging the the climate.

13
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  RW

Yes it’s quite clear the great reset includes stripping us of pets. Well they can fuck off with their fraud. I will be buying a pup within the next few months.

16
0
CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Can’t heklp but suspect they are taking the lead from China, where pets have been killed byt “the authorities” when forcing their owners into quarantine.Presumably they saw that it was yet another effective way to demoralise people.

12
0
J4mes
J4mes
3 years ago
Reply to  CynicalRealist

I’m sure you might remember in the early days of the covid scam, the dodgy scientists were talking about pets being carriers of covid. Such warnings fizzled away from the scientists poisonous lips, but the memory remained.

Maybe they realised this was one step too far too soon and didn’t pursue it.

Maybe it was the first nudge, while the hepatitis theory is the second nudge, and perhaps the third nudge will be the final one where they’ve effectively granted themselves permission to confiscate our pets ‘for our own safety’.

They will have deemed the public suitably brainwashed by this point to be more willing to give up their beloved dog.

11
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Do you think the famous dog owners among TPTB will be “giving up” their dogs? or having them forcibly taken from them?

0
0
DanClarke
DanClarke
3 years ago

The WHO has made healthcare in the 1st world countries worse, they should stick to countries who actually need them

6
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  DanClarke

What we had here may have made developed country healthcare worse than typical care in India or Africa.

5
0
J Vossos
J Vossos
3 years ago

Anyone involved in the flogging of the fake vaccines is lying. Don’t believe a word they say and do not get any more jabs. You put your health and life at risk with this poison.

Anything these monsters want is for certain not anything you want.

19
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago
Reply to  J Vossos

Indeed; all in accordance with the UN policy of population reduction.

2
0
thinkcriticall
thinkcriticall
3 years ago

Recent BBC Article on Excess Death – Explained from the DATA!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2oq8-mOldEg

2
0
Adrian25
Adrian25
3 years ago

Remember, whatever nonsense they try to impose upon us in the future:
JUST SAY NO!

12
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago

Highly suspect organisation produces highly suspect data. Well, that’s a surprise – NOT

6
0
TheEngineer
TheEngineer
3 years ago

The WHO is clearly one of our enemy within. Anything that they publish is to be treated with suspicion and extreme scepticism. A truly evil organisation; same as the UN and WEF.

6
0
swedenborg
swedenborg
3 years ago

Thank you for an excellent article.The WHO figures is based on a model which is absurd for countries with reliable real world data.Look at the Nordic countries with reliable data and Sweden with the world’s oldest and also the world’s most reliable death data.How many non discovered deaths of covid in a country with the most reliable death statistics did WHO find with their model? So many that they said Sweden was highest in the Nordic countries.

Nordic countries don’t need WHO estimates.They have real data.See below age stand. adjusted excess mortality.Sweden below Denmark,Finland(both LD the latter more so)and Norway lowest.
Do you believe Nordic raw data or WHO model?

agestansd.jpg
8
0
vivaldi
vivaldi
3 years ago

‘He who pays the piper plays the tune’….Gates has his song sheet and the “terrible” pandemic narrative must be kept uppermost in minds.

2
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

India used Ivermectin to treat Covid patients so it’s very important to the WHO that India is identified as having one of the worst outcomes from the Scamdemic.

7
0
chas cowie
chas cowie
3 years ago

The WHO has to punish India for using Ivermectin and undermining the “WHO Official” view that Ivermectin doesn’t work.

5
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  chas cowie

I am sure someone will correct me if I am wrong but didn’t Japan also se ivermectin?

1
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago

But they still believe China on 5,000 deaths???

Doesn’t make sense.

But having said that none of the ‘rona crap makes any sense.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

8 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

UK “Shafted” by US Trade Deal

8 May 2025

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

8 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

26

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

25

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

28

UK “Shafted” by US Trade Deal

12

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

10

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences