Later this month the World Health Assembly, the governing body of the World Health Organisation, will meet in Geneva, Switzerland, and among its business are amendments put forward by the U.S. Government to the pandemic treaty, the International Health Regulations 2005.
The process of creating a new pandemic treaty or amending the existing one was announced in December (though the origins go back earlier) and was a response to a call from governments, including the U.K, for a strengthened global pandemic strategy coordinated by the WHO.
In a consensus decision aimed at protecting the world from future infectious diseases crises, the World Health Assembly today agreed to kickstart a global process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organisation to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General, said the decision by the World Health Assembly was historic in nature, vital in its mission, and represented a once-in-a-generation opportunity to strengthen the global health architecture to protect and promote the well-being of all people.
Many are concerned, however, that the U.S. amendments will transfer significant sovereignty over public health policy to an unelected and unaccountable global organisation.
Michele Bachmann, Dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University and a former U.S. Congressman, has sounded the alarm about what she sees as a dangerous power grab by an unaccountable organisation with a poor track record in thrall to communist China.
In less than two weeks’ time a vote will take place in Geneva Switzerland at the World Health Assembly. They’re important because they’re the governing body of the World Health Organisation, WHO. This authority that they would be given would impact 99.4% of all the people in the world. There are 193 nations belonging to the UN.
The Biden administration is bringing amendments that would propose that all nations of the Earth cede their sovereignty over national healthcare decisions to the WHO, the World Health Organisation. So what this would mean is that the WHO would have decision-making authority to intervene into United States Government policy and any nation of the world without our permission.
So for instance, the lockdown, where you see 26 million today locked down in Shanghai, China, they can’t leave their apartments or homes, the WHO would have the authority to be able to impose that here in the United States for whatever pretext they want, they don’t have to show data, they could do this. What this does, bottom line, is it creates a platform for global governance through the WHO. This is what people need to know, it’s time sensitive. No one knew about this. The Biden administration gave these proposed amendments to the World Health Organisation on January 18th, no one in America knew this until April 12th, less than a month ago.
But in less than in two weeks, in Geneva Switzerland, the delegates will vote on this. The Biden administration has already released a list of countries, 40 of the most powerful countries in the world, including Canada, including the EU, including the U.K., including Australia, these countries are going along with the Biden administration’s insane push to give sovereignty over [to] the untrustworthy WHO. Again, this creates a platform for global governance.
Bachmann demands the Republican leadership drop everything and focus on forcing the Biden administration to drop the amendments.
This is the biggest global power grab that we have ever seen in our lifetimes and if this goes through nothing else matters… This is the greatest attack we’ve ever had on United States sovereignty… We cannot allow Joe Biden to give away American sovereignty, and really all 193 nations of the world’s sovereignty, to the hapless World Health Organisation, which is essentially a subsidiary of the Communist Chinese Party Government.
Barrister Francis Hoar told TalkTV‘s Julia Hartley-Brewer on Tuesday that he was also very worried. The broadcaster tweeted: “Boris Johnson is set to join a new WHO Pandemic Treaty replacing the laws of 194 countries to tackle the next pandemic. Barrister Francis Hoar says it will give power over the UK to ‘unelected’ WHO officials influenced by China.”
Some argue that, while the amended treaty does transfer sovereignty to the WHO, in the U.S. at least the effort will fail because it is not in line with the Constitution. Ryan Heath writes:
As a constitutional attorney, I am unconcerned about the proposed changes because the Biden administration lacks the authority to abdicate U.S. sovereignty in such a way.
As an initial matter, the Biden administration (the executive branch) lacks the authority to adopt any treaty on behalf of the United States. President Biden has only the authority to enter into Executive Agreements with foreign nations. For an Executive Agreement or other international agreement to become a Treaty (to have the force and effect of a Federal Statute), it must be ratified by two-thirds of the Senate. See United States Constitution Article II § 2. Support for abdicating U.S. sovereignty to declare a state of emergency to an international body simply doesn’t exist in the Senate.
Even if the Senate approved this measure as a Treaty, the Tenth Amendment expressly grants the police powers (the power to govern health and safety of citizens) to the states.
Others are less sanguine, however. Dr. Peter Breggin and Ginger Ross Breggin write:
These amendments will empower WHO’s Director-General to declare health emergencies or crises in any nation and to do so unilaterally and against the opposition of the target nation. The Director-General will be able to declare these health crises based merely on his personal opinion or consideration that there is a potential or possible threat to other nations.
If passed, the Biden administration’s proposed amendments will, by their very existence and their intention, drastically compromise the independence and the sovereignty of the United States. The same threat looms over all the U.N.’s 193 member nations, all of whom belong to WHO and represent 99.44% of the world population.
These regulations are a “binding instrument of international law entered into force on June 15th 2007”. U.N. members states can be required by law to obey or acquiesce to them.
In the U.K. a petition has been launched to protect the U.K. from the treaty.
You can read for yourself the treaty amendments proposed by the Biden administration. Here are some of the key changes.
It is clear that these amendments are primarily focused on strengthening the WHO and giving it more freedom to act notwithstanding a lack of cooperation or agreement from the state or states in question. The primary target the U.S. Government has in mind here is presumably China, aiming to make the WHO less dependent on gaining the cooperation of Beijing before declaring a public health emergency in China or otherwise getting involved.
It’s helpful to keep in mind that this is not a new treaty that is being proposed and amended by the U.S. Rather, these are amendments to the existing treaty, the International Health Regulations 2005, put in place after SARS-1 in 2003. This treaty is already a legally binding instrument of international law, and already allows the WHO Director-General to declare a public health emergency in a country without the consent of its Government, albeit having first tried to come to agreement.
While the proposed U.S. amendments certainly strengthen the hand of the WHO somewhat – including setting up a new “Compliance Committee”, whose recommendations nonetheless remain only advisory for states – they don’t fundamentally alter the nature of the arrangement. The existing treaty regulations, like all (or most) international law, do not actually compel states to do anything other than talk to the WHO and listen to it, and neither do they specify sanctions for non-compliance; almost all their output is advice. The proposed amendments don’t alter that. They don’t allow the WHO unilaterally to impose legally binding measures on or within countries.
With no new treaty, and amendments aimed primarily it appears at giving the WHO more independence from the Chinese Government the next time a pandemic starts in China, the alarm may be misplaced. On the other hand, the idea of the WHO going round declaring public health emergencies and recommending stricter lockdowns and more masks is hardly one to relish – though it’s been doing that anyway.
The bigger problem, arguably, is that governments have not resiled from their newfound commitment to lockdowns as a tool of public health management. This is contrary to the previous recommendations of the WHO from 2019, which are yet to be updated. The more important battle, perhaps, is ensuring that when this document and the national pandemic plans based on the WHO’s recommendations are updated, they do not codify the new lockdown orthodoxy for future pandemics and replace the sound, science-based, pre-Covid recommendations with ones based on the panic, politics and pseudo-science of the last two years.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I won’t pretend I have read the detail of this or other UN treaties but the idea that the UK can sign up to any global treaties after fighting so hard to get out of the control of the EU is completely laughable. Climate change treaties and Health scare treaties need to be explained in detail to the public and at most, used as guidance for national laws should the voting populace vote for them. It’s a little thing called democracy.
Also I thought foreign policy (and all international treaties are foreign policy) was supposed to have become subject to Parliament rather than continuing to be a matter of “royal prerogative”. But it seems that sometimes it is (when a Syrian play gets walloped back into the faces of those who were touting it) and sometimes it isn’t (when military pacts are sought with Finland and Sweden in preparation for escalating the deterioration of relations with Russia – to put it mildly).
Theresa May called Britain a “strong ally” of Israel. When was the treaty of alliance then? What does it say? Both are members of the UN and therefore it’s unlawful (under article 102 of the UN Charter) for them to agree a secret treaty with each other. But hey…who wants to know? I don’t recommend that anybody asks their MP to pursue this question.
Hold the front page – they make cr*p up as they go along, and no journalist or academic is allowed to notice.
There you go again with your Israel obsession. You can be an ally of someone without signing a formal treaty. That’s the beauty of the English language, it allows the precise meaning of a word to be determined by context.
He’s not wrong. Leave out the Israel part. Our government makes these useless, meaningless and distracting statements constantly.
Now we have the right perceptibly siding with Israel, and the left wearing Palestinian scarves and waving Palestinian flags whilst singing their national anthem at a conference.
Meaningless gestures designed to cause division within our country and having no effect on the situation in the Middle east.
WTF do we pay all these goddamn overseas Diplomats if our home soil MP’s are mouthing off like loose cannons over anything and everything they find politically pleasing?
Not wrong about what?
Replace the word Israel with anything of your choice and it should be obvious.
Only if the definition of “ally” has changed.
To what?
Some sort of official status when it tumbles from the lips of yet another feckless politician in a futile attempt to seem a peacemaker?
An ally doesn’t play key roles in 9/11, 7/7 and all kinds of other false flag events the world over. A terrorist cell does…..
OMG! The Daily Sceptic really does attract conspiracy theorists.
If you consider nothing else about the subject, consider that prior to 9/11 and the consequent launch of ‘The War on Terror’ America was facing bankruptcy and complete financial ruin.
The international community not only paid for the wars in the middle east, it financed its rebuilding, principally by one company, Halliburton. All predicated on a terrorist attack on the twin towers, and the now disproven claim of WMD’s which Han’s Blix and 700 inspections stated were not present in Iraq. Irrespective George Bush and Tony Blair invaded.
I’m still not 100% on board with the 9/11 false flag theory, but judging by what’s going on now with the WEF, WHO and the propaganda campaign the west has mounted to condemn Putin, it’s becoming more difficult to resist.
If you can believe that a global covid pandemic is in any way a false flag event, then the 9/11 false flag theory must be a credible proposition.
“If you can believe that a global covid pandemic is in any way a false flag event, then the 9/11 false flag theory must be a credible proposition.”
That simply does not follow logically, unless you meant to say that if you’ll believe proposition a) you’ll believe proposition b) and any and all propositions.
Blair’s lies about WMD in Iraq aren’t in dispute.
I have always resisted the 9/11 false flag theory, but am finding more and more difficult these days.
I wish Star would leave Israel out of it even for one day.
Zionist… say no more.
Exactly. “Israel” is in the quotation because that is the state Theresa May named.
This was another example of the government (as the puppets of the elite, IMHO) giving us our opinion.
In “Britain [being] a strong ally of [X]”, “Britain” can only mean us, the people, not the lumps of rock and clay upon which we stand for the national anthem. But, how was it determined that we are a strong ally of X? I can’t remember that referendum, nor this having been a manifesto commitment.
Ooher, four down votes for pointing out two simple facts, the first that Star is obsessed with “Israel” and the second that the word “ally” doesn’t necessarily imply a formal signed treaty.
That’s what he’s driving at. The term is meaninglessly vague and divisive if there’s no substance to it.
It isn’t meaningless though, and in what way is it divisive? Those, like Star, with an antipathy to Israel, weren’t united with those who love Israel before TM described Israel as an ally, so what she said can’t cause a division because it all ready existed.
I’m not repeating myself.
It’s never stopped you before. So is the DS a site for people with a healthy level of scepticism or a rest home for nutters and Jew haters?
I was surprised this morning he didn’t have his Israel rant but in the end he didn’t disappoint me.
Why are you so sensitive of criticism of Israel?
I’m not. But blaming the Jews for all the ills of the world? Count me out.
The British people have zero interest in an alliance with Israel. The politicians and a few corrupt spivs may do, but it’s a small nation a long way away. It’s a total irrelevance. It’s just that the USA is controlled by dual citizen Zionists and orders NATO politicians to grovel to Israel or else.
I’m British and you don’t get to tell me what I’m interested in.
Do tell.
A point I have been making Ad nauseam lately.
If they can’t provide a sensible and articulate response, ideally with some sort of debate arranged on these matters, with the remit to return to Westminster and challenge government, they should be sacked.
All MP’s are useless, lazy, good for nothing wasters getting paid a small fortune for looking busy with no accountability for the bad decisions they make.
Not a day without anti-Israel rant, eh?
Not a day goes by without the Israelis oppressing the indigenous population.
Israel surrendered more than a third of the land awarded them under the Balfour declaration. But that’s not enough for the bloodthirsty Palestinians who refuse to build a wealthy community like Israel. Their declared international terrorist government along with the global Muslim community have promised to wipe jews from the face of the earth.
Israel responds to indiscriminate, home made rocket attacks on their country by Palestinians with sophisticated military weaponry they worked for. The Palestinians have worked for squat, that’s why all they can afford are home made rockets.
How maliciously disruptive are the Palestinians to middle east peace. That can be summed up by Trump deliberately excluding the from Abraham negotiations which was heralded as a turning point in mE relationships. Sudan(?) announced peace with Israel after 50 years of declared war and others followed.
But not the Palestinians. They launched rocket attacks in defiance of their Arab community and Israel seeking peace.
The Palestinians are the indigenous population: why on Earth should they accept their ethnic cleansing?
And the Israelis elected as PM the former terrorist ( and also homosexual paedophile) Menachem Begin, so they’re in no position to whine about terrorism..
I never cease to be amazed by non-Jews who are Jew-owned.
>The Palestinians are the indigenous population
Nope. Black September shows most were booted out of Jordan for being islamopikeys
Where did the ethnic cleansing appear from? You can’t present an argument so introduce fantasies instead. The land given to Israel was barren and deserted.
Anther fantasy, Begin was a homosexual and paedophile. I’m guessing you associate this with Savile visiting the middle east when, in fact, it was because of his friendship with Anwar Sadat’s wife Jehan that he met and arranged a meeting between Sadat and Begin.
Were Anwar and Jehan Sadat homosexuals and paedophile’s as well?
And who say’s I’m not a Jew?
How many more vile conclusions can you concoct in a single post?
I think I see the problem, there!
Lord Balfour was hardly in a position to award any of that land, lived upon, and kept, by families, for, I presume, many generations.
We could look into who prompted Lord B. to issue his famous declaration (members of the global elite, naturally!), but that is really beside the point. Try to imagine Balfour declaring that the Koreans (say) could have Scotland. How much of it would they then have to surrender, before you quit kvetching that all the best places for a fish supper had been converted into DogULike franchises?
Except there were a lot more Jews in Palestine in Balfour’s day than there are Koreans in Scotland. They had already been settling there since the latter half of the 19th century, and had to buy what land they had.
The point does not depend upon exact correspondence.
There are quite a lot of Bangladeshis in the UK, but I do not see this as any justification for some foreigner (or even a British person) to award (supposed) ownership of the territory to people arriving from the former East Pakistan.
Had legal, Jewish, settlers, in combination with those long established in Palestine, constituted a majority, they could have determined the territory’s future without any intervention by Balfour.
Too late. Lord Balfour awarded it and it was a patch of abandoned land in the middle of nowhere the Israelis worked hard to make work.
When it did work, the Palestinians came sniffing round claiming it should have been theirs, despite having done nothing with it, before or since (in the surrounding areas).
This is a community governed by a terrorist organisation.
I doubt the accuracy of your claims. Do you contend Jerusalem was all but deserted, prior to the Mandate? Anyway, it doesn’t alter that Balfour had no defensible claim on the land.
What about the use of the rivers? Just because your settlement is downstream doesn’t mean you do not have established rights (to the extent we countenance any property ownership) to the uninhabited watershed.
Much of Scotland was fairly deserted, by the 1940s (following the purge of the crofters). Would this have made it OK for Lord B. (or, more appropriately, someone who wasn’t even Scottish) to hand swathes of the country to people from overseas?
Jews have lived in Israel, Judea and Samaria for thousands of years and in at least one 19th Century census I looked at, made up the majority in Jerusalem.
The first part is a broad statement that is not easily tested – but of which I conceive little grounds for doubt.
Your census point is interesting, or would be given the evidence. However, one of the greatest lessons, of the past couple of years – for those of us who didn’t already know it – is that we can trust almost nothing. I wouldn’t place confidence in our government’s 2021 census, so I don’t see a Palestinian one, two hundred years earlier, as being beyond doubt.
Nevertheless, while I am certainly not minded to dismiss what you wrote, the majority rule point, which I had made to Mr Instrument, stands.
The process by which IL came into being was inarguably convoluted, and this, IMHO, presents reasonable grounds for those who wish to dispute IL’s legitimacy.
I do not hold a position on the wrongs and rights, as I do not possess, nor shall I ever possess, sufficient information from which to form one.
I do take it for granted that some of the non-Jewish people, currently within Palestine (either inside or outside the part internationally recognised as IL), who oppose IL, are migrants, and that some of their Jewish neighbours are living where their their families have been living for generations. I also believe there are many, probably more, counterexamples. For that reason, it is all but impossible to issue pronouncements about individuals.
There is, anyway, the question of how long, after a territory is invaded, does it rightfully become the invaders’ possession. We do not, for example, often discuss an expulsion of Normans from England!
Lol! You might want to study the Bible or the archaeology of the Holy Land, neither of which support your Guardian reader’s viewpoint. Until 1946, the Jews were referred to as ‘Palestinians’ while the local Arab population were called ‘Southern Syrians’.
Britain is NOT a strong ally of Israel. The UK politicians are submissive wimps to the Israeli controllers of the USA. We, the people, think that Israel is a general global irrelevance, being a nation the population of Scotland plus Wales. The Jewish population in the UK is less than 1% of the voting public.
As a result, Israel is an absolute global irrelevance. Not an enemy, not an ally. An absolute irrelevance.
‘We the people’? Who elected you as spokesman for the British people? You have less legitimacy than Sleepy Joe Biden.
This is a ridiculous example – Theresa May cosying with Israel did not involve ceding it power over British citizens.
Sorry but what is laughable is the thought that the EU or Brussels was actually the controlling force. The EU as much as any other body is merely a signatory to several UN driven treaties covering just about everything in your life.
Leaving the EU did nothing to change this. The UK is still controlled by a series of international treaties , most of which it has very little or no influence over.
Demos has been given away several years ago.
The important question for any “controlling force” is how they enforce their control. How will the WHO do this, except through national administrations?
They will come up with the same issues of compliance and resistance as they do now. Those who have resisted masks and injections decreed by their national or regional governments are unlikely to submit if the orders are issued by the WHO.
They have lots of little tricks to overcome that tiny hurdle. Digital compliance being one. Don’t have a smartphone to enter a shop, your biometric data will do.
Depriving you of your right to work? That’s been done.
Reducing wages of the unvaccinated? That’s also been proposed.
Increasing your energy prices, increasing mortgage costs, reducing access to healthcare. Yep, it’s all possible and has been carefully scrutinised.
Scale that up to a national level. If 97% of the population isn’t vaccinated then perhaps the countries credit rating is affected. Maybe certain trade deals with other countries are curtailed.
They have lots and lots of nudges to make to enforce compliance.
Yes but how would the WHO enforce this?
My concern exactly. Are they going to send in UN forces to every country that’s naughty? Will they arrest naughty citizens?
Credit ratings and trade deals are immensely complicated and difficult to control – look at the problems the West is having with regard to sanctions on Russia.
Would Russia, China and India comply with a WHO telling them to do something they don’t already want to do?
I mentioned a country’s credit rating as just one possibility.
It is hard to see where government ministers derive the power to do this from – just another globalist scam
The reality is that no UK Government wanted to leave the EU. They have done everything they can since to keep us locked in. An integrated army that Clegg told the population UKIP were lying about, an integrated intelligence system that Clegg told the population UKIP were lying about, remaining in the EAW which holds all citizens under EU law and not British Common Law, fisheries still under EU control and NI protocol arranged in such a way that Ireland will become united under EU Law and the people who want something different can once again be persecuted.
Our democracy has been eroding since we were lied to about joining a European Common Market. We already had a free trading successful market called The Commonwealth. Non political and benefitting the people. That didn’t suit the socialist politicians who wanted control over our labour.
That treaty, for adoption in 2024, is an almost complete red herring.
Why do you say that?
I’m interested.
Finishes off any lingering ideas that the “Conservatives” are somehow not part of the Blairite woke globalist elite that are misruling so grossly the countries of the US sphere.
Theyre now called COMMSERVATIVES and LABOURCAMP. Those are your two main choices in the UK for governemnt. Communist Party Number One, in the blue corner, or Communist Party Number Two, in the red corner.
I like LABOURCAMP.
Shut that door.
The WHO was behind the SWINE FLU SCAM OF 2009 – the precursor or dry run for CONVID 1984. The WHO was also responsible for spreading the the fraudulent 3.4percent infection fatality rate which was assigned to Convid before it actually became public knowldege and officially recognised by GOVUK that Convid was a nonentity with a “LOW MORTALITY RATE” so called novel virus (the notion that there actually is a novel virus is an unsubstantiated unproven lie backed up by nothing more scientifically credible than GOVUKs fraudulent Convid death toll but ill go along with their fraudulent claim about a novel virus for the sake of arguement because the liars, traitors and criminals in GOVUK lose the argument no matter which way you spin it).
Not only that, the WHO was responsible for recommending a series of unsubstantiated so called remedies for Convid – murderous recommendations such as early ventilation – plus they have essentially turned a blind eye or directly recommended other blatanty evil and positively unhealthy solutions to what was admitted to be a LOW MORTALITY RATE NOTHING BURGER of a virus by the most qualified right form the very start.
Also look at what is being done in China right now like in Shanghai. Maybe they are road testing what they think they can get away with in the West in China or they may use this bout of extremist communist health policy in Communist China as an example of what should be done in response to the next scamdemic. Any leader signing up to an agreement with these lowlife criminals is a traitor and should be prosecuted and made an example of.
Every and any UK government, present and future, will do as usual, and claim that measures are imposed on them by external agencies, against their earnest wishes.
This is the same cop-out argument that’s been employed since 1974 and the various stuff forced on us by Common Market/EEC/EU. It is conceived by leftist civil servants and endorsed by lazy, stupid and compliant politicians of every stripe. As with EU stuff, the bureaucracy will spend time gold-plating it, setting up expensive quangos in England, unaccountable to Parliament, let alone the electorate, and stuffed with people like Whitty, Vallance, Michie and their ilk.
It won’t be as anodyne as suggested, but pure poison, the end of UK democracy and the destruction of national self determination and identity. To accede to this would be criminally irresponsible; treasonous, even.
“and endorsed by lazy, stupid and compliant politicians of every stripe”
And the same goes for the people who vote for them, then wonder where it all went wrong.
What UK Democracy?
The one we had a brief semblance of, but which we kidded ourselves was the genuine article.
Fun while it lasted I suppose.
It’s a Pharmocracy now.
I’d say neo-feudalist, with patent title replacing land title rent-seeking.
It’s laughable. Russia is painted as a tyrannical state with oppressive conditions bearing down on Putin’s minions.
Yet I know from someone that lives there that noting is further from the truth.
They value their individual freedoms they fought so hard and so long to win from communism. They have a flat rate 14% Tax rate which includes health care. There is little in the way of government authority either nationally or locally. If they want to build a house, they buy the land and the only ‘planning’ requirement is that they provide water, gas, electricity and sanitation to the site. That’s It, thereafter they build what they want, how they want.
The guy I know lives in Ufa which is the centre for jet engine manufacture in the country, both civil and military. It has five universities in a relatively small city. It has a church or temple of every religious denomination you can think of and there hasn’t been religious violence there for 400 years.
There is an international airport and the roads are good. Neither are ever closed for snow.
Crime is virtually unknown as they have a functioning police force which takes no shit.
Food is locally produced, fresh and cheap. He lives in a three bedroom, city centre apartment overlooking the Hilton and Holiday Inn Hotels which cost him the equivalent of £70,000. He also has a house in the country.
As you can imagine, the vodka is great, but locally produced whisky is crap, but he’s a Jock so he would say that.
Shame I cannot get my head round the cyrillic alphabet or I’d move there. Sounds infinitely better than the UK.
Before they do anything they need to do some proper science to investigate which aspects of the covid response actually worked, and by what extent.
These people are pushing lockdowns, vaccines, facemasks, social distancing (they’ll be mandated in law if it happens), but there’s very little evidence that they were at all helpful in controlling covid outbreaks, and increasing evidence that some of them caused immense harm.
But this won’t happen — we’ll just get more and more propaganda stating that the response was near perfect and that we’re lucky that the governments thought them up.
That’s the Communist situation, they know that we know they’re lying.
No they don’t. They are too enthralled with the idealogical utopia they build in their own heads they can’t imagine anyone knows they are lying. They don’t even know they are lying to themselves.
The problem is, of course, even they can’t agree between them what utopia looks like, which is why they always fail and end up eating themselves.
You mean IPCC type science?
Cos that’s all you’re going to get.
CHDTV Exclusive: Crimes Against Humanity
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chdtv-exclusive-crimes-against-humanity-dr-reiner-fuellmich-in-depth-interview
Dr. Reiner Fuellmich In-Depth Interview
Stand for freedom with our Yellow Boards By The Road
BY DOING NOTHING YOU ARE BUILDING YOUR OWN DIGITAL PRISON
Thursday 12th May 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
A329 junction London Road & Oak Avenue
Near Oakingham Belle pub
Wokingham RG40 1LH
Tuesday May 17th 5.30pm to 6.30pm
Yellow Boards
A322 Bagshot Rd
(by Bracknell Leisure Centre)
Bracknell RG12 9SE
Thursday 19th May 3pm to 5pm
Yellow Boards LONDON
Junction A4 West Cromwell Road/
A3220 Warwick Road
London W14 8PB
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Even if the concept was sound and potentially useful, we should be running a mile from anything the the WHO does. They have been captured by foreign countries and big money doners like Gates to pursue their personal ideologies.
Everything they suggested for Covid has been shown to be wrong, false, and unreliable. The start of the pandemic, when they ‘kept quiet’ for three months for the sake of their Chinese bosses is the most damning, but there are plenty of other things to damn them.
This is a red line, and we must not cross it.
And it is run by a terrorist at the helm.
Aided by a billionaire eugenicist. What could possibly go wrong … ?
That’s the only thing they have done right, and by the way what pandemic?
I thought someone would query the word, so ‘pandemic’ it is. The WHO took China’s word for the early aspects of the response, i.e not airborne, when Taiwan had already identified it as such. Why does no one listen to Taiwan.? Because its not a member of WHO and China would not permit it to be so.
The very reason we should listen to it.
The European Coal and Steel Community. Look what that became…. If anybody thinks it will stop at medical matters and health they are deluded. It will morph into something never ever witnessed on this planet before. And not in a good way either.
This is a naked power-grab, plain and simple. It must be resisted at all costs.
It has ZERO to do with “medical matters and health” – that is just the convenient cover.
UK should have nothing to do with this AT ALL for any reason.
Give an inch and they will take a mile.
They are way past an inch.
A global dystopia, rolled out before our eyes.
And fighting it is a thousand times more difficult than fighting fog.
A global dystopia, rolled out before our eyes.
The problem is that we are supposed to learn from history. Instead we seem intent on repeating it.
Just imagine that The USSR had gone global, collapse was no joke for The USSR, so just imagine a world wide collapse.
We now have The UN and the ‘globalists’ looking to repeat the experiment, ‘properly’ this time of course .When it collapses, and it will eventually , there will be nowhere to turn.
“Ah, but WE are wiser. We have an Hegelian synthesis of Communism and Fascism. And we have the wonderful boon of artificial intelligence, which is never wrong. We cannot fail”
Nice analogy that.
The WHO are probably the worst organisation in the world at managing pandemics; I’ve no idea why we’d want to mandate following their plans.
Eg, for Covid:
I have to disagree that WHO were wrong to say that facemasks were useless – there were at least 11 out of 14 existing RCTs at that time concluding that masks were useless against influenza.
Didn’t I read recently (here? TCW? ZH?) that they actually increased morbidity in hospitalised CV19 cases?
Of all the evil plans that the evil bastards have cooked up this is one of the most evil
It’s just a fragment of the plan.
Thank you for posting this.
A strategic risk to UK sovereignty, covert globalist power grab.
It’s time Johnson and his Reset Gang were held to account.
Theyre a NATIONAL SECURITY RISK, plain and simple.
And people condemned Trump for threatening to take America out the WHO.
The man must be laughing like a drain.
If he is genuine, why would he laugh? Being treated as automatically wrong is a horrendous form of discrimination, and Trump has had to shoulder it as a minority of one.
No Trump policy can ever be right, before it has been adopted by Biden.
Because, once again, he’s been proven right.
Biden will never adopt a Trump policy, other than dressing it up as his own and screwing it up completely.
The man must be laughing like a drain
You missing me yet?
(Poster/billboard campaign for 2024)
Talking of power grabs and WHO:
Ncuti Gatwa: BBC names actor as next Doctor Who star
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-61371123.amp
Still, can it be any worse than Jodie Whittaker in her weirdo whacky clothes?
I will not judge without viewing (and am unlikely ever to watch). However, there are certainly circumstantial grounds for suspecting woke casting.
I really do love, however, that the guy is Rwandan, and I hope that will inspire some marvellous storylines.
WHOke casting………
Dr WHOke
I think it may just show some particularly hard negotiating by the Rwandan Migrant Office.
As the Doctor has been played by a dozen of more actors, I don’t suppose having a black Doctor is any issue really. It is more the storylines which were appallingly woke. All of time and space to travel and, poof! Here we are sat next to Rosa Parks fighting off, not Daleks, but racists…
Not watched it since David Tennant played the Doctor. Utter drivel since.
However, I imagine rating will plummet, not because the new Doctor is black, but because it’s the second successive attempt at woke appeasement.
The BBC really does suck.
This is the one that finally did it for me: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0562864/
In retrospect, I think it might actually have been intended as a warning. (It was a year or two early to have simply been a dig at Dame Shirley Porter.)
I missed Dr. Who from about 1972 until Tennant pitched up and my daughter loved it, but had to have a cuddle to watch it.
You missed the Tom Baker years!
Caught bits of it, but wasn’t that interested.
Time and Relative Dimensions in Dinghy crossings?
The critical relationship is not that between the nation state and some supranational authority. It is the one between government and the individual, and, as was all too apparent during the past couple of years, ours in the UK, in common with those in most of the world, has gone irrecoverably bad.
We, the people, desperately need to take back control ™.
https://ourdecisiontoo.com/Issue/there-s-nothing-left-to-do-but-go-our-separate-ways/320/
What right does the UK government have to give away its sovereignty to an international organisation?
If we believe that the people are sovereign and have delegated powers in the government, then the government has no right to do so without consulting the people.
However, in the UK, the people are not sovereign. Parliament is. So actually the government still has no authority to sign away sovereignty to a third party, like the WHO. It has to be approved by parliament.
That is a very chilling prospect. Does anyone trust our MPs not to give away our sovereignty to the WHO?
Well look at the current parliamentary numbers Stewart. It doesn’t inspire optimism even if a vote could be forced on the issue.
Out the EU frying pan and into the WHO fire.
Why are our government officials so obsessed with joining bureaucratic, NGO clubs? Why can’t we stand on our own feet as the United Kingdom?
We can. It’s our elected representatives and their minions and side kicks who have trouble standing on their own two feet.
For most MPs, they have had a lifetime of the EU telling them what to do. Nod something through, if people don’t like it you can say “not our fault, our hands are tied”, take your generous salary and expenses, and push off home. What’s not to like?
Why would they change these agreeable circumstances for actually having to work, research things, think about them, debate them, pay attention and use their own judgment?
I thought we had left the EU aka Brexit
We have, and our government apprentices are learning how to govern, on the job, with no instruction.
What could possibly go wrong?
Mind you, I’d still rather be out the EU than in it. Our government will learn, to a fashion, eventually.
Once you’re out of the EU you’ll have to fight the true final boss. International, or inter-governmental institutions that are rapidly morphing into supranational entities mimicking that of the EU.
The ultimate desire of the atlantacists is to abolish the nation state, just as Monnet desired it with European nations when he first founded what is now the EU
https://swprs.org/the-wef-and-the-pandemic/
A fellow traveller.
Our government is so bad because it’s had nothing to do for 40 years except persecute us.
It is easy. Because the overlords get to do exactly what they want to do, while wringing their hands and pointing the finger of blame at someone else, saying they had no choice but to do it. “It is with great and a heavy heart yada yada yada….”
The only redeeming feature of our government is that they do not respect rules, it’s an old tradition and I think we should all take a leaf out of their book.
Tragically, they don’t get arrested, we do.
Tyranny anyone?
In relation to Who. Not suggesting tyranny, at the moment
If our government officials don’t respect rules, it’s because they are never prosecuted for the disasters they impose on us.
There are business owners prosecuted every day for making bad decisions. based on rules set by government officials, who can never be held personally to account for imposing those bad rules.
That’s what Tyranny is. Rules for thee but not for me.
Billions spunked on wasted covid resources, and Boris gets off with a £50 fine for partying.
Tedros wanted Mugabe to be the WHO goodwill ambassador
deleted
too risky to go there
https://maajidnawaz.substack.com/p/the-covid-vaccine-boomerang
“Misleading claims suggesting that more than 1,200 died after suffering adverse reactions to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine have once again been spread on social media..While the report discussed adverse reactions to the vaccine in a 90-day period and the figures are genuine, the pharmaceutical company has said the documents do not link the vaccine as being responsible for the people’s death.”
This week, the first batch of that judge-ordered data was released. Despite predictable media spin disguised as “fact-checking”, the basic and rather shocking revelation that 1233 people died within 90 days of taking the Pfizer jab is true. This is contained within Pfizer’s own adverse events report:
At the end of the article he says UK has already signed up to the WHO pandemic treaty (Boris wrote an article saying he thinks it is great idea) – so signing the petition, and indeed reading this article is too late.
Boris Jong Il
https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/no-government-can-address-the-threat-of-pandemics-alone-we-must-come-together
Get Globalist Tyranny Done!
Boris isn’t even an idiot, he’s an imbecile if he thinks he will be spared.
The man’s not an idiot, nor an imbecile, he’s a globalist.
His Brexit position was an utter scam. He knew damn well all this was coming down the line and that the EU didn’t matter anyway.
We need to get rid of this posturing fat little tyrant now!
I have heard him mention Global Britian but thought it a catch phrase.
Like Building Back Better and NetZero?
Only every western leader using the same terms. But they are catchphrases?
Totally agree with this comment. I said this last year and got laughed at. He knew what was coming and used the public to get into power for this agenda. Joining the ranks of the Young Global Leader club which he did not “graduate” from.
I suspect not graduating from the young global leaders club might be in his favour.
I mean, graduation from there is a term relative to one’s compliance, not anything remotely academic.
There is no way that our government (and even without new legislation or debate) is invested with authority to hand our rights in this way, overturning common law, international law (ICCPR, Helsinki, Nuremberg Code, Geneva Convention). So, I am sure they don’t care but it will not be legal.
But they have still done it and there is nothing we can do about it.
No, this is wrong. If existing law is being abused they have no right – this does not mean that existing law will not be abused but it is not the end of the road. Johnson and Javid cannot suspend the law though they may choose to ignore it.
O/T but I have to post it.
From Dominic Cumings. Whatever you think of him, this is great.
One of the most mature discussions on this topic, I highly recommend. No subscription required. Part one on the criminal nature of these organisations, including some history on the WHO
https://home.solari.com/reset-in-ukraine-with-karel-van-wolferen/
https://home.solari.com/special-report-reset-in-ukraine-part-2-with-karel-van-wolferen/
Brilliant. Thank you.
The is no such thing as international law. Just treaties between sovereign states the governments of said states are perfectly free to ignore should the choose to do so and the only thing other governments can really do about that is go to war over it.
If 400 other nations threaten you with sanctions unless you follow the treaty, I’d say that was a fair bit of leverage.
A trade war is nothing but a pretty ineffective kind of war.
There aren’t even 400 states (not nations) on earth (the article claims there are 193) and they’ll never all agree on something. Two fairly recent examples of government choosing to ignore treaties would be the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the UK leaving the EU.
If only our MSM weren’t still prattling on about ‘partygate’….
I want Johnson gone, he’s a globalist. Partygate may hasten the end when the Sue Gray report is published.
And they won’t just shuffle a replacement globalist into the place he vacates?
Dr Turdo Beejeesus needs stringing up alongside Gates and Fauci. For starters, that is.
Well speaking of the WHO, this excellent 30min video was shared by Victoria in the other comments section. It’s about how all aspects of the ‘pandemic’ were planned well in advance. Highly recommended. https://www.naturalhealth365.com/incredible-video-reveals-the-whos-diabolical-agenda-behind-the-covid-19-pandemic.html
All part of Agenda 2030 – you’ll own nothing and be happy (or else!) and all controlled by unelected bureaucrats
Usually, the US is the main holdout against this sort of thing. Now they’re leading the way.
One half of the US
Less than half…….
Trump wouldn’t of had any of it. He stopped funding the WHO.
Treason, n’est ce pas? Just like the EU.
But – in practical terms how could the WHO’s authority be enforced in any sovereign nation?
During the lockdowns, local governments recruited people to act as Covid Marshalls. These people never appeared because lockdowns were phased out but they are there and they were recruited. I can imagine it wouldn’t be so hard to bring them back. These people will be walking the streets and reporting on any infringements with subsequent police action. If it’s the WHO, I can imagine they might even have a uniform. These people – the WHO – are mad enough to do anything to destroy our lives and society. That is the whole point, to bring us to our knees.
There are already agreements among nations about how to deal with a pandemic, plus established pandemic plans. Has anyone explained why something else needs to be cooked up?
It effectively means that citizens are completely disenfranchised from all decisions concerning health: the WHO is completely unaccountable to any voters and the Ministers never stand up to it in any way.
There should be a referendum in the UK and every other nation state recommending that the nation leaves the WHO, stops making financial contributions and takes zero notice of WHO strictures in future.
No referendum. It should simply be rejected.
Exactly. Referendums can be manipulated. Imagine the lack of a ‘Say no to the WHO’ side of any media campaign. It is very dangerous territory. Most people are still asleep.
The big risk is that they would vote FOR the bleeping thing.
Too many brainwashed people in this country would think it is an excellent idea.
The attraction for politicians to hand over power to the WHO is the ability to dodge the blame for deaths. This is just “following the science” taken to its ultimate extent. It is therefore profoundly undemocratic and must be stopped.
My “Conservative”MP thinks this is all peachy. God help us.
The threat is more serious than outright war. Too many refuse to open their eyes and minds to it so it goes on effectively unopposed.
This is a global coup, done in the name of “health” so that the globalists can further their ends at the expense of the bulk of the population.
Someone come along and tell me any different, and that it won’t happen.
I thought giving away our country’s power to a foreign entity was an act of treason. We the people will not tolerate this.
We the people have already acquiesced to it. People want convenience. They don’t want freedom because freedom requires taking responsibility for their actions. Most people want to do as they are told and live by what Governments give them. We should have been up in arms over joining the Socialist and political EU in the first place, we should have said no to the unnecessary slaughter of so many animals under the guise of CJD, we should have said no to unlimited immigration. We should never have allowed our labour to be stolen with the introduction of PAYE. All these steps we allowed because we were lazy, wanted convenience over responsibility.
Now we have a digital currency being introduced and cash phased out. Who do you think benefits. Certainly not the entrepreneur or the individual businesses. They will be wiped out. Certainly the working class will be affected. Every transaction will be monitored and if citizens do not follow the narrative their money will be blocked. When will people stop being lazy and stupid. When will they understand that they are being wiped out of society unless they conform.
You are right. This is a treasonous act and all MPs who vote for it, must be arrested and charged with that in mind. None of us voted for this nor did we agree to this in any shape or form. I urge member of the police force/military/judiciary who still have their marbles intact to act on this. It is utterly not acceptable.
Once again the Globalists (mainly the same families who have tried power grabs before) are putting themselves and their lifestyles before anything else. They will create more wars and more destabilisation in order to control us. They dislike us so much they want to depopulate us and dehumanise us. The saddest fact of all is that 70% of the world will be happy to see this happen.
The WHO’s track record should lead to it being scrapped, not strengthened.
In practice, whilst the WHO might not be able to impose its recommendations on a Sovereign nation (like the UK) it would be a “brave” Prime Minister who ignored or defied it. And we haven’t had a brave PM since 1970-1990.
This is a blatant power grab by the Globalists/Big Pharma: it must not succeed.
Trump needs to get back on Twitter ASAP and blast the hell out of this.
Mind you – MSM would just reach collective agreement to pretend he wasn’t tweeting, or “fact check” his tweets.
Wonder if Musk will ban the fact checking if the twitter deal goes his way.
The absence of real sanctions means this is just a piece of paper, like the traffic paint markings on the road. Anyone can ignore it without penalty, The WHO doesn’t have an army and neither does the UN. So any country that disagrees with these corrupt bureaucrats’recommendations can safely do so. The Swedish Covid-strategy will still be available next time around.
I agree in principle but it is possible to imagine governments inviting the WHO in to bully us saying it is an international obligation – so you could have a Shanghai style lockdown scenario policed by Bill Gates etc and government saying it is just meeting its international obligations. I don’t think such a situation would have good legal standing but it might not stop it happening.
All depends on whether your government is a globalist govt signed up to globalist agenda
Yes let’s all leave our lives in the hands of a philosophy major, tedros. Wake up people, the WHO is dangerous, takes money from dangerous people and certainly is not working in your best intestests. Write to your mp today demanding the Uk NOT turn over these powers to an irresponsible organisation that has flip flopped every step of the way over the past two year covid scamdemic. You will be sorry if this goes forward. Very sorry.
UK has signed up to it apparently. Its too late.
Totally unacceptable. I will never, ever abide by WHO decisions. I did not vote for them, I do not recognise them. If our elected members allow this to pass, they MUST be charged with treason because they are giving away our country to a foreign body. Anyone who loves this country will stand up to such a coup. Not in my name!
Another disturbing problem is that as with the WEF you cannot get a single elected politician to even give an opinion on it, let alone call for a debate. I suppose it means that it has even less foundation but there is frankly a conspiracy of silence: politicians so deeply exercised over the EU have absolutely nothing to say.
Yep – Why is GB News not covering it? Just the kind of populist news item they would normally love – so why so silent GB News???
I cannot understand why the former “Lockdown Sceptics” has been so relaxed over this issue.
There’s a bit of denial about the impending takeover of the world by the WHO as if it’s happening to someone else, somewhere else. This should be at the forefront because I feel even those of us who are awake, and I include myself, sort of can’t believe it is happening.
Salvation may spring from an unexpected source…….
This is a long interview between Catherine Austin Fitts, an investment banker and former Whitehouse official. and Karel van Wolferen, a Dutch expert in oriental matters, in particular Japan.
It’s long, starts slowly, but once Wolferen is into his stride, at one point he sweeps away the coffee cup and papers on the table as he animatedly explains some interesting theories.
At one point he and Catherine discuss America’s debt to GDP ratio which is around 120%. Putin has kept Russian debt to GDP ratio to 12% (yes, twelve percent). The western world is a financial train wreck thanks to casino economics and we can well imagine why they would welcome a New World Order to wipe out all the debt, but it seems Russia is very well placed to resist it.
And when the majority of the worlds population, including China, India, Africa and South America do not condemn Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, it seems it’s the west that’s out of step with reality, not Putin.
https://home.solari.com/reset-in-ukraine-with-karel-van-wolferen/
Putin doesn’t look very well from recent pics published, with blanket over knees etc, how much longer is he going to be on world stage?
The WHO amendments is not a hill to die on.
“While the proposed U.S. amendments certainly strengthen the hand of the WHO somewhat – including setting up a new “Compliance Committee”, whose recommendations nonetheless remain only advisory for states – they don’t fundamentally alter the nature of the arrangement. The existing treaty regulations, like all (or most) international law, do not actually compel states to do anything other than talk to the WHO and listen to it, and neither do they specify sanctions for non-compliance; almost all their output is advice. The proposed amendments don’t alter that. They don’t allow the WHO unilaterally to impose legally binding measures on or within countries”
I think WHO is a disgrace in its present form with a corrupt Director and its abysmal role in this pandemic.I think opposing amendments is correct but it is not that ground breaking. By being members of UN and WHO previous rules were accepted by member states. These rules are now given some bad amendments but a state still have the right to say No thank you.
This is a minor issue and there are much more important things to concentrate the energy on like the Pfizer fraud data etc.
Nothing to see here, move on.
It’s all benign, after all “I’m from the WHO and I’m here to help”.
Yea sure. Why did Trump want to dump the WHO? Might it be that the second largest donor (controller) to the WHO after America itself is one Bill gates?
Imagine that, a man wanted in India for the murder of numerous young girls by ‘vaccination’ pulling the strings of an organisation that can help fulfill his ambition of vaccinating the whole world multiple time a year.
The same man who is a major investor in numerous major pharmaceutical businesses. The same man who has openly stated this ambition.
This is also the same Bill gates who was one of the first WEF World Economic Forum) Young Global Leaders, an organisation led by one Klaus Schwab who openly calls for a New World Order.
This is only one multi billionaire known to be attracted to the WEF, like flies round shite, because it represents what these megalomaniacs can never get enough of, power over others. Money is no longer enough for them.
The WHO has already changed its definition of a pandemic to represents almost anything it want’s, why would it not alter more of its own rules and regulations to further empower itself?
When the evidence is staring you in the face it’s best to take notice of it.
Just like the UK in the EU, follow the rules and then blame the rule maker for what you wanted to inflict on the population anyway
It is also sinister that the WHO and WEF conferences run concurrently 22-28 May.
I voted to leave the EU because my MP frequently used the excuse “It’s not our decision, we are following EU rules”. Politicians strive for popularity so any measures that can replace their own individual accountability and/or responsibility is welcomed by them. Public Health/pandemics has become the new religion in order to spread fear and control the masses, but elected politicians seek a “get out of jail card” so that any future unpopular decisions can’t be blamed on them, but the unelected executive (paid for by Gates and the Pharma industry) of the WHO. The Houses of Parliament was for all intents and purposes an illusion of democracy when the UK were EU members and if this Treaty is signed by the UK then the UK will be passing over its sovereignty of Public Health decisions to the WHO and its unelected executive in the same way.
The phrase ‘target nation’ says a lot ……………
i don’t disagree that this is unacceptable, but it just happened anyway. all 192 countries played their role in the un/who/wef global preparedness plan from 2019 https://apps.who.int/gpmb/assets/annual_report/GPMB_annualreport_2019.pdf readit and weap – at least the exec summary – event 201 (simulation) and the release of a deadly pathogen…
This will go through because Democracy in this country has always been a farce. We have been controlled by secret elite groups for centuries. To deny this is to evince a shallow understanding of British and world history. The lockdowns were a crime against humanity. There is no virus. The purpose of the lockdowns were to destroy the independent, medium sized and small sized businesses and transfer the wealth to the oligarchs. The same applies to the Russia/Ukraine ‘war’, where billions are being transferred in to the pockets of the military industrial complex aka Blackrock and Vanguard. The Ukraine is deliberately being depopulated and the countries of Europe further thrust in to impoverishment and bankruptcy. I cannot for the life of me figure out why so few people cannot see the f***ing obvious when it is staring them in the face.