You have to give it to King Charles, he does the Bertie Wooster meets Hugh Grant schtick very well. “By Jove”, he exclaimed at one point in his recent joint address to the US Congress, an exclamation that almost nobody has used in the UK since the passing of P.G. Woodhouse. But the fading Old World aristo charm only gets you so far in the New World. In all his unelected glory, Charles is a highly political Head of State as witnessed in his regular Net Zero promotion. Decades have been spent regaling his no-questions-allowed audiences with tales of impending doom. When he stepped up in 2009 to warn that Planet Earth had only 96 months to avert “irretrievable climate and ecosystem collapse”, he was talking, as he invariable does on his chosen subject, out of his Princely Posterior.
He has little in common with the thrusting capitalism that still drives many inhabitants in the United States. Let’s be honest – he would be telling Donald Trump to use the tradesman’s backdoor if he was not the US President. In 2009, he informed the British people that consumerism could no longer be afforded, and the “age of convenience” was over. Not, of course, for the pampered and indulged members of Britain’s Royal Family. Even his disgraced brother, Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, has all the high-born, inherited comforts. In his Sandringham estate exile, he is provided with a chef and a valet – perish the thought that the ending of the age of convenience should mean that the King’s younger sibling cooks and dresses himself.
Charles and the sinister Miliband seem as one in trying to ban convenience. By all accounts they get on well. One harking back “just the other day” to a pre-industrial time when cap-doffing peasants worked on the ‘sustainable’ landed estates and the other pushing a neo-Marxist dream where similar political control and heavily diminished expectations are imposed by state diktat. How Charles must have been impressed with Miliband’s recent suggestion to ban tumble dryers.
Our generation must decide how to address the collapse of critical natural systems, noted the King in Congress, a reference to his love of so-called ‘tipping points’. In his address to COP28 in 2023, the new King claimed that “we are seeing alarming tipping points being reached”. Alas, no specifics were given, understandably since there aren’t any. The US Climate Depot publication has tracked Charles’s regal ruminations for years, noting that he may be “the world’s wrongest man about climate change” – “may”, of course, being a necessary qualification since he is up against enormously strong competition.
In 2020, Charles said the world is “literally at the last hour” in the fight against climate change. At the time, Climate Depot noted that he had previously issued 10-year, 18-month, 100-month and 35-year tipping points. In true Davos Great Reset style, he went on to state: “We need a shift in our economic model that places nature and the world’s transition to Net Zero at the heart of how we operate”.
Over long decades of tedious claims of climate and nature collapses that failed to happen at the anointed hour, the Right Charlie has joined a select company of sandwich board know-all busybodies that also includes Al Gore and John Kerry. “Nobody is listening to me,” he nagged in 2016. “We are running out of time. How many times have I found myself saying this?” The uncharitable might note that constant repetition is the lot of the fool whose predictions never materialise.
So many ‘tipping points’, all of them inventions of garbage-in, garbage-out climate computer models, it is hard to keep up. And all the time, back in the real world, the climate seems to be improving with a little extra heat and carbon dioxide plant food causing massive ‘greening’ of the Earth. The Gulf Stream keeps streaming, the abundant coral reefs keep surviving as they have done for hundreds of millions of years while the polar bears are on the move across a thriving Arctic to avoid increasingly crowded neighbourhoods. Here’s a tip for His Majesty – stop sending children to bed crying with terrible predictions about their future by parroting invented, unfalsifiable pseudoscientific nonsense that you learnt from a small band of hand-picked, courtier Armageddonites.
His big claim in Congress noted the “disastrously melting ice caps of the Arctic”. Much of the Arctic is sea, where the ice waxes and wanes over the seasons. He was well advised to steer clear of the common claim that it will soon all be gone. Scientific data shows that the ice has been on a cyclical pause since around 2007. Presumably the King was thinking of the large Greenland ice cap, but again data shows that the rate of recent melting has declined. Over the last 20,000 inter-glacial years, ice up to 6 km deep has retreated from large areas of the northern hemisphere up to the Arctic. At current melt rates, the job in Greenland will finally be done in about 25,000 years’ time. It is easy to explain all these processes as natural variations, but that does not fit the political narrative of the Net Zero fantasy. But again, kids need to be sent to bed worried sick that any day soon a massive, unhinged ice sheet is about to crash into their houses, or at least inundate them with waters rising above their heads.
Stupid fear mongering, almost beyond belief.
And unbelievable nonsense stories are what the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has finally cracked down on. Much of the climate information fed to high-profile influencers like King Charles is based on the clickbait product of computer models fed with RCP8.5 assumptions. The IPCC has bowed to the blindingly obvious and ruled that this notorious scenario is “implausible”. As we reported on May 6th, it is difficult to overestimate the importance of this finding since it renders most mainstream media scare stories over the last 15 years as junk.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor. Follow him on X.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“High profile influencer” Masterly understatement of the monarchy’s globalism and ignorance of and contempt for the ordinary Brit.
Since Charles III. isn’t free to do what he wants in any part of his public life, it’s at least possible that he’s reading from somebody else’s script here as well.
I gave the immediate royal family (never have been a royalist myself) the benefit of the doubt while the old queen was around, but they are..now, all done in my eyes, the royal family died with Queen Elizabeth ll.
Not my King!
It’s the same playbook as used in public health, produce unnecessary fear supported by pseudo-scientific nonsense, and bingo…
I’ve read the first few pages of Gladwell’s Tipping Point. He uses two different Mathematical definitions so I didn’t know what a tipping point was supposed to be and gave up reading it.
Reached his personal tipping point quite a while ago.
Let’s face it, he’s just a silly old fool without the intelligence to even question his dodgy views
Luckily I have not seen his speech to the Democrats in Congress. I heard some Republicans attended. His speech at the dinner was actually a good one following on from Donald.
KC3 can do the right thing when he wants and be a credit to the country.
I have it on good authority that he got it all from a sunflower that whispered this truth into his regal ear.
There is no Royalty in Mad Eds Marxist world, Charles sups with the very creature that would wipe his office out.
Teaching an old Charlie new tricks is probably not that easy. If the guy had had any sense, he would have abdicated in favour of his son after a month or two. Kings shouldn’t already be well past pension age when their tenure starts.
I don’t claim that any of the other mock-Windors¹ would make a better monarch but they might at least still learn a thing or two.
¹ Name adopted for political reason during WWI, actually von Gotha und Sachsen-Coburg (mother) and von Battenberg (father, styled himself Mountbatten in the same fashion which is a literal translation). Don’t trust Germans denying that they’re Germans if you can avoid it.
I fear William may be as bad as his father in respect of leftist opinions.
Maybe. You probably know this better than I do. But at least, he didn’t already spend a lifetime with preaching about them.
It is ironic that another Keir has finished the Labour Party and another Charles will bring down the Monarchy.
It is high time the tax payer funded got on with their proper role. The Met Office should accurately measure and record so as to make accurate weather predictions.
The Governor of the BoE should focus on money and not lecture us on wokery, net zero, EU membership or any other political issues.
Likewise His Majesty ought to stick to being a well liked sovereign. His promotion of contentious political issues may suit the PM of the day but it will ultimately destroy royalty.
One supposes successive PMs have either supported or said nothing about political campaigns by KC3. A future Farage PM will be forced to give new advice.
The ‘tradition’ of the British monarch being the nation’s most expensive coat rack only began with Elizabeth the Eternal Void.
I’m sorry, you’re going to explain what on earth you mean. I haven’t the foggiest. For a start, which Queen Elizabeth?
As far as I know, Elizabeth II. was the first British monarch observing the principle of “strict neutrality” which is a slightly nicer way to express that she never did anything except get money for being alive. Edward VII. was very active as political diplomat. George V. eliminated the house of lords as political factor by appointing enough suitably minded new peers to fabricate a majority for this. I have no detail knowledge about any of the others but believe they still envisioned themselves as kings and not just as seriously expensive tourist attractions.
Elizabeth the Eternal Void – longest serving non-entity on the British throne.
QE2 believed her purpose was to serve the country as a figurehead. Alcoholics Anonymous exemplifies the principle of neutrality as far as is humanly possible and cannot be described as a nonentity. A fundamental difference is that the Crown possesses wealth whereas AA does not. The minute a monarch engages in controversy it endangers its existence and QE2 knew that.
QE2 believed her purpose was to serve the country as a figurehead.
[…]
The minute a monarch engages in controversy it endangers its existence and QE2 knew that.
Her predecessors acted differently, even the pretty recent ones. If monarch who expresses a political opinion or acts politically endangers its existence he is no monarch (this means solitary ruler, by the way) at all. Just an overpaid actor supposed to distract the public from the fact that monarchy has long since been abolished.
I’m also still convinced that this an ex post factum rationalization of a decision Elizabebth II very consciously made which I would render with the less-than-flattering words Governing the realm is bothersome, let’s have a fancy dress party instead!
Pity the poor continentals stuck with a boring President whose name no one can remember and who have enviously to follow the British royals for their fix of courtly gossip. Nothing has any meaning except what we give it. Nothing.
That you’re using words taken from foreign languages without knowing their correct English translation doesn’t change this translation. That’s the same as with democracy which is not just a weird string of letters but a combination of the Greek demos and kratos which means rule of the people (or the mulititude, as Aristotle put it). Monarchy is another word with Greek origin and means rule of one (person).
Daß sie Lehnworte aus fremden Sprachen benutzten, ohne deren korrekte englische Übersetzung zu kennen, ändert an dieser Übersetzung nichts. Das verhält sich genauso wie bei Demokratie, was auch nicht bloß eine seltsame Folge von Buchstaben ist, sondern eine Kombination des griechischen demos und kratos was Volksherrschaft bedeutet (oder Herrschaft der Masse, wie Aristoteles es ausdrückte). Monarchie ist ein anderes Wort griechischen Ursprungs und bedeutet Alleinherrschaft.
That’s the same text in English and German (as close as I could make it) and while nobody can stop you from assigning whatever meaning you like the the German words, you have no authority to change their custom meaning for anybody else.
‘Herrschaft’ also means “reign”. Last time I looked we only have one king or queen reigning ‘allein’ at a time. Everything weakens under the reflective gaze and you are completely overthinking this point. Marmalade is not jam and it is made with Seville oranges. Do I need your permission to have the authority to write that?
Charlie has followed his great uncle Eddie by following the ravings of a mad German. Adolph caused rather a lot of damage and Eddie was doing a deal with him and was waiting for the invasion. George saved the monarchy. Liz and Phil knew what they had to do. Charlie has been a WEF stooge and must be disappointed that Klaus has been caught with his fingers in the till and put out to grass. It won’t be long until he goes too. William needs to take his grandparents advice.
Since the synthetic statelet of Austria was explicitly prohibited from joining Germany despite a referendum where the people voted in favour of that, you ought to own up to your own handiwork and correctly label Adolf as mad Austrian¹.
¹ Who emigrated to Bavaria and became a volunteer in the Royal Bavarian Army.