What Follows Trump After the Dems Win in November?

With the US mid-terms in November looking like being somewhere between a heavy defeat and a bloodbath for the Republicans, Mark Littlewood looks at what comes after Trump and which are the bets worth taking.

5 min read
Subscribe to Listen

Political Betting is a weekly column by Mark Littlewood aimed at people who like gambling on politics.

There won’t be an election in the United Kingdom this November. Fevered speculation has finally been quashed by Andy Burnham, in a very rare display of decisiveness.

However, over on the other side of the pond, significant elections will take place on November 3rd as American voters go the polls in the most significant vote in the USA since Trump defeated Harris to become the 47th President two years ago.

The mid-terms look like being somewhere between a heavy defeat and a bloodbath for the Republicans. Thirty-five Senate seats are up for grabs, as are all slots in the House of Representatives. Congressmen (there are 435 of them in the House of Representatives) only serve a two-year term so are almost permanently in election mode if they are in competitive districts. Senators (of whom there are 100) serve six years and are elected by thirds every couple of years.

Although not designed to do so, the way the electoral system works in the USA favours the modern Republican Party in both Senate and Presidential elections. The Senate is comprised of two members per state. Therefore, the Democrats’ tally in the massive states of California and New York (a total of four) is easily beaten by the Republicans dominance in the lightly populated states such as Wyoming, Idaho, Nebraska, Montana and North and South Dakota (a total of a dozen). The ratio of Senate seats in these areas tends to favour the GOP by 3:1 even though on a headcount, those Democrat-inclined states represent more voters by a ratio of about 8:1.

Because the Republicans tend to do well in relatively small states, this means they can expect to win Senate elections and Presidential elections even if the total national vote tally is slightly against them. In fact, in a Presidential election, the Republican candidate could lose the overall popular vote by as much as two or even three percentage points and still reasonably expect to make it to the White House.

Because of the way the US election cycle works (unlike here in the UK there is no King from whom to request an early election), whoever wins the Presidency is likely to find favourable results ‘down ballot’. Hence, the Republicans find themselves in very narrow control of the House of Representatives thanks in large part to Trump beating Harris win 2024. Although there is some ‘split ticket’ voting, whichever party wins the Presidential election can expect to do well in the Senate and House of Reps elections held on the same day – generally speaking, those who go to the polling station will vote for the same party right the way from President all the way down to the local dogcatcher.

The ‘mid-terms’ though have no such overarching top-of-the-ticket ripple effect.

All of the evidence suggests that the Democrats are going to take control of the House of Representatives in the all-out elections for that chamber (it frankly would be a miracle if they didn’t – they are a general 1/10). But they also look likely to take the Senate, despite the present balance placing them 53-47 behind and only a third of seats being up for grabs. This is measurably less certain than the Democrats taking the House, but the Republicans are having to put a serious effort in states which should be considered nailed on to be in the GOP column. Vast numbers of millions are even being spent to defend Kansas which hasn’t flipped in the Democrat direction for nearly a century.

The Democrats are favourites to pick up a Senate seat in Texas (a general 4/6), heavy odds on to win in the swing state of Michigan (1/2 or tighter) and about an evens bet to win in Iowa (a state Trump won by 13% in 2024).

From a betting perspective, the smart money is to back a Democratic sweep (winning both the House and the Senate), generally available at 3/5 on the exchanges. I’m not usually a short odds gambler, but a 60% return in just six weeks on an outcome I’d attach about an 85% chance to is too good to ignore.

If my instincts are right, this November will effectively usher in the beginning of the end of the Trump era. He has been the defining figure of American politics for well over a decade. He has realigned the entire party system and has remade the Republican Party into a wholly different beast. He won the GOP nomination for President three times in a row by a country mile every time and became only the second man in history to come back as President having lost an election. The Democrats are having to redefine themselves entirely as a result.

The Democrats won’t win in November on any sort of positive platform. The rise of the Democratic Socialist faction will be anathema to the vast majority of the American electorate. However, they will probably triumph on a broad ‘temper Trump’ attitude amongst the American public. If Trump finds Congress against him, he will struggle to get much done in the last two years of his Presidency.

Before long – and despite the President’s unerring ability to suck oxygen away from every other public commentator and command the entire news agenda himself – the discussion will turn to what comes next.

The so-called ‘country club’ Republicans will be hoping that the Trump dominance of their party will go down as a wild aberration and things will snap back into ‘normality’ as soon as he’s gone. They are likely to be disappointed. MAGA is a phenomenon created by Donald J. Trump but it will last far beyond his Presidency even if there is, inevitably, a new carrier of the torch.

The last four Presidential have seen zero continuity of the party in the White House – they have gone Democrat, Republican, Democrat, Republican. This sort of four-cycle rotation has only happened once before in American history (when, in the late 19th century, Grover Cleveland became the only man other than Trump to serve as President in non-consecutive terms).

Just because politics is febrile everywhere in the West, it doesn’t mean that this cycle of disgruntlement will continue. If you want a quick return on your money, back the Democrat sweep in November. If you fancy a longer-term, longer odds bet, the 13/8 that a Republican will win the White House in 2028 represents incredible value.

Mark Littlewood is a former Director of the Institute of Economic Affairs and the Director of PopCon.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
chriswatch
chriswatch
16 days ago

Polls both in the US and UK are purely designed and intended to manipulate the electorate to comply by voting within the views and ideas of media magnates.

Douglas Brodie
Douglas Brodie
16 days ago

I don’t believe the polling odds cited by Mr Littlewood. At least he acknowledges that the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) now rampant in the Democratic Party are “anathema”. In line with his prediction that the MAGA movement will prevail after Trump’s presidency, I’m sure the American people are not going to vote for the DSA communists when the Americal economy is now doing so well after the damage it suffered under Biden.

RJBassett
RJBassett
16 days ago

Mr. Littlewood should confine his predictions to the UK where he might be able to claim some knowledge or expertise.

If I had the time or inclination I would go back to 2016 and check this but I suspect that Littlewood called that election for Hillary in a landslide.

blunt instrument
blunt instrument
16 days ago

Hard to take seriously a man who thinks Trump actually lost in 2020.

RonniC
RonniC
16 days ago

The day before yesterday my American brother-in-law drove from Detroit across country to Woodstock, Vermont. On the way, in town after town, all apparently traditional Republican supporters were posted sign after sign saying ‘Gas 6USD. Kick out the Republicans’ and words to that effect.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
16 days ago

You need to increase your medication Mark. The Democrats can’t win at tiddlywinks.

JXB
JXB
17 days ago

“MAGA is a phenomenon created by Donald J. Trump”

No. He capitalised and gave a name to what was already there, an evolution of the Tea Party movement.

Trump’s successor. I would say either J D Vance or Marco Rubio.

Dinger64
Dinger64
16 days ago
Reply to  JXB

Ron DeSantis?

JXB
JXB
16 days ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I doubt he could win the GOP primaries. Normally the VP is the “obvious” choice.

stewart
stewart
17 days ago

An America led by Trump looked a bit daunting just before he took office the first time.

But now, an America not led by Trump after he leaves office looks even more daunting.

How much of the opposition to climate delusion, DEI grifting, etc will continue after him? If the Biden years are anything to go by, it could be pretty rough.

tarby
tarby
17 days ago

A lot of faith in the polls here, the same polls that had Trump losing by a landslide in 2016, 2020 and 2024. I am quite amazed that someone so well versed in the betting game would stake their reputation on this outcome.

JXB
JXB
17 days ago
Reply to  tarby

“2010 was one of the biggest midterm reverses suffered by a sitting president’s party in modern American history.”

Republicans took control of the House winning 63 seats, gained 6 in the Senate.

Obama went on to win a second term.

Opinion polls are not the best guide.

NothingElegant
NothingElegant
17 days ago
Reply to  tarby

As a Dallasite, I’m very skeptical about the polls about the Texas senate race. On average, the sample is 600-1200 prospective voters in a state with 18.7M registered voters and most respondents are left leaning.

“Today, the response rate have crashed from 20% in 2000 to 5% in 2024, skewing samples toward urban, college-educated, institutionally trusting voters (AAPOR, 2024).” Link

MadWolf303
MadWolf303
16 days ago
Reply to  tarby

Agreed the polls are so rigged and even the betting mkts reflect wishful thinking.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
17 days ago

Trump squandered a lot of credit with what looks to me like an ill advised and possibly failed war that has cost a lot of money and caused economic disruption. I am not convinced there was a compelling need for it. Shame. But voting Democrat just seems nuts to me unless you’re an illegal immigrant or a handout addict.

JXB
JXB
17 days ago

All wars are failures until they are won.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
17 days ago
Reply to  JXB

It depends how you define “won”. It’s not 100% clear to me what the precise objectives are and I suspect it would be hard to prove they’d been achieved.

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
16 days ago

Presumably the objective was to create the conditions for a popular revolution or military coup in Iran that could of led to a slightly more moderate government that stopped funding terrorists and trying to develop nuclear weapons. After the mass protests at the start of the year this must of seemed fairly likely and the war was a gamble worth taking.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
16 days ago
Reply to  Matt Dalby

Maybe. How has attempted or actual regime change worked out in the past, say since WW2? It doesn’t seem to have a good track record to me.

stewart
stewart
17 days ago

I don’t really know why people should care so much about the war in Iran, least of all Americans. It doesn’t affect them particularly. There are basically zero casualties.

The idea that the changes in fuel prices are somehow life changing for them seems like a total psyop, particularly when you consider that everything has been going up like crazy for quite a while.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
17 days ago
Reply to  stewart

It has cost a lot of money. I don’t think I would be happy, though it would not even come close to making me vote Democrat, if I were eligible.

NothingElegant
NothingElegant
17 days ago
Reply to  stewart

Yes, it is baffling that any American thinks that the higher gas prices are a reasonable reason to usher in the party that will spend trillions for tax-payer funded “freebies”; readopt unworkable, ruinous net-zero energy; destroy capitalism/private enterprise and eradicate private property; reopen our borders, abolish all border control agencies and police while they release violent criminals from prisions. 🫤

NothingElegant
NothingElegant
17 days ago

Unfortunately, too many voters are have fatally short memories and too easily swayed by the economically infeasible policies of the left. Even with flawed polls, it is truly disturbing that there is any support for the crazy radicals of the red-green alliance who are unapologetically vocal about their unAmerican and anti-Semitic views while they happily admit that they view the DNC as their Trojan horse to usher in all the horrors of communism.

Gezza England
Gezza England
17 days ago

It all depends on the Far Left DemoTwat voter fraud being allowed to continue given that the RINOs side with them all the time. Every time there is a measure proposed to make sure only those eligible to vote are on the rolls and do so, the DemoTwats run off to the courts where Far Left judges block it. The DemoTwats demand ID to attend their party shindigs but somehow do not think it is appropriate for federal or state elections. There are calls for Donald to call a national emergency for the elections now that there is proof of foreign interference from China etc. but there has been an observation that his executive order requiring the postal service to only send mail-in ballots to genuine voters at real addresses contains something being overlooked. While this is being blocked in court, the EO also makes election officials responsible for ensuring all votes are genuine under pain of a conviction and jail time. Sceptics might say this is all very well considering the Blob-infected DOJ’s failure to prosecute fraud cases from 2020 but this time it could be different.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
17 days ago

The prospect of Democrat control in either of both Houses is truly terrifying. They are not the Democrats of the Kennedys or even of Carter. They are Islamist promoting, weak border, extreme socialists probably even worse than the Labour government here.

The risks to the world are extreme.

MadWolf303
MadWolf303
16 days ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Which is why the US will not commit suicide and vote Dem…..

blunt instrument
blunt instrument
16 days ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

In this war against humanity, America is Stalingrad.

RTSC
RTSC
16 days ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

As Robert Kennedy Junior recently pointed out.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.