This week’s UKHSA vaccine surveillance report has landed – and this week a change. In the (in)famous Table 12, which shows rates of infections, deaths and hospitalisations per 100,000 by vaccination status, the data have suddenly switched to giving rates for triple-jabbed rather than two-or-more doses, meaning we no longer have continuity with our previous data. So sudden was the change in fact, that the report itself has not kept up with it, and the notes under the table still say the rates are for “people who have received either two doses of a COVID-19 vaccine or in people who have not received a COVID-19 vaccine”.
The change means we have to start over in our week-by-week comparisons, so the infection rates by age for this period are depicted above and the unadjusted vaccine effectiveness figures are depicted below.
Below is how the total reported infections for the period break down by vaccination status (in this chart vaccinated means one or more doses). While the chart doesn’t take into account the different numbers of people vaccinated and unvaccinated, with over 70% of infections in the vaccinated it does show that the outbreak is predominantly in vaccinated people.
Below is what our previous chart would look like if we just added the new data in, but the trend in the past week is obviously nonsense as they’ve changed the parameters. Still, it gives an indication of the difference between the double and triple jabbed, and note that all but the under-30s are still negative (meaning higher infection rates in the vaccinated than unvaccinated), and the under-30s are still low. Also, the over-70s declined since last week anyway, despite the switch to triple-jabbed only. Makes you wonder what the data for two-or-more doses would have shown.
The negative effectiveness in the raw data here is being seen elsewhere, including in Scotland, Ontario and Iceland, and the UKHSA should be investigating this striking phenomenon properly by quantifying the potential confounders and producing adjusted estimates from the data.
Instead, the agency continues to insist, ludicrously, that “comparing case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations should not be used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infection”. (A new ‘fact check‘ from Full Fatuous has even appeared to hammer home the point again.) But that is an untenable position – of course vaccine effectiveness can be estimated by “comparing case rates among vaccinated and unvaccinated populations” – and as I noted in a post earlier, this is shown once more by the U.S. CDC, which has just published a report estimating hazard rates (an equivalent quantity to vaccine effectiveness) by doing just that. Furthermore, while the CDC study controlled for prior infection and adjusted for age, it deemed biases from other potential confounders to be “minimal”. This shows up the UKHSA’s excuses for what they are, and they should no longer be accepted.
For completeness, here are the charts for hospitalisations and deaths, though again the sharp rise this week is an artefact owing to switching to triple-jabbed only. The UKHSA report’s official estimate of vaccine effectiveness for the double-dosed against hospitalisation from Omicron after six months is 30-55%.
Stop Press: Eugyppius draws on the data from last week’s report to estimate the missing data from this week’s, and comes to a disturbing conclusion: that the two-dose-only group have much higher Covid death rates than the unvaccinated. This is disturbing as the report states that the high risk are prioritised for boosters, meaning the death rate in the remaining two-dose-only population should be biased low, not high.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The Covid-19 Vaxx – the gift that keeps on giving – literally.
Blood clots, anaphylactic shock, myocarditis, Bells Palsy, transverse myelytis, VITT – and last but not least, infection with the corona virus itself, saving people the trouble of seeking it out. If you’re vaxxed, it will find you.
All predicted by ‘real’ scientist over a year ago – blocked by the UK Media on ‘orders for above’ .
I do wonder, aren’t people actually “getting it’ yet?
‘Vaccine effectiveness’, government style, is based on a succession of lies, the first of which is detailed on the opening page of the UKHSA efficacy report – which states, “Large clinical trials have been undertaken for each of the COVID-19 vaccines approved in the
UK which found that they are highly efficacious at preventing symptomatic disease in the
populations that were studied.”
When are sceptics going to stop debating alleged ‘vaccine efficacy’?
Particularly when it was established from the outset that the injections have ZERO ARR efficacy.
This product enters govt modelling systems with zero efficacy, and comes out the other end with up to 80% efficacy.
These statistical lies are being manufactured to justify implementation of an unlawful, experimental medical program.
There is no need to debate efficacy. The efficacy is good, all the data lines up, worldwide. Trial, real-life data, all of it.
Accept it, as arguing otherwise make you look like an idiot
The headline and the charts below it tell us everything we need to know. These charts are glowing testimonials to the “efficacy” of the vaccines?
Say what?!
Confess it. You are Little Fon, returned to us, as boringly and predictably malicious as ever.
He may be a reincarnation of Hindu Kushner, the artist formerly known as Spud.
Isn’t it time for your weekly injection? You are a total pain in the gluteus maximus
You’re the idiot; look at my recent post.
You are the idiot.
Were you born a fool or was it the vaccine that did it?
Micro clots in the brain?
Must be difficult not being able to read simple graphs.
Fauci’s holdings in Chinese companies
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/faucis-holdings-in-chinese-companies/
TCW
Yellow Boards By the Road
Junction Long Hill Road,
New Forest Ride & A329 London Rd
(near Mercedes Benz)
Bracknell RG12 9FR
Stand in the Park Sundays 10am make friends, ignore the madness & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens Cockpit Path car park Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Henley Mills Meadows (at the bandstand) Henley-on-Thames RG9 1DS
Telegram Group
http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
No I think you will find blood clots are being caused by binge watching Netflix, the BBC told me.
Must be true then, eh?
Part 1
This is a wee bit long, but for anyone with children, grandchildren, nieces or nephews, it might be worth their time to have a scan through it.
The basics of how natural immunity works and develops a memory for viruses in order to identify and defeat future variants of them are interesting – and required knowledge when making decisions about giving the COVID-19 “vaccines” to children.
Before first contact with a virus – in the UK this is typically a flu/cold type virus – a child’s immune system is somewhat in the apprentice stage. It’s been genetically coded from each parent, but has not yet encountered real world working conditions in dealing with viruses or antigens.
When the child gets infected for the first time with a virus, the immune system springs into action. It reads the virus molecule, recognises it as alien and then identifies a way to defeat it.
The genome of some influenza viruses consists of eight genomic segments and these can encode for up to 11 or more proteins. It’s these proteins which are targeted by the child’s antibody response. But, very importantly, different elements of the child’s immune system concentrate on separate and differing proteins, and use strategies unique to each element to read and destroy each protein.
The child’s white blood cells carry lymphocytes, such as B-cells, T-cells and natural killer cells, and an array of other types of immune cells. These immune cells take various routes to target and defeat the virus by honing in on specific proteins on the virus. An analogy would be a unit of troops attempting to take out a machine gun nest by splitting up and going at the target from the front and both flanks; the backs of the machine gunners will most certainly be exposed to one of these attacks.
The immune system is truly miraculous and its criminal how the government has deliberately ignored its role in keeping our bodies healthy. Instead they deliberately pushed this toxic spike making concoction, which will have a devastating effect on it. If the government truly cared about our health they would have recommended vitamin C D and Zinc and a healthy lifestyle and not isolate healthy people or mandate mask wearing. They have done everything contrary to what is common sense, so no I don’t think the government or its affiliated health service cares about my health at all.
Part 2
The child has got his or her first flu and has been ill for a while, which made other kids aware this child carried a virus, and which forewarned them and helped them to avoid catching this virus via close-contact. Being sick isn’t just a pain-in-the-butt, it’s also nature’s way of warning others to keep their distance and stop the ill person from spreading diseases – which points to the fatuity of “vaccines” which allow the “inoculated” to carry and spread a live virus.
The child’s immune system has successfully completed its apprenticeship and totally defeated the virus. The child’s natural immune system has not just stopped the virus from infecting and replicating in cells, but totally killed it. Thus, the child will not be moving around asymptomatically and passing a live virus to others.
What’s really genius about the child’s immune system is that an array of his or her immune cells have read different proteins on the virus, and if this virus or a variant of it shows up again, the immune system is locked and loaded and ready to defeat it at a much faster pace.
The major advantage of the child’s immune cells targeting the virus via its many different proteins is because all viruses mutate. Over the years and decades in the UK the chemical make-up of the influenza virus’ proteins will change. But because the immune cells have memorised aspects of most of the virus’ proteins, it will still be able to identify it and remember its weak spots.
Apart from age and comorbidities, this is why old people are more susceptible to flu and cold viruses than younger people. Over the decades the virus’ incremental mutations add up to quite a lot, and the old person’s immune system remains mostly primed on aspects of the virus they encountered when young.
“Being sick isn’t just a pain-in-the-butt, it’s also nature’s way of warning others to keep their distance and stop the ill person from spreading diseases”
This is an excellent point, which used to be common knowledge in the days before little plastic boxes with QR codes on them that can be read by webcam and get a
mugperson classed as a suitable “case” for isolation regardless of whether they’re coughing their guts up or they’re as fit as a fiddle.Wearing a cloth mask and keeping two metres behind the person in front of you in Tesco’s wouldn’t do shee-yit against a real respiratory illness-based mass killer pandemic.
Part 3
The COVID-19 “vaccines”? Here I’m only referring to the percentage of these “vaccines” that do actually have some disease fighting ability.
First these are not actually vaccines. When “inoculated” people get infected with COVID-19, these “vaccines” don’t kill the virus, like natural immune systems do. They only stop the virus from entering, hijacking and replicating in cells. The virus remains alive in the body and can be passed on to others.
How do the limited number of batches of COVID-19 “vaccines” which can actually stop the virus from entering cells work? They have been developed and programmed to target an S-protein that was present on the spike of the original variant of this virus which infected people in late 2019 and early 2020.
Like all viruses, this original version of the COVID-19 virus mutated. The Delta variant soon came along and this, basically, did not have the S-protein – it had mutated into something with different chemical characteristics. Thus, the “vaccine” could not read or target it in a way that halted it from entering cells, which this virus needs to do in order to replicate itself.
But worse than this. While the “vaccine” could not actually stop the Delta variant from entering cells, it did actually bind to this variant’s spike protein. By binding to the Delta variant’s spike protein, the “vaccine” actually stopped the body’s natural immune cells from attacking the virus.
Point of order: Antibodies don’t “stop” the virus entering cells, affinity varies by type, they come “unstuck” (low affinity) and “reattach” all the time, they’re part of the clean-up crew, they ‘red flag’ the virus for other immune cells while blocking the receptor for a while; at best antibodies alone could only slow the cell infection rate, not stop it.
Hence why all the focus on antibodies is nonsense, there is no correlate of immunity for SARS CoV2
Part 4
With the Delta variant, the “vaccine” actually formed a shield around the virus molecule and protected it from being attacked by the natural immune system. This is fact and comes from Geert Vanden Bossche, DVM, PhD – this man is an independent virologist and vaccine expert, and formerly worked at GAVI and The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The COVID-19 Omicron variant, like the Delta variant, also, basically, does not have the S-protein. The “vaccine” also protects this variant against the natural immune system in the same way it protects the Delta variant.
People involved in immunology have for decades been very knowledgeable in how human immune systems work. So, it really has to be asked, did Big Pharma purposefully design the “vaccines” to cause malfunction in the natural immune systems of humans?
As regards children:
When a child is given the COVID-19 “vaccine”, it primes lymphocytes in the child’s immune system to target, read and remember the S-protein – the protein which was on the original virus in late 2019 and early 2020.
Being thus primed, these lymphocytes only react to virus spikes which have this particular S-protein. These lymphocytes are primed only to attack a virus which displays chemical characteristics peculiar to the S-protein. They totally ignore COVID-19 variants that don’t display the particular chemical characteristics of this S-protein, i.e., Delta, Omicron and any newer variants which show up.
I repeat myself, because it’s worth repeating. Worse than being totally incapable of protecting the child against the Delta, Omicron and whatever other variants which will surely arise in the future, the “vaccines” will actually bind to the spikes of all newer variants of the COVID-19 virus which infects the child, and will shield this variant from attack by other elements of the child’s immune system.
Part 5
And like I’ve already said above, when children are “inoculated” with these “vaccines”, their lymphocytes are primed for life to only look for viruses which display the particular chemical and electro-magnetic characteristics associated with the S-protein which was present on the original SARS‑CoV‑2 virus variant in late 2019 and early 2020.
Also bear in mind that SARS‑CoV‑1 has been around since about 2002. The vast majority of children have experienced this virus strain, read it, memorised it, and defeated it. They have developed antibodies that can defeat the SARS‑CoV‑1 variant. They have natural immunity to this virus.
SARS‑CoV‑2 is just another variant of SARS‑CoV‑1. Therefore, healthy children already have antibodies in place that are locked and loaded and ready to defeat SARS‑CoV‑2 and its variants should they show up and infect them.
There’s no if’s or but’s about it, there is no end of scientific evidence that shows that these so-called vaccines are doing and going to do nothing but harm and damage to children.
Interesting stuff FW. Thanks for taking the time to explain it fully..
When you take a look into our immune systems you find them to be fantastic protective pieces of biological machinery.
I have no doubt that even pre-plandemic, many “vaccines” were designed to damage people’s natural immune systems in order to make them more reliant on medications.
We split from chimpanzees about 7 million years ago. And both species have done quite nicely ever since. Now Gates and Big Pharma are telling us we will not make it any further without their serums.
Yeah!
They are now targeting children, and “targeting” quite rightly describes it. Hopefully, this current episode and the poisonous “vaccines” wakes people up to the criminal frauds they are. Big Pharma and Gates really need to be hauled before a Nuremberg type court.
We’ve been done a great disservice by the government-appointed scientists and their oversimplified explanations of how our immune systems work.
I rather fear that the majority in our population will soon be getting a lesson in how complex the immune system is, and how what appears to be beneficial in the short term can well prove to be detrimental in the longer term.
This item of news is astounding and proves how resilient our immune systems really are without Big Pharma interventions.
“An 87-year-old man in Iran hasn’t bathed in decades, drinks water from puddles and eats raw roadkill yet scientists have been left baffled by his surprisingly strong immune system and good health”
Very interesting about the Iranian man. This reminded me of the question about the overuse of bleach and disinfectants in the home.
This question is about what some would describe as the excessive use of these products in modern homes where children are being reared. These houses are kept totally sanitised 24/7 and the children that are born into them never experience any type of bacteria in their early stages of development – at least until they start school.
It’s suggested that it would be better for the children if the home was kept clean, but not fanatically sanitised. That exposure to a little more common bacteria in the early stages of development would be very advantageous to the training of the children’s immune systems.
That it would be better for young children to be exposed to the odd less pernicious bacterium in the home, and then they’d be better prepared when they’d encounter these bacterium’s more vicious cousins out in the world.
When we were fussing about cleanliness around our kids my dear old Mum, used to say ‘Let the kids eat dirt. Dirt is good for them’.
They also knew what to do with infectious diseases. If one kid caught Chicken Pox, they would have chicken pox parties to infect all the other kids in the district. (around the 1930’s).
We’ve become intoxicated and obsessed with the idea of ‘safe’.
A true story. When I was young I heard two old people say that eating small amounts of clay (soil that grass grows out of!) was good for people. At the time I thought, urgggggg.
But I found out in later years that we get vitamin B from meat, particularly beef and lamb. And do you know where cattle and sheep get their vitamin B from? No, it’s not from the grass and fodder they eat.
It’s via their eating of grass that they get it, but not directly from the grass. The vitamin B that cattle and sheep ingest actually originates in bacteria type creatures that live in the clay in which the grass grows.
When cattle or sheep pluck out a tuft of grass to eat, some of the bugs containing the vitamin B clings to its roots. The cattle and sheep swallow the entire lot, and thus get their vitamin B.
So, the two old folk – whom modern people would dismiss as uncouth savages – that said eating clay was good for people, were right. People with a low meat diet could get some vitamin B this way, just like cattle and sheep get it.
Therise in allergies is linked to excessive sanitising, I understand, the rise in milk allergies is linked to pasteurised milk. By the same token, natural births are better for children (and of course breast milk).
Incidentally I seem to remember Nestle was involved in a scandal over baby milk in the third world. Corruption in big food and big pharma is a long standing and ongoing problem.
An excellent summary of the way our immune systems work. Thank you.
Brilliant analysis, thank you.
Get ready to be “fact checked” by some dimwit with about two days training of how to spell – Not true. So there.
Good stuff; have five thumbs up and a star….
I’m thinking of wearing one on my jacket. I wonder what the people in the village (in Germany) I live in would say. I think they would be phoning up my brother who almost everybody in the village knows to tell him
You’re incorrect about SARS or sars-cov1. Very few people (globally) will have been exposed let alone have antibodies to this. The original SARS was a killer disease with little known zoonotic reservoirs other than bats hence it’s relative containment in Asia before it fizzled out. Children have robust immune systems in comparison to adults, and young adults and older children will have immunity through exposure to other viruses including coronaviruses. It’s just a fact of life as we age our immune capabilities drop and the toll of life makes is more susceptible to a nasty virus, it really has been nothing out of the ordinary. Yes, children and healthy young adults have the best protection already with their own untarnished immune system.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is a viral respiratory disease caused by a SARS-associated coronavirus.
Coronaviruses vary significantly in virulence. Some are deadly, and some are relatively harmless, such as the common cold or flu.
SARS‑CoV‑1 was a “coronavirus” (as is SARS‑CoV‑2 ). So, any child that has had a cold or flu in the last twenty years, and got over it, has created and carries antibodies capable of defending against coronaviruses.
So, actually, I’m not incorrect about it. Perhaps you should know about “variants” within a family of viruses, and viruses that have no genetic relationship to each other?
The children will have protection, but I would have thought that the bulk of it would be via cellular mechanisms, and not antibodies (although IgA antibodies do have a role to play).
The child would also have inherited some of its mother’s immunity.
If you say you’re not incorrect you must be correct….
You say above healthy children will already have antibodies to SARS-COV1 as they will have been “experienced” this virus atrain. The vast majority of people globally will not have come in contact with this virus, but you conflate SARS-cov2 with cov1 when all they share is a high homeogeneity with one another, which does not mean that they are familial. Doing a deep dive into the sequences, using BLAST and Vectornti, of the original cov2, I see no reason to link the two as closely related, although there would certainly be cross immunity from one to the other.
But I genuflect to your knowledge on the subject.
Are we one to these people that has absolutely nothing to say, but insists on saying it anyway?
I assume it is relevant to note that people confirmed to have recovered from a Sars Cov 1 in 2003 were found in 2020 to have immunity to Cov 2.
I assume this would indicate they are close enough.
The child would have inherited some immunity from the mother surely!
Dr Mike Yeadon has stated, often, that Coronaviruses are genetically ~80 identical – is that a “familial” descriptor or is he driving at something else (genuine question, I don’t know..!)
Thank you very much for such an interesting, and easy to understand, explanation.
Is it possible that the seemingly higher rate of effectiveness in under 18s, is a just a reflection of the number of u18s that are triple jabbed? Possibly kids who are genuinely vulnerable + Covidian parents, super cautious etc
Yes very few triple dosed in the under 18s.
If you compare efficacy against testing positive in the under 18s, vaccinated (any dose) vs unvaccinated there is negative 31% efficacy.
Many of the positive tests in under 18’s are bogus though.
Of course they are – over18s too!
Given that for anyone under 65 the chances of being hospitalised or dying of the original (and still the best) covid-19 were very close to zero the fact that these shitty injections don’t stop those under 65 catching the disease, and even make it much more likely, is devastating.
I’ve been comparing unvaccinated vs vaccinated (any dose) so still possible to compare on this basis to see the trend despite the double dose/triple dose split change.
Here’s the resulting chart over time of effiaccy against testing positive.
Negative efficacy still against testing positive in every age group (unvaccinated vs vaccinated any dose). That is SARS-C0V-2 positives per 100,000 higher in the vaccinated than the unvaccinated. And still more than double the rate of +ves in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated in the 18-69 age groups.
Worsening efficacy (increasing negative efficacy) in the older age groups (coloured red) although not falling quite so rapidly as last few weeks. Waning effect after the boosters continues.
Efficacy levelling off (at around same level of negative efficacy) in the middle age groups (coloured gold)
And efficacy improving (i.e slightly less negative efficacy) in the younger age groups (coloured green).
And the unvaccinated are just 32.1% of all +ve test emergency care admissions; the lowest percentage since the vaccine surveillance reports started. Not looking good for the experimental vaccines. And almost all of the increase in these +ve test admissions are due to increased admissions in the vaccinated (any dose)
Note the two charts shown are identical except I’ve changed the order of the bars (vaccinated on top in the first one and unvaccinated on top in the bottom chart), and the labels in the top chart are percentage of admissions that are vaccinated/unvaccinated and the labels in the bottom chart are numbers of admissions.
And a fall in the percentage of deaths within 28 days of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 which are in the unvaccinated.
Now down to 26.3% of positive test deaths in the unvaccinated (down from 29.4% in last week’s report) and 73.7% in the vaccinated (any dose).
Again the recent rise in +ve test deaths is mainly due to the increase in vaccinated +ve test deaths.
So much vax benefit and all you have to do is have a stroke,a heart attack, get myocarditis, pericarditis, the tremours, incontinence, crippling headaches and cancer in return.
Its the bargain of the century
Do you display this data on your own website?
No just post up here
While ‘cases’ are positives from an unreliable test it’s still interesting to see that +ve test rates are levelling off in most age groups.
But look how all the highest +ve test rates are in vaccinated age groups (the solid lines at week 3). And how unvaccinated rates (the dotted lines) have only ever increased steadily to much lower levels and are also levelling off in most age groups.
Sheesh. Big pharma approves of this message:
It um… it is the Mayo Clinic … read at your own peril… and that sore finger is probably cancerous….
They peaked with the invention of mayonaise.
Hey have you seen Fauci’s new AIDS vax?
Sure you are 90% more likely to get AIDS after taking it but if you don’t get the shot the MSM will shout ‘anti vax’ at you.
Didn’t the old one do enough damage then?
AIDS is going to be the Pharma money maker of the future …and not because of bath houses in LA.
The Covid vaccines are a crime against humanity. I think that’s all there is to say.
Yes …but everyone needs to start saying it …loudly!
All I hear from the 75%% is: “La la la la I’m not listening”
You could try justifying your statement with real reasoning and reliable data. ..If you can.
You actually owe a large debt of gratitude to those who are vaccinated. It will hasten the end of the pandemic.
I’ve just read your comments over on the forum. I don’t have anything to say to you at all.
what pandemic?
The question is how long people will take to accept this.
It seems to me all the data simply suggests there’s no real difference in infection rates of “vaccinated” v unvaccinated, so you can only conclude that the “vaccine” is no better than a placebo and at worse dangerous.
The virus is doing what viruses do, evolving to be less harmful, all credit to natural process despite the experts interventions.
read the whole surveillance report. You will find you are wrong.
How many of the unvaccinated are those on their last legs and so can’t have the injections? Is that made clear in the surveillance report?
Quote your data and source.
It isn’t my report.. go and read it. It’s not too difficult. You should be able to understand it.
Are those who can’t or won’t be injected separated in the report?
Is this a joke?
I’m not at all sure that omicron evolved.
I still haven’t seen undeniable proof that the jabbed are less likely to be hospitalised or die than the unjabbed.
People who are unjabbed that end up in ICU may have been too ill to be jabbed and that is why they end up in hospital and die, giving the fit and healthy unjabbed who don’t end up in ICU a bad name.
All the people who come up with the raw data and studies have a financial and vested interest in showing that the jabs work.
You make the key point there.
Just a conspiracy view. Unfounded and learned from fellow idiots.
No paragraph 2 is a very important point. The stats mix up the most vulnerable and the least to the CCP Virus.
So support it with actual data. Otherwise it is just arm waving.
The unvaccinated are lumped together in the official stats. So are fed to mislead.
People are considered unvaccinated in the first 2 weeks after being jabbed also in in a lot of countries you are considered unvaccinated if you haven’t had the booster. There are reports coming out that boosters are damaging the natural immune system.
Whose ‘stats’ ? There is your problem!
Go and read the surveillance report.
The surveillance report is flawed and has been criticized many times on these pages and here.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357778435_Official_mortality_data_for_England_suggest_systematic_miscategorisation_of_vaccine_status_and_uncertain_effectiveness_of_Covid-19_vaccination
Please show me a report or paper showing that the experimental jabbed are less likely to be hospitalised or die than the unjabbed that is not flawed.
Wherever do you get your figures from? “Daily Mail”? The majority in hospital are jabbed!
Listen to the excellent Nurses they are trying to sack, not the fake ‘journalists’
I just know this. Practically every statement these experts have made has been proven to be false (or questionable) by later data or studies. So if they say definitely that the jabs prevent “severe” cases and deaths, I assume this statement might also be dubious. It might be true or somewhat true, but probably not as iron-clad true as they want us to believe.
Here’s one article I found today with data that doesn’t exactly confirm that only the unvaccinated are dying or ending up in the hospital or dying.
Plenty of vaccinated are dying and being treated in the hospital as well.
The vaccine is also failing to provide protection against severe outcomes as the vaccinated make up more than 75%, or 2,245 cases, of the 2,984 hospitalizations. The fully vaccinated make up 68.7%, or 2,050 cases, of hospitalizations compared to the 24.8%, or 739 cases, for the unvaccinated. The province continues to try and mislead the public by stating statistics that imply the vaccines are working, for example, the unvaccinated are 3x more likely to end up in hospital. In reality, the only measure of the “vaccine’s” success, or lack of, is that it is failing to keep the fully vaccinated out of the hospital, as touted. Period.
The vaccinated are also filling up ICUs with 213 of the 408 total cases cases being vaccinated.
https://brightlightnews.com/fully-vaxxed-still-driving-ontarios-record-wave-of-cases/
This article – rare real journalism about vaccine injuries and cover-up of same – shows the most chilling aspect of what’s happening. It provides evidence that journalists are either being ordered to spike such stories, or intuitively know what they are NOT supposed to investigate and report.
Excerpts:
“She has been poked, examined, and studied by physicians at the National Institutes of Health, been in close contact with numerous Food and Drug Administration and NIH officials (where she was warned not to disclose any of the treatments she received), and then ditched. “Radio silence” is how she refers to it.
The media has dutifully gone along. Since Brianne (and numerous others) decided to go public with their vaccine injuries, the response from the mainstream press has been underwhelming. She was interviewed by three reporters from The New York Times, Newsmax, and other major outlets with nothing subsequently appearing in print. Even more telling were some of the comments by the journalists she connected with. A Times reporter told her they are under great pressure not to make the vaccines look bad. One journalist said she was “intimidated by someone at Pfizer” not to run her story.”
https://rescue.substack.com/p/a-million-americans-were-injured?fbclid=IwAR3m3MO9SCFEzBXRxeSRoRxviiRlBunXg4ADCfq9AA-sxvKr-GViPZJaNdM
Like the reporter who wrote the above article, I too am a “freelance journalist.” I can offer my own first-hand anecdotes about other mainstream reporters who seem to know what stories they are not allowed to investigate.
Of all the whistleblowers the world now needs, the most important might come from journalists in newsrooms who are brave enough to tell the truth about what they cannot report or write.
Here’s my experience with this phenomena. Since I wrote this, I’ve exchanged emails with other reporters at prominent news organizations who I was led to believe were looking into the same story … and then crickets.
Anyway, the only important journalism any of us are likely to read will come from “freelance” or “independent” journalists (not corporate journalists) … and it will most likely be published at obscure or “alternative media” sites.
https://uncoverdc.com/2020/07/13/covid-19-is-a-real-search-for-the-truth-now-taboo/
This is another – and little-appreciated – form of censorship. Some journalists are writing important stories. But that’s just half the battle. The other part of the battle is to find some publication with a large audience that will publish this work. As I know first-hand, good luck with that.
They need to go on Joe Rogans show his interview with Dr Malone got 50 million views and the view numbers are still rising. It was taken down very quickly by YT which just goes to show that the pharma industry doesn’t like the truth.
Many have known all this for a year.
So “wakey wakey” to those who find this a ‘revelation’!
What Mr Jones is doing here is using unadjusted data to deceive you into believing that vaccines don’t work.
He is being very malicious and dishonest in doing so.
The report, he references, clearly states that these numbers cannot be used in the way that he goes on to do.
e, it is expected that a large proportion of cases, hospitalisations and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated and no vaccine is 100% effective.
I think what he is telling you is the data is adjusted to suit, hence Malteser heads latest advert, using fear to encourage more injections, based on such data but very dishonest in itself.
No he isn’t. Read the report. If you understand it, you will learn you are wrong.
Um, you did notice that the infection rates are per hundred thousand?!!!
Remember, if brain currently in neutral, it is a rather good idea to put it into gear before starting!
per 100 thousand what?
It is per 100k people in that age group. So if majority in that age group is vaccinated, it influences the resulting number.
Have a good think, but make sure you are sitting down, in case you pass out.
Per 100,000 people in that age group and by vaccination status, you absolute Joey.
I’d just like add a gentle reminder here from Mark Twain…
So true!
It’s Dr Jones, actually.
So let the gov shut down the site, if it’s disinformation.
Funny how you need to adjust the data to get the correct result eh?
Since Mr Jones is continuing with his gross misinformation campaign to further his anti-vaxx agenda, some actual facts from the surveillance report should be referenced.
So looking at table 2a for effectiveness against hospitalisation, it is between 80% and 85% for 4-6 months after dose 3.
Why does your influencer not mention this in his article?
Why does he chose to misrepresent partial data to give an impression that vaccines don’t work.
He knows very well that they do work and choses provide the wrong impression.
Because he adds the words “unadjusted data” covering his misrepresentation of the information, he knows his readership is too ignorant to understand what this means.
He is relying on your stupidity, to get away with it.
Whether they work or not I am not qualified to say. What the point is though of a fit and healthy person having these multiple injections, has never been made clear.
Yes it has. Go and look into it.
Only in the communist way, which doesn’t interest me. I can only look after my own health and serious outcomes for fit and healthy people from the CCP Virus are really are rare events. So why take the potions?
Your spelling, grammar and punctuation are atrocious. I expect if you tried to verbally put across what you have attempted to say here in writing, it would come out of your mouth in a haze of rants snot and spittle, whilst your eyes swivelled like the tail rotor on a helicopter.
Don’t despair though, because this means you are more than qualified to get a job as a fact-checker with a Soros or Gates NGO.
Just concentrate on the facts of vaccine effectiveness. No point in attacking me.
Sorry mate, but there are no facts of “vaccine” effectiveness. On the contrary, there are only facts that the “vaccines” have an almost 100% negative-efficacy.
This means the “vaccines” actually gives people Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
I’m not going to bother posting references here, but there’s an abundance of statistics and data out there which prove that the “vaccinated” are much more likely to be hospitalised, suffer injuries and die than the unvaccinated.
I don’t mean to be too insulting, but I suspect you are one of these woke progressives who will not wake up to the perniciousness of socialist Marxism until you get a military boot up your butt and you are dragged away to a labour camp.
This happed to many progressives like you when the Bolsheviks finally took control of Russia and implemented their version of Communism.
I wonder if weasels can get therapy for their delusions.
A real vaccine stops you getting the disease in the first place. There have been more adverse reactions and deaths from this so called experimental gene therapy still in stage 3 trials than in 50 years of all other real vaccines. It is not a vaccine its a treatment. It doesn’t stop you getting infected and it doesn’t stop you infecting others. Ivermectin and Budesonide would have done a far better job but they are cheap so no billions of profit to be made.
I don’t think he’s anti-vax; after all, he’s probably had a polio vax and is protected for life. A rona vax, on the other hand, could take his life….
The whole vaccine passport, social distancing, masks and all the other crap we have had to put up with over the last two years has been to reduce the infection rate. Non of it works, and now it appears the vaccines after a short period of time make it worse. They do appear to reduce serious illness and death, again for a short period of time. So the sensible thing would be to vaccinate the elderly and vulnerable and alow the rest of us to get on with our lives using the immune system we were born with. Forcing a questionable vaccine on healthy adults and children is not just unethical, it is criminal and I hope in short time this is proved to be the case.
The vaccines are failing miserably in the way they were marketed at the public.
Go and read the vaccine surveillance report.
The majority are not ‘anti vax’, most have had vaccinations at some time, and this does not give immunity as the manufacturers have already said. ‘Vaccine hesitancy’ describes it better for most, its experimental still and therefore there is no immunity just a chance that it will reduce symptoms, although there is no way of verifying this
An experiment with over 10 billion doses. Don’t you think the evidence is pretty clear by now.
Its still experimental and therefore should not be subject to ANY coercion at all, forcing healthcare staff to take a vaccine which does not give immunity should be illegal. All other arguments are actually irrelevant
Have you decided whether the ‘experiment’ is providing the intended results or going badly – catastrophically- wrong?
What is the IQ of an average sheep though?
The evidence is very clear by now…
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2021/11/14/over-a-60x-increase-in-pro-sports-adverse-events-since-the-vaccines-rolled-out/
Why bother ? The slowly emerging ‘facts’ oozing out from the body politic are creating a new narrative for themselves – let them all work it out.
The biggest problem for Johnson and his gang now is keeping the lid on the scam so they can keep on track with their part of the global ‘project’!
The man who would know suggests otherwise… and who are we to argue?
Pfizer CEO: Our Vaccines Offer ‘Limited, If Any Protection’
Yes commonly quoted out of context.
Go and have a look what the actual statements were.
https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-bourla-omicronprotection-idUSL1N2TT29Z
Regardless of any of this, the surveillance report is based on UK real world data.
Reuters kings of fake news
Go and read the vaccine surveillance report.
Al the formerly respected News Agencies are now funded by Gates.
This year: “Two doses of the vaccine offers very limited protection, if any. 3 doses with a booster offer reasonable protection against hospitalization and deaths.”
Last year: Pfizer’s Early Data Shows Vaccine Is More Than 90% Effective. Pfizer announced positive early results from its coronavirus vaccine trial, cementing the lead in a frenzied global race that has unfolded at record-breaking speed.
From 90% to only reasonable…. What to do? I know! Let’s give people a fourth jab of the same magic brew. That’s what we do with the polio vax… no… wait!
What part of
” After 2 doses of AstraZeneca vaccine, vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron variant starts at 45 to 50% then drops to almost no effect from 20 weeks after the second dose. With 2 doses of Pfizer or Moderna effectiveness dropped from around 65 to 70% down to around 10% by 20 weeks after the 2nd dose”
tells you that these vaccines are effective?
And with 3 doses?
And against hospitalisation and death?
You must know you are grasping at straws by selecting partial data and misrepresenting.
Go and read the vaccine surveillance report.
I have. That was a quote from it.
I’d bet my right arm that you are one of these lefty snowflakes that rushed out to get the gene serums (you’ve taken the whole lot, boosters and all, haven’t you!) and now you feel completely different than you did pre-“vaccines”.
You don’t feel right, but you tell yourself that this is simply a sign the “vaccines” are working. But yet through your fog of idiotic snowflake stubbornness, you realise you have been injected with toxins.
And your attempt to entice others to also take the toxins is a subconscious quest for revenge by you.
It’s a fact with the far-Left that they don’t have the talent or work ethic to attain wealth and a comfortable lifestyle. So, they try to equalise their lowly status in life by dragging everyone else down to their level. Hence, they love Marxism, because under this system all people are equally poor.
It’s already been noted in the US and Australia that manifesting injuries and illnesses after taking the “vaccines” makes woke people all the more eager to force the same “vaccines” on others. Just like they use Marxism to make them and others equally poor, the “vaccines” have been co-opted by mentally unhinged woke people in attempt to drag the physically fit down to their level.
Only the far right talk about people on the far left.
Why does far right correlate with anti-vaxx?
So how come the ‘far left’ can talk about the ‘far right’ as being anyone who disagrees with them but only the Far Right can talk about the far left? Where is the point here?
They’re smarter…?
Because they don’t spend all day every day in a dark basement pulling themselves off to porn sites, whilst in periods in between trolling the web for something to rant and rave about.
Do a survey of the comments on this site. See what proportion are anti-vaxx (the overwhelming majority). So your references apply overwhelmingly to them.
Just every other hour, Fireweasel, not to project or anything.
Be careful, if rational knows you are so virile and active, he’ll want your phone number.
Still hope she’s a brunette! Preferably Mediterranean or dusky.
I’m an anarcho-Bonapartist.
Taken the shilling?
I just don’t want a jab. And will never get one. Why are you trying to convince me with such naivety?
I’m not, but I do object to you trying to stop others getting vaccinated, through your words.
Let them take the jabs! Who’s stopping? Full marks for courage, but we aren’t cartoon baddies on here
Do you really think the world is normal right now, presumably due to policies you agree with?
Typical, you are against free speech when it disagrees with what you want to believe.
You’d ban anyone that offered any criticism of vaccines. No matter what proof they offered in support.
You’d only allow those that support vaccines to speak. And you are very serious about this.
You types really take the biscuit. You are disgusting. And I mean that.
Reminder: trolls occur.
A curious troll at least asks questions, simulates empathy, but a Young Guard troll is either very young, or a 77th fresh face.
Not really.
If you have complete evidence against vaccines, then present it.
Don’t mistake your misrepresentation of selective information for complete evidence.
If you can’t present your argument without abusing your opponent, then it’s a sign that your argument is weak.
Go and read the vaccine surveillance report.
Why are you here, rat(ional)? Surely you’d be happier on Mumsnet?
I thought you liked debate. It appears not.
I’m here to distort the echo chamber you folks like to live in.
If you hear the truth, some may sink in.
This is in line with the data we have seen in Iceland. Even if it looks as if the authorities have now resorted to faking the numbers https://thorsteinnsiglaugsson.wordpress.com/2022/01/20/unruly-numbers/
All predicted – the jab makes you sick…so have another…who knew?
But then if people were bothered to look at exactly what they were having injected and how it is designed to operate once in the human body why should anyone be surprised?
Remember, in the only animal tests ever undertaken and the results explained over and over again, at least a year ago : “All the ferrets died”.
In the end the media – especially the ‘blindly trusted’ BBC and their selected, subjective Pharma -backed ‘experts’ have a lot to answer for in keeping objective ‘facts’ from the public while peddling the Government narrative and propaganda ad nauseum.
I suppose it is never too late to ‘wake up’.
One thing should be clear: “Trust me I’m a ‘scientist’ from the Government/ BBC” – will never, ever have the same ring again!
I am vaccinated (twice, last summer) and my immune system is probably in excellent shape, but neither of those in any way prevents a virus from being inhaled into my nostrils – there to gleefully glom onto the first cotton swab coming in, a promissory “I’ll make you famous” printed on its fibers.
The numbers of “cases” are garbage. They’re only relevant because they’ve been made so by those who are using them for purposes unrelated to medicine or science.
So look at the number of hospitalisations and deaths.
Would those be the circa 150,000 covid deaths as reported by our beloved MSM?
Or the 17,371 (covid-only deaths) for all of 2020 and up to 3rd quarter of 2021 in the ONS FOI report? (with a corresponding average age of death at 82.5 years – which is higher than the actual overall life expectancy).
Did you know that life expectancy varies with the age.
You can look it up here, but careful ..your argument will crumble.
https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/lifeexpectancies/datasets/nationallifetablesunitedkingdomreferencetables
Obviously, … because I’m vaccinated I’m either stupid or on death’s doorstep or a Commie.
To hell with it.
Nope. Resistance takes all sorts. How can any of us hate you when we have family jabbed? For me it’s about freedom, and an end to this tyranny. I ignore most of the science and conspiracy stuff because it doesn’t interest me. It may well be right, but I have my priorities. Sanity is one of them!
Freedom: that’s exactly what Brexit was all about, and the antis could never get their heads around that concept. Talk to a brexiteer and that was often the first thing that was mentioned. It’s the same with the vax. Measles, polio, and the other vaccines most of us had at school were one-off and (reasonably) tried and tested. This rona rubbish was rushed from the start by politicos and big pharma, and with not a thought as to the consequences.
While I voted to Remain, I switched to Brexit later – because that was what had been voted for (and I wanted it out of the way).
The trouble is that we have a severely distorted public sphere where there is no forthright exchange of views. I can respect anyone of a different viewpoint to my own – the more so, if they reciprocate my respect.
If you were vaccinated of your own volition, there’s nothing wrong with that at all; the choice was yours and it’s none of my, or anyone else’s, business. The problem comes from peer pressure, bribery, bullying… mandates. That is the road to tyranny.
Actually, many here will think you are also a fascist
There are going to be riots once the mass media start reporting on these data.
IF. The gov is still stirring the pot and ladelling out shite gruel.
We need to be patient and do what we can, hopefully there is some reality in this ‘liberalisation’ phase.
Then will they shoot people – I bet some of them can’t wait!
Or is this what their five new giant prisons are for?
So, no riots then.
How will we know there are riots as the MSM will not report them.. They are currently happening all over Europe – who knew?
Can we mandate and ensure every politician gets one of these transplants, please…
Elon Musk’s brain chip startup prepares for first ever human trials (msn.com)
I will volunteer Boris Johnson and Kier Starmer for a start.
Hasn’t Musk had one already?
Probably!
Well, that explains the “forehead” part of the “in the right hand or in the forehead”.
Wonder what year they’ll be mandatory, for some conjured up crisis?
It was some long time before I realised Elon Musk was a person. Thought him summat like Max Headroom. I mean – no one can have a name like “Elon Musk” no?
Those ‘unjabbed’ figures are actually much, much lower. Just like the whole blaming people who haven’t taken a jab for the failures of the jab, the recently-jabbed-and-infected get counted in the unjabbed.
Another first: the first time that someone who’s had a treatment gets counted as someone who hasn’t.
The deceit of the whole thing stinks.
Laughably blaming the healthy “unjabbed” for the infection of the multi-jabbed is just garbage-fodder for cretins to lap up!
It shows the total contempt our rulers have for the basic intelligence of the population – but maybe they are right.
They’re running out of possible combinations of lies, surely?
Johnson has his pockets stuffed with them to pull out at will – he probably dines out on dishes of lies as well!
He told another “big porky whopper” only today.
Johnson claimed that the NHS were fully behind the mandatory vaccination (or sacking) of NHS staff.
This is simply false. The BMA, the Academy of Medical Royal College and the Royal College of Nursing have official policy statements opposing this for NHS staff.
Johnson, it seems, cannot function without lying.
So either this collapses under its own weight, or we are in Commie land 1984/2020 style for the duration.
NHS England’s board.
Non-execs:
Execs:
It doesn’t just stink – it is probably the most outrageous, illegal display of deliberate evil from a lying Government directed at its own people we have ever seen in this country!
This is the biggest and most lethal orchestrated Government fraud in our history.
The evidence keeps mounting up. So why do they persist with the big push for ‘vaccines’? Surely the likes of Johnson, Whitty, Vallance and co., must realise they will ultimately have to face the consequences of their actions? Or is their arrogance and hubris blinding them to the obvious? Alternatively are they just plain evil?
Maybe they can’t slow down the juggernaut in less than x miles.
They do what they’re told. Also, what @BS665 says. That would be the mother of all U-turns.
But yes, they are evil.
Figures from Scotland, which I’ve not seen being mentioned here.
Usual issue that it all revolves around a positive test result, and nobody can be bothered to note whether a patient has been moved into ICU because of severe CoViD-19, or for some other reason such as a disagreement in the pub.
The “booster” is appearing effective, for now, just as our original salvation, the two-dose treatment, did, for a period.
Source link: https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/11089/22-01-12-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf
So, the vax didn’t live up to the marketing hype? I am shocked, shocked I say.
If the customers felt it worked for them…
It is blatantly obvious now that people may be ‘vaccinated’ but they are not inoculated.
No, only indoctrinated.
I suppose the vaccine people in response to this would say “well, we never said the vaccines would stop infection, our product documentation says these vaccines may not stop infection and they may not stop transmission, and we mainly sold them on the basis that they reduce serious illness and hospitalisation”
Which may or may not be true but governments most definitely sold these vaccines to the public as being the answer to preventing infection and transmission and furthermore have used them as the raison d’etre for vaccine passports which now make absolutely no sense whatsoever.
They didn’t tell the governments to shut up, did they?
They should have. They known damn well the legal consequences of allowing a product to be misrepresented.
Things are changing https://youtu.be/9UHvwWWcjYw
I had to chuckle watching that. You can see in his face he’s waking up to the fact that he’s been one of the internet’s favourite experts on a pandemic that wasn’t!
Boris Johnson has nothing to offer most members of the electorate at the moment other than “I got all you vaccinated”. At least that’s the impression I received from today’s interview in which he was asked about threatened cuts to the amount of government money “spent” in constituencies that “belong” to Tory MPs who might “write to Graham Brady”.
Some people are saying this is just like what happened with Owen Paterson.
They’re right, but they’re forgetting what happened next in that case: Johnson and his fellow Old Etonian Jacob Rees-Mogg had their faces rubbed in it. I still reckon Johnson’s premiership will be toast by early February at the latest.
There’s also another pattern with Johnson: he gets sacked for lying.
Sure, David Davis delivered his “In the name of God, go” speech appallingly weakly yesterday.
And Labour’s choreography of Christian Wakefield crossing the floor of the House wearing Geri Halliwell’s Union Jack knickers on top of his beard was also pathetic. Why anyone would think he was going to look cool dressed like that, I really don’t know. Perhaps there’s mileage in the gossip that Keir Starmer and pals want a weakened Johnson to stay in his position.
But the Carlton Club, man, the Carlton Club.
Oh, and this from the Times about half an hour ago:
“Tory rebels seeking to oust Boris Johnson retaliate in ‘blackmail’ row – We have texts and a recording, say angry MPs”
The betting market has got this one wrong, with its current implied probability of 0.25 for Johnson losing the Tory leadership before the end of March. He won’t get past the middle of February. He may not even make it out of January.
PS Now who might bug a meeting with the government chief whip? *Whistles sweetly*.
The buffoon has an awful lot to answer for…
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/01/damage-done-us-forever-never-get-back-british-student-breaks-crying-lifting-covid-mask-rules-video/
Maybe the resident troll would like to read some analysis done by Hart on population estimates of unvaccinated and vaccinated, and how underestimating the unvax population like they clearly are is making the vaccines look better for hospitalisation and death. Its an easy trick to do to manipulate the perceived benefits.
If the vaccines were as effective as they say we were would be seeing clear differences in all cause mortality in the higher age groups. Norman Fenton has analysed this also and found no clear benefit.
Holy sheet…
https://americandigest.org/the-return-of-hitler-youth-in-quebec/
Justin Castro is raising an army….
The ONS have also changed their presentation of stats for all cause mortality. I’m not suggesting it’s anything underhand, but it annoys me because I’ll have to rewrite all my scripts that export the data to these charts
https://gray-mushroom-06a8e7010.azurestaticapps.net/
A blistering editorial attack on the vaccine manufacturers by the British Medical Journal.
https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o102
Pharmaceutical companies are reaping vast profits without adequate independent scrutiny of their scientific claims. The purpose of regulators is not to dance to the tune of rich global corporations and enrich them further; it is to protect the health of their populations. We need complete data transparency for all studies, we need it in the public interest, and we need it now.
Non of this is surprising. Many Drs and Scientists said that this would happen and they were right. I watched a Dr in the US showing the blood test results of his patients before and after these jabs and the immune system markers were seriously damaged. They now say that many of those dosed up have VAIDS. Dr Ryan Cole says they are finding far more cancers (approx 20x) in the jabbed and I can vouch for this as I am hearing of people often, all jabbed. Nothing to do with wait lists. Then you have the Canadian Dr Charles Hoffe who has found mini blood clots in 62% of his jabbed patients and so it goes… So what’s it to be- a reduction in symptoms for a mere few weeks (and that’s only a maybe) of something that is not dangereous for around 99.74% of people v increase your chances of something far more serious and life threatening? And we haven’t even started on long term damage yet.
An opportunity for solicitors sharpening up their pencils perhaps? Claims for damages, maybe? Or are the usual suspects immune from prosecution?
The scamdemic might be coming to a well deserved end:
https://policescotlandangels.org/?p=979
Hopefully BoJo and his mated will be among those arrested.
The evidence, and incontrovertible at that, in plain sight, accumulating daily refuting every facet of the “UK Government official response” – meanwhile Johnson, Javed, Zahawi and all the other Covid Gauleiters pump out the same unadulterated garbage as if the tide of evidence does not exist.
If for no other reason, hopefully forthcoming evidence of Whip intimidation notwithstanding, Johnson has to go – the damage he is doing to the fabric of these islands is, I hesitate to say, catastophic – and Putin drives the wedges between the US, UK, NATO and Europe deeper by the hour. What the hell does Johnson think he is doing?
Thinking isn’t Bozo’s strong point!! Many people think/thought he was intelligent but he leaves all decisions to other people! He takes responsibility if it works but offloads it if it doesn’t work. TCW claimed Johnson is a fraud, which is true, he is.
Perfect summary of just how terrible Johnson has been
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/wholl-grab-the-steering-wheel-from-out-of-control-johnson/
I have been following this very closely for two years now, I was looking at china in Dec 2019. I won’t go into the whole litany of bullshit, but there is one point that is starting to become more and more jarring – this claim that the jabs have a mortality benefit. Do they/ Do they really? If they do…. HOW? What is the mechanism? They do not prevent infection, they do not reduce viral load. So HOW is this claimed mortality benefit being achieved? And why has no one explained this?
I don’t know but the trials never showed a mortality benefit. 15 deaths in the Pfizer arm, 14 in the placebo (before they switched everyone to the vaccine and 5 or 6 more people who were in the placebo arm and then got Pfizer and died)
They always knew they would not reduce transmission. The upper respiratory tract is protected by pretty much a completely independant immune response from anything induced by the jab. The people who suffer from severe covid are those who havent been able to combat the virus in the urt and it has spread to their lungs. It can then cause damage to blood vessels and sometimes lead to a runaway immune response leading to excessive inflammation and hypoxia (bit like a pneumonia type situation). The antibodies that the jab induces are in much higher concentration in the lungs and so that is where they will have an effect in theory. There is much more to it then just antibodies. Im sure there are some vulnerable people who have benefitted, but as a whole it is definitley unclear how much, especially considering the harms the vaccines can do.
Real world data is not supporting the claims. The US has more deaths post vaccine. The uk had about 70k deaths before the vaccines and now we are at 150k (yes i know all the figures are b0llocks but comparing like for like). Analysis by Norman Fenton has not shown a benefit in all cause mortality in the vaccinated.
I have no clue what the UKHSA think they are playing at, getting rid of the 2 doses data. What are they going to do in 2-3 months time when the boosted are dying at a higher rate than the unvaxxed? (my best guess on timing).
Given that it was clearly done in a rush, with footnotes not updated, I am imagining screaming rows and someone going “FINE!!! I’ll just delete the column! Happy now?!!! FFS” and there we are.
And yet jabbit still lies to us that the jabs reduce transmission. What mental gymnastics is he using to come to that conclusion? He sure as hell isnt using this data. I mean we are in a prime period to assess whether the boosters do anything with transmission, and shock, still case rates are higher in the highly boostered groups. lol. And it would be even worse if they had accurate numbers of unvaccinated.
Another ‘variant of concern’ on the way? No doubt it’s currently cooking
in a lab somewhere.
https://news.sky.com/story/omicron-sub-lineage-ba-2-designated-as-covid-variant-under-investigation-says-ukhsa-12521718
The UKHSA is apparently investigating a sub-lineage of the Omicron variant which has been detected. Case rates are currently very low. Surprise, surprise – it is more transmissible than the more transmissible Omicron.
I wonder if this variant has skin rashes and lesions involved. I’ve noticed there’s been a lot of news alerts on the radio (on in my car, Smooth radio, when I’m driving) about shingles caused by reactivation of the dormant virus for those who have previously had chickenpox.
They are wishing the pox on us all!
Suppose an island has 1000 inhabitants ranging in age according to a roughly normal distribution. A novel virus strikes which is fatal to the old and vulnerable killing off the oldest and sickest 50 inhabitants. Many of the others catch the virus but don’t die. The wave passes.
A vaccine is created and everyone takes it. A second wave arrives. Hospitalisations and deaths are drastically reduced and the vaccine is hailed as a great success. It doesn’t prevent catching the virus. It does not prevent passing the virus. Then a small child notices that there are no old and frail people around as they all died when the virus first struck. The child asks a question. “Is the vaccine the cause of the reduced numbers in hospital or is the reduction because there are no longer any old and susceptible people around?”
I am waiting for this question to be asked and answered.
Go and look at the death data and work it out yourself.
You will notice it is not as simple as you currently think, but eventually you will learn that vaccines have worked very well.
Dr. Robert Malone on posted irrefutable proof of the Ivermectin success story in India. Ivermectin needs to be allowed for medical use and for doctors to prescribe it immediately in United States. It is an act of criminal malfeasance to keep up the sham in the face of overwhelming proof and overwhelming harm to the people of this nation. If you want you can get it from https://ivmpharmacy.com
Somewhere in the leaked Fauci emails that Project Veritas leaked, is Fauci stating in April 2020 that Ivermectin, HCQ and Interferon ALL worked well to combat Covid.
People need to swing. Cancelling Ivermectin cost the lives of million. This was a mixture of corporate/governmental manslaughter.
IN THESE LATEST UKHSA FIGURES ONLY 40,000 of the 14.2MILLION UNDER 18s are BOOSTED, CASES IN THE SINGLE AND DOUBLE JABBED CHILDREN OUTWAY THE UNVACCINATED 4 to 3, SAME AS ALL OTHER AGE GROUPS. REMEMBER THE ONLY REASON WE JABBED TEENAGERS WAS TO STOP THEM FROM GETTING INFECTED…. ONS 2021 TOTAL DEATH in 15-19 AGE GROUP IS UP 25.5% ON 2020 ALL YOUNGER AGE GROUPS UNCHANGED….