79320
Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book.
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Transport Department Finally Admits it Carried Out No Cost-Benefit Analysis Before Imposing Mask Mandates on Public Transport

by Will Phillips
26 September 2021 5:00 PM

Depending on how your lives have been affected by all the restrictions, July 2020 either feels like a lifetime ago or not. For Dr. Alan Black it is probably the former. This is because it took until June of this year for him to get an answer to a freedom of information request he submitted to the Department for Transport he submitted 11 months earlier. And no, it wasn’t because they were working from home…

The request? “Please can you provide me with the name and findings of the peer-reviewed study which led to the imposition of mandatory face coverings on public transport.”

The response? You guessed it, a refusal to comply. Worse still, when the Department finally did reply – having been forced to after Dr. Black complained to the Information Commissioners’ Office (ICO) – it admitted that it hadn’t bothered to undertake a study of the likely effect of mandatory masks on public transport when the measure was introduced on June 15th, 2020, and it still hasn’t bothered to this day.

The main issue here is not that the Government didn’t carry out any sort of cost-benefit analysis before imposing any of its restrictions – that’s not exactly newsworthy. The issue is the DfT’s heel-dragging. Dr. Black’s initial request was rejected by the Department for being “vexatious”. Well, I am not sure I can see anything vexatious about such a request. Neither did Dr. Black, which is why he persevered. He appealed the decision and asked for an internal review – and when that wasn’t successful he complained to the ICO.

Following the ICO’s intervention, the DfT claimed it didn’t respond to the request at the time because doing so would have caused “a disproportionate level of disruption” to the Department. That’s pretty weak. How about the disruption caused by issuing un-evidenced mask mandates on public transport?

The DfT’s response epitomises the Government’s reluctance to justify any of its Covid restrictions with hard evidence. Nowadays, anyone submitting an FOI request to a Government department not only has to wade through a forest of red tape, but as Dr. Black’s experience shows, Whitehall will use every trick in the book to conceal the fact that little or no thought went into the Government’s knee-jerk approach to managing the pandemic.

Tags: Department for TransportFace MasksGovernmentPublic Transport

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Biden Accuses 70 Million Unvaccinated Americans of Slowing Economic Recovery

Next Post

Pfizer CEO Hints at Annual Covid Vaccine Booster Roll-Outs

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

36 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Andrew Tate’s Confrontation With the BBC, Robert Kennedy Jr.’s Presidential Campaign and the Fall of Joe Biden

by Will Jones
6 June 2023
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Government ‘Counter-Disinformation Unit’ Targeted Oxford Professor for Questioning Lockdown Evidence

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

How We Know Flu Really Did Disappear in 2020 and 2021

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

“Vaccines Have Been Pulled For Much Less”: Dr. Aseem Malhotra Makes Waves in Australia Renewing Call for Withdrawal of Covid Shots

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

8 June 2023
by Jonathan Barr

Just Stop Snake Oil

8 June 2023
by Toby Young

Government ‘Counter-Disinformation Unit’ Targeted Oxford Professor for Questioning Lockdown Evidence

36

Just Stop Snake Oil

34

News Round-Up

50

How We Know Flu Really Did Disappear in 2020 and 2021

18

Pablo Picasso, Hannah Gadsby and the Science of Names

14

The Problem With the WHO is Not That North Korea is Leading It

9 June 2023
by Dr David Bell

How We Know Flu Really Did Disappear in 2020 and 2021

8 June 2023
by Will Jones

What Settled Science? Decades of Research Only Widen Guesses of Temperature Change

8 June 2023
by Chris Morrison

Who Destroyed the Kakhovka Dam?

7 June 2023
by Noah Carl

Richard Dawkins: “Affirmative Action is Racism”

7 June 2023
by Amber Muhinyi

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment