77234
Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book. Book your tickets here to the FSU’s live discussion with Matthew Goodwin about his new book.
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Vaccinating Young People Is Unethical; Those Vaccines Should Go to Poor Countries

by Noah Carl
6 September 2021 8:32 AM

On September 3rd, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) – an independent panel of experts – advised against offering COVID-19 vaccines to healthy children aged 12-15.

The panel concluded that, although “the health benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms”, the margin of benefit is “too small to support universal vaccination”. However, it did recommend expanding the list of underlying health conditions that would qualify someone in the relevant age-group for vaccination.

The panel’s recommendation apparently came “as a blow to the Government”, which for some reason really wants to vaccinate healthy children.

Immediately after the announcement, Health Secretary Sajid Javid wrote to the U.K.’s Chief Medical Officers asking them to “consider the matter from a broader perspective” (which reads like bureaucratese for “ignore the recommendation of the JCVI, and find a new justification for the policy”).

And it’s worth asking: if the Government does decide to ignore the JCVI’s recommendation, and offer the vaccine to healthy children anyway, will it adopt the slogan: “Don’t necessarily follow the science.”

I can understand why children with an underlying health condition would be worried about getting COVID-19, and it seems right that they’re being offered a vaccine. However, for the overwhelming majority of healthy children, the disease poses virtually no serious risk.

The main justification for vaccinating young people is to protect older people. But given evidence that natural immunity provides better protection against infection than the Pfizer vaccine (the only vaccine approved for those aged 12-15), this justification looks increasingly weak.

It’s now abundantly clear that vaccinated people can transmit the virus. Hence the only true safeguard – for a child visiting a vulnerable grandparent, say – is a negative COVID-19 test beforehand.

However, even if the vaccines had no side effects and offered the same level of protection as natural immunity, it would be unethical to vaccinate children at the present time. And that’s because it’s a waste of vaccines that could go to people who actually need them.

Rather than offering vaccines to children and young people, rich countries like the U.K. – which have so far been hogging all the vaccines – should donate them to elderly people in poor countries.

Even though a government must always look to the interests of its own citizens first, the benefit/cost ratio of donating vaccines to poor countries is so vast that this principle is hardly relevant. People forget that the risk of death from COVID-19 is not just higher, but orders of magnitude higher, for elderly people.

I said that Britain should donate its remaining vaccines to poor countries in an article back in July. The same argument has been made by several other commentators, including – mostly recently – two scientists writing in the journal Nature.

Zain Chagla and Madhukar Pai argue against vaccine ‘booster’ programs on the grounds that far more lives could be saved by administering vaccines in poor countries. The global vaccine supply is limited, they note, so “this is a zero-sum game”. Every vaccine given to a healthy British 12 year-old is one that can’t go to a 70 year-old in Africa or Latin America.

Even discounting side effects, it’s unethical to vaccinate 12–15 year-olds in Britain when a such small share of the population in poor countries has been offered a vaccine. COVID-19 is a disease that disproportionately targets older people, while posing almost no risk to children. Our vaccination policy should reflect that.

Tags: JCVINatural immunityVaccines

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why the Government is Wrong to Claim 12 Year-Olds Are Competent to Consent to Covid Vaccination Against Their Parents’ Wishes

Next Post

Hospitality Sector Faces Surge in Bankruptcies as Government Support Dries Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

65 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About Meghan and Harry’s Alleged Car Chase, Insane Immigration Under the Tories and the Sinister Closure of Triggernometry’s Bank Account

by Will Jones
23 May 2023
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

France Bans Short-Haul Flights to Tackle Climate Change

25 May 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

26 May 2023
by Toby Young

Black Lives Matter Heads for Insolvency After Founder Patrisse Cullors’ Brother is Paid $1.6M for ‘Security Services’

25 May 2023
by Will Jones

Government Ministers “Alarmed” that the WHO Could Gain Powers to Impose Lockdown on U.K.

26 May 2023
by Will Jones

Countering Censorship With Free Speech and Facts

25 May 2023
by Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson

Migration Hits Record 1.2 Million New Long-Term Arrivals in 2022

44

News Round-Up

38

France Bans Short-Haul Flights to Tackle Climate Change

30

The Only Way to Bring Peace to Ukraine is to Defeat Putin

93

Government Ministers “Alarmed” that the WHO Could Gain Powers to Impose Lockdown on U.K.

21

Countering Censorship With Free Speech and Facts

25 May 2023
by Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson

The Only Way to Bring Peace to Ukraine is to Defeat Putin

24 May 2023
by Ian Rons

Frequent ‘Adjustments’ to Past Temperatures by Met Office Cast Doubt on Global Warming

24 May 2023
by Chris Morrison

No, Democrat-Supporting Political Activists. Ron DeSantis’s Florida is Not a Racist Hellhole

24 May 2023
by Tony Morrison
370799 02: Author Martin Amis poses for a photographer June 12, 2000 at a book signing at the Beverly Hills Library in Beverly Hills, CA. (Photo by Frederick M. Brown/Online USA)

Martin Amis: Brilliant Stylist, Dull Moralist

24 May 2023
by Dr James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment