77262
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

If the Government isn’t Following the Science When it Comes to Vaccinating Children, Who is it Following?

by Toby Young
6 September 2021 2:28 PM
If the Government isn’t Following the Science When it Comes to Vaccinating Children, Who is it Following?

We are publishing a guest post today by Dr. Peter Hayes, a Senior Lecturer in Politics at the University of Sunderland, pointing out that when it comes to vaccinating healthy 12-15 year-olds the Government can no longer claim to be following the science.

“Follow The Science” has been the defining slogan of Covid policymaking for the past year and a half. However, we may now be at turning point. On September 3rd, that august and scientific body The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advised not to start vaccinating otherwise healthy 12-15 year-olds. The Government, however, seems likely to set about vaccinating them anyway.

In his letter to chief medical officers, Health Secretary Sajid Javid says that the JCVI is against vaccination of 12-15 year olds because its margin of benefit against harm is “too small” and tacitly suggests that the officers come up with something to enable him to override this advice. However, Javid’s spin on the committee’s advice is misleading. It is not only the marginal benefits of the vaccine but also the unknown extent of its harms that has led the JCVI to recommend against it.

(1) The JCVI states that in advising whether or not to vaccinate it has focused on “the benefit to children and young people themselves, weighed against any potential harms from vaccination”, and that it has done this to the exclusion of other issues such as cost.

(2) It states that overall “the benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms” [emphasis added].

If the benefits are greater, albeit only marginally, it might seem logical for the JCVI to approve of extending the vaccination program. The reason it does not is because of an important proviso. There is uncertainty, the JCVI says, about what the harms the vaccine might have in the medium to long term. There is, therefore, an asymmetry between our knowledge of the extent of the benefits of the vaccine and the extent of its harms. It is known perfectly well that the maximum benefit is small because even if it is assumed to protect every healthy child aged 12-15 from serious illness, very few become seriously ill anyway. The question of maximum harm is more open ended. In particular, the JCVI expresses concern over the very rare side effect of myocarditis. In the short term, the JCVI states, patients recover, but in the medium to longer term there is “the possibility of persistence of tissue damage resulting from inflammation”. Therefore, the JCVI argument is not simply that the marginal benefits are too small to recommend vaccination. It is that the benefits at best are small, and that while the known harms are marginally smaller, the unknowns might change this balance for the worse.

The JCVI also comments that while the effect of the vaccine on transition rates is uncertain, in its view any impact “may be relatively small”. This is significant when it comes to efforts to justify the vaccination of 12-15 year-olds on social and educational grounds. Although rather vague, such justifications implicitly assume a significant reduction in rates of transition.

The willingness of the JCVI to engage in critical scrutiny of the vaccination rollout has not been all that much in evidence in the past. No wonder the Government was unpleasantly surprised by its refusal to rubber stamp an extension to 12-15 year-olds. Perhaps the committee is heading out in a new direction. But more to the point, we are left with the question of the new direction taken by the Government.

If it is no longer following ‘the Science’, who is it following?

Stop Press: A senior panjandrum at the British Medical Association has said 12 year-olds should be able to overrule their parents to get a Covid vaccine because they’re “mature enough” – but admits jabbing teens will only cut infections by 20%.

Tags: 12-15 Year-OldsJCVISajid JavidThe ScienceVaccination

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Vaccine Passports For Theatres Will be ‘Nail in Coffin’

Next Post

A Third of Under-40s in England Haven’t Had a Single Covid Vaccine Dose

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

57 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

To view today's newsletter click here

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks
1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

18 August 2022
by Chris Morrison

News Round-Up

19 August 2022
by Jonathan Barr
Lockdown Effects May be Killing More People Than the Virus

Lockdown Effects May be Killing More People Than the Virus

19 August 2022
by Toby Young
The Government, the Healthcare Profession and the BBC Have Made Muppets of Us All Over Covid

‘Net Zero’ Groupthink Got Us Into This Mess

18 August 2022
by Jonathan Barr
A-Level Students Miss Out on University Places as a Result of Lockdown

A-Level Students Miss Out on University Places as a Result of Lockdown

18 August 2022
by Toby Young

News Round-Up

57
1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

1,200 Scientists and Professionals Declare: “There is No Climate Emergency”

30
The West on Russia vs the West on Saudi Arabia

The West on Russia vs the West on Saudi Arabia

22
A-Level Students Miss Out on University Places as a Result of Lockdown

A-Level Students Miss Out on University Places as a Result of Lockdown

11
News Round-Up

News Round-Up

59
The West on Russia vs the West on Saudi Arabia

The West on Russia vs the West on Saudi Arabia

19 August 2022
by Noah Carl
Can Nuclear Energy Save Europe?

Can Nuclear Energy Save Europe?

18 August 2022
by Noah Carl
The U.S. Are Not the Good Guys

The U.S. Are Not the Good Guys

17 August 2022
by Noah Carl
Woke Medicine Abandons Meritocracy and Sense

Woke Medicine Abandons Meritocracy and Sense

15 August 2022
by Noah Carl
No, the Arctic isn’t Warming Four Times Faster Than the Planet

No, the Arctic isn’t Warming Four Times Faster Than the Planet

14 August 2022
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© 2022 Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© 2022 Daily Sceptic.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment