59212
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

New York Times Fact Checks “Deceiving” CDC on Masks and Outdoor Transmission

by Will Jones
13 May 2021 9:17 AM
New York Times Fact Checks “Deceiving” CDC on Masks and Outdoor Transmission

When the New York Times weighs in to fact check the CDC, you know something is in the wind. On Tuesday, reporter David Leonhardt wrote a scathing criticism of the U.S. Federal Health Authority’s recent advice that “less than 10%” of COVID-19 transmission is occurring outdoors.

Leonhardt points out that while this is technically true, it is like saying “sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year” when the actual number is around 150 worldwide. “It’s both true and deceiving,” he says.

He calls this “an example of how the CDC is struggling to communicate effectively, and leaving many people confused about what’s truly risky”. The CDC places “such a high priority on caution that many Americans are bewildered by the agency’s long list of recommendations”.

They continue to treat outdoor transmission as a major risk. The CDC says that unvaccinated people should wear masks in most outdoor settings and vaccinated people should wear them at “large public venues”; summer camps should require children to wear masks virtually “at all times”.

However, in reality, “there is not a single documented Covid infection anywhere in the world from casual outdoor interactions, such as walking past someone on a street or eating at a nearby table”.

Leonhardt digs into the studies that supposedly underpin the CDC’s advice and finds layers of conservative over-caution.

Many of the instances of “outdoor transmission” in the literature turn out to be from construction sites in Singapore. This appears to be a classification issue.

The Singapore data originally comes from a Government database there. That database does not categorise the construction-site cases as outdoor transmission, Yap Wei Qiang, a spokesman for the Ministry of Health, told my colleague Shashank Bengali. “We didn’t classify it according to outdoors or indoors,” Yap said. “It could have been workplace transmission where it happens outdoors at the site, or it could also have happened indoors within the construction site.”

The decision that they were outdoors was made by researchers making conservative assumptions.

“We had to settle on one classification for building sites,” Quentin Leclerc, a French researcher and co-author of one of the papers analysing Singapore, told me, “and ultimately decided on a conservative outdoor definition.” Another paper, published in the Journal of Infection and Public Health, counted only two settings as indoors: “mass accommodation and residential facilities.” It defined all of these settings as outdoors: “workplace, health care, education, social events, travel, catering, leisure and shopping.”

Even with this conservative definition, however, the studies still found only a maximum of 1% of infections were caught outdoors.

So where did the CDC get 10% from? Leonhardt enquired and received this statement:

There are limited data on outdoor transmission. The data we do have supports the hypothesis that the risk of outdoor transmission is low. 10% is a conservative estimate from a recent systematic review of peer-reviewed papers. CDC cannot provide the specific risk level for every activity in every community and errs on the side of protection when it comes to recommending steps to protect health. It is important for people and communities to consider their own situations and risks and to take appropriate steps to protect their health.

The systematic review referred to is not provided so we cannot see their working, but it’s clear that this is another conservative estimate on top of a conservative estimate. Then the advice based on it, that this “less than 10%” transmission risk warrants wearing a mask outdoors most of the time even when vaccinated, is conservative on steroids smoking a pipe.

Some may think being over-cautious has no downside. Leonhardt disagrees. “Erring on the side of protection”, he says, “has contributed to widespread public confusion about what really matters”.

Unfortunately, for him “what really matters” includes wearing a mask indoors, which apparently makes “a huge difference”. He points to Britain, claiming that our “scientific approach” of being “more aggressive” and “requiring masks indoors even as most of the country is vaccinated” while being easy-going about outdoor masks is not doing us any harm.

Perhaps he would be interested to know then that the UK Government’s scientific advisers wouldn’t agree that masks make a “huge difference” indoors. In fact, they claim they offer no real protection to the wearer and, in terms of protecting others, cite a review study that states it could find no evidence above low quality for such an effect. They seem to misunderstand this study however and claim to have evidence that masks reduce transmission to others by 6-15%. While not a fair representation of their source, even taken at face value this can hardly be called a belief that masks make a “huge difference”.

Every journey starts with a single step though. The acknowledgement that the advice health authorities dole out might be harmful in its over-caution and even “deceiving” is welcome. Perhaps the New York Times will now develop a healthy taste for scepticism and begin to sniff out what else those in power might not be being entirely honest with us about.

Tags: CDCDavid LeonhardtFace MasksFact checkNew York TimesOutdoor transmission

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round Up

Next Post

Some Funeral Venues Still Imposing 30-Person Limits on Services After May 17th

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

23 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

To view today's newsletter click here

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks
News Round-Up

News Round-Up

1 July 2022
by Toby Young
Did Vaccines Really Save 500,000 Lives in the UK?

Did Vaccines Really Save 500,000 Lives in the UK?

2 July 2022
by Noah Carl
Halifax Customers Close Accounts in Response to Gender Pronouns Fiasco

Halifax Customers Close Accounts in Response to Gender Pronouns Fiasco

1 July 2022
by Toby Young
“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

2 July 2022
by Will Jones
Why is the Scottish Government Trying to Silence Me?

Why is the Scottish Government Trying to Silence Me?

1 July 2022
by Lois McLatchie
News Round-Up

News Round-Up

39
Did Vaccines Really Save 500,000 Lives in the UK?

Did Vaccines Really Save 500,000 Lives in the UK?

35
“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

30
Confessions of a Conservative Rebel

Confessions of a Conservative Rebel

22

News Round-Up

19
“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

“There’s No Herd Immunity and Covid is Still Wreaking Havoc,” Says Imperial Professor of Immunology

2 July 2022
by Will Jones
How Governments Bullied Us During the Pandemic

How Governments Bullied Us During the Pandemic

1 July 2022
by Susan Broomhall
Confessions of a Conservative Rebel

Confessions of a Conservative Rebel

1 July 2022
by Nick Dixon
Pfizer Set to Seek Approval for Its Covid Vaccine in U.S. Babies This Winter

The Case Against Vaccinating Children Against Covid

30 June 2022
by Will Jones
Letter From a Teacher to the Conservative Party About Mask Mandates in Classrooms

Children Need to be Taught to See Through The Lies

30 June 2022
by Mark Shaw

POSTS BY DATE

May 2021
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
The Daily Sceptic
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© 2022 Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© 2022 Daily Sceptic.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment