• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Latest News

by Toby Young
19 June 2020 11:10 PM

British Public No Longer on Double Secret Probation; Just Probation

Okay, it’s an Animal House joke and those who aren’t of my vintage might not get it. But at one point, when Dean Vernon is trying to think of ways to nobble Delta House, he says, “There is a little known codicil in the Faber College constitution which gives the Dean unlimited power to preserve order in time of campus emergency.” On this basis, he puts the unruly fraternity on “double secret probation”.

The “alert level” was lowered today from “Level 4” to “Level 3”. The UK Government’s press release about it is full of “the science” – “The Joint Biosecurity Centre has recommended that… blah, blah, blah.” Apparently, the definition of Level 4 is “a COVID-19 epidemic is in general circulation; transmission is high or rising exponentially” and the definition of Level 3 is “a COVID-19 epidemic is in general circulation”.

Transmission hasn’t been “rising exponentially” since around March 18th, according to best estimates, so why has the Government left it until now to lower the “alert level” to 3? They really are making it up as they go along. Presumably, this charade is so Boris can say he’s abandoning the absurd two-metre social distancing rule because of “the science”.

Incidentally, according to the eagle-eyed reader keeping a beady watch on the NHS England daily death tolls, only two people died in English hospitals yesterday. He writes:

I was interested to read on the BBC news website a piece in which it was going through the various reasons people disbelieve some of the “facts” about COVID-19.

One of the reasons the BBC gave was that “people think the numbers are being misrepresented”.

I think the irony of that was lost on the BBC which regularly distort the numbers.

We only have to look at the officially produced figures released by the NHS every day, and the ONS weekly, to see for ourselves that the numbers quoted in the daily briefings are misrepresenting the actual figures.

He predicts that any day now NHS England will be forced to disclose that no people have died in English hospitals from COVID-19 the previous day.

Will that mean the Government drops the “alert level” to Level 2? Don’t bet on it.

Meanwhile, Britain’s largest hospital trust – the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust – has become the first to declare it has no COVID-19 patients requiring treatment in intensive care.

Ripley’s Un-PC, Believe it or Not

I can understand Aunt Jemima being cancelled, even, at a pinch, Uncle Ben. I mean, it’s batshit crazy, but you can see the twisted logic. But Ripley from Aliens? The kick-ass space soldier who takes on one of the scariest creatures in the universe? She’s a feminist icon, surely? I mean, she’s right up there with JK Rowling… no, wait.

Incidentally, it isn’t just Aliens that now carries a “disclaimer” on Sky. According to the Mail, 16 films have now been put on the naughty step:

Sky has warned viewers that Breakfast at Tiffany’s, Flash Gordon, Aladdin and even a version of The Jungle Book from as recently as 2016 have “outdated values”, as broadcasters respond to concerns that some content is no longer acceptable.

Sky Cinema, the broadcasting giant’s movie service, has issued a disclaimer to its subscribers that some of its content “has outdated attitudes, languages and cultural depictions which may cause offence today”.

Sixteen films have the warning, including The Goonies, Aliens, Dumbo, Gone With The Wind, Lawrence of Arabia, Tropic Thunder, The Jazz Singer, The Littlest Rebel, The Lone Ranger, Balls of Fury and The Last Samurai.

Hang on a minute. Why hasn’t How to Lose Friends & Alienate People, the film based on my memoir of the same name, been given a “disclaimer”? Oh, the shame…

Has Smoking Always Been a Prophylactic Against the Plague?

A reader sent me the above extract from Thomas Hearne’s Diary. Looks like it isn’t just Covid that tobacco protects people from…

Greater Anglia Absolutely Determined to go Bust

Greater Anglia is literally begging people not to use its service

A reader has drawn my attention to the absurdly alarmist notice on the home page of Greater Anglia’s website. Here’s the notice in full:

Can you travel another way? Help us keep trains clear for those who really need them.

Greater Anglia is temporarily running an amended rail service as part of the national effort to deal with the coronavirus crisis. To support this, it is important that people work from home if they can, stagger their travel times to avoid crowds, and use other forms of transport wherever possible.

To help stay safe, you should maintain social distancing wherever possible and remember passengers should wear a face covering whilst on our stations or trains. This will be mandatory from 15 June 2020.

Social distancing measures will effectively cut the number of people able to travel on our trains by up to 90 per cent – so it’s even more important that people take only necessary journeys.

Passengers should always book online where possible and travel at quieter times, and we urge those who must travel to be considerate of other travellers and our staff during these testing times.

It seems like a parody. Social distancing has “effectively cut” the number of people who can use Greater Anglia’s service by “up to 90 per cent”? How have they worked that out? Nonetheless, this warning seems to be having the desired effect. According to the reader:

We travelled on four trains today and we were the only people in the entire carriage in each case…

It’s heart-breaking. Rail businesses, strapped for cash at the best of times, are now doing their utmost to discourage people from using their services. Their chances of surviving this period of insanity must be slim. Although, to be fair, they’re just doing the Government’s bidding. Perhaps with the “alert level” falling from “Level 4” to “Level 3”, they’ll be able to reduce the number of rail users they’ll have to cut from 90% to 75%.

It’s not just a cynical old Tory like me saying this, incidentally. Someone forwarded this message by the Labour-supporting railway historian Christian Wolmar:

The railways emphasis on simply deterring people from using trains will undoubtedly have a long term effect. Usage bottomed out at around 5 per cent of previous levels but even now, in the middle of June, it is only approximately 11%. How is the industry going to start persuading people that train travel is safe? In fact, evidence from Japan, Italy and New York suggests that very few people actually catch the disease from public transport – in research, few clusters were found on public transport.

When will the rail industry change its message? Waiting for a vaccine could be worse than waiting for Godot. Social distancing and the railways are simply incompatible and the industry bosses should be honest enough to accept that and put out messaging to that effect. Unfortunately the unions have been complicit in this as well. Rather than supporting measures that would begin to attract people back, TSSA boss Manuel Cortes said on June 15th that he hoped the mandatory wearing of masks would not mean people started using the railways again. Yet, his members’ jobs depend on precisely that.

The long term consequences could be devastating. The hordes of the Treasury are already circling the rail industry’s wagons. They are already unhappy about the huge cost of the bail-out to the railway companies and things will only get worse if passenger numbers do not pick up substantially soon. Even optimists in the industry reckon usage will reach 50% of last year’s norm by the middle of next year. That means subsidies to operate the railway will be enormous – possibly £300m per month in addition to the £5bn or so a year for investment – and there will be enormous pressure to cut back on investment and even on services.

The railways must start welcoming people and not keep telling them to go away.

Schools Soon Able to Increase “Protective Bubbles” From 15 to 30!

How’s this for a non-climb down climb down? According to the Mail, Gavin Williamson has announced that schools will be able to increase the number of pupils in “protective bubbles” from 15 to 30 so all children can return in September. So, er, what’s the difference between a “protective bubble” and a “classroom”, then? Thirty pupils is the average class size in England, for heaven’s sake.

He said the “bubbles” would in future be expanded to “include the whole class” – which would be around 30 pupils. But he refused to give more details, saying full guidance for schools will be published over the next fortnight.

Expanded to “include the whole class”? So they’re not actually “bubbles” any more? Doesn’t make a lot of sense.

The only “bubbles” are in Boris’s brain.

Simon Dolan Gets His Day in Court

Simon Dolan has been given a High Court date for his application for permission to Judicially Review the Government’s coronavirus regulations to be heard: July 2nd.

The Judicial Review will seek to challenge the Government on three main points:

  • Whether lockdown is unlawful because the Government implemented regulations under the Public Health Act 1984 instead of the Civil Contingencies Act 2004 or the Coronavirus Act 2020.
  • The legality of the continuation of lockdown, and whether the tests for lifting it are too narrow, failing to take account of the economic and social impacts of lockdown.
  • Whether the restrictions brought in by the Government contravene the European Convention of Human Rights, which cover the right to liberty, family life, education and property.

To date, the CrowdJustice campaign behind the Judicial Review has raised more than £182,000, with 5,400 pledges. Thanks in no small part to readers of this site. If you feel like contributing again, click here.

Sign the Stu Peters Petition

The Free Speech Union has gone to bat for Stu Peters, the Manx Radio host who’s been suspended by his employer and referred to the Isle of Man’s Communications Commission – the equivalent of Ofcom – because he had the temerity to challenge the concept of “White Privilege”. This is a flagrant violation of Stu Peters’ right to free speech and the FSU has written to the Communications Commission demanding it drop its investigation and exonerate him.

A petition has been started by some Isle of Man locals in support of Stu. Please sign it to show your support for free speech.

Another Poem

Tiree MacGregor, who has written a poem for Lockdown Sceptics before, has written another.

Of a Convention under Threat

“[A]nd the two honest men grasped each other’s hard hands in mutual understanding.”
— George Eliot, Adam Bede

Handshaking: formerly, a civil act
In which the right hand, classically, grasped
Another’s and, depending on the tact
Of each, then “shook” (jerked up and down), while clasped
Briefly or long; in pressure varied, some
Shakes called “firm,” “crushing,” “wet fish,” even “non-”;
Of universal use; perhaps had come
From early in mankind’s existence on
The continent of Africa; of late,
Since civil life has seemed to many rotten
And Covid fears hold sway at any rate,
Avoided if not seemingly forgotten,
Forbye defences of civility
Put forth by lockdown sceptics (please which see).

Round-Up

And on to the round-up of all the stories I’ve noticed, or which have been been brought to my attention, in the last 24 hours:

  • ‘England rugby fans could be BANNED from singing the iconic “Swing Low, Sweet Chariot” song because it originated among slaves in America 150 years ago‘ – The Woke Inquisition reaches new heights of idiocy
  • ‘NI schoolchildren to follow 1m social distancing‘ – If one metre is good enough for the children of Northern Ireland, why not the children of England? Is it because four children under the age of 15 have died from Covid in England and none in NI?
  • ‘We shouldn’t work ourselves into a frenzy about the threat of any “second wave”‘ – Ross Clark in the Telegraph
  • ‘Escape from Lockdown‘ – Good podcast series hosted by Alex McCarron. In this episode he interviews Dr Hugh Willbourn
  • ‘José Mourinho accuses FA of double standards over Dele Alli ban‘ – For once, I agree with the Special One. Many, many people have breached social distancing rules far more flagrantly than Deli Alli
  • ‘UK debt now larger than size of whole economy‘ – The BBC reports that the UK’s national debt is now greater than its annual GDP for the first time in 57 years.
  • ‘Boss of NHSX should be fired over app fiasco‘ – Guido Fawkes pronounces his verdict on the NHSX contact-tracing app car crash
  • ‘Nobel Prize Winner Michael Levitt: How The West Got Coronavirus Lockdowns Disastrously Wrong‘ – Our old ally Professor Michael Levitt calmly lays out the case against lockdowns
  • ‘Can’t stand free speech? You’re fired!‘ – Free Speech Union Director Douglas Murray with a modest proposal for the woke overlords now controlling the mainstream media
  • ‘Counsel of the Woke‘ – Good piece in City Journal about the unholy alliance between public health experts and woke activists
  • ‘The lockdown cannot mask this assault on human nature‘ – Sean Walsh with another robust piece in Conservatives Global
  • ‘Global poverty: coronavirus could drive it up for the first time since the 1990s‘ – Alarming piece in the Conversation saying that coronavirus could push up to 400 million people into extreme poverty
  • ‘The end of tourism?‘ – Piece in the Guardian on how the West’s mishandling of the crisis has decimated global tourism
  • ‘Tories’ poll lead over Labour slashed to four points amid criticism of PM’s handling of coronavirus crisis‘ – Real story here is that Keir Starmer is so unimpressive he can’t even outpoll Boris
  • ‘The threat has passed, so why are our civil liberties still suspended?‘ – Fraser Nelson poses a good question in his Telegraph column
  • ‘The pitfalls of wrongthink‘ – Laurence Fox surveys the wreckage of his acting career after daring to say what everyone else thinks on Question Time
  • ‘Pub chain “has no choice” but to open on 4 July‘ – Founder of pub chain Oakman Inns says he faces a stark choice: reopen all of its sites on July 4th or go bust

Theme Tune Suggestions From Readers

Two suggestions for theme tunes for this site from readers today: “Lunacy” by Swans and “Right to Decide” by Hawkwind.

Small Businesses That Have Reopened

A few weeks ago, Lockdown Sceptics launched a searchable directory of open businesses across the UK. The idea is to celebrate those retail and hospitality businesses that have reopened, as well as help people find out what has opened in their area. But we need your help to build it, so we’ve created a form you can fill out to tell us about those businesses that have opened near you. Now that non-essential shops have reopened – or most of them, anyway – we’re now focusing on pubs, bars, clubs and restaurants, as well as other social venues. Please visit the page and let us know about those brave folk who are doing their bit to get our country back on its feet.

Shameless Begging Bit

Thanks as always to those of you who made a donation in the last 24 hours to pay for the upkeep of this site. It usually takes me several hours to do these daily updates, along with everything else, which doesn’t leave much time for other work. If you feel like donating, however small the amount, please click here. Alternatively, you can donate to the Free Speech Union’s litigation fund by clicking here or join the Free Speech Union here. And if you want to flag up any stories or links I should include in future updates, email me here. (Note: please don’t email me at any other address.)

And Finally…

Amusing video by a YouTuber calling himself AwakenWithJP. It purports to be useful advice for risk-averse people – particularly about how they can protect themselves from the super-dangerous, Spanish Flu-like, killer-virus known as Covid.

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Latest News

Next Post

Sweden Did in Fact Lock Down When it Came to Care Homes

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

498 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Matt Mounsey
Matt Mounsey
4 years ago

Soon to be replaced by workers in other countries. If it can be done remotely, you don’t need a British passport for it.

36
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt Mounsey

This has been repeatedly raised, yet so many are ignoring it.

23
0
awildgoose
awildgoose
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt Mounsey

Or algorithms running on a server somewhere.

13
0
A Heretic
A Heretic
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt Mounsey

Even if not replaced abroad there’s plenty of cheaper UK locations than anywhere HSBC is currently based where people will be happy to take on these roles remotely.

11
0
karenovirus
karenovirus
4 years ago
Reply to  Matt Mounsey

Call centres are not renowned for length of service awards. With just natural wastage all those 1,200 jobs could be located overseas in less than five years.

Last edited 4 years ago by karenovirus
8
0
RickH
RickH
4 years ago

I wonder how many will extract a commercial rate for premises and facilities. Or will there be yet another weak roll-over – to capital and its predations, whilst unions just ‘Tut’?

6
0
PoshPanic
PoshPanic
4 years ago

They’re laughing all the way to the bank. £300 a year to turn a room in your house into an office? How much does that extra room cost per year?

16
0
LilyVLibre
LilyVLibre
4 years ago

They will all be happy to do it, until they are told their pay is being frozen. When are the councils going to start claiming business rates from these people? If your home is a place of ‘work’ then the rates should be applied. Have the H&S visited all the home ‘offices’ to ensure they are ‘Covid Secure’? An injury at home when working is the responsibility of the employer!

21
0
PFD
PFD
4 years ago
Reply to  LilyVLibre

Not only is the home COVID secure there will be insurance implications for both the homeowner and company.

There are also GDPR and other privacy concerns with people working from home, many not on a VPN, with other adults able to look over shoulders at screens and access clients personal information.

16
0
iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  LilyVLibre

And the next step, of course, is to gradually offshore these jobs!

16
0
MizakeTheMizan
MizakeTheMizan
4 years ago

I’ve been involved in the outsourcing of accounts functions to India. Each one has been a disaster because management have failed to calculate how much efficiency is added through communication with people you are sat next to. In one case they brought the entire function back into the UK, and in the other two a small team was created in the UK to carry the teams in India.

However, if you get the employees in the UK to prove it can work, make them work remotely, and work out how those inefficiencies can be overcome, then …

11
0
A Heretic
A Heretic
4 years ago
Reply to  MizakeTheMizan

Waiting for colleagues to get around to responding on whatever chat app they’re currently ignoring is a total nightmare vs a quick chat over the top of the desk.
I’m anti-social at the best of times but there’s no way I’d choose to work from home 100% of the time.

15
0
peyrole
peyrole
4 years ago

HSBC UK the next bank to go under. Customer Service is overlooked until its too late, there is seldom any going back. Bloody fools.

11
-1
Rowan
Rowan
4 years ago
Reply to  peyrole

Customer service is so 20th Century and bloody fools they certainly are.

Last edited 4 years ago by Rowan
7
0
NonCompliant
NonCompliant
4 years ago

I’m pretty sure there are insurance/liability issues to working from home 100% of the time. The reason I know this is a former employer restricted our wfh for this reason.

5
0
JayBee
JayBee
4 years ago

A friend of mine who works for a large, solid multinational was concerned last summer that the next step after the home office would be an even more intense shift of these home offices to countries in the 3rd world.
This week, they got news of a major restructuring in that direction and British redundancies to come because of that.

9
0
Amari
Amari
4 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

Next step: Britain becomes the third world

0
0
I am Spartacas
I am Spartacas
4 years ago

When I worked for a big multinational company about ten years ago we were all offered the opportunity to become home workers if we wanted to – with laptops and mobile phones it made it much easier to do so – anyway, all you had to do was apply to work from home and that was that – you got lots of help setting up your ‘work station’ at home etc and quite a lot of people leapt at the opportunity to work from home and not have to come into the office anymore except for the odd important meeting which wasn’t very often or if they preferred they could just join-in via a conferernce call and number provided. I was tempted to work from home myself but held back for a little while to see how others found the experience – I’m glad I did really because the initial novelty of home working quickly wore off for many homeworkers who were steadily starting to regret their decision – among many things they would complain about was for example feeling they were being ‘left out of the loop’ etc when important decisions were made and they didn’t get to hear about or were the last to know, they found trouble getting assistance when they were struggling with their work, they complained of feeling isolated and had no one to talk to about their work related problems and complained that their ability to contact someone quickly about an urgent problem could be lengthy and troublesome – when they worked in the office they could usually discuss their work issues almost immediately face-to-face with someone who could usually help there and then and the problem could be resolved almost immediately rather than it taking hours, days or sometimes even weeks to resolve where homeworking was concerned … but most of all many homeworkers say that they missed the office comradery … that cohesiveness that made them feel connected with the rest of the workforce which you just cannot form working home alone.

Things may have changed today but evidently I decided back then not to work from home.

I decided that it was much healthier to (try at least) keep work and homelife as seperate as possible.

1
0
Crystal Decanter
Crystal Decanter
4 years ago

All part of the reset to benefit giant corporations

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
5

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

The Met Office is Unable to Name the Sites Providing ‘Estimated’ Temperature Data For its 103 Non-Existent Stations

12 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

Is Britain on the Brink of Civil War?

12 May 2025
by Joe Baron

Disney Re-Releases Snow White – and it Bombs Even Worse Than the First Time

12 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

12 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Free Speech Union Helping 71 Year-Old ‘Thought Criminal’ Arrested by Kent Police and Held in Cell For Eight Hours

11 May 2025
by Toby Young

Is Britain on the Brink of Civil War?

29

From “Horrific” to “Dogwhistle”: Lucy Powell’s Change of Tack About the Rape Gang Scandal

29

Starmer Admits Mass Immigration Risks Making Britain an “Island of Strangers” as He Announces Latest Crackdown – But Refuses to Cap Numbers

27

Why Are Popes so Soft on Migration?

23

News Round-Up

19

Why Are Popes so Soft on Migration?

12 May 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

Is Britain on the Brink of Civil War?

12 May 2025
by Joe Baron

From “Horrific” to “Dogwhistle”: Lucy Powell’s Change of Tack About the Rape Gang Scandal

12 May 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Declined: Chapter 18: The Unthinkable

11 May 2025
by Molly Kingsley

The Backlash to the War Against Boys

11 May 2025
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

June 2020
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
« May   Jul »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences