The Flaw at the Heart of the UKHSA’s Vaccine Effectiveness Study
The UKHSA's vaccine effectiveness study keeps coming up with estimates much higher than other studies or real-world data suggests. Is this why?
The UKHSA's vaccine effectiveness study keeps coming up with estimates much higher than other studies or real-world data suggests. Is this why?
The latest study from the UKHSA finds vaccine effectiveness is declining, but much less than in other studies. Why is that?
In an email seen by the Daily Sceptic, Dr Mary Ramsay, Head of Immunisation at the UKHSA, admits that her agency is continuing to estimate vaccine effectiveness but is not publishing the results. Why not?
Recent research has concluded that the effectiveness of the Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen vaccines in the prevention of Covid experiences a rapid decline over a six month period.
This week's UKHSA report shows infection rates twice as high in the vaccinated versus the unvaccinated – but dismisses its own data as biased. Why, though, has the agency not updated its VE estimates since May?
Dr Mark Shaw asks whether the Government, health care profession and media are now too far down the vaccine-saviour narrative road to be capable of objective consideration of the evidence.
A new study has discovered that vaccination status has no impact on household transmission of the Delta variant.
The UKHSA caves to pressure and removes the chart showing sky-high infection rates in the vaccinated. Plus it states VE should not be estimated from its data. Is that because VE is now as low as minus-132%?
A new Lancet pre-print study from Sweden finds zero vaccine efficacy against infection after nine months, and worrying drops against severe disease as well. But some people are living in a parallel universe.
Cambridge statistician David Spiegelhalter – assisted by the Times – joins calls for the UKHSA to stop producing "completely unacceptable" data showing infection rates higher in the vaccinated.
© Skeptics Ltd.