The Lancet COVID-19 Commission report has said the virus may have leaked from a US lab and implies that Government agencies may be covering it up, in a report that otherwise pushes a standard Zero Covid line.
If SARS-CoV-2 didn't leak from a lab doing research funded by the US Government, why have officials gone to such lengths to frustrate investigations into the possibility and conceal evidence that would exonerate them?
Lockdowns, masks, fast-tracked vaccines and vaccine passports – all emerged from a radical biosecurity agenda that can be traced back to the Bush White House in 2005 and as of 2020 has established itself as orthodoxy.
Has the lab leak been proven false? That's the impression you'd get from a BBC article yesterday. But the new studies mentioned in that article prove no such thing. One even admits there is "insufficient evidence".
On February 26th 2020, Anthony Fauci wrote to a journalist advising calm, just as he had since the virus had appeared. The following day, he suddenly started telling people to prepare for lockdown. The question is why.
In a recent blog post, legendary biologist Nick Patterson fully endorses the lab leak theory. He states that “by far the most likely cause of the pandemic was an accidental leak of an engineered virus”.
Does the virus have a natural origin or did it leak from a lab? Will a new investigation settle the debate? Read our exclusive interview with Matt Ridley, co-author of 'Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19’.
Antibodies in Italian blood samples from September 2019 – What is the evidence that SARS-CoV-2 originated earlier than December 2019 in Wuhan, and what are the implications for our understanding of the pandemic?
Instinctively, it feels as though 'experts' must be peddling untruths knowingly, out of a misguided sense of paternalistic responsibility. But more troubling is the possibility they have bought into their own fictions.
The head of the WHO privately believes Covid originated in a Wuhan lab, despite publicly dismissing the lab leak hypothesis as a 'conspiracy theory'.
