Less than a week after Laura Dodsworth wrote a piece on the ‘nudges‘ involved in the Government’s threats of more restrictions, the NHS’s most senior doctor has warned Britons that our freedom to enjoy Christmas could be stripped from us if enough people don’t get a ‘booster’ Covid vaccine.
“The freedom we now all enjoy,” Professor Stephen Powis writes in the Sunday Telegraph, “is a direct result of the country’s willingness and desire to come forward for a Covid jab when it has been offered.” That very ‘freedom’ will be gone again if take-up doesn’t stay high.
Although the country once again finds itself at a crunch point, the NHS vaccination programme remains the strongest weapon in the armoury. Because we rolled out jabs so quickly, we are likely to see protection from the virus waning sooner than other countries. That means that without a booster, many people will find themselves more vulnerable to Covid, going into winter. So it’s vital that everyone gets their top-up jab as soon as they are eligible.
People will be contacted to book their jab six months after their second dose. And if for some reason you don’t receive an invite, you will be able to book directly through the national booking service after you become eligible.
We have to seize the moment, get our booster jab and protect ourselves as we go into what will no doubt be a tough winter, particularly as we are likely to see seasonal flu pose a risk to our health. And to maximise the impact of the vaccination programme we must all continue to act responsibly.
The more of us that come forward for our booster jab, and the more we keep our resolve in helping to limit the spread of infection, then the greater chance we all have of staying well.
So, when your time comes, take up the offer, book your booster and protect the freedom and Christmas that we have all earned and deserve to enjoy.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I was sceptical about Trump. He royally f*cked up with the ‘vaccines’, and I’m very uncomfortable with the formalised union of state and business, but they do actually seem to be doing all the right things atm. Elite theory explains a lot I believe. Anyway, back to the rugby.
Yeah, I feel something similar.
I can’t say I’m too enthusiastic about him. He’s bit of an oaf.
But… I like what he’s doing.
Declaring there are only two genders – tick.
Deporting illegal immigrants – tick.
Getting rid of DEI – tick.
No men in women’s sports – tick.
The ticks just keep coming.
Actions speak louder than words.
And nominating RFK for Health Secretary.
You do know the bbc was paid a lot of money as were many other msm outlets to brainwash you. Calling Trump an oaf proves their brainwashing worked. What has Trump ever done to the UK? Now if you wanted to call a few of your recent pms. An oaf, it would be more appropriate, don’t you think? Clean your own house. It is one big mess.
He needs to shrink the administrative state. US AID is a small part and low hanging fruit (easy to sell to the public).
I hope he is just getting started and directs his guns at more of these agencies which are little more than parasites living off the productive population.
So the USAID reduction to 600 (for now) according to my calculations is a ~93% reduction in staffing. Imagine the massive savings across the US government if only a quarter of the alone was achieved? A return of depts to their core focus, due to not having time or resource to waste – I’d guess with the right leadership this would improve efficiency, because if they don’t they’ll be gone as well – focuses the kind I’m sure…
Yes go back to your rugby…glad England won yesterday. When you wake up, you might just want to see where all the money you pay in tax goes here in little Britain. You may be due a a refund.
Posted before, and posting again…
…Bonfire of the vanities, inanities and insanities taking off nicely. Burn baby, burn.
Time of early February evening to fire up the woodburner.
Need to light the woodburner?? Isn’t this the hottest February the planet has ever known?
Only in Shepherd’s Flaming Bush
“The United States Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1, states, “The Congress shall have the Power to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States.”
Don’t think the founding fathers envisaging giving it away to aliens.
Funding a cement plant for Hamas. I wonder what they used all the cement for….
Hospitals, duh. Sewage systems, highway bridges, that kind of thing.
What are you implying?
Good!
It is GREAT.
Just the beginning.
Winning.
Slightly Off-T
Kim Rye at The New Conservative pointing out how Labour are intent on pushing the crime of islamophobia. Of course this has nothing to do with Labour haemorrhaging muslim votes, oh definitely not.
https://thenewconservative.co.uk/islamophobia-and-the-politicisation-of-islam/
“Interestingly, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets is now under full political control of an exclusively Bangladeshi-Islamic male-only political party, that goes under the Moniker of ‘Aspire’. This is one such example of Muslims breaking away from the Labour party.
With all attention focused on Islamophobia, the rise of political Islam has been studiously ignored by politicians (including feminist ones) and the mainstream media alike. Yet in the case of Aspire, an individual previously banned from office for electoral fraud and “undue spiritual influence”, namely one Lutfur Rahman, is back in charge running his private empire.”
Thanks for the link.
Trade, not Aid, is how poorer countries develop. And reading what much of the £billions of US Aid have gone to promote, it is obvious that it was being used “inappropriately” to push extreme left-wing/woke policies.
If it has a knock-on effect here and the large left-wing charity-quangos lose funding, so much the better.
WHAT HAS DOGE FOUND!!!! That is the whole point of this investigation. Not how many people have been sacked! Was there cia involvement? Who approved the outrageous spending.
Since this article was posted, a judge in the USA has banned Trump’s order. Any comments, especially from American friends?
Smaller companies with specialities like global health care could go out of business.
Global health companies have no business save pocketing tax dollars. There is no such thing as global health, ie, health abstracted away from the people who are healthy (or not).
and if they do go out of business because they were so dependent on the teat of US aid, then they were never a sustainable, real business
That’s the point I was trying to make: Global health care isn’t a business specialization that’s manifestly different from health care. It’s entirely unclear what that’s supposed to be at all. I could think of parachuting in US medics to deal with emergencies abroad. But that’s just my best guess. It might as well be covaxx bombers dropping syringes from the sky.
Indeed – I’d say it’s 99% politically driven – influence abroad etc at heart, however like all these things if not kept in check it becomes a monster that forgets its original, and only, purpose. The only answer is burn it to the ground and start again
Highlight of USAID spending (from DM video): $2,000,000 to fund so-called sex change operations in Guatemala. That’s going to help poor people there. Not.