The GMB Union has hit back against the prospect of care home workers being forced to take Covid vaccines. Rachel Harrison, GMB National Officer, says the Government doesn’t have “the foggiest idea or concern about the impact their decisions make on a workforce already suffering from many of the worst political failures during the pandemic”. The union has warned that more than a third of its members in social care would consider quitting if vaccines are mandated.
The i has more.
GMB said that the move, which is being considered by the Government, was an attempt to “strongarm” care workers into taking the jab.
Under the plans, care home staff in England who work with older people would be required to get the jab or risk losing their jobs. They will reportedly have 16 weeks to get vaccinated.
One in six care workers – around 52,000 – have not had the vaccine despite being eligible.
Rachel Harrison said: “Carers have been at the forefront of this pandemic, risking their lives to keep our loved ones safe, often enduring almost Victorian working standards in the process.
“The Government could do a lot to help them: address their pay, terms and conditions, increasing the rate of and access to contractual sick pay, banning zero hours, and ensuring more mobile NHS vaccination teams so those working night shifts can get the jab,” she said.
“Instead, ministers are ploughing ahead with plans to strongarm care workers into taking the vaccine without taking seriously the massive blocks these workers still face in getting jabbed.”
Unison General Secretary Christina McAnea said that “encouragement achieves better results with the nervous than threats or coercion”.
“The Government’s sledgehammer approach now runs the risk that some care staff may simply walk away from an already understaffed, undervalued and underpaid sector,” she said.
On Tuesday morning, Cabinet minister Liz Truss insisted that the Government had not yet committed to the plans, saying that officials were “currently consulting on this issue” but that a decision would be “very imminent”. The Government have refused to rule out the move.
However, Ms Truss said it was “incredibly important” for care home staff to be vaccinated. …
The Government is also planning a consultation on whether Covid jabs should be made compulsory for all NHS staff, alongside those in social care. According to official data, 151,000 NHS workers – just over one in 10 – have not have [sic] the vaccine.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Health Secretary Matt Hancock has confirmed that plans to force care home staff to get vaccinated against Covid will go ahead.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Good luck to any health care/nhs worker when they take this revolting government to court.
Using what for law? Courts are subsidiary to Parliament in the U.K.
That’s not true.
While it shouldn’t be, it probably is true these days and of course, Parliament is now subsidiary to Government, which itself answers to Bill Gates and the Bill Gates controlled WHO. We are in very serious times, likely so serious that these will be the end times for a very great many of us.
Hancock saying it is “mandated” isn’t actually law. To make it a legal requirement they would need to pass legislation through Parliament.
Even then it can be challenged in court.
if these care workers just ignore the mandate, the higher ups would need to fire them.
Then the care workers can take this to court and easily win.
Yes. They will have to exempt for medical conditions and pregnancy and breast feeding. But it must be inequitable if it does not allow exemption with evidence of antibodies or previous infection, and given the worries over possible effects on fertility from an unlicensed treatment, they will have a hard time on mandating it for anyone fertile.
Looking forward to the evidence presented for such a challenge already.
I’m a Nurse that walked due to the on going bollocks.Im raging due to the Murders last year let them come and get me I’ve got a nasty surprise waiting for them.Me!!
I applaud you! I pray that one day justice will be served up to this murdering government!
bless you mate
They’re f**king right! They are already paid disgracefully low wages for the work that they do. Every one of them should down tools until the fascists back down!
I’ve mentioned it before but care home owners have been coercing staff to get vaccinated for many months. My sister in law a qualified nurse manager at a care home resigned her job for this reason in April. Three other staff left with her for the very same reason. These matters have to be challenged in court as they are coercion, which under the Nuremberg is a crime. This situation is made even more of a crime, given the experimental nature and extremely poor safety record of these unlicensed products.
I know of a care home where they already made the flu jab mandatory for all staff, even volunteers. The people who run these places are not often well educated and in this case they really think it’s the right thing to do ‘for the good of the residents’
This is about reducing potential staff sickness as any vaccine stimulates the recipients immune system. It is recognised that a person can still catch influenza or CoViD19 despite being vaccinated, they could still be infectious.
I don’t understand the comment.
Me neither. If what we’re told to believe is true, i.e. that the “vaccines” don’t stop someone catching or spreading the virus, they merely cut the risk of serious symptoms in the vaccinated, then a vaccinated Care Home worker is more dangerous to the residents than an unvaccinated one…. the vaccinated worker is more likely to carry the virus into work simply because they don’t know they have it.
This isn’t a fucking vax you twat.
You want to talk about ‘potential staff sickness’? Go have a look at the latest Yellow Card stats for ‘vaccine’ adverse effects. I don’t know a single person who has been jabbed that walked away feeling fit to work. I do know someone who was potentially killed by the ‘vaccine’.
EDIT: this was intended as a response to John.
I’m not sure what you mean.
Yes, it’s recognised that the injection recipient can still catch and transmit the virus, so how does that reduce potential staff sickness?
Potentially, there may be increased staff sickness if the recipient has adverse reactions over an unknown timeframe.
See my comment to huxleypiggles below
What’s the point of the vaccine then? Apart from further enriching the already filthy rich and powerful people who seek to dominate the entire human race, that is?
The GMB has made its opinion known. I would hope there is the possibility for a strike if this is ignored.
In this case, I think, more subtlety is needed than strike action.
Remember – a lot of these staff are dedicated to the care that they give. I saw my mother through levels of care towards the end of her life, an most of the staff were exceptional in what they did. Any Care facility dismissing staff on this basis will be in deep doo-doo, given the demands and scarcity of staff. One would hope that the GMB will be canny in mounting pressure and legal action.
One would hope that pressure from clients and their relatives would help – but I fear that Covid indoctrination may work against that.
A well backed strike in would be one way of reversing this, however I doubt most care givers will risk their charges to the extent necessary to get the change.
Resigning is then the only real alternative to strike action, unless the GMB puts it’s money where its mouth is and fights the Government and employers in court. Whatever happened to the Nuremberg Code, the UK is supposedly signed up to?
What happens if the care worker says they cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons? Or that they refuse to say if they are vaccinated or not?
I can’t see how this can be legal anyway.
I fear it may be made superficially legal by this protozoic slime of a ‘government’. In which case things will be a real test of the independence of the judiciary and their upholding of conflicting prior and higher international standards of civilization.
It’s legal because government is altering public health regulations to state nobody can be engaged in a care scenario without vaccination.
Since Parliament has mandated it via Statutory Instrument it is legal and there is nothing anybody can do about it – short of voting in somebody who will repeal it.
Nope. It cannot override the human rights’ legislation already in place. It will be challenged, successfully, in the courts.
Pretty sure the Nuremberg code is supposed to prevent any government mandating an [experimental] medication on to its people. New national laws can not override this.
Coercion is strictly verboten under Nuremburg Law.
In the U.K. Parliament is sovereign. What it says go.
That’s the way out system works. Don’t like it – move to the US
See what the Speaker had to say about this, sovereign? they have no bloody say anymore..it’s a dictatorship…
Michael O’Bernicia is currently laying a Private Criminal Prosecution for mass murder by government policy in a Common Law Court. Maybe you should read up and support this man?
As it is, your persistent support and defence of the government and its ‘vaccine’ puts you firmly in the shill bracket.
No not so. Unless the Governments expressly withdraws the UK from the provisions of the Nuremberg Code and other similar human rights provisions and those withdrawals are then ratified by Parliament, it will have no legal right to do what it is doing and this immoral nonsense, for that’s what it is, must fail in court.
You need to study a bit of basic Constitutional Law mate.
Human rights legislation in the U.K. has no capacity to override U.K. parliamentary legislation.
Parliament is sovereign – end of story.
We’ve left the EU
Human rights legislation wasn’t passed by parliament?
The UK hasn’t left the European Court of Human Rights! The Withdrawal Agreement committed the UK to remain a member of the ECHR.
You really shouldn’t be commenting on things of which you are clearly ignorant
“You really shouldn’t be commenting on things of which you are clearly ignorant”
He does it all the time, especially about MMT and debt.
If ever there was a case for banning the really thick, then Julian makes it. But no, let him keep making a fool (arse) of himself, it does them no good.
Far better to keep quiet and let people think you’re a fool than to open your mouth and prove the point!!
This is what Remainiacs have always done and continue to do, argue before understanding the issue at hand.
Lucan Grey isn’t ignorant – their comments are made in the hope/belief that the people reading them are ignorant
Nothing to do with the EU, just how thick how thick are you!
No, it’s not. There are Human Rights concerns and criminal implications. This Coronavius act does not over ride those. And the vaccine’s efficacy and safety needs to be proven and weighed up against the harms caused by not taking it. If any government of the UK were to insist on compulsory vaccination, it could feasibly give rise to objections on the grounds of individual liberty and human rights. This is owing to article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects people from being interfered with physically or psychologically and includes mandatory vaccinations.
Yes – Lord Lucan is floating 0n Cloud 9 – way ahead of reality.
The ECHR doesn’t bind parliament in the U.K. for example they already said prisoners should get the vote and the U.K. parliament just ignored it.
Parliament decides what applies. If you don’t like that then leave the country.
And Parliament cannot over-ride the courts! If you’d been paying attention over the past few years, you’d know that.
Just try compulsory vaccination sunshine, but I guess even you daren’t go there.
The GMB would do better to focus on the need for informed consent to participate in a phase 3 trial.
My sister in law gave up caring for people to care for dogs because it pays better….
Virtually everything pays better than care work.
And dogs are treated far better than elderly humans. Dogs are treated with kindness and it’s a legal requirement that they be allowed to behave naturally. Unlike human beings at the moment. In fact, it’s a legal requirement for humans to behaved unnaturally.
And it is more worthwhile. Most people deserve what they get.
The HYS comments on the BBC article about this subject appear to have been largely written by the 13,000 wasters who occupy the Cabinet Office
I’m sure they will happily trade in their well paid jobs to work in the care sector if required lol.
My elderly mother is in a care home now. Partly thanks the the lack of interest / care shown to her last year by the NHS during lockdown 2. I am utterly appalled at the idea that those caring for her are potentially to be treated as subservient slaves to this dictatorial government.
If this goes ahead I face a double problem. Firstly her care is likely to suffer as some (good and experienced) staff will leave. Those that replace them (if they can be found) will have little or no experience and will likely (and not unreasonably) expect higher pay given the risk they are having to take. This can only result in my mother getting poorer and more expensive care – which we as a family are funding. Even worse the entire exercise provides no real additional protection given that the “vaccines” don’t stop people catching or spreading the virus.
This is another cynical move by the government to coerce or literally force more people into taking an unsafe, improperly tested drug that only has emergency use approval. It is a totally unacceptable situation, and even if it were to affect my mother’s care I really hope the care workers refuse to accept the situation. I will gladly support all that leave or strike in protest at this despicable action. I feel this is a battle line which absolutely must be drawn as it is already clear that there are plans to force this on the entire health sector including the NHS. From there it is only a very short step to mandating “vaccination” for the entire public sector and shortly followed by the entire population. This is utterly terrifying, but I can only hope there will be a major push back and this becomes the Pig Dictator’s Waterloo.
I understand your concerns completely.
I think coercing or mandating individuals over vaccines leaves no doubt about the sinister motives driving the vaccine. Nobody without evil intent or an ethical lobotomy would contemplate reversing the agreed anti-nazi framework enacted after WWII.
… unless they had adopted the same moral framework as Mengele.
Simple.
Yes they have accepted the Mengele framework and there is much worse to come.
Caption competition
‘The vaccine blood clot was this big’
It is abhorrent to force hardworking, hard up, under paid, care workers to get an experimental jab which may or may not stop the spread of disease, to a population pretty much universally protected or aware of their risk. It’s salt in the wounds as it is being done without irony or remorse by a government who haven’t/wont even accept or acknowledge that their mishaps in shipping thousands of people out of hospitals back into care homes was the cause of the UK’s death-toll in the 1st wave. The subsequent lack of care these former hospital patients who were booted into care homes and then not seen by any medical staff for 6/8 months, then led to the spike in deaths in the “2nd wave”.
My sister works in the care industry and has done for ten years – she has had both jabs because she was told that her job could be at risk if she didn’t – however she knows of care workers who have quit rather than be bullied into having the vaccine.
As usual with this disgusting Government, this is yet another step to one more slippery slope. As others have said, the whole cobbled-together social care system, which is continually promised to be sorted out, never gets any sensible help, in any aspect; whether staff pay and conditions, which users pay what and all the rest.
In common with every other snap decision this and previous Tory Governments have made (and other crap governing parties), it is astonishing that nobody either in Parliament or the army of civil servants, advisers and other hangers-on ever stops for a moment to consider the consequences of what is proposed. Along with this latest wheeze, which will decimate social care, we can look at fudged Brexit “deals”, the Green nonsense (uncosted, same as lockdowns) and many other egregious examples of inability to think properly and plan correctly.
Governments of whatever persuasion see the elderly as a burden and an expensive nuisance. Any method of removing them is welcome. Blaming the young for killing granny is the acme of nauseating hypocrisy.
Correct, but they also see the rest of us as a similar burden. Calculating from the Georgia Guidestones, they really want rid of around 95% of us. Judging by the apathy and stupidity of Joe public, there are times when I think that they may well be right.
Until recently, I taught English as a second language. Several of my students were care workers and from BAME backgrounds. One of the reasons I left my job was because I was not prepared to promote vaccine take-up. I could not accept that it was ethical to push an experimental vaccine when no-one knew about the possible adverse effects. I also thought it would undermine the professional relationship I had with my students.
Many of the care workers I have taught will struggle to find employment if they decide they can’t get vaccinated and care homes will end up having to recruit new staff on higher rates. Some may become financially no longer viable. If the vaccines do not stop infection or transmission, then what is the point of making them a requirement? On the other hand, if they do work, then the most vulnerable will be protected and there really is no issue. If the situation really is so dangerous, then why is it only now that this problem is being highlighted and the government is allowing a period of 16 weeks for it to be sorted out?
Their priority is a needle in every arm, everything else is theatre to that end. Global depopulation or total population control are the only logical reasons I can think of. We’re way past the Govt hysteria/Incompetence possibility.
Yes Toby your mate is fucking Hitler, not putting your jamrag on to go in Harrods isn’t going to cut it.
Yes, it’s quite soul destroying seeing many people on this site still pushing the incompetence excuse. Creatures like Cummings openly state that the only incompetence the government is guilty of is not pushing totalitarianism hard enough and fast enough.
The incompetence conspiracy theory was blown out of the water a year last April. Those still pushing this nonsense are more than likely on the government payroll.
Very neatly summarised.
In a nutshell.
Global population control and depopulation are a match made in heaven, sorry I meant hell.
I’m a social care worker although my workplace is registered as a care home by the CQC even though we don’t provide nursing care or have long term residents. Most people are under 65. My employer is a well known mental health charity and mandated the so called vaccine three weeks ago to all their employees regardless of whether they have a front facing role. I’m working my last few shifts as I already know people who’ve experienced life changing side effects following the vaccine and are now on life long medication. I don’t have any health problems and don’t want to take the risk of needing care from the NHS. The thought of being hospitalised absolutely terrifies me.
Well done and good luck for the future. Sooner or later they are going to come for the rest of us too.
I applaud you and I hope you find alternative employment. Good luck!
May become academic soon when people start keeling over from ADE and the other side effects of the jab
And when that doesn’t happen will you change your mind?
I wish that you could ask that question of a friend of mine who is now in a wheelchair with GBarre syndrome one week after his first jab.
I imagine Lucan Grey would either see this as coincidental or simply write it off as collateral damage.
77th Brigade members are still on comments’ boards promoting the narrative. There is only one person on here doing that. QED.
I know of a man who now has Bells Palsy following his first jab.
Sadly he is just one of many.
The way this is supposed to work is that you are supposed to complete lengthy clinical trials before experimenting on millions and millions of people.
Nobody with a brain would. The fundamentals of not unwillingly taking a vaccine are as simple as ABC, and are not to do with Hollywood horror.
I really don’t know why you are on this website!
He’s hoping for promotion to Captain.
With a new number: 666.
Now, now, lance corporal next and that’s as far as he gets because he has given himself away too easily.
I have 2 relatives who have had a stroke within a couple of weeks of their jabs. Both unexpectedly, they had health issues but not relating to stroke risk. Both have permanent damage. They are both in their 70s. It could be a coincidence, but it’s still not a risk I’m willing to take as a healthy 50 y/o
Clots.
Yes, those people are, aren’t they?
The point isn’t obvious horror scenarios. That isn’t likely.
Overstating things diminishes the fundamental wrongness, and the very, very simple issues around refusal.
will be put down to “variants”
If anyone here could answer these questions, I’d be grateful.
Medical interventions can only go ahead after the patient has given their fully informed consent. If a carer of NHS staff member turns up for a covid vaccination, when asked if they consent replies that they are only there because they have been told that if they don’t have the vaccine they will lose their job & this is documented but patient is jabbed anyway, what is the legal position?
Also if the patient states as above & the vaccine giver declines & documents that they can’t carry out the intervention as coercion is not consent, where does the patient stand re employment?
Thank you!
The legal position is that you cannot be engaged in a care giving employment without the vaccine. That overrides everything is else because Parliament said so when they acceded to the change in the Health Regulations.
No jab, no job. And that is that.
Until it is decided that that it is no longer that and is now this.
No. It isn’t as simple as that.
Yes it is. That’s how the law works in the U.K. Parliament passes legislation and the courts apply them.
We’ve left the EU
No – that’s not how it works at all, otherwise all governments would have been dictatorships. The courts can (and have) found against many governments.
The courts can find both that the government is acting in contradiction of its legislation and that where 2 pieces of legislation clash one takes precedence.
Idiotic! Firstly the EU has absolutely nothing to do with this.
Secondly , the courts assess the legislation and apply it as they see fit. The UK has an equality bewteen the legislature and the judiciary, neither is subservient to the other. If a judge decides the ‘law is an ass’ he can rule so, and decide to interpret the legislation as he sees fit. This ruling can be appealed to a superior court but ultimately what judges decide is the law , is the law.
You sir, are an ass!
Go back to the BBC and Guardian
Finally a union standing up for rights. Pity it took this long.
Unions are just the same money grabbing cunts as The MPs they give not one fuck about who they are supposed to represent
I thought I detected a note, in the comments from the union, of “Pay our members more and we might change our advice”. Hope I’m wrong.
They’re not though are they – they’re trying to find ways to convince their members to be “vaccinated”?
So the GMB aren’t against making the vax mandatory in principle, they just want to use it as leverage to get more money for their members.
Terrific.
Slow handclap.
If this becomes ‘law’ then what next?
I imagine a lot of people will just give up working in care homes, and elderly people who need care will be the losers. Again.
No doubt that eventuality is covered in Hancock’s small print. More midazolam to be prescribed.
This seems like a propaganda step to start blaming care workers for spreading covid. It is to take the heat from Hancock for kicking the elderly out of hospitals without a thought for their welfare or for those already in care homes.
They’ve already done that by blaming agency staff.
Yup, that was the Fat non-Controller’s first reaction to the Care Home Crime last year. Utterly despicable.
My brother, a kind, caring, compassionate human being, will now leave the care home he has worked in for over ten years, as he will not be forced to have the vaxx. He’ll find another job, he’s done many things in his life, but the caring profession will lose something far greater….and all for the equivalent, in efficacy, of a flu jab? The fricking mind boggles!
Maybe they could get antibody tests(I’m sure in the circumstances they’re in great majority already have had covid), which could put more to the outside world idea of natural, long term immunity.
Isn’t it strange how the government ignores those who have had the virus and now have natural immunity as a result?
You can’t even get an antibody test it seems.
Especially one on the N”H”S, it’s a risky jab or nowt.
There’s no money to be made from natural immunity
Good point – even I forget about natural immunity as it has been propagandised out of existence.
An antibody test is only of worth 2-3 months post covid infection. I had an antibody test done 6 months after my infection (to try to shut the boss up) but came back negative. I know of medics who caught covid, tested positive & had a negative antibody test 4 months later.
Sure, because you need a T cell test, which the Government has strangely refused to pour magic money into.
But research paper after research paper is showing natural immunity as as strong, often stronger, as the “vaccines” – obviously so, possibly life long.
Antibodies do go once you’ve recovered, doesn’t mean immunity has gone. That was yet another lie the Faucist movement in England pulled last year with that study showing antibodies gone after recovery, pretending that meant natural immunity didn’t last, but claiming the “vaccinations” would work in a different way.
Well they work in a different way allright.
Yes, because that’s what happens with antibodies – they dissappear. What is needed is a T-cell test which provides evidence that sometime in the past, the immune system responded to covid-19 (and thus, will respond again)
I should’ve read other replies before pressing ‘post comment’. Sorry @Sandra Barwick – no plagiarism intended
If only 10 per cent of staff haven’t been jabbed then you could say that in care homes there is a kind of herd immunity in microcosm in each care home. as 90 per cent have been jabbed. Obviously it would differ from care home to care home but the 10 per cent could do tests (not that I believe in tests) but as a policy there is an alternative from a legal/ethical POV. It doesn’t have to be a jab.
Test, jab, if it’s mandatory we’ve entered a brave new world.
Sovietism returns to inflict it’s toll on Russians
https://medicalxpress.com/news/2021-06-moscow-mandatory-vaccinations-case.html
The global cabal must have put pressure on Putin then in some way because I remember he was outspoken in resisting this push.
Russia only has the GDP of Italy, and may need to appear to comply. I have a feeling Muscovites are adept at appearing to conform whilst finding ways round regulations.
Cripes, is this a union behaving in support of workers’ rights? I thought all that had stopped “because of covid”…
I will quit if/when I’m forced to get jabbed by my employer and I’ll take them to court for constructive dismissal.
Why quit rather than wait for them to sack you?
If they do that as part of a parliamentary legislation as with the care workers then you would lose.
The courts cannot override parliament.
Yes they can!
Surprisingly ill-informed there! Not only can they, they do.
If the govt gets the health workers mandatorily vaxxed, it will be teachers and other public facing professions next then – us.
Yes
Its not nervousness that stops me from having the jab! I know what it contains and I know why its being administered and its nothing to do with our health.
I’ve got more confidence in my immune system than this ‘therapy’ so they can stick it
Me too – its kept me healthy so far and I’m taking extra care through diet and supplements.
Hope this is true, if they stick to it, if ALL workers stick to it, they can win, its as easy as that. Can employers be sued if they coerce through any means and something goes wrong?
Whilst the pharmaceutical companies are immune from prosecution thanks to our government, I’m led to believe the vaccinators are not.
I rather feel that the whole care home approach to old age care is now a busted flush, who in their right mind would now agree to go in a care home or work in a care home? My 91 year old Aunt says she has accumulated a bottle of pills and the whole lot is going in washed down with something strong, should anyone suggest she has to go into a care home. I think she is serious and I must say I feel pretty much the same. I cannot see the care home system coming through this hoo-haa in the same way it started, we need to review our whole approach to old age care, I would suggest that care homes in their present format are not the answer.
Very difficult with dementia though, faculties to take your own life are gone. So many people don’t have families to care for them 24/7. I agree though that social care is a mess.
Well, there’s a lot of folks who don’t want to live in old army barracks or Hong Kong who will presumably be offered the jobs taken from the care home workers who wouldn’t take their medicine…
3 million from Hong Kong. Johnson’s last action before he goes could be to hand over the entire UK to the Chinese Communist Party. That could be a ‘conspiracy theory’ but isn’t there a spate of ’em coming true right now?
So long as he and his mates can retire in wealth and comfort for their remaining years, a nice Cotswolds village perhaps. Maybe the Chinese can release some British peasants from the camps occasionally for sport – like grouse shooting.
I think you mean peasant shooting . . .
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/this-untested-vaccine-should-never-have-been-released-the-truth-will-out-and-heads-will-roll/
Speaking in the House of Commons this afternoon, Health Secretary Matt Hancock suggested that people who refuse a covid-19 jab, will be refused treatment on the NHS.
https://richieallen.co.uk/hancock-we-have-no-duty-of-care-at-all-to-vaccine-refuseniks/
Fine with me. I take it that I will no longer be deducted National Insurance payments from my wages, and can put that money towards a proper private healthcare alternative?
Unfortunately for you, NI was de-linked from the NHS in the 50s. It’s now just a jobs tax. Though you do need it to be able to claim a state pension.
This raises the spectre of someone bleeding to death at the side of the road following a car accident being left to bleed out and die because they have not taken the magic potion. I am not religious but thinking back to Sunday School is there not a story about a good Samaritan that has something to say on this matter?
But I guess Covid is the new state religion and if people have to be left to die at the side of the road well so be it…………..happy days.
Well there you go. We were locked up, sorry down, to save us from needing medical care and precisely because we were locked up, sorry down, many of us now need medical care we might not have needed if we hadn’t been locked up, sorry down. And those of us who are locked up, sorry down, but are healthy, can only guarantee future health care if we allow ourselves to be injected with experimental toxins that are quite likely to make us need health care. Alanis Morissette could’ve sung a song about this
I think even Toby would have to agree now that his old chums are just pure evil.
Hancock and Leadsom are close to the lowest forms of life anyway, but still.
Stop Press: Health Secretary Matt Hancock has confirmed that plans to force care home staff to get vaccinated against Covid will go ahead.
Hancock is just flexing his muscles because he got called ‘Totally F*****g Hopeless’ by Boris.
So true …
As Martin Niemoeller would have put it:
First they came for the care home workers, and I did not speak out—because I was not a care home worker.
Then they came for the whole NHS staff, and I did not speak out— because I was not a NHS staff member.
Then they came for…..
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.
Conclusion:
We have learned absolutely nothing from history.
Zilch.
The currently alive generations are overwhelmingly an effin’ disgrace to humanity.
I think they will have some support but sadly not enough to beat the Covidian Cult. Crowd funded legal challenge after dismissal maybe?
What I find very sad about this, is that the government pick on some of the poorest workers in the countrty to try to impose this. Then these people have to leave their jobs or strike to resist.
Flat track bullies.
Chatting yesterday with an acquaintance who is a Carer. She’s had to do extra shifts to cover staff sickness, including one colleague who has started having fits, never having had them before. Hmmm.
Earlier in the day, talked to hairdresser whom I hadn’t visited since December. She’s not going to have the jab as her father died a few days after having had his.
If this jab is mandated then how is it not corporate manslaughter when the inevitable casualties start to happen?
It is. Morally it has another name beginning with M. . .
Hold your nerve, care workers. You CANNOT coerce or force anyone to undergo dangerous medical experimentation. This is a war crime and any and all employers thinking about threatening staff with this bullshit must be served notices of liability if they even think about issuing ultimatums. YOU CAN STILL CATCH AND TRANSMIT THE VIRUS! It makes you no more of a risk to the elderly. This ridiculous bullshit must be called out everywhere by everyone. The emperor has no clothes, their arguments are vacuous and stupid. Enough is enough.
This is a dark day indeed and surely confirms the worst of all our fears. We must fight against this at all costs…who is leading the charge so I can support them?
I hope (not that I’m confident) the government will lose in court eventually, but the trouble is how many will have already succumbed to the powers that be by then? It’s an irreversible medical intervention…
And NHS employees (and my wife) are up next after a “consultation”.
And whilst I applaud those care home workers who are moving jobs…it is not a huge leap to suggest this is the beginning of mandatory annual jabs for all. It is easy for me to say this…but better to let them sack you than to move on? That way their is a trail of illegal dismissals that can shine a light on this madness
In case you don’t already know there is a petition against compulsory vaccination for health and social care workers. Here is the link:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/577842
Following on from the lack of response to my FOI request asking for weekly hospitalisations due to vaccine ADRs, I am sending the following to my MP under the title ‘suggestion to reduce vaccine hesitancy’……In the interests of assisting the government in reducing vaccine hesitancy might I suggest that henceforth the DHSC/PHE publish alongside its weekly number of hospitalised covid cases the weekly number of hospitalisations due to vaccine Adverse Drug Reaction?
As the former will obviously dwarf the latter it should finally send the message out that the vaccines are indeed safe.
Perhaps to gain maximum traction this should be publicised by the BBC, our trusted source for information regarding coronavirus and vaccines.
I cannot possibly see any reason why we shouldnt do this, so what does my MP think of this suggestion?
I look forward to your response.
I know I’m banging my head against a wall at this stage, but dammit I cant just sit here and eat shit forever.
The unvaccinated NHS workers statistic must surely ensure that ‘I am the 1 in 10′ by UB40 makes it onto LS’ theme tunes playlist
The two care homes near me have forced their staff into having the jab already. New contracts/codicils they had to agree to. Disgusting
Minimum wage. Zero contracted hours. Wearing a mask all day, restricting your breathing.
Now to be forced to have a jab that could cause long term medical problems.
My daughter did care in the community and zero contract means, do as you’re told or next week you find yourself with zero hours. She was working 60 hours some weeks.
She lived on a weekly basis doing as she was told, because if she didn’t, she didn’t get the hours and that meant she didn’t have a wage the following week.
A lot of the staff will have already been coerced and threatened into getting jabbed, if they didn’t, they didn’t have the luxury of working from home or being furloughed, they get sent home and as they are officially employed but they get zero income, they would get zero help.
This system has been seriously damaged over many years.
My father and his generation fought to get better wages and working conditions, I know as I grew up with it. Somewhere between then and now we have lost the ability to stand and fight for our rights.
Zero contract is the proof, that benefits no one except the employer.
The carers won’t be able to fight this alone. The public needs to get behind them but unfortunately, it’s the public who are now demanding for everyone to be jabbed.
I’m as guilty as everyone else, I didn’t see this coming, I never noticed that you no longer got a working contract of x amount of hours and a lot of care work and retail is zero contracts.
It’s easy for us to say, don’t give in, take them to court, claim unfair dismissal but carers don’t have the luxury to pick and choose jobs because they will find themselves unable to get any form of care work because they have not been jabbed.
My daughter no longer works in care, it really was their loss but she told me if she did, she probably would get jabbed, because she would not have had a choice.
A person dying as a result of voluntarily having this jab is a tragedy, but a person dying as a result of being forced to have this jab, surely, is murder.
This is absolutely against all human rights. This ‘vaccine’ would have been pulled at any other time for around even 50 deaths from it, yet after I believe over 17000 deaths worldwide they are still promoting it as ‘safe’. Anyone who has done any research will not want this poison. Two days ago a friend told me that her 26 yr old son’s fit, sports playing colleague of the same age, had the AZ vaccine, having wanted the Pfizer one but the surgery had run out. So his GP persuaded him to have the AZ. 2 days later, he was dead. I hope his family sue the arse off that doctor. It won’t bring their son back but might make him think twife about killing others.
They can’t sue the doctor. But they can start publicising their experience.
I had the impression that if ever a situation arose that I found myself being mandated or coerced into taking part in a medical experiment, I was protected by law because of the Nuremburg Code. That was until I found out that the Nuremburg Code has never been signed into Law.
I do however have protections under H&S and Employment legislation:
https://www.riskex.co.uk/jab-for-a-job-vs-health-and-safety-law-what-is-the-current-position
Incidentally, I’d advise anyone thinking of quoting the Nuremburg Code not use the condensed, Wikipedia version (in fact, if advise them never to use Wikipedia for any serious research)
Matt Hancock also said in the commons yesterday that there should be no duty of care to the refuseniks of the vaccination in other words you don’t have the injection then the NHS can refuse to treat you.
Nobody batted an eyelid in the house of commons. And I note it has not made headlines here. I also note that Hancock did not mention the fact that these same refuseniks have paid out thousands some millions in taxes towards the NHS, is he going to refund the money or stop taking the tax? Why is he being allowed to get away with this kind of statement? and why are the press and media not doing anything about it?
Perhaps we can get a refund then if the glorious NHS is going to discriminate.
Who is next – the clinically obese?
The smokers?
The alcohol dependents?
etc etc
Damn the NHS collaborators, Damn the useless politicians, Damn the lot of them who have colluded and waged war against the people’s of the world whose fault was to trust their governments’ integrity.
Wow. The level of hubris encourages my belief that their fall is drawing nearer.
Go long term sick if you work for the NHS
They need to say they have a cough and lost their sense of taste and do this on a loop whilst playing along pretending to be pro vax. as covid symptoms are contraindicated for having the jab because the jabber has to be able to distinguish jab symptoms clearly. Keep on doing this every time it’s your VAX appnt. Yes it’s dishonest and goes against the grain for me but..,
Alternatively that they had a terrible reaction to PEG or polysorbate 80 containing laxatives whilst on holiday (is not on NHS records.) PEG allergy is also a no-no for covid jabs I believe.
Post deleted
I wouldn’t wish care home residents to suffer any more than they already have under this dictatorial regime, nonetheless I hope that every care home worker resigns their job if they are forced to have this gene therapy.
Health workers…. Under no circumstances resign, make them sack you – it’s the only chance you have.