French philosopher Renaud Camus, who is opposed to mass immigration, has been banned from entering Britain after the Home Office told him his presence would go against “the public good”. The Telegraph has the story.
Renaud Camus, the French novelist, was barred from travelling to the UK to speak on immigration later this month.
The 78 year-old has warned that unchecked immigration will lead to demographic “replacement” of Europe’s indigenous populations.
In an email seen by the Telegraph, the Home Office informed Mr Camus that he had been denied the electronic travel authorisation (ETA) needed to enter Britain.
“Your presence in the UK is not considered to be conducive to the public good,” the email read.
Mr Camus, who is an openly gay advocate of non-violence, told this newspaper that “of all the European governments guilty” of allowing unchecked migration, “the British government is one of the guiltiest”.
“No wonder it does not want me to speak,” Mr Camus added.
Vauban Books, the independent publisher of Camus’ work in English, said: “The decision to bar Renaud Camus from the UK is only further confirmation that that country has abandoned the most basic principles of liberal democracy.
“Camus is one of our greatest living writers and will be remembered as such by posterity. The Starmer Government, by contrast, will be remembered – if it’s remembered at all – only for its serial betrayals and profound mediocrity.
“Here as elsewhere, it has inadvertently shown just how precious Camus’ voice is, now more than ever.”
The Home Office was approached for comment.
It is understood that Mr Camus was to deliver a speech at an event organised by the nationalist and anti-immigration Homeland Party.
One of the party’s policies is the re-migration, or encouraged mass emigration, of unintegrated and illegal migrants.
Mr Camus himself has been branded a conspiracy theorist for his view that mass immigration will lead to the replacement of settled populations.
The denial of his ETA comes amid a growing debate over free speech in the UK, particularly on the issue of immigration. Some have argued that the 2024 summer riots in the wake of the Southport murders were fuelled by online misinformation.
The Government has pledged to clamp down on people “pushing harmful and hateful beliefs”.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
When it comes to what’s against “the public good”, the first thing that springs to mind is the Starmer government.
Which, let’s not forget, was voted in on barely 20% of the total electorate.
Yes, brought to you by the same party that think men can have a cervix.
I’m of the belief that a great majority of the current government – alongside many other politicians – should be housed in Broadmoor for the criminally insane.
I think a frontal lobotomy followed by a few rounds of ECT ought to do it.
That’s assuming there’s something in their frontal lobe a large assumption.
No just multiple injections on the same day of the Covid shot
and who consider the rape, torture and murder of poor little white girls less important than votes
Criminal degenerates
Millions of immigrants is ‘against the public good’
Perhaps Renaud Camus should come over by rubber boat and seek ‘asylum’. The Zealots That Be would put him up in a posh hotel at our expense.
He should set sail in a dinghy and then hitch a ride with the RNLI taxi service, then he’ll be right.
I was just about to share this. It is freaky how I can often tell what the DS are going to drop next, lol.
Anyway, The Homeland Party are mighty pissed, and so should many people be. What was that about the UK having a long tradition of free speech, Starmer?? Pure censorship. What an utter piss-take, but is anyone remotely surprised?
”This is an attack on our freedom to assemble and discuss political ideas. This is political interference from the government as they feel threatened by us talking about the issues they’ve brought about. They don’t want us to push back against the demographic replacement of our people.”
https://x.com/R7ECC/status/1913179131157639212
You’re going to get more in the coming days. One has died today on the way over. People-traffickers raking it in. They’re all on the French coast, eagerly awaiting their all-inclusive holiday and new life in El Dorado ( formerly Great Britain );
”BREAKING NEWS; I’ve heard from sources that THOUSANDS of Migrants are gathering close to French Beeches waiting for calm waters then? An absolute INVASION’ is coming incited by TickTock Rap videos of Migrants Boasting from their Luxury Hotels rooms >Migrant Holiday Brochures.” Norman Brennan
”Jaw-dropping footage revealed by Mark White today showing what GB News believes to be Sudanese migrants showing off their 4* hotels.
This is a mockery. There are homeless British citizens sleeping rough on the street and economic migrants fleeing France are a priority for our government.
Keir Starmer promised he would end the migrant hotels, yet another failure.
These videos are nothing but an advertisement for others to come to the UK, of which we believe, there are thousands more queueing up.”
https://x.com/alexharmstrong/status/1912878438412673447
Perhaps a gofundme could be set up to purchase a couple of Direct energy and weather control stations directed over the channel. Fire may not be useful but use of heavy rain and storms to keep the waters choppy and inaccessible – apart from desired times of short duration – could be handy.
Hang on, aren’t these already in use elsewhere across the globe?
I am thinking what I would do to solve this, but it might be illegal so I cannot say it out loud. Because we live in a
Police state.
“Your presence in the UK is not considered to be conducive to the public good,” the (Home Office) email read…
…Same goes for Sir Two-Tier, Theeves, Nobrayner, Phillistine, Edward Samuel Miliband, and the Department of Energy Insecurity, the last 14-years of fake-Tory, fake-government, Ofgem, -com and -twat, the Online Safety Act, the Farm Tax, the Climate Claptrap Act, VAT on school fees, Stonewall, Border Dis-Control, BBC Mis-Verify, Hate Speech Laws, etc, etc, etc.
Home Office Deportation Orders all round.
Wasn’t it just a few days so there was lots of huffing and puffing over Israel’s refusal to admit certain anti-Jewish Labour MPs?
This is no doubt revenge.
“Mr Camus himself has been branded a conspiracy theorist for his view that mass immigration will lead to the replacement of settled populations.”
It’s not a “view” – it’s simple fact. Happening now and has been for decades. Birthrate below replacement, population increasing, proportion of whites decreasing.
Kant talked about the distinction between the public use of reason and the private. The private use is where for example you go and work for a corporation where you’re supposed to use your cognitive faculties to the max during ghastly brainstorming sessions. The public use of reason would be the questioning of the ethics of the existence and behaviour of joint stock corporations and such reasoning has no outer limits. Drip by drip they have gotten us accustomed to the banishment of the public use of reason.
Only Good People Banned from Britain
What is this criteria of the “public good”?
When were these criteria established?
And who decides?
It’s all news to me that there are some self appointment guardians of what is good for me and what isn’t.
I would really like to know who these people are.
Names. I want names of thr people who claim to know what is good for me and have given themselves.the power to impose it on me.
Come you fucking cowards. Show yourselves. Who the hell are you? Stop hiding behind “Home Office”. Who are you?
I share your anger. The only thing I can think of to console myself right now is this: stopping this bloke coming means they fear his message will be listened. I think there’s a chance that the continual doubling down on the immigration thing will eventually wake enough people up for something to change.
What is this criteria of the “public good”?
It’s part of the job of the home secretary to decide that.
Is it? Where does it say that?
Immigration law. It’s a standard criterion orginally meant to deny entry to foreign criminals and the like. It’s just that the Labour definition of persona non grata (people pushing hateful and harmful beliefs aka speaking unwelcome truths) is a bit peculiar to Labour and one not many other people are likely to agree with.
Where is this Labour criteria written out? Is it published somewhere?
In England it is a difficult situation. It is falling apart any concept of a social contract is long gone. Long term increased competition for diminishing resources suggests to me that if you want a vision of England in five years time then think of zones of influence and influential clans. It will be a time of great clan rivalry, battles all the time. Also a time of fun and moments where all sides reflect upon eternal beauty for a moment. The good seed will insert itself in the barbaric age and it will work its magic.
We’ll destroy them all. Remigration will be forced.
The whole of Starmer’s front bench are ‘against the public good’ but they’re allowed in …
Worse. There are people in this country who actually voted for them.
Remigrate them with the illegal aliens that they love so much. I’d be hard hearted and do it. Love Pakistanis so much, great. You are on the same plane to Pakistan as them. Cheerio communist.
Oh my.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QqreRufrkxM
The UN officially calls immigration to cope with the effects of so-called demographic change (aka state-sponsored default hormone-poisoning of women of reproductive age to stop them from getting children) replacement migration¹. So, how’s that a harmful and hateful belief or a conspiracy theory?
¹ https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd-egm_200010_un_2001_replacementmigration.pdf
This makes a certain superficial sense given that the Great Replacement is the fundamental policy of the Anti-white Party and its anti-white government. The mistake the Anti-white Party is making, of course, is that this ban points to their real (unspoken and unspeakable) intentions towards our people.
Just hop on a dingy M. Camus.
‘Anti-immigrant’ is a propaganda term.
Stalin Starmer is an enemy of the people. Does he realise, yet, that he will not escape his trial after the Great Civil War. ?
It is always in the public interest or good to prosecute criminal activity. Illegal entry is just that and acts against the public good. Discussing demographics can never be against the public interest. Shame on the Home Office for excluding this man.
So pleased that they know what is good for us. Like child rape and torture, bombings, 2 tier policing, censorship, blasphemy for some, poverty, third world conditions in Birmingham. All no doubt for the Public good.
I dare say Mr Camus will attend the meeting virtually to deliver his message. This will be equally powerful as it will remind everyone of our pernicious government’s desire to shut down free speech by trying to ban him.
I suspect Mr Vance will have a few choice words on the subject.
As usual, the British establishment deems his philosophy to be the wrong type of diversity. The establishment knows that the majority of British people never wanted mass immigration and incompatible multiculturalism but the establishment is determined to force it upon the nation in any case. Some naive, useful idiots, from the population go along this, as they are incentivised to do so. However, few have ever worked or lived in any of the countries of origin, so have no clue as to the dangers that are being admitted to the country. On the current trajectory, it cannot possibly end well. In time, many capable citizens will leave Britain, leading to a process of continuous relative decline and societal instabilities.
I’d never heard of Renaud Camus before but thanks to this government now banning him, I’ve followed him on X and will be taking a close interest in anything he has to say from now on. Try as they might to prevent it but the truth will out. Is he any relation to Albert Camus? Apparently not, according to Wiki who, predictably, describe him as a far-right conspiracy theorist. So, it seems that gay men can also be far-right. Who knew?