The extremely creepy Santa-died-from-Covid John Snow Project video has left many both puzzled and outraged. David Bell, for instance, described it in a tweet as “using Christmas to promote pharmaceutical sales”.
But what about not just exploiting Santa and Christmas to promote COVID-19 vaccines, but exploiting Christ and Christianity itself?
Consider the below cover of the German mass-circulation weekly Stern from December 23rd, 2020. The Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine had become the first COVID-19 vaccine to be authorised in the European Union two days earlier on December 21st; rollout of the vaccine in Germany would start the day after Christmas.
The main title reads “Vaccination: An Act of Brotherly Love”. It already thus suggested what would become the underlying premise of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign as the latter gradually morphed into a campaign of not just mass vaccination but virtually universal vaccination: namely, that even persons who are at little or no risk from the illness should still get vaccinated to somehow protect others.
Note how the vial in the Stern cover-image is turned so that “BioNTech” is in the centre and clearly legible, whereas the lettering of “Pfizer” is compressed by the perspective and the curve of the vial. The rest of the world might be confused about whose “vaccine” this really is and mistakenly believe that it is Pfizer’s. But in Germany there was never any doubt that it is BioNTech’s product.
In Germany, the vaccine was thus presented not as God’s gift to humankind, but literally as humankind’s gift to God. And this meant Germany’s gift to God, since it was developed by a German company which, perhaps not coincidentally and as discussed in my first article on BioNTech here, had been promoted and kept afloat by the German state ever since the time of its founding in 2008. Indeed, as discussed in my article, BioNTech’s very founding was sponsored by the German state.
This sacralisation of the BioNTech vaccine upon rollout may help to explain why, while all the other Covid-vaccines which were rolled out at roughly the same time have either been withdrawn from the market (Johnson & Johnson, AstraZeneca) or had their use restricted (Moderna), the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine has remained entirely untouched by regulatory action. The sacred vaccine has necessarily to be without fault.
Even when some fault is admitted by regulators or in scientific journals, the invariable conclusion is that the benefits outweigh the risks. How indeed could it be otherwise? This conclusion appears to be literal, unquestionable dogma. To question it is to be a heretic and to find oneself censored or banned by a new inquisition.
And note that we are still required to draw this conclusion even though it is now widely admitted, even by the German Minister of Health, that the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine does not provide the benefit it was authorised to provide: namely, it does not prevent COVID-19.
It is impossible to escape the impression that inoculation with the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine has become an end-in-itself. It is a sacrament which the faithful are expected periodically to perform.
Some have tried to explain the remarkable deference towards this drug as an effect of ‘regulatory capture’, and some sort of ‘capture’ must indeed be involved in the USA, for instance. But in Germany, no capture was needed, since the German state has always been the sponsor of BioNTech and its product.
Indeed, as discussed here, the German vaccines regulator, the PEI – which is responsible for batch release of the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine throughout the European Union – has acted more like a partner of BioNTech, enabling the development and commercialisation of its drug, rather than an arms-length regulator overseeing it. The outgoing president of the PEI, Klaus Cichutek, who announced his retirement last week, has even published a paper with BioNTech CEO Ugur Sahin on developing a Coronavirus vaccine.
Cichutek, moreover, has boasted that “we are the EMA” – i.e., the German PEI is the EU regulator, the European Medicines Agency – “since we’re doing the scientific work there”.
This implies in turn that the German PEI has done the “scientific work” underlying the authorisation of the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine not only for the entire EU, but even for a country which has left the EU: namely, Great Britain. This is because the British authorisation is nothing other than a rebranded version of the EMA authorisation, as can be seen here (bottom of page) and below.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Reality, Dear Shirley, is what remains after you’ve stopped believing in it.
These people are ignorant, arrogant, dictatorial swines.
To be a scientist is to be naïve. We are so focussed on our search for truth we fail to consider how few actually want us to find it. But it is always there, whether we see it or not, whether we choose to or not. The truth doesn’t care about our needs or wants. It doesn’t care about our governments, our ideologies, our religions. It will lie in wait for all time. And this, at last, is the gift of Chernobyl; where I once would fear the cost of truth, now I only ask, “what is the cost of lies?”
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Until the site policy changes, I still feel unable to say anything about Khan.
How to say something without saying it. Excellent
W
?
Yes, that’s a good one.
She soesn’t look British either.
https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-mayor-does/mayor-and-his-team/shirley-rodrigues
Up to her neck in the climate scam.
https://www.c40.org/our-team/shirley-rodrigues/
Another traitor.
Oh look, she’s a WEFfer too. One of Klaus’s little helpers.
https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/london-gets-second-indian-origin-deputy-mayor/story-MDyeozEaCrejcITNTGxs0J.html
And she’s not British.
https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/officers/_ee0VX_tfT92JJKu6sdqIAvACm8/appointments
Born August 1961 apparently but the day of birth not given and born in Nairobi but Indian origin.
As well as being Deputy Mayor on £130k plus she also holds three Company directorships.
See below LM.
Don’t give observers of this site ammunition, LM; I couldn’t give a rat’s arse which mafia claims her.
Until people realise that the rot started with the windrush, we don’t have a hope.
And which mafia is to blame for windrush?
Labour ….. blame the voters of 1945.
What? She’s an archetypal Londoner, as any leade of the GLC will tell you.
“Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with environmental protection”, says the German economist and IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer. The next world climate summit in Cancun is actually an economy summit during which the distribution of the world’s resources will be negotiated.
Let’s admit it: ULEZ policy has almost nothing to do with environmental protection or health protection. The next :London budget will actually be an economy summit during which the distribution of Londoners’ wealth will be imposed.
@LeeHirstComic on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/LeeHurstComic/status/1690662796160122880
”
According to Sadiq Khan, your old diesel cars are causing such bad pollution in London that each year you are literally killing thousands of people.
You absolute bastards.
However…
If you give him £12.50 each time you drive in, the dying people can go fuck themselves.
“
I wrote that in comments here a couple of times already: If Khan is so worried about the health of the population of London, why is a license to poison them available for less than 13 quid?
Once you understand that “illegal” really means “legal for a price”, a lot of things start to make a lot more sense.
My personal theory, as with all indirect so-called sin taxes, is that Khan wants the money and that the health-babbling is just a (thin) justification for fining relatively poor people (with older cars) for doing something which is free for relatively rich people (with current cars).
You do need to remember that the Tube is very polluted and well over the legal limit. But that problem is pout on one side to get the fare money from millions of Londoners, and b***er their health. He should be prosecuted, and TfL!
““These further emails show an industrial scale conspiracy with leading scientists to manipulate the debate on the Ulez expansion by inappropriate requests to reword independent scientific reports,”
Boy wait till the penny drops on carbon emissions and their relationship to climate change….
“The correspondence comes to light just days after the Telegraph revealed how Mr. Khan’s deputy tried to discredit and ‘silence’ Imperial College scientists, who found that the ultra-low emissions zone (Ulez) had little impact on pollution.”
Now now, Ms Rodrigues. Their contract was to make ridiculous predictions about covid deaths, not fabrications about ulez. Another contract will be necessary – if you can find the funds from council tax payments that are diminishing as the populace wake up.
Khan must still resign because he’s still politically responsible for members of his staff publically claiming that white people cannot be real Londoners.
I think real Londoners need to kick the others out.
It’s very simple. If you are prepared to change the health research data to push a measure through regardless of the impact, you are prepared to kill people to meet your own political ends. Children, the elderly, across the board. It isn’t just some minor political wrangle, it’s a knowing criminal conspiracy to further political ends.
Strange, that sounds exactly like the vax scam. The World has become a disgusting place.
Well it was the wrong kind of science.
Expect much more of this under a Labour Government.
Stealth tax.
It’s worth reading up about C40 cities and Sadiq Kahn’s involvement.
https://www.c40.org/about-c40/
C40
Who We Are
Mayors of C40 cities are committed to using an inclusive, science-based and collaborative approach to cut their fair share of emissions in half by 2030, help the world limit global heating to 1.5°C, and build healthy, equitable and resilient communities. C40 supports mayors to do this by:
Raising climate ambition through 1.5°C climate action plan support, high-impact accelerators and fostering innovation.
Building equitable and thriving communities via global and regional programmes.Building a global movement through robust international advocacy and diplomacy.
Scaling up climate action and sharing best practices across high-impact sectors.
Facilitating access to finance for investment in green jobs and projects that improve resilience in cities
None of this shyte makes any sense and I mean that literally. This is truly just a random collection of words.
A dangerous man would only employ other dangerous men or women
“Ah yes science. One gets such wholesale returns of conjecture from such a trifling investment of fact” ——-Mark Twain