Households will pay a £170-a-year Net Zero levy on energy bills in the coming days, with Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt accused of “slyly” shifting costs back to consumers. The Telegraph has the story.
The Telegraph has learned that the two-year suspension of green levies announced last autumn is to end from the beginning of July, after just nine months.
The cost of the levies was shifted from consumer bills to be funded instead by the Government, following a year-long campaign by energy firms and MPs amid spiralling gas, electricity and food prices last year.
It will again be imposed on consumers, although there has been no formal announcement. Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg, who was Business and Energy Secretary when the costs were taken away from consumers last year, said: “Green levies are part of the problem behind the U.K.’s particularly high electricity prices. They ought to be abolished but should fall on general taxation until that can happen. The ambition for Net Zero must not make us cold and poor. Any new or re-imposed charge ought to be announced to Parliament first and not slipped through slyly.”
The decision to fund the green levies via general taxation, as opposed to consumer bill payments, was announced by Kwasi Kwarteng, the then Chancellor, when he unveiled the energy bailout used by the Government to subsidise consumer bills since its creation in October.
At the time, the Government said: “Schemes previously funded by green levies will also continue to be funded by the Government during this two-year period to ensure the U.K.’s investment in home-grown, secure renewable technologies continues.”
But the Treasury will stop funding the cost – which has risen from £150 last year to £170 now – from July, meaning that it will be borne by consumers once again.
A Treasury source insisted that the move was “not an active decision of this administration”.
Due to the way the Energy Price Guarantee (EPG), the Government bailout, was designed, it covered the green levies on bills, the source said. From July, when EPG subsidies will end for most bill-payers, so will Treasury funding of the green levies.
The disclosure prompted astonishment among senior Tories – particularly after Grant Shapps, the Net Zero Secretary, told the Telegraph on Saturday: “We know we need to fund this transition, but we don’t want to do it through household levies… I don’t want to see people’s household bills unnecessarily bashed by this.”
Mr. Shapps said he wanted to scrap plans for a new £120-a-year levy to fund the hydrogen industry. However, days after his remarks, consumers will once again be saddled with the £170-a-year cost of levies that fund other ‘green’ schemes, ranging from the installation of home insulation, to historical contracts with wind farm developers.
Tory parliamentarians and Government figures consulted by the Telegraph said they had expected the charges to be borne by the Treasury for at least the two-year period announced in September. Critics of the levies had expected a public debate about whether the charges should then be reimposed on consumers, either in part or in full, or scrapped altogether.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The world record for the most people on one moving motorcycle is 56 and was achieved by the Indian Army Corps of Signals.
I thought it was 60, by the London Met police to escape from Palistinian protesters!
That has to win a prize for the most useless fact anyone knows.
Who on earth down ticked that comment, are they saying you’re wrong?
https://thenewconservative.co.uk/the-new-conservative-party/
Well if Frank Haviland had any say in the matter we might be able to pull this country round.
Great article (‘Chief wet-wipe Sir Mark Rowley’) Very much in the style of Rod Liddle.
Yes, that certainly brought a smile.
Thanks for the link. Entertaining read.
“American Bully dogs: some demanding they all be shot and others asking that the owners are not stigmatised.”
Perhaps that should be the other way round… he mused.
Open display of prejudice against people with ginger hair is actually quite common. That said, I’m much in favour of increasing the number of police officers on a motorbike to at least four, preferably six. That ought to keep them busy with themselves instead of pointlessly messing with other people’s affairs and as they don’t care for most everyday crimes, anyway, this can only be a good thing. The sight would also be much more entertaining than two of them in a car.
None, ‘cos we’re not allowed to call them “policemen” any more?! Or am I listening to other sources of information too much? I think the latest linguistic scam is to use terms like “police”, or maybe “policepersons” or whatever!
My favourite Parliamentary petition was, and remains, “Reclassify Cheese as a vegetable.”