In search of enlightenment on why the Covid vaccines are harmful to some people, I paid a call on Dr. Chris Newton. Dr. Newton taught in the Department of Medicine, Hull University, and before that he worked as Senior Research Scientist at the Max Planck Institute in Munich. His research in Munich included cellular transfection with DNA. He has more recently contributed a lengthy chapter on Covid pathogenesis and therapy to Nutrition and Integrative Medicine for Clinicians, Volume Two.
Dr. Newton told me he was extremely dismayed to find that effective medical therapy for Covid was being ignored or undermined. Chris commented: “It became rather obvious, the system was running interference to prevent any potential therapy from gaining traction. The reason being that an authorised therapy for prophylaxis or early therapy would block emergency authorisation of the vaccines which at the time were under development.”
Professor Arne Burkhardt, who sadly has recently died, was a highly respected German pathologist who performed autopsies on people suspected of dying from the Covid vaccines. He led an international team of 10 scientists in developing a test for spike protein in human tissue.
His autopsy slides show damaged blood vessels, both the cells that form the inner lining (the epithelium) and the fibrous ‘tube’ of the vessels, as well as the disintegrated heart muscle fibres suspected to lie behind sudden adult (or arrhythmic) death syndrome (SADS). His team’s test has found spike proteins in almost every organ in the body. The dark dots in the slides that he showed in what turned out to be his last presentation, in the EU parliament on May 3rd, represent lymphocytes (white blood cells).
I asked Dr. Newton whether he deemed these findings by Dr. Burkhardt and others convincing. He said he did as he trusts that professionals of the stature of Professor Burkhardt and fellow pathologist Professor Walter Lang will have carried out the control tests required and so there is every reason to be confident in their findings, as evidenced by neutralising antibodies and spike-specific T-cells.
Dr. Newton explained that the original DNA sequence for the vaccine spike protein is a portion of the SARS-CoV-2 virus code data released by China in early 2020. The first step in creating the mRNA vaccines was to turn the computer sequence into physical DNA in a laboratory. Dr. Newton explained that the process was to join short segments of DNA and to assemble the full coding sequence of the spike protein as ‘hard copy’ DNA. Dr. Newton said that he had himself used a similar process when studying the molecular biology of oestrogen receptors at the Max Planck Institute.
The ‘hard copy’ DNA, which is circular in form and known as a plasmid, is added to a cellular bioreactor where the spike DNA is reproduced many times and then converted to mRNA. A purification procedure removes cellular proteins, lipids and DNA. mRNA is much more fragile than DNA and so is encased in lipid nanoforms. Salt solutions are added and the liquid then frozen to minus-70°C to keep it stable during storage and transport.
What happens when these mRNA-containing lipid nanoparticles are injected into people’s bodies was the subject of several hours of conversation between Dr. Newton and myself. Dr. Newton’s particular concern is that the lipid nanoparticles are designed to penetrate membranes and these ingredients can potentially reach every organ including the brain. He suggested that there are several ‘hot spots’, including the ovaries, testes and bone marrow.
Although spike protein will be expressed when cells take up mRNA, Dr. Newton suggested that inflammation of tissues cannot solely be ascribed to the spike protein. The mRNA is carried by the encapsulating lipids and so toxicity of carrier lipids may equally provoke a harmful inflammatory response.
Dr. Kevin McKernan’s research has shown that the purification procedure described above has not been effective: the vaccines contain a large proportion of DNA, including the original circular plasmid and linear fragments of a wide range of sizes. If DNA (rather than mRNA) is taken up by cells, they may continue to generate spike protein for a long time.
Meanwhile, Dr. Gabriele Segalla, a specialist in these types of nanomaterials, has found that the lipid nanoparticles, when warmed up from minus-70°C and then injected into the body, become unstable and the minute droplets disintegrate, forming clumps and even solids, thus generating another set of unpredictable, harmful and little understood substances in the body.
Dr. Segalla emphasises that size is important. These microscopically small nanoforms behave differently to the same chemicals when in physically larger formation – an important feature that is recognised by European medicine regulators. This means nanoforms can be toxic on account of their small size and not solely because of the actual chemical compounds involved.
Returning to my conversation with Dr. Chris Newton, he explained to me that all of the various components of the vaccine cause inflammation and there is little or no information as to how the body neutralises, stores or excretes them, or in what timeframe.
In another chapter of Nutrition and Integrative Medicine for Clinicians, Volume Two, Arden Anderson reports that chronic inflammation is always damaging and is fundamental to many diseases including heart disease, stroke, diabetes, high blood pressure, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer’s. In his own chapter, Dr. Newton sets out the foods and antioxidant supplements useful against inflammation, spike protein and COVID-19 itself. Sounds like the NHS is going to need a few copies.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
If it’s not for Noah, so called free speech advocate DS would be just another propaganda mouthpiece with monochrome view of Ukraine conflict: peaceful democratic Ukraine was unprovokedly invaded by barbaric Russia in February 22. Those pesky Russians who are in the habit of occupying nuclear plants so that they can shell themselves causing nuclear incident…
Even if US didn’t openly provoke Russia, they (US state in partnership with MIC and big business) definitely have million reasons for the war to continue. Europe is weakened by the war and US is making money. Classic.
An excellent article which makes a lot of sense. Obviously the timing of the Russian invasion was, shall we say, fortuitous, allowing TPTB to maintain their fear programme on the back of a waning C1984.
The reasoning expounded by Noah Carl matches very much with the views of proper news organisations which are US based, such as Brighteon / Natural News, and the excellent Technocracy News.
The bottom line is that it is seriously beginning to look like the US deep state has declared war on the world and has recruited some deeply influential and well-funded pockets to their cause – the likes of Gates, Bezos,Zuckerberg etc. In many respects the US is a failing state and their current actions could perhaps be seen as the flailings of a dying man, but this of course makes it very dangerous.
A very plausible theory, it also explains why the
one had to be removed at all costs as he wasn’t onboard with the Ukraine/permanent war project.
Sounds plausible. As they say — America is prepared to fight Russia to the last European.
There’s also the small matter of the Biden family’s dubious commercial interests in Ukraine.
Not to mention the now accepted secret biolabs, funded by the USA, which everyone said was a conspiracy theory.
The difference between ‘conspiracy theory’ and ‘truth’ is now about 6 weeks….
Granted this friction has been boiling for a long while, even before Euromaiden and during Obama’s tenure nothing much was resolved despite the “revolution” (or coup depending on your perspective). But you’re right, the Biden’s connections are certainly worthy of note in this whole debacle, Hunter’s Burisma “contracts” are highly suspect. They were anyway but especially now in retrospect, Burisma being owned by Ihor Kolomoyskyi. We could argue Zelensky owes his rise to power to Kolomoyskyi (and his ‘1+1 Media Group’) in the ‘Servant of the People’ comedy series, plus Kolomoyskyi reportedly was the original funder of the infamous Azov Battalion. I gather there are abundant shale deposits in the Donbas too which again Kolomoyskyi (Governor of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast at the time) presumably wanted to benefit from which may have had something to do with perpetrating the conflict in 2014. The whole thing stinks to high heaven.
I’ve said it before.
America’s worst nightmare has been and will continue to be any alliance between the raw materials of Russia and European tec./industry – then it’s Goodnight Uncle Sam and take all your decadent baggage with you.
As an additional bonus that would be our best chance of avoiding The Great Reset.
What’s not to like…
Strange that there’s no mention of the role that eco-zealots may have played in effectively making Nordstream 2 a white elephant. Given that they’ve managed to get Keystone and various other pipelines in America cancelled or so wrapped up in lawsuits that they may never happen it seems obvious that they regard pipelines as an easy target in their war against fossil fuels and would put pressure on the U.S. government to try and stop the flow of gas/oil anywhere in the world.
I’m not sure which is worse, this delusional article from Carl or the number of Daily Sceptic readers who appear to buy in to this nonsense.
Anyone who thinks that the US intelligence agencies or the State Department is capable of organising anything more than a group order at Starbucks is delusional.
Many of us have said from the outset of the Ukraine war that the US deliberately provoked Russia. I have no problem accepting the argument outlined above is highly plausible.
“When you think about it, this is extremely provocative. Imagine if Chinese officials travelled to Canada, and publicly backed a protest movement seeking to replace Canada’s government with a pro-Chinese one. Americans would be outraged”
Whilst there is, as usual, much to agree with in Noah’s piece, he (never mind the Putin fans active in comments) cuts the Russians way too much slack. And his paragraph 4 – repeated above) is laughable.
No need for hypothetical Chinese in Canada. What about actual Russian funding of GangGreen fanatics “protesting” oil pipelines in US and Canada and Fracking in the UK and Europe? What about RT’s disgraceful support for the same “protestors”?
When will Noah notice that?