The World Health Organisation (WHO) has quietly abandoned its investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, citing ongoing challenges over attempts to conduct crucial studies in China. Nature has the story.
Researchers say they are disappointed that the investigation isn’t going ahead, because understanding how the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 first infected people is important for preventing future outbreaks. But without access to China, there is little that the WHO can do to advance the studies, says Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan in Saskatoon, Canada. “Their hands are really tied.”
In January 2021, an international team of experts convened by the WHO travelled to Wuhan, China, where the virus that causes COVID-19 was first detected. Together with Chinese researchers, the team reviewed evidence on when and how the virus might have emerged, as part of phase one. The team released a report in March that year outlining four possible scenarios, the most likely being that SARS-CoV-2 spread from bats to people, possibly through an intermediate species. Phase one was designed to lay the groundwork for a second phase of in-depth studies to pin down exactly what happened in China and elsewhere.
But two years since that high-profile trip, the WHO has abandoned its phase-two plans. “There is no phase two,” Maria Van Kerkhove, an epidemiologist at the WHO in Geneva, Switzerland, told Nature. The WHO planned for work to be done in phases, she said, but “that plan has changed”. “The politics across the world of this really hampered progress on understanding the origins,” she said.
Researchers are undertaking some work to pin down a timeline of the virus’s initial spread. This includes efforts to trap bats in regions bordering China in search of viruses closely related to SARS-CoV-2; experimental studies to help narrow down which animals are susceptible to the virus and could be hosts; and testing of archived wastewater and blood samples collected around the world in late 2019 and early 2020. But researchers say that too much time has passed to gather some of the data needed to pinpoint where the virus originated.
Many researchers aren’t surprised the WHO’s plans have been thwarted. In early 2020, members of then US president Donald Trump’s administration made unsubstantiated claims that the virus had originated in a Chinese laboratory, and US intelligence officials later said they had begun investigations. The city of Wuhan is home to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a high-security lab that works on coronaviruses. Chinese officials questioned whether the virus originated inside the country’s borders.
In the midst of simmering hostility between the two superpowers, WHO member states requested in May 2020 that the agency put together a science-led effort to identify how the pandemic started. Although China agreed to the mission, tensions were high by the time the WHO group left for Wuhan, and engagement with China quickly unravelled after the group returned.
In its March 2021 report, the team concluded that it was “extremely unlikely” that the virus accidentally escaped from a laboratory. But the inclusion of the lab-incident scenario in the final report was a key point of contention for Chinese researchers and officials, says Dominic Dwyer, a virologist at New South Wales Health Pathology in Sydney, who was a member of the WHO team.
That July, the WHO sent a circular to member states outlining how it planned to advance origins studies. Proposed steps included assessing wild-animal markets in and around Wuhan and the farms that supplied those markets, as well as audits of labs in the area where the first cases were identified.
But Chinese officials rejected the WHO’s plans, taking particular issue with the proposal to investigate lab breaches. Zhao Lijian, the spokesperson for China’s foreign ministry, said the WHO proposal was not agreed by all member states, and that the second phase should not focus on pathways the mission report had already deemed extremely unlikely.
The Nature report adds that outside the formal WHO process some studies have gone ahead. In May 2022, researchers in China published the results of an analysis of donor blood supplied to the Wuhan Blood Centre before December 2019. After screening more than 88,000 samples collected between September 1st and December 31st 2019, the researchers did not find any SARS-CoV-2-blocking antibodies in the samples (though did find some non-neutralising antibodies, which they implied are false positives due to cross-reaction or other issues). A second study, by the Chinese CDC in February 2022, looked at samples collected at the Huanan wet market in January and February 2020 and found evidence of the virus among humans but not among animals, confirming the early outbreak but casting doubt on the idea of a zoonotic spillover event at the market.
We may not be inclined to believe these Chinese findings. But we should note that they are more than the U.S. has managed to put out in the same period. The U.S. published one study of archived Red Cross blood in November 2020, which found 39 antibody-positive serum samples (2%) collected December 13th-16th 2019 in California, Washington and Oregon. No further studies of early spread in America have appeared. On this evidence, of course, the virus is more likely to have been circulating in the U.S. than Wuhan during autumn 2019. Certainly, the Wuhan data may not be trustworthy, or the U.S. data may be mistaken. But clearly there is good reason to look into what was going on in America as well as China. Note that we still don’t have a single wastewater study from the U.S. to give an indication of when in 2019 the virus may have begun circulating in different parts of the country (to be fair, we also don’t have any wastewater studies from China). A wastewater study from Brazil turned positive as of November 27th 2019, suggesting extensive community spread in the Americas during that month.
We also still have no idea what U.S. scientists were working on in relation to SARS-like viruses at the onset of the pandemic. Yet we know that in collaborative coronavirus projects with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the genetic engineering of the virus was typically stated that it was done (or was proposed to be done) in the U.S., not China. We also know that Jeffrey Sachs disbanded the Covid origins taskforce which formed part of the Lancet Covid commission he was chairing because he perceived severe conflicts of interest and a basic lack of cooperation from U.S. scientists.
Concerns about a U.S. cover-up are growing. The latest senior figure to call for an investigation into the role of the U.S. in the origin of the virus is Matt Pottinger, the Deputy National Security Adviser at the start of the pandemic, who recently wrote in the Wall Street Journal that “China hasn’t been the only problem”.
In the early days of the pandemic, a small group of Western virologists came together to consider the pandemic’s origin. Emails that eventually came to light revealed their plan to push the public conversation away from the lab-accident hypothesis and toward the natural-origins explanation. In a now infamous February 2020 letter in the Lancet, and in an equally problematic letter in Nature Medicine the next month, some of these scientists labelled any questions about a possible lab origin as “conspiracy theories”, even though they lacked evidence to dismiss the lab-leak hypothesis.
But in September 2021, a leaked Defense Department document revealed that some of the same scientists had worked together, along with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, on a 2018 proposal to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Their project? Genetically engineering rare gain-of-function features, called furin cleavage sites, into SARS-like viruses in their possession.
To its credit, DARPA didn’t fund that research, but it was highly significant — or spectacularly coincidental — that the SARS-CoV-2 virus, containing this precise feature never-before-seen in any SARS-like virus, began infecting people in Wuhan the next year. Scientists who had called the lab-leak hypothesis a conspiracy had failed to disclose that the lethal virus sweeping the world was eerily similar to the one they had wanted to create.
China’s systematic efforts to block meaningful investigation doesn’t mean that the U.S. should throw up its arms. In fact, both the Trump and Biden administrations have taken action to dig further. The Trump administration began asking questions internally. Early in his tenure, President Biden also authorised a limited, 90-day review of this issue by America’s intelligence agencies. It’s fair to say that both administrations did something and that neither has done enough.
Earlier this year, an international group of scientists and former national security officials — including us — signed an open letter detailing some of the failures of scientific journals and news organisations and calling for greater accountability. What we now need are bipartisan, evidence-based hearings asking the toughest questions about the pandemic’s origins. Congress must carefully look at China’s transgressions as well as our own shortcomings.
The obfuscation by the Chinese is obviously very poor form and only increases suspicions they are hiding something. However, what the Nature report – and, based on that report, the WHO – fail to acknowledge is that we don’t need Chinese cooperation to investigate what U.S. scientists and officials can tell us about the origin of the virus and early spread in America. Investigating this properly should have begun long ago, and even now it is not too late. The politicians need to compel the scientists and officials to reveal what they know.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
My assumption is the parliamentarians did not know. Twitter did though, and very quickly. I also suspect Trudeau did. But that’s probably based more on my dislike for the little tyrant than any actual intelligence data. There are some very strange things going on. This whole Zelenski appointment of Marina Abramovic as an ambassador is more than a little weird.
Spirit cooking
Ambassador.
If Rothschild is bothered about anti-semitic conspiracy theorist rumours that he is an evil puppeteer ruling the world – probably best not to get photographed in front of a painting titled “Satan Summoning his Legions” with a self proclaimed dark magic witch!!!
Marvellous. So well posed.
He appears to have managed to summon the first two!
I don’t normally lose it but the downtickers really are a bunch of Next Tuesday’s.
Yes I don’t get it. All I have done is post facts. I haven’t made any assertions about those facts. Seems odd so many Daily Sceptic readers would take issue with that.
I’m baffled
Why can’t these people say what it is they object to?
Dubious connections that make Jimmy Saville look like a saint.
“There are some very strange things going on.”
That is entirely the point. All that is happening is intended to be Orwellian.
Castreau knew.
Castreau
Canadian ‘values’
Full throated roaring for a Nazi
Their deputy PM Freeland comes from the same stock
What a bloody disgrace
A country in massive decline
Again with the massive downticking! What’s going on with DS readers today? Some sort of rent-a-mob thing? Weird.
Probably the government’s 77th Brigade, which should tell you something!
By our standards, huge down ticking for comments on this Ukraine-connected article. Perhaps it’s Ian Rons and his pro Ukraine mob? Fair to say though that there is a lot of establishment weight thrown into supporting this mad proxy war against Russia, and the ‘it’s a good idea for Nato to surround Russia and neutralise it before breaking it up and selling it to Blackrock’ brigade. Never forget – the alternative to this war would have been to stop shelling Luhansk and Donetsk provinces (ie civilians), grant them independence within Ukraine, and to enshrine Ukrainian neutrality, in military terms. That’s all Putin asked for in 2021.
There’s at least one Canadian who probably would not have applauded: (2) CAUGHT ON CAMERA: Pastor kicks out police without warrant from Passover service – YouTube
What a bloody insult to those Canadian lads who died in two World Wars.
Fair do’s, I understand that Adolf misgendered far fewer ppl than Winston, so what else is there to say?
…Don’t any of them have Google? It would have taken 2 minutes to find out who he is…..LOL!
They know they are supporting those people in Ukraine anyway..they all do…so we shouldn’t be very surprised…..don’t forget until the West’s apparent complete ‘amnesia’ about the Azov Battalion and the gnatzi far right elements in Ukraine…the USA Congress did not allow any weapons to go the Azov Battalion by law.
“This year, (2018) the $1.3 trillion omnibus spending bill signed into law last week stipulates that “none of the funds made available by this act may be used to provide arms, training or other assistance to the Azov Battalion.”
White supremacy and neo-Nazism are unacceptable and have no place in our world,” Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), an outspoken critic of providing lethal aid to Ukraine, said I am very pleased that the recently passed omnibus prevents the U.S. from providing arms and training assistance to the neo-Nazi Azov Battalion fighting in Ukraine.”
Anyway the complaints are already coming in…
https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/jewish-group-demands-apology-after-mps-honoured-man-who-fought-for-nazis-1.6575593
OTTAWA – Several Jewish advocacy organizations condemned members of Parliament on Sunday for giving a standing ovation to a man who fought for a Nazi unit during the Second World War.
The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies issued a statement
saying the division “was responsible for the mass murder of innocent civilians with a level of brutality and malice that is unimaginable.”
It’s highly unlikely that the 14th division ever harmed black people so what’s the problem, why keep raking over the past? (sarc)
The sooner folks realise that MPs are just a bunch of grifting dilettantes the better. As for the downticking, I’d say the site is being trolled by a bunch of goons.
It would be funny it it were not so tragic! The Canadian Parliament member claimed he didn’t know who he was honouring. Well this has opened up a lot of eyes and hopefully has brought many people to their senses.
This guy was a volunteer in the Galician Einsatzgruppe of the Waffen SS.
Amongst their other actions was Babi Yar, one of the worst atrocities of the Holocaust.