There has been much talk about the so-called ‘pink tax’. This is the claim that products marketed toward women are more expensive than those marketed toward men – that the pink bottle labelled ‘sensual’ tends to have a bigger price tag than the blue bottle labelled ‘revitalising’.
But does the ‘pink tax’ really exist?
After all, there are strong economic reasons to think it wouldn’t. If two otherwise-identical products were priced differently, consumers could just opt for the cheaper one. And the lion’s share of shopping is done by women, so you might expect them to be more price-sensitive.
In a paper published online last July, Sarah Moshary and colleagues put the ‘pink tax’ to the test. (Their paper hasn’t yet been peer-reviewed).
The researchers collated data on the prices of a large number products in categories like soap, body wash, deodorant, shampoo and shaving cream. They then identified whether each product was aimed at men or women – based on purchasing data, text analysis of product descriptions and manual coding by research assistants.
Interestingly, unisex products comprised less than 20% of the total; these were excluded from the analysis.
Moshary and colleagues also identified the main active ingredients in each product – to make sure they were comparing apples with apples (or in this case, shower gels with shower gels).
What did they find?
When the researchers compared products in the same category without considering active ingredients, they found that those aimed at women were slightly more expensive. However, when they controlled for active ingredients, they found that women’s products were very slightly cheaper.
Here’s a map of the average ‘pink tax’ in each state. (The study was based on U.S. data.)
As you can see, it was zero or negative in every single state, meaning there isn’t a single one where men pay less than women for the same products. I don’t see much of a geographical pattern in the size of this ‘blue tax’.
Contrary to claims made by feminists, Moshary and colleagues find no evidence that women face a ‘pink tax’ when shopping for bathroom products. As a matter of fact, it’s men who pay slightly higher prices. And don’t accuse the authors of ‘sexism’ – all three of them are women.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Now let’s contrast this comical farce to the crimes that evil gnome Fauci actually did commit, as per the previous article on here. Because if there were any justice, *that* should’ve been your ”trial of the century”. But as I’m sure we all know, hell will freeze over before he sees the inside of a prison cell. A bit more dirt on Mr Untouchable. No wonder he always comes off as so chuffing arrogant;
”During the pandemic, the American people started to feel that Big Government was very cozy with Big Pharma.
Now we know just how close they were.
New data from the National Institutes of Health reveals the agency and its scientists collected $710 million in royalties during the pandemic, from late 2021 through 2023. These are payments made by private companies, like pharmaceuticals, to license medical innovations from government scientists.
Almost all that cash — $690 million — went to the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID), the subagency led by Dr. Anthony Fauci, and 260 of its scientists.”
https://nypost.com/2024/06/02/opinion/nih-scientists-made-710m-in-royalties-from-drug-makers-a-fact-they-tried-to-hide/
It was a sham trial from the very beginning but it will backfire on corrupt Biden. If America wants to see a genuine lifelong criminal they only need to look at the White House and take a glance at Ukraine and his sons laptop.
I hope Trump takes the pair of them to Court and slams the door behind them. Then again, Trump isn’t Biden so will just get on with the job he will, once again, be elected to do.
I’m not a mad fan of Trump but Biden is a corrupt man and long has been, his son is arguably worse. I recall the laughably named Democrats calling Trump a Warmonger. Trump never fired one shot. Biden started firing 30 days into his corrupt “Presidency”. He never did explain why, in some places, there were more votes than constituents.
That’s the left for you. Always accusing other people of being what they themselves are.
I hold no remit for Trump but honestly it will be worth seeing him re-elected just for the reaction. Since his conviction, his campaign (which I’m sure he has plenty of money to fund himself) has apparently been receiving millions in donations from the ‘little people’ incensed at what they have seen happen.
I hope it back fires but the NPC mob will believe anything Biden says.
I hope he fires back at those jibes from De Nero. He seems to be living up to his character in ‘Meet The Fockers’, a stooge for the military industrial complex.
So far, my experience has been that those who are happy that Trump has been convicted or don’t mind because they don’t really like him will not be able to explain what he has been convicted of. They can’t explain any of it. They are basically NPCs that have heard the sound bites about Trump being charged and convicted and act accordingly in strict NPC fashion.
Those who understand what has happened are horrified and very very worried.
That said, it’s not the worst thing that has happened in US presidential history. John Kennedy was murdered in what amounted to a coup. And his brother Robert also when he was about to become president. The US is still a bit rough around the edges when it comes to regime change. Not like the UK where they can depose not one but two Prime Ministers in a matter of weeks and it all looks like it’s been done by the rules.
Agree entirely but Biden is mad, deranged and senile. The fact he’s about to die makes him more dangerous than the average Potus.
Worse, I think he is surrounded by people pulling his strings who are actually wicked.
Guilty of spoiling the Liberal Progressive, One World Government, Climate Change Party, where the commies get to divvy up the planet while pretending they are saving it. They cannot have Trump coming along and withdrawing from any more climate treaties. In the sixties he would have been shot in his Lincoln Continental, but these days they gotta be a bit more subtle about it.
As the Babylon Bee put it: Donald Trump found guilty of being Donald Trump.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/trump-verdict-us-civil-war/5858746
A good article from Global Research confirming Paul Homewood’s interpretation. An interview with the gorgeous Megyn Kelly also embedded.
This appalling abuse of the justice system really does put the USA on a par with Bannana Republics. How could they be so crude as to find The Donald guilty on unproven charges? Hopefully this doesn’t set the precedent for other Western nations although in our case we certainly are pushing the boundaries.
As Mark Steyn puts it. it is worse than a banana republic. This is not some backwater, this is supposed to be the helm of the free World.
I heard that the prostitute Stormy was calling for him to be jailed immediately. They must be getting desperate. Was he that bad a fu@k, I mean, she already got paid I assume the first time, and then after for hush money. That is one expensive prostitute. Go to Thailand and you will get a much better deal.
“Trump never fired one shot. Biden started firing 30 days into his corrupt “Presidency”…
And the American MSM, which along with BBCs Trusted News Initiative, must be busted up as illegal info monopoly and racket, began calling for his Impeachment literally on his 2017 Inauguration Day.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/01/20/the-campaign-to-impeach-president-trump-has
Some simple facts to remember — It is a Democrat State — and a Democrat judge who is on record wanting to take him down with a daughter that sells merchandice in the downfall of Trump. Only in America as they say!
“ But astonishingly, here in Britain the media almost to a man has ignored them all and instead lazily assumed that Trump must have committed a crime.”
I don’t find that at all astonishing. Almost everyone I know dislikes Trump, thinks he is dangerous or a fascist or something- I doubt any of them could name a single policy decision of his though. Even people I know who probably vote Tory here view him with disdain, probably not smarmy enough and too brash, not at all “respectable”.
Make no mistake. God sent President Trump