The high number of U.K. excess deaths since April has finally made it into the mainstream media, courtesy of the Telegraph and Professor Carl Heneghan. According to the ONS, as of August 5th 2022 there have been 13,398 excess non-Covid deaths registered in England and Wales since April 23rd. The Telegraph reports that the Government is now looking into what is behind this alarming wave of unexplained deaths, which is about time, having previously said it would not. Does it only matter when the Telegraph says it?
However, nowhere are the vaccines mentioned by mainstream outlets as a possible factor. Instead, the impact of lockdowns (especially denial of healthcare access) and the lingering effects of Covid are put forward as likely causes.
I don’t doubt that these will be contributing. But with the main causes of the excess deaths being related to the heart and circulatory system, and the Covid vaccines being known to injure the heart and cause clotting, it is frankly bizarre and irresponsible not to include the vaccines in a list of possible causes of a rise in heart deaths and strokes.
A plausible scenario, for instance, would see vaccines and Covid combining to injure the heart and circulatory system. A signal for this would be a higher rate of cardiovascular deaths in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated. Data on deaths by vaccination status are hard to come by (and the ONS data on this are missing thousands of deaths and apparently misclassifying them, according to Professor Norman Fenton). But data on hospitalisations by vaccination status for non-Covid reasons appear to show that the vaccinated are being hospitalised at a much higher rate than the unvaccinated.
It’s worth noting that cancer deaths, despite what some are claiming, are not currently running high, which suggests withdrawal of healthcare access is not playing as large a role as some suggest. If the problem was primarily being caused by withdrawal of healthcare access then we would expect a large rise in cancer deaths as well, not just heart deaths.
That the Covid vaccines can injure the heart is well-documented in the scientific literature. A large Scandinavian study in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) found vaccination increased the risk of severe heart inflammation up to 120-fold. It also found that incidence of serious heart inflammation following infection (and not vaccination) was negligible, counting against the claim that the problem is primarily due to complications of Covid infection.
A major French study in Nature found serious heart inflammation up to 44 times higher after Covid vaccination.
A Thai preprint of a prospective cohort study in adolescents found cardiovascular adverse effects in almost one in three teenagers and suspected or confirmed heart inflammation in one in 29 young males.
The likely mechanism for this damage has been identified. A recent study showed that the coronavirus spike protein by itself damages the heart. Another study found that the spike protein can persist in the body for months following vaccination, causing debilitating symptoms.
A number of leading scientists and medics have been voicing concerns about the vaccines’ effects on the heart. Danish scientist Professor Christine Stabell-Benn analysed the vaccine trial data in a Lancet preprint and concluded that the data show a “potential danger signal” for heart-related deaths connected to the mRNA vaccines.
Dr. Peter Doshi, an Editor of the BMJ, also analysed the trial data in a pre-print and concluded the vaccines appear to be more likely to cause serious injury than prevent it.
A concerned heart surgeon in Japan wrote to Virology Journal to call for all Covid booster vaccinations to be stopped for safety reasons, citing in particular the impact on the heart.
There is further evidence of widespread serious injury from the Covid vaccines. Data from health insurance companies indicate a massive growth in claims for vaccine injuries since the Covid vaccines were rolled out. Surveys by governments and researchers indicate a rate of serious side effects of between 0.3% and 0.9% per dose. When you’re vaccinating tens of millions multiple times, that adds up to hundreds of thousands of serious injuries.
Studies which blame Covid frequently have flaws which exaggerate the impact of Covid on the heart and hide the impact of vaccines. For instance, a major study in Nature showed a huge increase in heart problems in ICU Covid patients compared to a control group. However, the control group consisted not just of ICU non-Covid patients but all non-Covid patients, so was confounded by the already poorer health of those in ICU. The study also didn’t distinguish those in ICU whose primary diagnosis was Covid, meaning it exaggerated the problem by including as Covid patients those in ICU with heart problems whose Covid infection was incidental. It also didn’t separate out the vaccinated and unvaccinated, so didn’t distinguish the consequences of infection and vaccination, meaning much of the problem could have been from vaccines rather than infection. Dr. Clare Craig analysed the data in the study’s supplementary information and found that the vaccinated-and-infected had much higher rates of heart inflammation than the unvaccinated-and-infected – a result consistent with the Scandinavian study cited above, which found negligible impact of Covid infection on the heart but a big problem from vaccination.
Covid and lockdowns may well have contributed to heart problems. But there’s a very obvious cause of heart injuries that mainstream outlets are entirely failing to acknowledge. Are they unaware of the studies on this, or are they just afraid to mention the vaccines? Either way, it is a serious failure in a matter of significant public concern. Let’s hope the Government does better.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Let’s be honest, if they thought for a moment that there was a perfectly reasonable explanation for all this, they would have investigated it already. The fact that they won’t, tells you it’s not good news.
Are lockdown zealots about to be thrown under the bus to protect big pharma and their puppets in the regulatory agencies?
Excellent article, Will. As Rob Slane on the blogmire.com said recently, why are they ignoring the herd of trumpeting elephants in the room?
And it would be easy enough for those who wanted to investigate to obtain samples of the vaccinated by age-group and the unvaccinated, matching for other variables, via GP records.
Thank you so much Will for your tireless efforts in pursuing this, for the benefit of all the people that were conned and died a useless death or continue to suffer.
Excellent analysis.
Science should explore the full reasons for the excess deaths.
As it stands there is an ‘approved hypothesis’ (lockdowns) and ‘science’ will go looking for reasons to support it.
Doesn’t matter. A herd of elephants in the room can’t be ignored forever. So as long as they are dumb enough to keep sticking this sludge into people, despite its uselessness, the clearer the correlation between toxic sludge and AEs/deaths will become.
A lot of very powerful people and institutions seem to be digging a very deep hole. This could end quite badly (as if it wasn’t bad enough already).
I think anyone, in an ideal world, that is under 70yrs and has been jabbed, that suddenly dies without any known comorbidities, should have a post mortem. As opposed to just having this fall-back option of ‘SADS’. What they’re going to do now is a whitewash, because even if an ECG is off and shows arrythmias and a blood test shows raised troponins, they will not put that down to the vax. They will try to pin it on, if not Covid, Sudden Arrhythmic Death Syndrome. If everyone who dies prematurely and is identified as having been vaxxed had a PM then they might just be able to show causality. If people are dying well before their ‘expiration date’, which is in the 80s in most countries, and have no known health conditions then this must be scrutinized further. Its too easy to write it off as something else and the corruption continues. Bringing back routine post mortems is the best way to determine cause of death when a common denominator, such as having had the Covid jab, is identified.
But it’s normal to suddenly drop dead don’t ya know? Heart attacks, dementia, strokes in the under 30s & teens is perfectly normal. Questioning the efficacy & safety of the “safe & effective” bioweapon injections is what is abnormal.
Except that isn’t SADS*, SADS is due to problems with the conduction system of the heart. Not ischaemia. The other confounder is the temperature that we have experienced earlier in the summer, which increases the risk of cardiovascular problems including MI and stroke. The excess death rate was around 15% in 2003 and 20% in 1976.
Yes the vaccine or rather the immune system’s response can cause problems, as does the smallpox vaccine (cardiovascular) and many others (mainly neurological) but it is not responsible for every excess death.
Clotting issues have been identified with the AstraZeneca vaccine and this appears to be due to the development of antibodies to one particular receptor on the platelets, this side effect has also been seen in patients receiving heparin injections.
All sudden deaths are still reported to the coroner who can request a forensic autopsy by a home office pathologist.
*SADS initially stood for Sudden Adult Death Syndrome (cf Sudden Infant Death Syndrome), this was changed to Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndrome when it became apparent that although physically there were no indications of a problem but there was a problem with the ion exchange system in the electrical conduction paths in the heart, it is estimated that 12 young people under the age of 35 die every week in the U.K. from SADS. It is suggested that 30% of these conditions are genetic with the remainder being triggered by fever. Brugada is probably the best known, which is entirely genetic, another entirely genetic condition is estimated to affect 1 in 100000, and this condition can be triggered by stress or exercise and until someone collapses there are no signs or symptoms.
Thanks John. Lord knows the reason for the downticks. I wonder if the culprits could explain further?
I find it very odd that you neither mention or discuss any of the points raised in the article……in fact you don’t seem to engage with it at all…..for instance the up to date (and shocking) Thai study?
But you do mention the smallpox vaccine..why? That vaccine was ended in 1971 and that was because no one was having it anyway..so it can’t affect younger people, and for the oldies like me, why would it affect me now 50+ years down the line? Similarly, Heparin injections? Not new, and why would they be causing things exactly now? Is there a Heparin injection fest we don’t know about?
I’ve had a look at adolescent deaths in the Uk and they hover around 1.400, annually, mostly due to accidents, suicide or self harm and cancer..SADS doesn’t even make the list…although I did find a FOI for England and Wales which showed around 100 deaths from SADS … not the 900 + you mention..
I’m a bit baffled about all of your post..all of the things you mention have always been here, so it doesn’t illuminate why excess deaths are happening now….especially in the younger cohort…
Well if I were one of them paranoid ‘conspiracy theory’ types, I’d be asking if ‘John’ wasn’t one of those ’77th Brigade’ people we’ve heard all about by now. He never seems to respond in any other discussions but if something about the pseudo-vaccines lands up he pops. At the very least he comes across as a Covid jab apologist. People who appoint themselves as know-it-alls or intellectually superior to everyone else in the comments sections don’t tend to rub me up the right way to be honest. Nobody here gives a shit about your textbook spiel. Discuss *with* don’t lecture *at* and your posts might be more positively received. Everybody here is a layperson and games of one-upmanship never go down well and show a lack of communication skills. Read the room man, read the room!
Smallpox is still administered as standard to the US and Finnish military, not sure about other countries. The 12 per week is from http://www.c-r-y.org.uk which for an 18 month period is 900+. That is for SADS in the under 35 age group.
..no the USA suspended it in 1972….either way it’s irrelevant….the 12 per week is cardiac problems, that’s even if you believe the figure they as a charity who have a vested interest to be correct….
the vast majority of which could be inherited, or as a result of other diseases…it doesn’t relate entirely to SADS…
I don’t think for a minute that you will deviate from your script, you say the same thing all the time…I think the headline applies to you doesn’t it? As I said, you haven’t engaged with any of the evidence presented..you just don’t think it’s true which is fair enough, but just say so, don’t beat around the bush with nonsense….
The smallpox vaccine is still administered to US military following the “war on terror”.
So what…? How is it relevant to the conversation..it isn’t…
This is the reason I referred to heparin, sorry Mogwai but it’s a published paper https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8112568/pdf/NEJMoa2104882.pdf
…but this study shows that people had got thrombosis, AFTER the vax..pretty much proving the articles point. The heparin that was given later exacerbated it! So again, not really relevant. I think Mogwai is right, but I suspect you have just changed your name…you write very similarly to someone who used to comment on here often, someone who had taken all the vaccines and couldn’t/wouldn’t accept any of the evidence that was presented…you don’t seem to have changed….
“All sudden deaths are still reported to the coroner who can request a forensic autopsy by a home office pathologist.”
Ok, and of course all the majority of coroners and Home Office pathologists are as honest, courageous and free-thinking as the day is long, and their profession is strangely unafflicted by the greed, cowardice, dishonesty and groupthink that has afflicted the rest of the medical profession, and every other professional body on the planet, regarding covid.
SADS is not detectable at autopsy. In fact if no structural problems are identified in the heart then that will almost guarantee a diagnosis of SADS.
A friend of mine died at home almost twelve months ago less than twenty four hours after being “boosted.” Cause, a massive heart attack, no previous heart issues. Procedure dictated this death was referred to the Coroner. His conclusion, Post Mortem not necessary and the “booster” was considered coincidental.
How much of this has and is still going on?
That’s hideous!
But isn’t it just telling that the Coroner has had orders from above to just not investigate further? I think this is happening all of the time and something else that appears to be orchestrated because other countries are reporting the same. So all these kids and young people dying suddenly, their deaths don’t warrant further investigation because they’re not deemed suspicious enough? This beggars belief doesn’t it? Kids dying is being normalized and the Coroners are in on it. So we have to wait for somebody to be embalmed before people find evidence of a causal link then? Insane.
Yes indeed Mogs. To be honest if it was one of my family there is no way would I let the matter drop.
Exactly the same thing happened to a dear friend of mine. He was such an active, vibrant, larger than life person who appeared healthy fit and strong (70). Such a wealth of knowledge has gone with his passing. Much missed.
Very sad.
Let’s not forget that these injected bioweapons were & remain experimental. The FDA “approved” cominarty has never been produced or distributed.
The Nuremberg Code, which was 75 years old yesterday has been utterly violated by the imposition of the NPIs let alone the deliberate withholding of pertinent information to the contents & immediate, let alone medium & longer term, effects of the bioweapon injections.
Vera Sharav gave an impassioned speech yesterday in Nuremberg. The comparison to the recent history is stark.
https://childrenshealthdefense.eu/eu-issues/vera-sharav-unless-all-of-us-resist-never-again-is-now-75th-anniversary-of-the-nuremberg-code/
I would hope that, like criticism of lockdown, which was previously a big no-no, it will be a trickle of info, followed by a flood, but I honestly believe we are a long way away from that point. At the moment too many MSM people are still cowed enough not to rock the boat for fear of being cancelled. Other journalists appear to actually believe the propaganda (I’m looking at you MD from Private Eye, who only this week asserted that the vast majority of people ill and dying of covid are unvaccinated. There’s a man who has never been bothered by a statistic.) I think, sadly, it will take a lot more public vaccine deaths before the penny drops with a lot of people – so that may start occurring again in September with the next round of boosters. For most people I speak to it has never crossed their minds that, essentially, mass murder is taking place in plain sight, but then many people only get their info from the BBC, so what do you expect? (They also know nothing about Dutch farmers, Canadian truckers, Trudeau and his mandates and all the many other snippets of news the BBC won’t mention as it doesn’t fit with their narrative.)
If they’re ever charged and prosecuted, they will probably get away with ‘manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility’, and spend the rest of their lives in a secure hospital.
Now for a real classic
: I never subscribed to the Eye but used to buy it regularly for years. I already grew a bit tired of the endless gebrexel (mock German participe supposed to mean Brexit agitation) despite I generally sympathized with the position of the magazine on that. Eventually, one has to accept that a certain discussion had a certain outcome. MD’s relentless COVID agitation made me stop buying it. Hence, I’ve sort-of cancelled my subscription and it wasn’t even about a joke I couldn’t take.
I’d subscribed to ‘The Week’ for about fifteen years, not long after it started I think. After a full-page article of the ‘what shall we do with the unvaxxed?’ sort, cancelled my subscription. It wasn’t its usual ‘news round-up’ treatment – it was its ‘own’ article, and very partisan. Did explain why I was cancelling, but this long-term subscriber never got a reply. And I haven’t missed the magazine since. Fact is that I’d felt less enthusiastic about The Week in recent years, but if it hadn’t been for that article inertia would have had me continuing the subscription. The Week/Private Eye and other magazines who have villified those who simply object to being coerced into being injected with something they don’t want and can never get rid of – they appear to have no idea just how strongly they’ve alienated a percentage of their readership/potential readership. I’ve bought Private Eye a few times in recent years when about to board a train. Not now.
Similarly, I cancelled my ‘Spiked’ subscription after Brendan O’Neill’s appalling article advocating mandatory “vaccination” for care home workers. I think some of the savings went on increasing my DS sub.
“They also know nothing about…Italian farmers, Spanish farmers, the Sri Lankan revolution and subsequent introduction of QR codes.
And for reference, just among sportspeople up until and inc Aug this year. Look at the ages. Young, fit and healthy people did not normally just drop dead in their droves. Or are we meant to believe that being fit, young and healthy ( as nature intended ) is now deemed a risk factor???
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/
Please explain why in 2015 Loughborough University felt the need for a seminar on cardiac risk in elite athletes?
Cardiomyopathy is a known issue for elite athletes when they reduce their exercise levels.
People of African descent are at higher risk of sudden cardiac arrest, e.g. Foe and Mwamba.
One of the references is to a footballer from FC Manchester having an ICD fitted following a collapse, which suggests a conduction problem.
I assisted in the resuscitation of a paramedic colleague who had a sudden cardiac arrest 24 hours after completing a 200 mile cycle ride, he had an ICD fitted after an ECG showed long QT syndrome, a conduction problem not a structural problem.
There are video compilations showing athletes keeling over. This is a new phenomenon but what is the cause?
Come on John.
…I used to attend football matches all the time, 30 years plus..in all that time I did not see any footballers die on the pitch..nada….I did once see an elderly man die in the stands…that’s it….and people are dying so quickly, or in their sleep that there is no chance of resuscitation….this is not normal in younger people…
Exactly. As far as I am concerned John is being disingenuous at best, much though I appreciate his technical input.
And here’s me thinking you could sniff a 77th a mile away. As ebygum mentioned, he’s made no comment on the actual article but prefers to lurk around the comments section thinking he’s giving everybody the benefit of his perceived wisdom. Its tedious and adds nothing to the discussion. That’s what search engines are for.
Mogs, I appreciate your praise. I will give the benefit of the doubt for now but patience is running thin. The problem is that I have a lot of colleagues and associates who work in the NHS through all grades and specialisms and to a man they are zealotry in their commitments to the official mantra; seriously it is as if they are brainwashed.
Two of them are degree plus micro biologists who did nothing but C1984 testing for the last two years. They still insist there has been a pandemic and vehemently insist that PCR tests can specifically identify C1984. I despair of them both but it just shows how deeply they have bent to the Orwellian propoganda.
Maybe, just maybe, John is one of those. We’ll see.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nBBuRLOmT4s this is from 5 years ago and African players more at risk.
1250 sudden deaths across the world over an 18 month period is not young people dying in droves. 12 young people a week is 12 * 78 = 936 and that’s just the U.K.. of those listed there are clearly some that were adversely affected by the vaccine but not all.
Hey John. Good to see you didn’t flounce off like a stroppy teenager after all!
Hope you saw my post to you, apologising if I upset you. Anyhoo, gonna have to agree to disagree on this one. Once again you come across as somebody ( other than Rain Man ) who seems to be on the wrong side. I appreciate the tendency towards impartiality but, as I said before, nobody likes a self-appointed resident fact-checker/know-it-all who doesn’t make it clear where his loyalties lie and who talks like he swallowed a text book.
Tell me this without the lecture, do you think the pseudo-vaccines contributed towards the excess death numbers we are seeing?
The normal legal term used in certain branches of government, such as planning committees, is “declaring an interest”. No shortage of occasions when it doesn’t happen, or if they assume that everyone knows that they’ve got their fingers in a pie, etc.
Another question for John would be “do you agree that the correlation between so-called vaccine rollout and excess deaths should be urgently and thoroughly investigated by multiple independent bodies, and pending the results of these investigations the mass vaxxing should be suspended and the emergency use authorisation be withdrawn, and that currently it’s not the case that there has been informed consent, and there was no emergency”?
There may be a correlation but that doesn’t prove a causal link.
No there was no emergency.
If you go to your GP with high cholesterol and they prescribe atorvastatin, do they explain the possible side effects, highly unlikely, you’ll be given a prescription as the GP is following NICE guidelines, which are “evidence” based. Which is why informed consent is a bit of a myth, people put faith in their GP/consultant.
I’m not saying any causal link is proved I’m saying suspend the vaxxing now because there is no emergency and there is a strong evidence of safety problems (not surprising given safety trials were skipped).
At the very least such a proposal is to be recommended for its modesty.
Contributed probably, the main cause definitely not.
Definitely not, lol
And you know this how?
You’ve admitted that you’re ex NHS. (And Leicestershire NHS: I’ve personal experience of their utter uselessness BEFORE the scamdemic)
Aren’t you utterly appalled by the performance of that organisation and the vast majority of its employees over the last 30 months?
I mean, we suspected that it was utterly crap by comparison with most other developed states, but I doubt that more than a handful of us knew exactly how badly it would let us down.
Except I was seeing patients face to face throughout 2020 after they’d been referred to us by a GP telephone consultation.
I did type “the vast majority of its employees”.
And if you were seeing people face to face after GP telephone consultations, doesn’t that reveal the GPs as cowardly work-shy parasites?
I don’t downtick and I do not like being personal but here it is:
You are talking complete BS!
I would say yes to this. Nowadays my first comment when I hear of anyone less than 70 years is ‘did they have the jabs?’
Currently we have The British Heart Foundation pumping out an advert depicting heart problems in young people, from a young brown-skinned (natch) boy all the way to a teenage girl footballer who collapses on the field – very well acted.
The whole advert is sickening and frankly gruesome. That the BHF would seek to normalise cardiovascular injuries in young people so forcefully and graphically leaves me struggling to get my head round it.
I wrote to them at the start of the Scamdemic complaining about their pushing of masks but received a typical boilerplate response which would have insulted anyone’s intelligence.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DU_i0ZzIV5U from 13 years ago, player had had an ICD fitted.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TCbVIEtoiI Mwamba at white hart lane
Just exceptions.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_association_footballers_who_died_while_playing
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxBHX39eU7o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upch33dRZnQ&t=76s discussion by cardiologist after Eriksen event in Euro 2020.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hT8GZlBBv5k same cardiologist discussing elite cyclists.
This information also won’t get traction in the MSM & is also a contributor to the increasing death rate of previously young & healthy individuals.
The positive to take from this is that there is a detox solution which doesn’t rely on big pharma.
In the UK melatonin is the one we can’t get as a supplement. Wonder why it was banned from sale….?? Wonder why sun was suddenly so bad for you….??
Noon day sun between the hours of 1030am – 230pm on sunscreen free skin & received by eyes not blocked by sunglasses is crucial for the natural production of melatonin. Half an hour is all it takes, or so Dr Dave Cartland has informed me.
https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/12/21/detoxification-protocol-against-graphene-oxide-and-body-magnetism/
Surely comparing deaths in 2022 with the average for 2015 to 2019 will understate excess deaths?
We would expect deaths to be lower than that average because many people who would have died this year were killed in the 2020 Spring spike and the 2020/21 Winter spikes.
Note that the ONS 5 year averages this year do not use 2020 – so 2016 – 2021 is in use now, so it’s 6 years with a gap in the middle.
Blimey.
Thanks Will. I’ve been banging on about this very point since they rolled out the new narrative.
Dan Wooton on GB news posed the question to a statistician and he dodged the question and drew it back to the same lockdown is the cause answer.
I think this argument is weak and won’t last. It’s getting too obvious.
Foolish to refuse to consider the vaccines, but the signed indemnity clause by the governments is obviously why
With the obvious follow on being that the other side would be intelligent enough not to take the risk of going bankrupt.
Who was behind the push for worldwide indemnity?
I don’t suppose Big Pharma knew they were pushing injections deliberately designed to maim and kill.
No, no, that would be out and out deliberate Conspiracy Theory. Silly me.
One obvious question would seem to be – Does Sweden have comparable excess deaths? With their lockdown lite & presumably less impact on health services it could give an indication if there is a relationship. I don’t have the info & have not seen it published anywhere. The other thing is that recent videos i.e. Neil Oliver & John Campbell etc tend to focus on the side effects rather than deaths. This is perhaps an area where we should be looking.
Good question
NL had what the government referred to as a “lockdown lite”. It started out very similar to Sweden, got worse, but never as bad as a lot of places. Kids under 12 were never forced to wear the face rag, kids in school only while moving around (yes, stupid beyond words, but at least not the whole time while in class, as in most countries).
After the first wave spring 2020 care homes stayed open, they said keeping away family did more harm than good. Although there are waiting lists (don’t know how bad), that was more to do with hospitals cancelling a lot of surgery due to winter ‘corona surges’. GPs were pretty much open, my mom had to see hers on the odd occasion and it was never a problem.
Yet NL has been seeing elevated deaths since March, with quite a few weeks of excess mortality. In fact, at one point the upper limit for deaths was estimated too high, which meant there were no excess deaths until it was modified to what it should be… A mistake, sure.
In any event last week also saw excess deaths again, although that really may have been related to the heat. We didn’t have the same length of hot weeks as the UK, so the heat doesn’t explain it. The temporal relationship with the 3rd and 4th booster, on the other hand, goes a long way toward explaining what no one is looking at.
I expect the September 4th/5th booster to have a sluggish uptake, and the inevitable rise in deaths, where I expect the correlation to be more obvious.
Thanks for this, but would still like to see a comparison with Sweden & some hard figures. If any of the contributors to the DS reads these comments sections, what about doing a comparison. Or even looking at the US states that didn’t have hard lockdowns compared to those that did?
You can email them at thedailysceptic@gmail.com
Have emailed them, thanks.
I mean, what’s the worst that can happen? It’s only a novel mRNA ‘vaccine’ that no one has any idea about safety implications of injecting the whole damned population with…obvs innit?
–
–
–
If you guys want to hear our latest podcast, then check it out and subscribe below:
Ep. 51 BANNED FROM TWITTER (Find out why)
We’ve been banned from Twitter for a week…find out why! Plus we talk Canada and Justin Trudeau, your first ‘Listener Rant’, Climate change madness, University PHD’s gone mad, Scotland’s gone crazy, The return of the Big Breakfast and MUCH MORE!
https://therealnormalpodcast.buzzsprout.com/1268768/11142910-ep-51-banned-from-twitter-find-out-why
Re the jabs and lack of MSM investigating this.
If my memory serves me correctly, when the jabs were rolled out OFCOM or whatever the government department was, stated that MSM could NOT publish anything negative about the jabs.
To my mind therein lies the biggest problem. Censorship.
Interesting how cancer deaths are allegedly sharply elevated in the U.S.
Houston, We Have a Problem (Part 1 of 3) | The Ethical Skeptic
The Government won’t go looking for information it doesn’t want to see, let alone admit it made an appalling mistake.
The jabs are “safe and effective” don’cha know.
“Let’s hope the Government does better” Would that be the same Government that called injectable prophylactics “vaccines”, allowed them to be launched without the full safety data, giving their manufacturers indemnity, under an emergency use authorisation licence when there wasn’t an emergency?
That would be akin to expecting the Government to admit that it lied consistently since March 2020. You’d be better off hoping there were fairies at the bottom of your garden.
The thing that got me with the Daily Telegraph arcticles like this one, you can comment below the line, yet anything questioning vaccines are being removed, they are effectively censoring the discussion