Three participants in the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial died shortly after vaccination and their deaths were not fully investigated, it has been revealed.
The revelations come in a report from Pfizer released on July 1st by court order as part of the documents which the U.S. FDA relied on to grant emergency use authorisation for the Pfizer vaccine in December 2020. They add to worries that adverse effects of the vaccine in the clinical trials were not properly documented, giving a potentially misleading picture of the drug’s safety.
One of the deceased participants, a 56-year-old woman known as subject #10071101, was given two doses of the vaccine on July 30th and August 20th 2020 and died from a cardiac arrest two months later. In Pfizer’s report on the participant it says:
In the opinion of the investigator, there was no reasonable possibility that the cardiac arrest was related to the study intervention of clinical trial procedures, as the death occurred two months after receiving Dose 2. Pfizer concurred with the investigator’s causality assessment.
However, it’s not clear how the investigator and Pfizer can be so sure the death was unrelated to the vaccine when there was no autopsy and no thorough medical assessment. As Sonia Elijah, who has analysed the report and summarised parts of it for Trial Site News, comments:
The conclusion that “there was no reasonable possibility” the vaccine could have caused the fatal cardiac arrest because “death occurred two months after receiving Dose 2” is not only presumptuous but also lacks a robust medical assessment. This is evident by the further comment that “it was unknown if an autopsy was performed”. Why was there no follow up or inquiry into whether an autopsy was performed?

A second deceased participant was a 60 year-old man known as subject #11621327, who died three days after his first dose of vaccine, given on September 10th 2020. The report says that the “probable cause of death was progression of atherosclerotic disease”. However, the subject had no known history of the condition (though was reported as obese). While the investigator deemed there to be “no reasonable possibility” of a link with the vaccine, seeing that it happened three days after the injection and “autopsy results were not available at the time” of the report, again, it’s hard to see what that conclusion is based on.

A third deceased participant was a 72 year-old man known as subject #11521497, who received the first vaccine dose on October 7th and 19 days later, on October 26th, was admitted to hospital because “he fainted in the middle of the night”. Reported as a syncope (temporary loss of consciousness usually related to insufficient blood flow to the brain), 16 days later, on November 11th, he died. The investigator claimed there was “no reasonable possibility that the syncope was related to the study intervention” and Pfizer said the syncope was “most likely coincidental”. But again, it’s unclear what this assessment is based on as the cause of death was reported as “unknown” and neither the investigator nor Pfizer attempted to investigate.

There were also a number of serious but non-fatal adverse events among trial vaccine recipients, but oddly, in every case where the trial investigator deemed it to be possibly related to the vaccine, Pfizer “did not concur”, according to Sonia Elijah.

For example, a 71-year-old woman known as subject #11421247 developed severe ventricular arrhythmias in the evening following her second dose on October 14th 2020. The trial investigator wrote that “there was reasonable possibility that the ventricular arrhythmia was related to the study intervention [vaccine]”. However, Pfizer stated there was “not enough evidence to establish causal relationship”. This was despite arrhythmia being one of the adverse events of special interest (AESI) listed by Pfizer in its analysis of post-authorisation adverse event reports.
Another example is a 48 year-old woman known as subject #11781107, who developed lymphadenopathy with “at least four enlarged lymph nodes” in the period immediately after receiving her first (and only, as she withdrew owing to the adverse event) dose of the vaccine. The hospital oncologist stated the vaccine was the “most likely etiology [cause] for her lymphadenopathy” and the trial investigator said “there was a reasonable possibility that the lymphadenopathy was related to the study intervention”. However, once again, “Pfizer did not concur”.

This is another case where the adverse effect should have been anticipated, as toxicity studies in rats (contained in another of the Pfizer trial documents released under the court order) showed an “increased size of draining iliac lymph nodes”, meaning Pfizer was well aware of the possibility. Subsequently, a study published in Cell has shown that spike protein and mRNA from the Covid vaccines persist in human lymph nodes up to eight weeks post-vaccination.
These reports add to the accumulating evidence that adverse events in the trials were not fully or properly investigated and recorded, giving a potentially misleading picture of the vaccines’ safety. Such evidence includes the disturbing stories of Maddie de Garay, a 12 year-old girl who was left nearly blind and suffering daily seizures shortly after receiving the vaccine during the Pfizer trial, an injury which Pfizer recorded as unrelated “abdominal pain”, and Augusto Roux, who was hospitalised with heart inflammation which the hospital doctor wrote was an adverse reaction to the vaccine but which was recorded by Pfizer as unrelated “bilateral pneumonia”. In addition, Danish investigators have found that more people died in the vaccine arms of the mRNA trials than in the control arms. The need for proper investigation by the medical authorities into the safety of the Covid vaccines remains as urgent as ever.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Policy based evidence making.
Last sentence.
Good luck with that whilst ever TRPTB control the MSM.
We are being played.
WTF up.
http://www.elavtoit.com/vaktsineerimised/TEADUSUURINGUD/death-after-quadrivalent-human-papillomavirus-hpv-vaccination-causal-or-coincidental-2167-7689.S12-001.pdf
https://mdpi-res.com/d_attachment/jcm/jcm-10-05876/article_deploy/jcm-10-05876.pdf
I think I have said this several times now but always worth repeating.
Never investigate anything unless you know in advance that the result will be favourable.
Like an old boss of mine used to say “if you don’t want to know the answer to the question don’t ask the question in the first place”.
This news is sadly no surprise, I would say it was to be expected.
The obvious and continuing problem is that the politicians, regulators, mainstream scientific research community, MSM and of course the pharma industry have absolutely zero incentive to pursue this issue; indeed quite the opposite.
However I am still optimistic that the many principled and courageous Davids in this battle will simply not give up until the Goliath that the covid establishment is is beaten.
Whilst a number of battles may be lost the war will eventually be won. The truth will out.
Most certainly I am noticing a greater and greater number of people who have now had covid multiple times, despite being vaccinated upto the hilt, have had enough bullshit and are now saying NO more vaccines and NO more lockdowns. The penny is beginning to drop.
And many of those that dismissed my very rational scepticism as lunacy and conspiracy theory for the last couple of years are now open to hearing what I have to say – and they appear to be listening!
“Most certainly I am noticing a greater and greater number of people who have now had covid multiple times, despite being vaccinated upto the hilt, have had enough bullshit and are now saying NO more vaccines”
The chart linked to below (which actually does now have an identified source) shows a pleasing drop off between 1st, 2nd and 3rd dose.
Vaccine uptake in England (doesn’t give the source) : LockdownSceptics (reddit.com)
“23% of adults are still purebloods”.
Note to the BBC: that is more than three million.
The fact that the British Bullshit Corporation are putting out this 3 million lie, and that Tedros has asked nations to ‘find’ the unvaccinated leads to the depressing conclusion that they will start coming after us again. But it’s almost impossible to imagine how they could possibly do this in a way that doesn’t look completely absurd…?
Yeah well the BBC are rather prone to getting their numbers wrong vis a vis last summer’s freedom marches.
Naomi Wolf has been reporting that CCP-owned Sinopharm now manufactures the Pfizer BioNTech ’vaccine’ at various locations around the western world, including two facilities in the US! And they’re not administering this junk to their own population. What does this tell us??
That there are no suitable manufacturing facilities located on Neptune.
Or “corrupt company behaves corruptly shocker” as Oliver Wright might put it if the Times muppets would allow him…
Depressing and predictable as these revelations are, I wonder if this is the best way to counter the still prevailing narrative. As new variants evolve and become dominant (or are unleashed on the world’s population; choose your view), it seems that the Covidocracy still has its sights set on getting as many needles as possible into as many arms (or thighs in the case of infants, God help them) as possible.
Now despite getting the illness over and over, many people either believe that each jab is saving them from worse things, or some at least are wondering WTF is going on. My problem is to understand why this farce is still playing out. Is it simply that Big Pharma is out to make as much money as possible before even the most captive politicians and public health “experts” are sent packing? Or is it the bigger and nastier story of destroying the health, or immune systems, or ability to think, or reproductive capabilities, of as many people as possible to a) reduce the global population and/or b) make us all chronically sick for the whole of our lives?
I don’t profess to know the answer. If it is “just” money, then there’s some hope that despite the side effects of the jab, most people will eventually say “no more”.
But if it really is the nastier story, then even with all the enormous good work done by so many global truth sayers – like here in the Daily Sceptic – the Bad Guys seem to be winning. If that is the case, then like in the fight against the Chemical-Agricultural industry, what we need is the equivalent of a “food scare”, and at least one major MSM with enough morals left to report it. The present level of jab side effects is sadly not enough. I know too many people who don’t know anyone with jab problems. Nor are their mates unexpectedly dropping dead in unusual numbers.
Any suggestions?
“Or is it the bigger and nastier story of destroying the health, or immune systems, or ability to think, or reproductive capabilities, of as many people as possible to a) reduce the global population and/or b) make us all chronically sick for the whole of our lives?”
This is your answer as I have been posting on here for months.
The ‘food scare’ you allude to is on its way, exactly how bad it will get we don’t know.
For the rest of your answers just look up Agenda 2030.
https://newspunch.com/the-world-economic-forum-vows-to-buy-up-dutch-farmers-lands/
This should enlighten you. With thanks to BB or perhaps eb.
The trillion dollar question.
moment.
.
It seems to be an unholy alliance / nexus of several criminal racketeering operations stacked on top of each other, in a feeding frenzy of asset stripping and theft from a dying West. Like many who frequent this site, I’ve followed the whole thing in detail watching the whole thing play out like a slow motion horror film.
Key moments on the road to discovery for me were:
Dr David Martin – proving with documentary evidence that patents existed for the S1 spike protein (now being expressed god knows how many billions of times in the bodies of most people around us) as far back as 1999. It is indeed a bioweapon – this was my first
The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert Kennedy Jr, who again provides overwhelming evidence that Fauci is nothing more than a monstrous racketeering sociopathic gangster who is simply rinsing and repeating past crimes on a larger scale.
Naomi Wolf – who has managed to trace much of this global fraud event back to China. This is new to me but has been staring us in the face from the start. Who is the WHOs biggest backer? China. Who flooded the internet with those early fake videos to ratchet up the fear? China. Who introduced the world to ‘lockdowns’? China. Who manufactured the tests, PPE and other Covid landfill? China. Who claimed to have sequenced the novel but not novel at all chimerically engineered virus? China. Who owns BioNTech? China. Who is now manufacturing the ‘Pfizer’ shot to administer to Western (but not their own) populations?
If you really want to go down the rabbit hole, this is a great site. they refer to Covid as an ‘Enterprise Fraud Construct’ which I love. They have some great diagrams. They believe that the US is already under Chinese occupation and is currently being steered by ‘cutouts’ including a Proxy President to an engineered spectacular showdown with China and Russia so that it can be comprehensively and spectacularly defeated in the South China Sea around August time. You heard it here first.
So when I try to combine all of this information into some kind of sci-fi/action/horror film script (I have a film background; can’t help it) it goes something like this:
1) The debt-based Ponzi scheme globodollar economic system has been on the road to collapse since the early 70s and everyone knows this. Its collapse is a mathematical certainty and it’s been on life support since 2008.
2) The West has been hollowed out for decades, its manufacturing base and technology all being transferred to China.
2) So the financial overlords and political class have a serious and unprecedented problem to deal with, and fast – how to manage around 1.5 billion people who believe they are wealthy and are about to wake up one morning in developing world status.
3) A solution is decided upon: CBDCs and digital IDs but these need to be introduced under cover of a Trojan horse: vaccine passports.
4) Some lunatics who don’t get out much and never meet ordinary people decide that they will tie vaccine status to digital ID as a means of ensuring compliance in an era they know will be unpredictable and tumultuous.
5) Population reduction (in the West) suits everyone – less mouths to feed and less resistance. Vaccine politics creates division and uncertainty, also very useful if your trying to steer a large number of people towards a system they won’t like.
In short, our friends and family are probably being injected with a Chinese bioweapon that they voluntarily booked an appointment for. Once injected they will be more susceptible to infection, more likely to give it to others, and more likely to become seriously ill and/or die. It’s grim, but no more grim than any number of past human atrocities, and it’s an ingenious means of attack, because the weapon itself causes disparate and unpredictable harms, while the scheme itself exploits the inherent vulnerabilities of science capitalism and groupthink.
According to the Fact Checkers, these jabs were all put through standard safety testing …..
when they clearly weren’t, not least because there is still NO medium to long-term safety data and the testing procedures were clearly very flawed.
They are all experimental, and the guinea-pigs are everyone who was encouraged, bribed, bullied or mandated into having them with insufficient information to make an informed decision.
Very many heads should roll – in the Pharmaceutical Companies; global and national Public Health Bureaucracies; and Governments.
American lawyers seem to be doing great things re bringing fraud cases forward. My understanding is that if fraud can be demonstrated (and the whole thing is dripping with fraud) then the manufactures lose their indemnity. Serious people are working on this; I believe very strongly we will see the end of Pfizer and Moderna.
Leaving Sinopharm supreme of course, with their plausible deniability and possibly remedies for the harms caused by the mRNA bioweapons.
Nice job.
We should be so lucky. The fact that Fauci is still walking free in the land of lawyers after all the lies re HIV/AIDS and now Covid doesn’t give me much hope of a just outcome
One thing is very clear. When Fauci and his chums in the pharma world say there are no side effects from the ‘vaccines’, they are lying through their back teeth. And should they bother being honest when they’ve been given freedom from liability?