This is the 32nd of the round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the 31st one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This was done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr. Tess Lawrie in June wrote an open letter to Dr. June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been ‘fact checked’ here.) Boris Johnson said in October that being double vaccinated “doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you against passing it on”. We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.
- Baroness Heather Hallett has outlined the key areas under scrutiny in the forthcoming pandemic public enquiry, including side-effects from the Covid vaccines and a focus on children.
- A study has found thyroid eye disease reactivation associated with COVID-19 vaccination.
- Dr. Eddy Bettermann discusses reports of blindness linked to Covid vaccination.
- A study has found young girls developed genital ulcers after receiving Pfizer’s Covid vaccine.
- A doctor says he has seen “many, many, many complications in pregnant women, in mums and in foetuses, in children, offspring, foetal death, miscarriage, death of the foetus inside the mom – what I’ve seen in the last two years is unprecedented”.
- A risk-benefit analysis by Doctors for Covid Ethics of the use of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents has found that the vaccines are not necessary, have not proven efficacious and have not been proven safe.
- An American paediatrician has written an open letter calling for an immediate halt to Covid vaccines for children.
- An investigation has been launched in Scotland following a second spike in the number of newborn baby deaths, with at least 18 babies under four weeks old dying in March, a rate of 4.6 per 1,000 births.
- West Midlands Ambulance Trust has recorded a 74% rise in cardiac arrest emergency calls in 2022 compared to 2019.
- Dr. Tess Lawrie has written about the experiences of those injured by Covid vaccines.
- Eudravigilance – the European version of the Yellow Card Reporting system – as of May 21st has reported 4,355,070 reactions from 1,802,670 reports of which 1,974,083 were deemed as serious. 44,850 fatal reactions were reported with an approximate actual number of deaths being 14,400. This is due to a 3.11 reporting rate in fatalities across multiple reactions.
- VAERS – the American version of the Yellow Card reporting system – as of May 20th reports a total of 1,268,008 reports of adverse events following Covid vaccines, including 28,141 deaths and 231,975 serious injuries. For children up to the age of 17 there have been 48,833 reports, of which 4,479 were deemed serious and 117 fatalities.
- DAEN Australia – the equivalent of the Yellow Card reporting system – has logged (up to May 10th) 127,419 reports of adverse events, including 852 deaths.
- Children (Under 18) Adverse Events U.K. – up to May 11th, the MHRA reports a total of 4,048 adverse event reports, comprising 3,729 Pfizer, 263 AstraZeneca, 29 Moderna and 27 unspecified from 3,813,700 children vaccinated with 6,327,300 doses. This includes 79 reported cases with Pfizer of myocarditis/pericarditis, suggesting a current reported risk of 14 cases per million first doses and 11 per million second doses for this age group.
- Booster Doses – 49,487 adverse events have been reported across all vaccines up to the present from 39,474,656 people vaccinated.
Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.
According to an updated report, as of April May 11th the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,492,541 events based on 455,990 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 2,140.
- Pfizer (26.8 million first doses) now has one Yellow Card in 157 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 34,941 people vaccinated (767).
- AstraZeneca (24.9 million first doses) has one Yellow Card in 102 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 19,575 people vaccinated (1,272).
- Moderna (1.7 million first doses) has one Yellow Card in 44 people vaccinated. Deaths: one in 36,170 people vaccinated (47).
Overall, one in every 117 people vaccinated (0.85%) have experienced a Yellow Card adverse event. Reported adverse events are not necessarily caused by the vaccine and further investigation is required to establish causality. The MHRA has previously estimated that the Yellow Card reporting rate may be approximately 10% of actual figures. Note that sometimes in Yellow Card reporting, the numbers of adverse events (including fatalities) will be lower than the previous week. The Yellow Card system is a passive reporting system, so in theory this should not happen as all reports should be cumulative. However, the MHRA says it analyses the data prior to publication, with deaths and pregnancy conditions being notably investigated. It does not state criteria by which reports would be removed and to date has not clarified why these data vary. It is therefore unclear how many reported adverse events have been removed from the reports since reporting began in February 2021.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Several days ago DS published a piece called In Defence of Jacques Baud by Suze Halewood.
It has now disappeared from the site, but it can still be read, and you should do so if you haven’t, at the wayback machine here: https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/26/in-defence-of-jacques-baud/
“There follows a guest post by Suzie Halewood, who says that Ian Rons’s recent Daily Sceptic piece criticising the claims of Jacques Baud misses the target.”
Was it taken down because the government issued a D notice?
Second question: by far the most interesting and informed poster here BTL in recent weeks and months has been Mark, in my opinion, who has consistently provided fascinating commentary and links on the Ukraine war, often providing a different perspective to the mainstream view. Mark does not appear to have posted since the article was removed.
Was Mark banned from DS comments by the government D notice also?
Of course, I don’t know the answers. These are questions. Mark, are you reading this? Can you clarify? DS editorial staff: any comment? Can you at least refuse to confirm or deny whether you have been issued D notices. Wink wink.
Hmm, there’s a knock on my door and some flashing lights outside. I better just check who that is at this hour on a Saturday morning. If you never hear from me again….
The link you posted does not seem to exist anymore.
You do appear to be on to something unless clarification is forthcoming from either this site or Mark.
Thank you for your post.
You need to use the Wayback machine to view it. Copy the link, go to archive dot org, paste the link and search, go to the archives found and there you have it.
here’s the link:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220526134225/https://dailysceptic.org/2022/05/26/in-defence-of-jacques-baud/
Thank you.
Now I see it.
Let’s see if the site or Mark give a view on your earlier comments.
I see it too. Would our loving government really disappear a commenter? They won’t be able to hide the collapse of the western backed Ukraine forces for very long.
I work on the principle that if the press aren’t reporting Ukraine, the Russians are winning.I was fortunate enough to have seen their blanket lying about climate, so I now recognise their blanket lying about Ukraine … as I also recognised their blanket lying about covid.
You left the blanket lying about covid until the end (I thought you were going to overlook it) and yet it’s undoubtedly the most egregious example.
Interesting that the comments on that archive snapshot are from a completely different article about climate…
Mark is switched on enough to create an anon account and post via ToR at a time one of us would see it, so I doubt very much he’s been banned.
A “D notice” is usually about a specific set of facts within a specific subject, covering the whole media, the MSM are still covering Ukraine, although less so even the BBC radio news had somenoe saying AFU was losing yesterday, so it can’t be a blanket notice on Ukraine, and there’s no specific fact in the piece that stands out as too inconvinient, although it’s possible.
If there were outside influence it’s more likely a quiet word in someones ear; though I suspect it’s a group or singular editorial decision.
I am not sure DS would be subject to D notices but their ought to be some kind of explanation
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/ukraine-good-russia-bad-delingpoles-swiss-intelligence-officer-tells-a-different-tale-part-4/
Ukraine good, Russia bad? Delingpole’s Swiss intelligence officer tells a different tale, Part 4
previous parts on TCW
Agreed, about Mark. Good commenter. DS was reluctant to post any links on Jacques Baud from the start. I had a whinge BTL about this, but to no avail. Now Ian Rons and Toby are writing what might be seen as ‘hit pieces’. I’d like to see a right to reply from Jacques Baud. Something fishy here, and I do think that DS has been threatened in some way. Somehow I missed the piece by Suze Halewood – can only blame the weird way in which DS lists and presents its articles (I still don’t have any idea why it is so confusing). So – thanks for the links guys.
PS, I too found the Ian Rons pieces ‘pathetic/contrived’ and ‘fact-twisting’. Consuming such nonsense brings about a bad taste and unpleasant feeling. Only the truth will do. These days, it’s really helpful if you speak Russian – as a nation, they are blunt and serious, very religious, emotional, not always the easiest of people, but they have huge talent with media and finding out the ‘truth’ of what’s going on. They have no time for lies.
DS also published a hit piece against Dr Sam Bailey regarding her critical view of virology and vaccinology and her supportof terrain theory.
There was no indication that she was asked to give her response to the criticisms raised or aright to reply.
I don’t come here as much these days so not sure if it is the same Mark commenting on the newer story about Klaus Schwab here today.
Looks the same Mark to me. Thankfully.
Well good that’s one less conspiracy theory to worry about. Now back to the article that was pulled: Toby, DS editorial team, and Free Speech Union: why was the article pulled please?
“Mark, are you reading this? “
I am now, loop, thanks to your heads up on the other thread!
Many thanks for your concern and your kind words (and the same to others on this thread). I wasn’t aware that my distraction from DS by other matters was causing concern – I suppose because of the unfortunate timing in conjunction with the deletion of Suzie’s post.
With regard to the latter, I had seen it appear but did not have time to read it and when I went back it had vanished, so I was waiting for an explanation to appear. Thanks also for the wayback link, so I can read it now.
I don’t know anything about the deletion of the article, but I do get the impression DS is being a little more tightly controlled btl, lately.
As of the 26th May release, out of 143 million doses given we have lost 2,248 to suspected adverse drug reactions, a rate of around 1 in 65,000. There has been around 53.5 million recipients suggesting around 1 in 25,000 people who have taken the vaccine may have died as a result over the course of the rollout.
The current release tells us there were another 8 tragic deaths over the past week possibly relating to vaccines. The dashboard tells us that up to the 18th May we averaged 32,000 doses per day, or around 225,000 doses for the week. That suggests a per dose fatality rate of around 1 in 28,000, far closer to the per recipient rate than the per dose rate detailed above.
Are they getting worse? We are given no details regarding 4th doses, so it is possible the fourth jab is causing more problems for the elderly and vulnerable. More worryingly is that by now we can be pretty sure the only people getting first and second jabs will be children of school age.
When I read that report, and other information coming out, I’m just horrified.
In God’s name, how can any government, any medical person, anyone, still say these things are “safe and effective”? All the evidence shows that they are anything but. How much .longer do they think they can keep on saying it, keep on pushing these so called “vaccines”?
I’m going to have another go at my MP, quoting some of the above, and the piece about vax injuries and lack of compensation from yesterday, and ask his opinion. Oh, I know it won’t do any good, but I don’t want the bar steward ever trying to say no-one told him so he didn’t know!
It’s gone too far and it’s too late for an admission of guilt. They’re pot committed.
Whatever happened to “If it can save one life it is worth doing”?
Obviously no longer applies to stopping jabs that kill.
Thank you very much, Will and DS, for continuing to collate and publish this information.
From my home state, the daughter of the South Australian branch of the Australian Medical Association (Australia’s doctors’ guild), Michelle Atchison, reports the death of her only child, Caitlin, aged 26(!), who “died suddenly in her sleep”. Dr. Atchison is a full-on Covid hysteric who opposed the reopening of SA’s state borders and who has publicly agitated for Covid ‘vaccination’, so presumably her daughter was jabbed to the eyeballs. “We recognise there is a very small chance of serious side effects, but it is a safe vaccine and we encourage people to take it”, she said. People who pass away overnight are usually the victims of a heart attack. Heart attacks are one of the ‘rare’ risks of the Covid vaccines.
Still, it’s a good thing poor Caitlin was ‘fully vaccinated’. If she hadn’t been, her death would have been so much worse.
‘Top doctor who became voice for nurses struggling during Covid pandemic’
Read that in the headline and I thought ‘Great, this woman stood up to TPTB and gave them a piece of her mind’. Got my mind changed on that just a few lines later.
The Karma bus took the wrong Atchison. Will Doctor Mother change her tune? Doubt it.
I do wish they would stop calling them vaccines – they are lethal injections.
The queues for ‘lethal injections’ would be disappointingly short, from the government’s point of view.
Hence the redefinition of what constitutes a ‘vaccine’.
We must keep reminding people the pharmaceutical companies call them “biological agents” in their own literature.
It was the Behavioural Insights Team who focus grouped the term and discovered people were hesitant to be injected with a biological agent. Imagine that.
They took the decision to rebrand them as vaccines. Other western nations followed suit.
What followed was a wholesale reworking of the concept of vaccines across the board. From the WHO downward, the traditional definition was changed.
Originally it was some substance, usually an attentuated sample from an infectious agent, triggers a long lasting natural immune response leading to immunity from future exposure to the live virus in the wild.
All this was changed to drop the requirement for long lasting immunity. An absurdity. Yet there we have it.
Now that the dust is finally settled, undoubtedly they were neither safe nor effective. I work as a salesman and go to about 5 houses each day. Our customer base is mainly the 50+ and retired folk, I cannot say that I’ve seen deaths from the shots but I’ve noticed that everyone has got a story. Lots of heart attacks, blood clots etc. The one thing though that I do notice is that they’ve (speaking generally of the 50+) only got the MSM as their trusted source. I spent all of 2021 asking if I’ve been jabbed, I’m sorry to admit it but I lied on many occasion that I had (being self employed, commission only you’ll say anything to put bread on the table) succumbed to the death shot.
Tables turned now mind, all the elderly folk are now telling me (well about 50% ish) that they will not take anymore, stopping at the 3rd. Then I lie again and say I stopped at the 2nd and generally I get a “well done, I wish I stopped at the second”.
I might have the balls soon to say I didn’t even get the first
People buy off people, and for me to sell I’ve got to be “people”.
Anyway, the mic drop is coming soon… Monkeypox anyone??
That’s encouraging. Thanks for posting.
I’ve had a similar response, especially the never again group. Some of them I doubt will have the strength of character to resist once the propaganda starts again. They too rely exclusively on the mainstream media.
A promising sign. But perhaps not quite enough. Time will tell.
I’d say the real takeaway is the importance of being honest about being unjabbed, and advertising the fact. I think many people are reliant on msm and are unaware they are being lied to. But many are desperate for a courageous person to show them it can be done. You can resist etc.
I do accept your job makes this difficult, so I mean it more in the personal sphere. Acting as a symbol of defiance to let others know they are not alone.
As the vaccines are neither safe nor effective, in fact you know they are negatively effective, you could say to yourself you were acting in the best interests of your clients by NOT getting vaxxed, and protecting their fragile mental state of health by pretending to them that you were!
Well done, sir!
(Don’t admit to the truth.)
I’m sure it’ll all come out in the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, Baroness Hallett did such a good job getting to the bottom of 7/7
/s
Would someone please explain the Queen thing to me
As I understand it I’m required by law to hand over a portion of my assets to a woman who has billions so she can buy more racehorses
It appears that next week I’m expected to spend my own money celebrating this arrangement
If the above is true then there is little wonder that they thought they could get away with locking us up without anyone complaining
As they say, the argument in favour of the monarchy, racehorses and all, can be summed up in only three words:
PRESIDENT TONY BLAIR
Indeed. Having a head of state who is obliged to be apolitical is a valuable thing. There’s the argument that “well, we don’t need a president either” but then that would simply hand over presidential status to the role of prime minister (and God knows, since Blair, haven’t they been trying to that anyway.)
It makes one important part of the executive powerless. I like that. And a president, with his office and staff and security, would end up costing us more and making things worse.
Having said that, if Charlie and his spawn don’t stop peddling climate propaganda and stepping into politics I am strongly in favour of doing to the last King Charles what we did to the first and replacing the House of Windsor with a better behaved one.
Have you forgotten the queen berating those who did not get jabbed? Or her own comment that the wind farm plans needed to be hurried up to save the planet ? (Which are due to net the crown 10s of billions in rents)
They are a parasitic class deeply interwoven with the Rothschildes by intermarriage and cross patronage. They have their seats set for the Great Reset. They are not our allies.
No – which is why I put the caveat that they need to keep their noses out. They are in their position because we allow it as a semi-benign alternative to an elected and politicised figurehead. They need to remember that and STFU or they will lose the support that keeps their family in clover.
Not convinced by that – there would only be the president, their immediate family and staff. As opposed to to royals where there’s a whole dynasty of them (plus staff), a large number of whom are fully or partially supported by the state, in one way or another.
Not really much of an argument. Even assuming the odious Blair got elected, there would almost certainly be a fixed maximum term (there is in most countries), and if he did something particularly unacceptble before that he could get kicked out.
With a monarch we are stuck with them. And the next monarch is likely to prove considerably more controversial than the current one, given some of his views.
Ah, but you’ve been given an extra day off – bow down and be grateful serf.
What I find so ludicrous about the whole vaccine fiasco is that there was a Common Cold Unit that spent over 40 years researching the common cold to try and find a cure. They gave up as they concluded that there was no cure for a specific virus as they mutate so frequently and by the time a vaccine is developed the virus has mutated into a different strain and the vaccine will be useless.
Please correct me, but I understand that the flu vaccine is a cocktail of various flu viruses which they administer in the hope that there is a similar one to the strain anticipated.
Ummm, that ran out of Porton Down, I suspect it was more data gathering than with the aim of helping individuals.
People use to go and have “holidays” at the Common Cold Unit. They would be infected isolated and studied, so not just data gathering. A friend of my parents use to go there for a 2 week break for free.
I don’t think the studies were aimed at finding a cure, more to find out how to spread it about. Just sayin’…….
Only a layman’s opinion. The common cold is a blessing in disguise.
Check out the link below which did an analysis of lots of flu vaccine studies in 2018 and concluded that –
Source: https://www.cochrane.org/CD001269/ARI_vaccines-prevent-influenza-healthy-adults
So, in absolute terms there’s a 1% improvement so flu vaccines are a complete waste of time for the majority (unless you’re invested in them of course!).
Most people only get influenza once in their lives.
i had flu in my mid-20s, and a flu jab through work (NHS) about 5 years later.
That’s it. Not had either since.
The response was not about health, covid, flu or colds. It was about power, pure and simple.
They think they rule us. They are meeting limited resistance. That is the takeaway. Covidmania has emboldened them.
The next massive government response may be triggered by monkeypox, war with Russia or China, food shortages, power cuts or anything else that fits the bill. Climate alarmism if they can get away with it.
What it won’t be triggered by is mass unemployment, mass immigration, demographic changes, people toppling statues or defacing cenotaphs etc.
They have learned we seem to be prepared to fight for nothing and will capitulate to almost anything. Very dangerous with a global elite calling the shots.
Anyone else thinking of the four horsemen of the apocalypse??
You are correct on all points.
This is why the jabs are so bloody useless and injurious to the recipients.
“The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This was done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety.”
I think we can conclude that neither of these statements are true.
We know that the trial requiring placebo blind participants no longer applies to Pfizer as these participants were given the vaccines.
We also know now that Pfizer covered up the adverse effects in the early trials including at least one death. That the trials did not include elderly or vulnerable who were ostensibly the initial targets of the “vaccines”.
And as we have said repeatedly and you have chosen to ignore. These are not technically “vaccines” at all.
TIME TO UPDATE YOUR PREAMBLE.
I absolutely agree. I have no problem with DS quoting these things from various sources. But I object to the casual endorsement of them.
Is this what controlled opposition looks like? Get all the dissenters in one place, lowering their guard?
It’s more like self-controlled opposition. Toby refuses to accept the obvious and doesn’t want anything linked to him, like this site, being labelled a conspiracy theory site.
This accounts for his recruitment of such utter falsehood peddlers and BBC emulators as Ian Rons.
Perhaps we should call them spoiler alerts instead of conspiracy theories.
And these spoiler alerts/conspiracy theories are becoming more mainstream, and from respected sources, using original material such as video footage of speeches from Davos.
Unless Toby still doesn’t believe the billionaires and world leaders who attend Davos have any real influence…
Many thanks for putting these reports together.
Moderna CEO going to give away some of his billions to private companies who are working on ways to address climate change
My interpretation:
https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/moderna-ceo-pledges-donate-most-his-4b-fortune-bloomberg
The Expose has an updated list of adverse effects/deaths today.
We are all getting weary from this but there are still a lot of people (BBC watchers) who think the injections are a good thing, please do what you can particularly to alert parents who might think getting a child injected is a good idea as holidays approach. Sending a copy of the list even with no other explanation is not too time consuming.
My personal experience this week:
Friend’s cousin dropped dead from brain aneurysm aged around 50.
Request to a charity I am involved in from 49yr old for help. Was working, had clotting issues has lost leg unable to work or do garden struggling to find help.
Nothing unusual here ……..
I think we have to accept that the governmental system is corrupt and we need new systems completely separate from what has been forced on us.
Absolutely agree with your last point. I’d argue the focus must be an alternative to a large centralized government.
My preference would be localism. Paying taxes to a local or regional entity. That entity can send on tax money to genuine national needs, like national defence. The rest stays locally.
In most cases it would bring a very swift end to mass immigration, the colossal waste we see in government, and many other ills in society like sales taxes.
Obey your Government, follow our science. If it goes wrong and you are crippled for life, we will ignore you for political expediency.
Now there’s an offer you can’t refuse – if you do you’ll be jailed. Coming soon to a World Government Regional Administration near you.
‘A doctor says he has seen “many, many, many complications in pregnant women, in mums and in foetuses, in children, offspring, foetal death, miscarriage, death of the foetus inside the mom – what I’ve seen in the last two years is unprecedented”.’
On hearing this Bill Gates said nothing, smiled and was seen to develop an erection.
lf it isn’t hurting, it isn’t working, as these latest charts from South Korea show all too clearly.
https://2ndsmartestguyintheworld.substack.com/p/south-korea-not-funny-joke
Really is time DS that you directly challenged the Govt and senior medical Narrative that the vaccines are safe and effective. The science and the data are all against this and the Govt would not dare to take you down for this. Remember the Emperor is wearing no clothes and it’s time someone said so
https://expose-news.com/2022/05/29/gov-confirms-5-months-develop-ai-ds-covid-vaccination/. Snap.