The Treasury faces a £13 billion hit from Labour’s ‘green’ North Sea shutdown, BP’s former finance chief has warned. The Telegraph has the story.
Brian Gilvary, who sat on the board of BP from 2012 to 2020, said punishing tax rates and a ban on new drilling had prompted many oil and gas operators to halt activity in British waters sooner than expected.
As a result, companies are ripping pipes and platforms out of the sea far earlier than planned. The vast costs of such decommissioning can be claimed back against the tax paid on previous years’ profits, meaning a huge rebate bill for the Treasury.
The latest estimates suggest the rebates, plus foregone tax from North Sea operations, could cost the Treasury around £13 billion between now and 2035.
Writing in the Telegraph, Gilvary, who is now Chairman of Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos Energy, said: “Forcing fields to close prematurely does not simply switch off future tax receipts; it also brings forward the point at which those decommissioning tax reliefs crystallise, increasing the near-term pressure on the public finances.”
Gilvary said the decline of the UK oil and gas industry under Labour was “eroding long-term national wealth” and damaging “the fiscal capacity to fund public services”.
The warning comes a week after BP announced plans to exit the North Sea by selling its operations there. Meg O’Neill, the company’s Chief Executive, has since said the region “doesn’t compete for capital”.
Oil and gas companies face a 78% levy on their UK profits after Labour increased a windfall tax on the industry when it came to power. The Government has also extended the levy by two years, from 2028 to 2030.
Gilvary said BP’s decision to exit the North Sea was “a tangible warning sign” about the cost of these policies.
He said: “When major operators retreat, the consequences ripple far beyond corporate balance sheets.
“Investment falls, supply chains weaken and highly skilled jobs, many clustered in Scotland and the North East, begin to disappear. Tax revenues decline, and with them the fiscal capacity to fund public services and the energy transition itself.”
Annual decommissioning costs have already risen from £2 billion in 2024, the year of Labour’s election, to £3 billionn every year from now to at least 2030, according to data from industry regulator the North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA).
The NSTA predicts at least £28 billion will be spent on shutting down the North Sea from now to 2035. This implies a total cost to the Treasury of around £13 billion over that period.
Worth reading in full.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
A failing country in free fall. Britain. Look at your new PM. There is no more to say.
We’ve been here before , let’s think – Ship Building , The Railways , The Car Industry , The Coal Mines , 😵💫😭🤯
Deliberate sabotage of the British economy ….. by the British Establishment.
“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.”
― Taylor Caldwell, A Pillar of Iron
Spot on ! It is Treason laced with Criminal Intent !
I am sure this is all part of the plan.
Ripping out subsea infrastructure is the death knell for sure. Reinstating all of that if (when) North Sea drilling is encouraged again will make the proposition a lot less financially attractive. Sheer stupidity and ideology over physics.
The taxpayer, not the Treasury
Let’s not forget about the tax increases and exploration and development restrictions imposed by the Tories.
I wonder if Ineos or BP could tell us what the cost will be to reinstate all the removed infrastructure when a future (Reform) government authorise drill baby drill.
I would speculate that it may not be economically viable for what are mature fields with a limited life.