News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the ‘climate emergency’, public health ‘crises’ and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

5 min read

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

27 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Heretic
Heretic
3 months ago

Mass migration has exposed the lie at the heart of Sinn Féin

Little mention is being made in the mainstream about the reports that it was Sinn Fein who forced Steven Ogilvy to share a HMO house with his two Sudanese Muslim attackers, whom he welcomed and helped to move in, that the Satanic Filth Alodid who gouged his eye out was a police officer in Sudan from a “prominent” = wealthy Sudanese family, and that two of his wealthy brothers followed him to Ireland to claim asylum.
May I add a much nicer photo of the poor victim Steven Ogilvy from Remix News than the one in the UK mainstream:

Belfast attack suspect was granted asylum based on controversial fast-track questionnaire

comment image

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 months ago

Are you having a laugh. This new format is unreadable. If it keeps up you will have lost my patronage.

Ben Vol10
Ben Vol10
3 months ago

Bookmarked for future reference: jav uncensored

stewart
stewart
3 months ago

I can’t express enough contempt for people who would like to see the government regulate children’s mobile phone use. It is so short-sighted, so utterly self-defeating and quite frankly so bloody ugly.

Firstly, if tou can’t control your kids and want to the government to do your job for you, don’t get everyone else involved just to solve your parenting problems.

If it’s other people’s children you want to “help”, here’s an idea: mind tyour own business. How arrogant do you have to be to tell others how to bring up their children.

If you care so much about other people’s children, what else are you willing to demand the state intervene’s in? Kids diets so they don’t grow up obese? If not, why not? Why mobile phones, yes, but unhealthily overweight, no? Where do you stop?

This is before even getting into the fact that the government doesn’t give a shit about anyone’s children. It’s all an excuse to exerts more control on the population. It’s the same government that pushed experimental jabs on children. FFS.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  stewart

Well, they already give your kids breakfast, if you’re not up to the task, so why not dictate their tech habits too, so you don’t have to bother.

Surely it’s only a matter of time until they’re handed over to the state as soon as they’re born, to ensure they’re raised properly..

Heretic
Heretic
3 months ago

“Mass migration has exposed the lie at the heart of Sinn Féin” – “Sinn Féin’s enthusiasm for newcomers from sub-Saharan Africa sits in sharp contrast to its historic hostility towards Unionists, exposing a profound contradiction at the party’s core”

Yes, and nowhere is this sinister Catholic IRA network more evident than in the OUTRAGEOUS POLITICAL STATEMENTS of Liam Kelly, the first Catholic head of the Police Federation of Northern Ireland, who denounced the protesters as “RACIST” and “FASCIST”. This man’s duty is to “POLICE WITHOUT FEAR OR FAVOUR”, which he is violating by using blatantly COMMUNIST LANGUAGE to describe the protesters.

“Police without fear or favour” means that law enforcement officers must act impartially, applying the law equally to all individuals without bias, intimidation, or PERSONAL INTEREST.”

Liam Kelly said that the “disorder in Belfast was caused by ‘violent fascist law-breakers who want to wreck Northern Ireland’.”

 “Violent racist and fascist lawbreakers offer nothing but hopelessness and mindless thuggery.”

Belfast riots: Police Federation brands rioters as ‘violent fascist law-breakers’

Liam Kelly must be sacked for violation of his duty, imposing his own political beliefs in his job, and calling for “maximum prison sentences” for the protesters, which is BEYOND HIS… Read more »

JXB
JXB
3 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Sinn Fein was/is politically Marxist-Socialist.

The United Ireland it wanted/wants is nothing to do with Irish nationalism but the desire for a Communist State ruled by them.

stewart
stewart
3 months ago

How does one distinguish between a principled resignation and a calculated career move?

Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
3 months ago

Peter Hitchens gloriously pushing back against the idea that five year-olds shouldn’t be made to learn poetry by heart

’He’s a cheery old card, grunted Harry to Jack
As they slogged up to Arras with rifle and pack
But he did for them both by his plan of attack.’
Seigfreid Sassoon 1917

From memory, learned aged 14. Appropriate for our times I think.

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago

Healey resignation torpedoes Starmer

Writing that the level of spending increases had to be “fair”, the Prime Minister suggested that “irresponsible borrowing” to pay for higher spending would put the public finances at risk.

What a fool Sir Keir is.

No. Defence spending does not have to be ‘fair’. Defence spending has to be sufficient. Welfare spending has to be fair and opinion can be divided and debated on the fairness between those contributing and those receiving. If his government does not believe the current or future threat to the country is real he should say so and not grant any more money at all to defence.

As for suggesting that ‘irresponsible borrowing’ would put the public finances at risk… that ship sailed a long time ago – unlike the country’s ‘fleet’.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago

Brilliant intervention by Hitchens.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

From 14.06.2012, so almost exactly 14 years old… any idea why it’s resurfaced today?

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

Restore to hand Burnham victory, leaked poll suggests

I remain of the view that this result hinges on how the LAB voters react to being taken for granted, maybe by deciding not to participate rather than endorse a candidate forced on them, and if REF are able to persuade the 42% who stayed home last time, to come out and vote… both of those blocks are more significant than RES, I believe?

Angelcake
Angelcake
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I wonder if they are counting right away or holding onto ballots for next day counting.. or what the proportion of postal votes might be. Forgive my scepticism but this is part of Andy’s kingdom after all.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Angelcake

Yes, they seem pretty confident it’s a shoo-in, hopefully we’ll see a Kinnock moment…

soundofreason
soundofreason
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

I remember waking up to the Today programme to hear that it seemed John Major had won (yes I know – we don’t vote for a PM). I recall thinking that it was the Beeb showing how clever they were (ha!) and demonstrating that they had pre-recorded various pieces to cover any eventuality. It slowly filtered through that it was real and that this wasn’t Aunty being smug and saying ‘Look, I even considered this’.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  Angelcake

We must accept that vote fraud is widespread. I would be surprised if we do not see a surge in postal votes and a delayed count – voters safety and all that.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

If Burnham wins by a narrow margin there’s a silver lining. Burnham’s ‘authority’ will be weakened by a narrow win and Labour will be thrown into months of (more) crisis and exposure of their weaknesses as the Leadership competition stirs the pot.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  DiscoveredJoys

Every silver lining has a cloud… just saying! 😉

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Ridiculous headline in my view. Fraud aside, it’s the voters that determine who wins. No-one hands victory to anyone.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago

To paraphrase Uncle Joe – it’s not who votes that decides who wins it’s who counts the votes.

pjar
pjar
3 months ago

Keir Starmer’s leadership in chaos as defence ministers quit

Well, this is going to be interesting… who’s going to take the Defence and Armed Forces portfolios, I wonder? Angela Rayner and Lucy Powell, perhaps? Starmer was scraping the barrel already, to put together his cabinet, who’s next in line in this government of no talent? Another role for David Lammy? Surely not…

Angelcake
Angelcake
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Jarvis is the latest lickspittle

pjar
pjar
3 months ago
Reply to  Angelcake

I wonder how he imagines he’s going to make a difference with the reported 0.08% increase in funding that the previous incumbent couldn’t?

Hope he doesn’t plan to spend it all at once…

JohnK
JohnK
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

A quick scan of Dan Jarvis’s CV via GBN shows that he is an ex Army guy; not clear what rank he was etc, but his experience is evidently from the Army. Spot the inside battles with the other forces to fit within the budget etc.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago
Reply to  pjar

Many comments elsewhere assume the failure to spend enough on defence is caused by incompetence or ignorance. I do not agree. It is their objective to down size Britain’s capabilities. They are succeeding on many fronts. This has been going on since later Blair-Brown years and throughout the period of whoever it was occupied Ministerial positions for 14 years.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

We couldn’t have reached the stage where we have no Navy, a couple of wounded aircraft and perhaps one Division in total of ground troops for this not to be deliberate. This degradation has not occurred in two years. The Contories are largely to blame.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.