An Alternative to the Guardian’s List of 25 Books to Read Before We Turn 25

The Guardian's "25 books to read before you turn 25" is wet, childish and light on real classics, says James Alexander. His answer is a sturdier 25-book list, and a good deal less hand-wringing.

9 min read

The Guardian has consulted some “leading authors” to select 25 books that will get children reading again instead of screening. Sam Leith, who is the ringleader, adds: “Of course, for every book that appears on this list there are many dozens more that could, or should, have been here.” Well, that’s a relief, as the list was pretty terrible.

There seems to be a hint that here we have one per year and that the most babyish books come first. Anyhow, this is the Guardian list. You should consult the original to see the full justifications. Here I add my own annotations to the list.

  1. Peepo! by Janet and Allan Ahlberg. Fair enough. Though my eldest son’s favourite say-the-word book was Hug!
  2. Goodnight Moon by Margaret Wise Brown and Clement Hurd. Nope.
  3. Fox in Socks by Dr Seuss. A classic. Remarkable for the sketch of folly in the shape of the “noodle-eating poodle”: my term-of-abuse of choice for any abject follower of any sort of political fashions, including COVID-19. Someone one wants to hit across the head with a paddle in a puddle in a bottle…
  4. Gruffalo by Julia Donaldson and Axel Scheffler. Not too bad.
  5. Frog and Toad Together by Arnold Lobel. Never heard of it.
  6. Just So Stories by Rudyard Kipling. I read this to my youngest son and we greatly enjoyed it. So that’s two so far.
  7. Tom’s Midnight Garden by Philippa Pearce. Never heard of it.
  8. Moominland Midwinter by Tove Jansson. Never heard of it.
  9. Journey to the River Sea by Eva Ibbotson. Never heard of it. Sounds like a drunken pro-Palestinian song.

The last line of this book is, apparently, “Children must lead big lives… if it is in them to do so”, which would make me ironise if I read this to a child. “And if it isn’t in them to do it, darling, then they can lead small lives, if they want.” Stare at child with blank benignity.

  1. Treasure Island by Robert Louis Stevenson. Thank God for that.
  2. Northern Lights by Philip Pullman. Never heard of it. Steampunk. Heard of him though. Oh dear.
  3. The Owl Service by Alan Garner. Never heard of it. Sexual tension for 12 year olds. Steady on, Leith.
  4. The Secret Diary of Adrian Mole, Aged 13¾ by Sue Townsend. The release of that sexual tension, I suppose. I remember this book very well. It seemed to be a major part of Government/BBC and comprehensive school library propaganda in the 1980s. What was the Government up to, encouraging us to dwell on these years and make them into an entire life instead of leaving them behind? Better than Catcher in the Rye, says Leith, but David Copperfield, alluded to by Holden Caulfield, is better than either. And Steerforth had no use for Clearasil.
  5. Noughts and Crosses by Malorie Blackman. Never heard of it.
  6. A Hand Full of Stars by Rafik Schami. Never heard of it. “A window into the lives of young people living under repressive regimes”, declares the Guardian. Let’s move on.
  7. The Bell Jar by Sylvia Plath. No. And Crow was rubbish too.
  8. Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro. “Nobody who reads Never Let Me Go will soon forget it”, we are told, and the funny thing is I can’t remember if I have read it or not. Now I feel a bit like Anthony Hopkins in The Remains of the Day. [Welsh accent]: Oh, well.
  9. Beloved by Toni Morrison. Story about slavery. Well, I suppose this is the Guardian.
  10. Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut. Never read it. Better than Catch-22? Or I, Robot? Or the Beano?
  11. The Devil in the Flesh by Raymond Radiguet. Married woman has an affair with a young man. Never heard of it. Read Constant’s Adolphe instead.
  12. Four Quartets by T.S. Eliot. I confess that my monocle flew out when I read this. “Time present and time past…” I like bits of it. I cannot see why a young person would read this old-age lament of Tom’s, unless asked by a teacher to do so for an exam. I’d say read Eliot’s essays instead. Kids pretend to like Eliot’s Lloyd-Webbery cats, but it is only silly adults who like ‘em.
  13. Emma by Jane Austen. Bloody hell, Leith is suddenly piling on the Eng. Lit., isn’t he? Irony, oh yes.
  14. The Handmaid’s Tale by Margaret Atwood. All Leith’s good work is undermined by this reversal. In fact let me quote him:

Atwood’s 1985 novel about the cruelty of a Christian fundamentalist patriarchy has become ever more essential over time. This story imagines a world in which a military theocracy abolishes women’s rights to own property, read or write and removes their reproductive autonomy altogether. It’s tense and exciting – and it teaches a moral lesson that shouldn’t any more be needed, but apparently is.

Leith doesn’t explain, but perhaps even a few days away from the Spectator to write something for the Guardian addles his brains a bit (or makes the hypocrisy come naturally).

  1. White Noise by Don DeLillo. Never read it. Wouldn’t read it. American tosh. An American woman PhD student in Cambridge was reading it near me in 2000 and it looked like rubbish then and it would look like double rubbish now. Just read Tom Wolfe’s Radical Chic again instead.
  2. Middlemarch by George Eliot. “Time to read probably the most grown-up novel in the language and certainly one of the best.” Well. Pass. I read it. Not as good as Disraeli’s Coningsby. Poor old Casaubon. Dim little Will. As for “grown-up novel” I don’t think that there is such a thing. Novels are for young people: to write and to read. Most old novelists are condemned by their success, and a bit of pride, to try to keep writing novels. I think anyone over 30 who still reads novels habitually, especially “grown-up” ones, has never matured beyond a certain point.

Now Leith is not solely responsible for this list. He consulted Michael Rosen, Frank Cottrell-Boyce, Katherine Rundell, Nicolette Jones, Jacqueline Wilson and the former children’s Laureate, if he or she is not one of those already named. But where is Narnia, where is Roald Dahl, where is Alice in Wonderland, where is, I don’t know, The Owl and the Pussycat? And I am not even trying very hard. No Lord of the bloody Rings?

And what is there for boys? The list sounds like a sort of wet, dismaying way of raising a neurotic girl, who’ll dye Blue, spray Orange and vote Green on every occasion. So here is my alternative list, a sort of Frankie-Boyle-against-the-Queen sort of list, except I imagine the Queen would have preferred my list, while Frankie Boyle would probably prefer the Guardian’s. I’ll start with the three from the Guardian list that I’ll let through.

  1. Fox in Socks. Though I am also fond of the misanthropic nature of the fellow who does not like Sam-I-Am.
  2. Just So Stories.
  3. Treasure Island. Everyone used to like Robinson Crusoe as their seafaring lost-boy classic but it is very hard to read now. I think I read it in my late 30s. So Treasure Island it is. Peter Pan is no good and Lord of the Flies is too nasty and forgetful.
  4. The Iliad in some form or other, whether abridged, cartooned or Faglised.
  5. Asterix in Britain.
  6. The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes.
  7. The Three Musketeers. All of these are essential. Asterix for self-mockery and spirit, Sherlock Holmes for a celebration of eccentricity and skill and the Musketeers for exuberance and a bit of history: perhaps Milady was the first heroine I found perplexing and wonderful. Perhaps, come to think of it, Richelieu was the first politician I saw depicted (apart from Caesar in Asterix).
  8. The Pickwick Papers. The Fat Boy. The fighting cab driver in the first chapter. Sam. Mr Weller and the difference between his and his son’s Cockney. The funny conversation with Count Smorltork about the nature of politics. Tracy Tupman, etc.
  9. And, damn it, we need some non-fiction. Kirk, Raven and Schofield, The Pre-Socratic Philosophers. Yes, indeed, Leith, how about that for grown-up? Everyone should read bits of Heraclitus. Everyone.
  10. Boswell, Life of Johnson. Teaches you how to talk for victory, how to kick stones to refute silly arguments and how to throw snails into the gardens of your enemies.
  11. Shakespeare, for God’s sake, The Collected Works in some form or other.
  12. Hobbes, Leviathan. Own it. Read about it. Read bits of it, from back to front. Read the opening. Read the definitions of laughter, vainglory, etc. A very strange book. Has the great line: “I put for a general inclination of all mankind, a perpetual and restless desire of power after power, that ceaseth only in death.”
  13. Hang on, I am rushing ahead into profundity. Let’s go back a bit and have Catch-22 by Joseph Heller. An exquisitely sadistic comedy of war.
  14. Decline and Fall, Waugh, not Gibbon.
  15. Instead of Roman history, read anything by Steven Runciman: for instance The Fall of Constantinople.
  16. Death in the Afternoon by Ernest Hemingway. The best of his books. About bullfights. Read it in unbearably hot weather or abroad.
  17. Something terrible and tragic by Turgenev: or Point Counterpoint by Aldous Huxley: or, hell’s bells, Michael Arlen’s Green Hat: anything with a deathlike and to-die-for heroine: absolutely essential for the sentimental education of a young man.
  18. Goldfinger by Ian Fleming. Keeps it simple.
  19. The Mating Season by P.G. Wodehouse. Yes, where was Wodehouse in the original list?
  20. Mr Noon by D.H. Lawrence. Bet you didn’t think I’d pick that one. The best depiction of a kiss in all literature. And amusing to boot.
  21. The Last Days of Hitler by Hugh Trevor-Roper. Historical sensibility meets a real contemporary problem. Knocks all of Len Deighton / John le Carré into a cocked hat too.
  22. Hegel’s Philosophy of History. At some point you must read this book. Imposing, because of the imposition of a pattern on all history.
  23. I and Thou by Martin Buber. Profound. If you don’t like meditation and theology then, instead, for equivalent profundity on another scale, how about Olaf Stapledon’s Star Maker, which is quite possibly the greatest and most staggering vision of the future ever attempted by the imagination of man?
  24. The Gospel of John.
  25. Plato’s Parmenides. The most astonishing philosophical work ever written. As relentless as the Hammerklavier and 10 times as exhausting.

That’s more like it. I have ignored poetry and if you want any don’t bother with Four Quartets: just read Macaulay’s Horatius from The Lays of Ancient Rome instead. Anyhow, the Guardian list was woeful. Make your own list. But nothing, please, about slavery or Syria. Nothing about how children should live “big lives”, if they can, which sounds like a curse. Read plenty of Chesterton. Read Orwell’s 1984 if you want, but school makes you read that anyway. Read anything that doesn’t remind you of AI. Read a bit of everything: a page or so will do for most things. But you won’t go wrong with your boys and quite possibly even girls if you stick to my 25 and ignore the Guardian list.

And, please note, most of the good stuff was written before 1960. The English, broadly speaking, got better at the electric guitar after 1960 but got worse at the written word.

James Alexander is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at Bilkent University in Turkey.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

41 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
wryobserver
4 months ago

My pick: Dumas’ “The Count of Monte Cristo”. A tale of happiness, despair and revenge. I have lost count of how many times I have read it.

Angelcake
Angelcake
4 months ago

Some of the ‘never heard of it’ ones are actually pretty good. Never Let Me Go is an absolute masterpiece. Predates the Covid era but describes squashy feelz tyranny really well.

jnik18
jnik18
4 months ago

Or perhaps something with a twist on a legend. Arthur Past & Future, A legend for all time; with spin offs from Arthur’s dreams where he and his two friends enter the bizarre future world where everything is surreal in ‘Arthur’s War on Woke’. Truly original and entertaining for the reader as well as their child.

The Enforcer
The Enforcer
4 months ago

Spot on James but I would offer one other – Mao by Yung Chang – It tells of the cruelest monster who ever lived, how he thought and how to react to Xi Jinping because little has fundamentally changed since Mao. He is still revered and is probably why China will fail again as they did under Mao.

st27
st27
4 months ago

“The Owl Service by Alan Garner. Never heard of it.”

Well, that’s your problem. Garner is an odd genius, and The Owl Service is still sinister and chilling (with the Welsh-English politics now evident) when I read it as an adult. You can get a child into Garner with the easier Weirdstone, and then hit them with full-on Garner (Red Shift) later.

Totally agree about Waugh’s Decline and Fall. Waugh at his dark, hilarious best. I can’t remember the name of the boy who gets slightly injured by a drunken schoolmaster wielding a pistol at sports day, and then (always as a brief, utterly callous aside) slowly declines until he dies of the after-effects. I think I’m supposed to forget – it’s just a minor detail. I’ll thank my English teacher for ever for setting that as our O Level text – in an obscure public school rather like Llanabba.

But talking of weird British geniuses, where’s Peake? There’s no better depiction of contemporary Britain than Titus Groan and Gormenghast.

And since someone complained about “nothing for the boys” – Stig of the Dump (though my partner loved it as a girl too). And Masefield, Nesbit, and all those classic… Read more »

RTSC
RTSC
4 months ago

Every child should read Winnie the Pooh (or have it read to them) and then perhaps they’ll ignore the awful Disney “adaption.”

wryobserver
4 months ago
Reply to  RTSC

Agree. Also Kenneth Grahame’s “Wind in the Willows”. Watership Down, anyone? Perhaps a little bleak.

Steven Robinson
Steven Robinson
4 months ago

I think anyone over 30 who still reads novels habitually, especially “grown-up” ones, has never matured beyond a certain point.

Don’t kid yourself. Not being able to read novels after that age – habitually or not – is a sign of an encrusted, hard-boiled soul who can no longer enter the inner worlds of other people.

To say nothing about succumbing to the soul-destroying effects of the mobile phone, affecting all ages.

Has Nick Rendell not ‘matured beyond a certain point’? See the second para of his piece of today’s date.

Mark Splane
Mark Splane
4 months ago

I will restrict myself to just two peeves (!), one specific, the other more of the pet nature.

When I was about 13 an older boy at my school lent me his copy of “Crow”, exhorting me to read it. It was completely unlike any poetry I had ever encountered before. Black (black as a crow!), sardonic, irreligious, utterly devoid of sentimentality, largely dispensing with that whole scansion/rhyme scheme kerfuffle. Above all, it was intensely masculine. (One thing it was not was written by Sylvia Plath. Is James conflating her with her husband? Bit sexist?)

It inspired in me a love of poetry I’ve never lost. If you have a teenage son who thinks poetry is “just for girls”, the Crow’s your man. Or rather bird. (I grew into the girly stuff, like Plath, as I got older)

The pet peeve concern Shakespeare. Genius, towering figure in English literature, central part of our culture, etc. Yes, all true, but he wrote (almost entirely) plays. So why this thing about reading Shakespeare? Plays are meant to be, well, played. His words don’t live on the page: they only truly come alive when performed.

[Here endeth the rant]

CrisBCTnew
CrisBCTnew
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark Splane

I love Shakespeare’s sonnets, and have even learnt several by heart. #29 – When in disgrace with fortune and men’s eyes – is absolutely stunning!

Mark Splane
Mark Splane
4 months ago
Reply to  CrisBCTnew

That’s why I emphasized “almost” above: the sonnets are definitely to be recommended.. But they’re only a small part of his oeuvre.

wryobserver
4 months ago
Reply to  Mark Splane

If you want sardonic poetry try Don Marquis’ Archy and Mehitabel. Any kid would love it.

dxb
dxb
4 months ago

The Handmaid’s Tale might be sensible reading, given that the future demographic of the country may lead to the imposition of exactly those restrictions.

Mogwai
Mogwai
4 months ago
Reply to  dxb

Gilead’s a wet dream for many troglodytes on the Right. They must’ve watched that series with feelings of longing because that’s precisely how they view women: totally subjugated, zero rights and reduced to nothing more than breeding chattel. I reckon they’d be better suited to Afghanistan than the West.

pjar
pjar
4 months ago

A lot of these should be “before twelve”, surely?

Alan M
Alan M
4 months ago

Sorry, but to me, the fact that you’ve “never heard” of so many children’s books; Moomin Troll, Tom’s Midnight Garden, Northern Lights (the first instalment of “His Dark Materials”) Noughts and Crosses, that my children were reading over 30 years ago, sadly, says more about you. They are all excellent books suitable for the age of the child they are aimed at (7-12 say)

Kevin Finnerty
Kevin Finnerty
4 months ago
Reply to  Alan M

Totally agreed. And I would add ‘The Owl Service’ to the list.

mrbu
mrbu
4 months ago
Reply to  Alan M

I was surprised at the “Tom’s Midnight Garden” comment. Mind you, I became aware of it through a BBC dramatisation first broadcast during my childhood, along with other “minor classics” of children’s literature by the likes of E E Nesbit and R L Stevenson.

Frances Killian
Frances Killian
4 months ago
Reply to  Alan M

Plus Eva Ibbotson is hilarious. Read a number of hers to my son and we both fell about laughing… not much good for bedtime.

Dave Summers
Dave Summers
4 months ago

Might I respectfully suggest that the flurry of “Never heard of it” is not a great starting point for a meaningful appraisal?

Mark Splane
Mark Splane
4 months ago
Reply to  Dave Summers

Agreed. And neither is “Never read it”. Not that it deters Alexander from appraising the book anyway.

soundofreason
soundofreason
4 months ago

After reading Guy de la Bédoyère’s take down of Wuthering Heights in the DS recently I decided I ought to download (Project Gutenberg) and read it. I’m really struggling with it. 60% through according to my e-reader and boring as Hell according to me (though I’m not actually sure Hell would be this boring). It seems to me to be as pointless as Eastenders (I’ve never watched a complete episode) and as comically unbelievable as Tess of the D’Urbervilles (what else could possibly go wrong?). No wonder they use it as an exam study book; I can think of nothing better to deter a reading habit and to prevent the development of controversial thinkers.

I will finish it unless I die first. Maybe there’s a superb plot twist that will make it all worthwhile.

Not on my 25 before 25 list.

Mark Splane
Mark Splane
4 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Are you, perchance, a dude? “Wuthering Heights” is chick lit. Us blokes just don’t get it. Though it inspired Kate Bush (who did get it, being a chick herself) to create a truly amazing song that we all can get.

Thomas Hardy was a great writer, but “Tess” is far from being a great novel. He wrote much better. Try “Far from the Madding Crowd”.

harrydaly
harrydaly
4 months ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Some useful tips for reading WH on the Reactionary Essays substack.

Zack Stiling
Zack Stiling
4 months ago

I don’t think any books aimed at infants need to constitute essential reading for anyone. Mr. Alexander is obviously right to include Shakespeare and the Gospel of John, but surely these have to be given, a freebie if you will, as on Desert Island Discs… And if we’re going to have the Iliad, as we should, let’s make it Chapman’s original English translation in rhyming couplets. All the great Homeric majesty is lost when we reduce it prose.

My own contribution would be Le Grand Meaulnes by Alain-Fournier, a delectable adolescent fairy-tale of fin de siècle France. It was recommended to me by my uncle as the most beautiful book he had ever read, and I am inclined to agree. I was astonished when he told me he had studied it at school in the 1970s. Running in a close second is La Dame aux Camélias by Dumas fils, though that’s a little less innocent as the heroine is a demi-mondaine. I am sorry that Mr. Alexander did not like Middlemarch. I have not read it myself, but for what it is worth I consider Eliot’s The Mill on the Floss to be an outstanding tale of childhood, love and… Read more »

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
4 months ago

Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro – actually I think that’s quite a good book.
Disturbingly so.
Apart from that, in general, anything that survives a few centuries without being totally forgotten must have some intrinsic value in it.

Angelcake
Angelcake
4 months ago
Reply to  MajorMajor

Sorry didn’t see your comment. I agree.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
4 months ago

I only do da numbers

1984
Catch 22
IQ84
Fahrenheit 451

anbak
anbak
4 months ago

Animal Farm, 1984 and Brave New World should always be on the list.

Angelcake
Angelcake
4 months ago
Reply to  anbak

My husband is convinced that Orwell never existed!

Mrs.Croc
Mrs.Croc
4 months ago

I’m with you apart from Buber, whom Ifind pretentious!
I would like to put forward Arthur c Clark and Ray Bradbury as well.

DiscoveredJoys
DiscoveredJoys
4 months ago

As far as non-fiction is concerned I have often found that reading the Introduction presents all the ideas in a book that are worth remembering. Some non-fiction books are worth reading beyond the introduction and even then skipping the boring bits works well.

But as Mogwai says I now read books for ‘escapism’. Any book that involves major unkindness, abuse, or detailed violence is returned to Kindle with most of it unread.

BevGee
BevGee
4 months ago

No pony books? 😀 My mother bought me three pony books every week. How she avoided doubling up, I’ll never know.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago

What , no George macDonald Fraser, no Flashman?

No Just William?

Agreed about Catch 22.

Zack Stiling
Zack Stiling
4 months ago
Reply to  Jack the dog

Absolutely. George MacDonald Fraser is probably the greatest post-war novelist.

Angelcake
Angelcake
4 months ago
Reply to  Zack Stiling

His autobiographies are great too and coruscating about Blair.

NickR
NickR
4 months ago

The Way We Live Now, is wonderful because though 200 years old, it’s the way we live now.
The Painted Veil, best book I’ve read for years.
Thomas Hardy? The odd Russian or French classic?

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago
Reply to  NickR

Agreed.

I like a spot of trollope before bed.

Mogwai
Mogwai
4 months ago

Although I went through phases of various genres over the years ( yes, even ‘chick lit’ ), I’ve always preferred novels which offer escapism from real life, as opposed to other works of fiction which are serious or have some underlying moral that the author’s trying to convey. So when my mates at school were getting off to girly stuff like Sweet Valley High or Judy Blume, I was getting it on with Dean Koontz, Stephen King and James Herbert et al, scaring myself silly with horror, my favourite genre of all.
I hold my grandparents responsible as they let me stay up and watch American Werewolf in London when I was a kid, which traumatized me but got me hooked on all that good stuff.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
4 months ago

I would suggest “The Bonfire of the Vanities” by Tom Wolfe, for those wishing to understand what a mad world we are now living in. Depressing stuff.

Jack the dog
Jack the dog
4 months ago

Another top choice.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.