The Southport inquiry has blamed the killer’s parents, saying the attack that left three young girls dead would not have happened if Axel Rudakubana’s mother and father had done “what they morally ought to have done”. The Telegraph has more.
Axel Rudakubana, then 17, killed three girls at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29th 2024 and attempted to murder 10 others.
An inquiry into the incident heard how the teenager’s parents, Alphonse Rudakubana and Laetitia Muzayire, knew their son was hoarding knives, was accessing “chilling” violent content online and had been making poison in his room.
In a report published on Monday, Sir Adrian Fulford, the inquiry Chairman, described the “complete abandonment of responsibility” by the killer’s mother and father as “utterly unconscionable”.
He said he was “strongly critical of the moral failure of [Rudakubana’s] parents to warn the authorities about [his] weapons and what I find was their fatalistic approach to the risks that Rudakubana posed of violence to others”.
In Sir Adrian’s report, comprised of two volumes with a total of 763 pages, he said there was a “fundamental failure” by any organisation, or multi-agency arrangement, to take ownership of the risk Rudakubana posed.
It highlighted five major areas of systematic failure, including a misunderstanding of autism, a lack of oversight of his online activity and an absence of any agency accepting responsibility for Rudakubana.
Sir Keir Starmer promised to make “fundamental changes” to keep the public safe in the wake of these “harrowing” findings.
Bebe King, six, Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven, and Alice de Silva Aguiar, nine, died after sustaining multiple stab wounds during the attack.
Their families previously called for Rudakubana’s parents to be “held to account” for their son’s crimes.
Rudakubana was jailed for 52 years in January 2025, and he almost certainly will spend the rest of his life in prison. He avoided a whole life sentence because he was nine days too young.
Merseyside Police previously considered charges against Rudakubana’s parents, but in June 2025, a spokesman said the evidence against them had not met the required threshold.
In November, the couple gave evidence to the inquiry, prompting the force to confirm its detectives would examine their transcripts.
It is understood that Merseyside Police will be reviewing the newly published report.
Sir Adrian concluded that, had Rudakubana’s parents reported their “true level of knowledge” to the authorities before the attack, their son would have been arrested.
“It is with the greatest reluctance that I conclude that they bear a very considerable responsibility for the events of July 29th 2024,” he said.
Singling out Mr Rudakubana for creating “significant obstructions to constructive engagement” with agencies involved, he said the couple were too willing to “defend” their son.
Worth reading in full.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Is this young man autistic, is he medicated with drugs? Does he suffer from mental illness?
Deport the parents.
Starmers comments sicken me, he was the one that fought to bring these parents in, all three of those childrens deaths are as much his responsibility as the scum that did it, and I personally will never forget that.
Nor his personal reaction in banging up Lucy Connolly and several others [one of whom committed suicide in prison] within days of the event. Starmer was clearly very rattled by something…………..
I’m pretty sure it wasn’t them who killed those girls and maimed others.
Just stop. The parents were complicit, and should be charged as accessories to murder, flogged in public along with their Filthy Satanic Spawn, then all permanently deported to serve their prison sentences in a Rwandan hellhole… their possessions and property to be sold and the money given to the 13 victims and their families, as well as to the prison guards wounded by the Spawn in the prison attacks.
That is justice.
The father was known to be involved with genocide in Rwanda, Starmer cleared him and his wife to be in UK, so I wonder hmm, who’s to blame?.
” Sir Adrian’s report, comprised of two volumes with a total of 763 pages”… WHAT???!!!
How ridiculous! Are these lawyers paid by the page?
That’s more than the TWENTY YEARS OF WORLD HISTORY covered by 752 pages in
Sir Winston Churchill’s Volume 1 of WW2 “The Gathering Storm” 1919-1939 !!!
Good point. They have to generate lots of pages of course for ££££s but also to hide the obvious truth which could fit on the back of an envelope.
I’ve got “The Gathering Storm” on my bookshelf to read, along the next two volumes in the series. Part of what I inherited from my parents, which I am working my way through. Currently reading Ralph Waldo Emerson, who I recommend.
Yes, you are right that it “could fit on the back of an envelope”!
That’s great that your parents left you those books!
Yes I owe them so much, trying my best to live up to that
It’s always someone else’s fault.
Misunderstanding of autism? Seriously?
I agree that the parents have clearly been useless to the point of complicity
but also note that the report so far as I can see fails to mention the murderer’s ideology.
Yes, there were news reports immediately after the Stockport Stabbings that said the Snivelling Rwandan Coward had been attending the local mosque in Stockport under the tutelage of the imam there, but then those reports vanished within days.
Who chose the target of those helpless little girls at the dance class for the Snivelling Rwandan Coward, who did not live nearby and could not have known they were even there? And why has that imam never been questioned by the police?
When are we deporting the parents?
Wasn’t it Immigration lawyer Stalin Starmer himself who facilitated his parents sneaking into Britain from Rwanda, and helping conceal the links between the father and the genocidal regime?
So, the agencies and organisations failed to take ownership of the risks and Julie Sweeney et al were thrown into prison for typing some horrified ill-judged hyperbole. Who exactly will be called to account for this gross negligence of public safety? I think we already know the answer…
Why are we still keeping this monster alive? if he were a dog the Police would have shot him, and yet we the tax payer are paying to feed, clothe and no doubt entertain this piece of evil. The death penalty should be bought back for extreme cases like this one.
Hopefully he’ll get seen to and offed by fellow prisoners at some point like what happened with Ian Huntley, though I’d prefer it if the other cons didn’t wait quite so long.
Speaking of the death penalty, which I’m in favour of bringing back, don’t you think it’s weird that in countries where euthanasia is legal, and people can get euthanised just for having depression, ‘human rights’ strangely aren’t an issue but if you asked those same countries why they then can’t bring the death penalty back for evil, dangerous people where there is no doubt of their guilt, human rights suddenly become a thing again?
The way people can be selective in justifying when to the end another human’s life is strangely warped and is back to front, I think. I mean, why haven’t the Netherlands or Canada got the death penalty? Are prisoners’ lives deemed more valuable than the innocent, law-abiding folk being pressured into undergoing MAiD for having chronic illness? The latter are considered a burden and therefore disposable but dangerous and sadistic serial killers not..I find it very peculiar and it doesn’t reflect well on society as a whole.
Appreciate your comment Mog particularly in relation to MAiD.
Further to the topic of euthanasia: this 3min vid is worth watching. I knew they euthanised autistic people but didn’t know it was this bad. I don’t know if you were following the recent case in Spain where the young woman was euthanised as she’d been gang raped in a state care facility by migrants ( who couldn’t be named due to them being minors ) and tried to kill herself but ended up paraplegic, but there was much more controversy that transpired. Turns out a friend arrived at the hospital hoping to change her mind but they wouldn’t let her in to see Noelle. This is because she’d agreed to donate her organs and the hospital were lined up to make 8 million euros from this euthanasia procedure. So if healthy young people are being euthanised rather than helped ( if it’s because of psychiatric disorders or autism, for instance ), could this also mean the hospitals have a vested interest as they stand to gain financially?
”This is my video that recently went viral. I cover the euthanasia situation in the Netherlands. For people under 30, it mostly targets autistic people (75%) and women (74%).”
https://x.com/johannesmkx/status/2043589682420691435
This is… Read more »
Indeed, though a better question might be why they’re happy to end the life of a foetus right up to the point of birth, when they’re so squeamish about the death penalty for rapists, murderers, traffickers and paedophiles… access to MAD is, theoretically at least, still voluntary.
Yes that is undeniably beyond sick and wrong on every level as well. I am pro-choice when it comes to both abortion and euthanasia. However, both of these procedures should be highly regulated with far stricter criteria than what is happening currently, but both are 100% being abused. And what I find ridiculous is that people with mental health illness are able to be euthanised when just the fact they have established psychiatric disorders means they’re not of sound mind and unable to give informed consent.
Also, if the state sanctions these people committing suicide by proxy then surely that’s an admission that the state has failed these individuals. I’m afraid you cannot compare a 25 year old with chronic depression to an elderly person with advanced terminal cancer or Motor Neuron Disease. The person just needs to meet the criteria of experiencing ”unbearable suffering with no prospect of improvement”, and this relates to either physical or mental health of the individual.
Prime candidates for deportation surely, oh no but what about their ‘human rights’ to nurture a hateful individual who murders British people.
Perhaps one day similar accusations might be thrown at the parents of Shamima Begum?
I think they should prosecute his parents as accesories to murder.
Autism, and the internet, left to do the heavy lifting, then..? It
Well apparently about 90% of the population under 30 are autistic so it makes sense to bring this into the equation.
Yes of course they are, and dont forget those who’ve suddenly realised years later thats been the problem all along.
Oh the poor wee lamb!
Sir Adrian also took a swipe at the Internet and the “all too readily available” nasty stuff, and of course X formerly Twitter – major culprits in ”inspiring” the Devil’s Spawn whose parents and therefore him, should not have been here.
Zillions of people use the Internet and X, very few butcher or rape little girls. Rapes and murder happened pre-Internet and X.
If there is a causal link there MUST be correlation – no correlation there, but elsewhere…
We can see correlation between tte inrush of the excrement from the World’s middens and cesspits since the dawn of the 21st Century.
Given that AR was below the age of 18 his parents were also responsible for allowing him access to the material being described.
I wonder if one of the “fundamental changes” Starmer promises to ‘keep the public safe’ will include no longer prioritising the needs of asylum seekers and illegal immigrants over the needs of the British people…
“Public” means our multi-culti, diverse, “brightest and best” enrichers from the Third World… Anglo-Celts need not apply.
I wonder if one of the “fundamental changes” Starmer promises to ‘keep the public safe’ will include shutting the firkin borders and no longer prioritising the needs of asylum seekers and illegal immigrants over the needs of the British people…