The Equality Act has fuelled a massive rise in racial discrimination tribunals, a report from Don’t Divide Us has found. The group says the act has “achieved the exact opposite of its stated aim” and calls for its repeal. The Telegraph has the story.
The number of employment tribunals debating a claim of racial discrimination has tripled since 2017, while the proportion of successful claims has remained static.
The campaign group Don’t Divide Us said it proved that the Equality Act was contributing significantly to a divided Britain.
The organisation’s report found that the number of tribunal applications for race discrimination cases had shot up from 165 in 2016-17 to 1,201 in 2023-24 – a seven-fold increase.
The number of cases reaching tribunals rose from 285 to 829 over the same period.
But over the whole period, just 5% of claims were successful – and this figure has remained relatively static.
Dr Alka Sehgal Cuthbert, the campaign group’s Director, and lead author of the report, said the Equality Act undermined English case law and contributed to a grievance culture in which people resorted to “lawfare” to resolve petty disputes and imagined slights.
“The Equality Act has achieved the exact opposite of its stated aim, making the UK a less tolerant and less equal place,” she said.
“It provides the legal scaffolding that supports this surge in workplace discrimination claims, the overwhelming majority of which have been found groundless.
“Instead of bringing greater fairness, equality and harmony, the Equality Act has been a major vector for curtailing the fundamental freedoms for citizens to speak their mind, and to appear before the law as equal.
“As we examine in our case studies and analysis section, the Act has handed inordinate power to those making malicious and bogus claims, or to thin-skinned people wilfully misinterpreting perfectly innocent comments or interactions.” …
Anna Loutfi, an equality and human rights barrister who co-authored the report, said the Equality Act was a “spectacularly unsuccessful attempt at social engineering by the state” which undermines centuries of English common law. She continued:
The Equality Act’s prioritisation of subjective rather than objective tests is contributing to increasing fractiousness in workplace culture and relationships.
Far from reducing racial tension and disparity, the Act and its offshoots, including the Public Sector Equality Duty and Positive Action programmes, are entrenching division.
In pivoting the law away from prohibiting discrimination towards ensuring ill-defined equality, the EA 2010 has opened the door to political engineering.
The Act was never oriented towards the pursuit of racial equality; instead, it has driven a ‘mission creep’ of continuously expanding rights, which has the opposite effect from that intended.
We urge the Government to conduct a review into the Equality Act 2010, with a view to eventual repeal.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Sowing division is exactly the intention
One of the (unstated) aims of the Equality Act is to make the in-group preference of the English people illegal, i.e. to make the English people less equal in their own country.
Yes. The aim is not ever to elevate the downtrodden, enrich the poor, educate the simply schooled. That would not suit the predatory ruling class’s objective. The last think they want is a world full of bright sparky independent healthy happy integrated uncontrollable humans.
The author mistakes the aims of the promoters of this Act as benign. In fact they were divisive: for the elites the more disputes the better as they can use them for fracture society more, penalise the private sector more and introduce even more draconian laws.
What a surprise – or maybe not. As a subscriber to Eugyppius’s stupid theory, I dismiss the conspiracy theory of it being designed to be divisive but that the people who created the Equalities Act were too stupid to see what the outcome would be.
“….the Act has handed inordinate power to those making malicious and bogus claims, or to thin-skinned people wilfully misinterpreting perfectly innocent comments or interactions.” …
Ah yes, the thin-skinned people. I know a thing or two about this sort. As is regularly demonstrated by certain posters on here, the ‘terminally offended’, all too ready to resort to crybaby status and claim victimhood, all because they can’t hack an opposing opinion delivered in a no-nonsense manner. Cue the deliberate misinterpretations and unsubstantiated accusations…
As ever: ”Offense is taken, never given” applies. Basically, many people could do with growing a pair, because I don’t know how they get through life.
Is being ‘thin-skinned’ a protected characteristic?