It's becoming increasingly common for U.K. universities to set up 'positive action' schemes which directly discriminate on the basis of race. A new letter challenges this controversial practice on legal grounds.
Ian Fleming's James Bond novels are the latest literary works to be butchered by sensitivity readers. Changes in racial language are one thing, but other edits reduce Fleming's descriptive flair to embarrassing clichés.
The University of North Carolina moved against encroaching woke culture and voted to ban diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) statements and politically preferential hiring.
The Equality Act allows 'positive action' by employers to favour candidates based on race. But what if this harms employees by, for example, perpetuating stereotypes of racial inferiority, asks Amber Muhinyi.
Year Zero is fast approaching at Aberdeen University as it sets out plans to "embed a bold, progressive and sustained programme of antiracist curricular reform", giving all courses three years to "decolonise".
Rejecting race-based positive discrimination isn’t a mad or selfish attempt to disrupt the programme, but simply standing up for equal treatment under the law, writes Amber Muhinyi.
Many critics of wokery allow that the woke have "good intentions" but just err in the means to achieve their goals. But is that really true? David Hansard thinks not.
Oxford has launched an "investigation" into an email sent by a don 26 years ago when he was an LSE undergraduate. If someone says they told an off-colour joke when they were 14, is Oxford going to look into that too?
With a rapidly growing 'EDI' industry and fresh impetus to meet diversity targets, ‘positive action’ based on race is now a reality in Britain. But candidates must be able to opt out, writes Amber Muhinyi.
The Archbishop of Canterbury has defended the establishment of a £100 million woke fund to "address past wrongs of slavery" during a time of financial crisis among parishes.
