Harry and Meghan’s official website appears to have been hacked by evil racists determined to discredit the couple. What other explanation could there be for the fact that it contains a massive faux pas?
Queen Elizabeth II died three months ago, yet as of today the website Sussex Royal still refers to her as ”sovereign” and says that: “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex deeply believe in the role of the Monarchy, and their commitment to Her Majesty The Queen is unwavering.”
Nowhere does the site acknowledge that the Queen passed away three months ago.
Evidently, this is yet another example of the kind of vicious trolling the beleaguered couple have to put up with from racist Britons, a subject covered with so much courage and sensitivity in their just released Netflix documentary. It seems the couple can’t even put up a website without hate-filled hackers – presumably at the behest of conniving royal courtiers, or even the King himself – taking it over and filling it with outdated content to make them look foolish. This appalling ‘prank’ gives the impression that the couple are such preening narcissists they can’t be bothered to update their website after the most consequential Royal event in decades.
It is precisely this kind of treatment that has driven the couple into exile, the main subject of their stunning and brave documentary.
Whoever is responsible for this cruel stunt should be ashamed of themselves.
Stop Press: Toby appeared on GB News to give his take on the Meghan and Harry documentary. For some bizarre reason, he doesn’t take their claim to be victims of oppression very seriously.
‘It’s a parody of wokery.’
— GB News (@GBNEWS) December 8, 2022
Toby Young says Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's 'claim' of being ‘victims’ won’t be taken seriously.@toadmeister | @mrmarkdolan
Freeview 236, Sky 512, Virgin 604
GB News YouTube: https://t.co/Wa58gYHxmd pic.twitter.com/P0zkMKQGrG
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Sorry Will, I couldn’t work out what you were saying. Perhaps you can take the tongue out of your cheek.
I read this as a huge diss to H&M. The retail brand must be furious
Harry and Megan who?
He’s the Queen’s grandson that wore the Nazi uniform.
She’s an actress on a popular TV drama — it is okay, not great.
Not sure why they’re in the news.
They’re in the news because they’re just super and great at saving the planet.
She is a feminist icon I’ll have you know.
Using your looks to bag a rich man and then ride his coattails to fame – feminism in the 21st century, same as feminism in the 1st century.
They’re in the news because being professional whingers can clearly be quite lucrative. I can’t believe there is someone even more pointless and vacuous than the Kardashians raking in lots of dosh for selling their empty lives to the highest bidder, but there you have it.
Using your looks to bag a rich man and then ride his coattails to fame – feminism in the 21st century, same as feminism in the 1st century.
Looks? The nicest thing one can say about the lady in this respect is that she’s plain-faced and seems to have been exposed to an explosion in a near-by make-up factory not that long ago. Considering that Harry – Rich man? Rather pampered forever yoof offspring of a rich familiy. – used to be notorious for his promiscuous sex life, the skills the lady presumably has who managed to convince him to swap all the others for just her (at least officially and for now) would seem to be of a more intimate nature.
“Using your looks to bag a rich man and then ride his coattails to fame…” I am inclined to think she was riding more than his coattails.
Not sure who she is, but is he that polo player chap?
Pretty sure she’s something to do with Dunelm, and I think he’s the guy off the Sainsbury’s ad. I think.
Now if I was a loony conspiracy theorist I’d comment on the fact he’s making quite the Masonic gesture in that photo.
I’m actually taking the Mick BTW. I see some seriously crazy comments and observations when I end up getting lost down various online rabbit warrens.
But seriously, why would a bloke choose to walk or pose with their hand in their coat/shirt like that? Pocket, maybe, but I can’t imagine this being a very natural thing to do. Does anyone on here regularly stand around like this? This site may be total claptrap but I’ll let you be the judge. The ‘Hidden Hand’ eh?
https://veritas-vincit-international.org/2015/01/18/hand-signals-of-freemasonry-explained/
She’d just punched him very hard in the collarbone. He tried to express his own views and ‘woke the dragon’
Harry: signal to us if you need rescuing. Two blinks followed by a nose-scratch…
Haha, he’s wearing an imaginary sling then. But harking back to my BBC-watching days of old, I do remember Harry constantly making this gesture. I think it’s just some weird mannerism but it does look really unnatural and daft. I just assumed born royalty were trained from an early age in deportment and how to present oneself in public as they’re being scrutinized and ‘papped’ left, right and centre their whole lives.
Harry and Meghan, the royals the country doesn’t want, whining like pathetic kittens about being victims of oppression yet again.
Like the metaphorical tree: if a rich couple suffer but don’t blog about it, then did the event really happen?
She’s alive in their hearts!
Sorry about that. If it’s any consolation, I just made myself sick.
He must be really upset that Major Hewitt didn’t accept his paternal responsibilities and palmed him off to one of the wealthiest families in the UK. Such rejection can have a deep psychological impact don’t you know!
A cynic might suggest that the firm hosting their site has gone bust and it’s no longer maintained. With any luck, it will disappear eventually!
This B movie actress and her key grip helper will get roundly booed if they EVER set foot in the UK again. Order the popcorn
I expect they’ve been too busy jetting round the World lecturing the peasantry about saving the planet, making self-pitying documentaries, and counting their spare bedrooms and bathrooms to get round to updating their website.
We shouldn’t be critical. The poor dears must be exhausted.
“Nowhere does the site acknowledge that the Queen passed away three months ago.”
I prefer the straightforward explanation – this is a very thinly veiled insult to Charlie and uses cock-up -honestly- as the cover for not acknowledging his now elevated position.