• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

And Finally…

by Toby Young
31 May 2022 1:20 AM

In this week’s episode of London Calling, James Delingpole and I discuss whether Boris will survive a vote of no confidence, wonder if it would make any difference if he was replaced by a chimp, marvel at the Government’s theft of Jeremy Corbyn’s socialist policies, ask if vandalising the Mona Lisa really is the best way to persuade fence-sitters that we’re in the midst of a climate emergency, and, in Culture Corner, give our verdicts on Stranger Things Season 4 and Ricky Gervais’s SuperNature.

You can listen to the podcast here and subscribe on iTunes here.

Tags: Boris JohnsonLondon CallingMona LisaStranger Things

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Fears of Cover-up as Pathologist Who Said 30-40% of Post-Vaccine Autopsies Died of the Vaccine Went Oddly Silent and Suddenly Stopped Carrying Out Autopsies

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
9 months ago

Thanks; good article.

6
0
For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
9 months ago

Twas ever thus, and again we are powerless to do anything. They falsely blacken the names of anyone who opposes their view, call them deniers (of what), or accuse them of being in the pay of vested interests (have you got to be one to know one?) like big oil or the Russians/Chinese.
A pox on the lot of them, except they would exploit the pox, lock us all down and try to feed us untested drugs to destroy our spirit.

11
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
9 months ago

Perhaps “incestuous,” is a bit harsh. Just friends helping each other out.

At our expense.

Lovely people.

2
0
varmint
varmint
9 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

“A bit harsh”?? There is nothing too harsh for the charlatans. The friends “helping each other out” are sending millions in the wealthy west into energy poverty and causing those in the third world to stay dying young of preventable diseases and back breaking labour because they are denied fossil fuels and fobbed off with phony renewables to “save the planet”.

6
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
9 months ago
Reply to  varmint

I was of course extracting the urine. My dry, northern humour clearly doesn’t travel well.

2
0
varmint
varmint
9 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

AHH Yes——————–I have tried my dour Scots humour a few times and it hasn’t worked. People got the wrong idea and thought I was being serious and then I had to go and explain. It’s never good when you have to explain your jokes. —But actually I kind of knew you were taking the piss. I just never let a good opportunity for a rant about the climate hoax to pass.

3
0
LwM
LwM
9 months ago

I think the term “renewables” is deliberately misleading. Solar panels and turbine blades are not renewable or recyclable and have to be replaced. We should have energy definitions around the common denominator of “fuels”, viz:
fossil fuels
nuclear fuels
biomass fuels
imported fuels &
*weather fuels*
That’s much more honest!

6
0
varmint
varmint
9 months ago
Reply to  LwM

They mean the fuel itself is “renewable”, but ofcourse there is nothing “honest” when it comes to anything remotely connected to climate change dogma. The whole thing is a pseudo scientific fraud with all manner of people and businesses feeding at the subsidy trough filled with taxpayers misspent money.

6
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
9 months ago
Reply to  LwM

Intermittent (weather) and non intermittent (everything else). Non intermittent could usefully be subdivided into “easily ramped up” (e.g. gas) which is good for meeting peak demand and not easily ramped up (e.g. nuclear, possibly coal) more suitable for base load. You could also usefully subdivide between sources that are under our control (we have the fuel and the technology) and sources where we rely on other countries.
We get roughly 10% of actual generated electricity from abroad (mainly France and Norway)

4
0
JohnK
JohnK
9 months ago
Reply to  LwM

To some extent it’s a question of time. The only one on the list that is not renewable is nuclear; the rest are produced by plants in the longer term. After all, they claim that “biomass” such as wood fuel for Drax is kind of renewable in the medium term, whereas so-called “fossil fuels” are longer term storage mechanisms.

2
0
Purpleone
Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

Is Uranium not naturally occurring / created in the ground around the world? Highly reprocessable fuel as well. Take your general point though. Biomass through growing weed trees etc could be sustainable,
trouble is you need a lot of land

0
0
stewart
stewart
9 months ago

It is worrying that such an eminent committee should get things so wrong

They didn’t get it wrong. The figures were changed, or to use a previously used term, sexed up to support a pre determined policy.

The system doesn’t work how it’s supposed to work or how people are made to believe it works.

We.live in a completely corrupt system.

I challenge anyone to show me otherwise.

11
0
varmint
varmint
9 months ago

Yet how often do we hear that anyone who questions Climate change orthodoxy or the green technologies that are supposedly going to fix all of that (whatever all of that is supposed to be) must be “in the pay of big oil”. They are “stooges for the fossil fuel companies”. The implication being that fossil fuels are the devil incarnate despite providing 85% of the worlds energy and bringing billions out of a miserable life of abject poverty, and renewables are all sweetness and light despite providing about 1% and forcing poorer people in developed countries into energy poverty and adversely affecting economies. Those champions of these niche technologies then insist that poor people living on a dollar a day in the third world should not use their fossil fuels to “fight climate change”——-Yes Green Politics is a nasty old business.

9
0
JohnK
JohnK
9 months ago

Well, here’s an example of natural long-term energy storage (NLES). A picture’s worth a thousand words.

Natural-Energy-Storage
6
0
varmint
varmint
9 months ago
Reply to  JohnK

If even a little bit of the astronomical sums spent on renewables had been put into clean coal development we would not be seeing the enormous electricity bills we currently have, crippling the economy and leaving people unable to afford energy.

2
0
RTSC
RTSC
9 months ago

It’s blatant corruption and grifting. But since the corrupt grifters are in the House of Frauds or protected by the other corrupt grifters in Government, they’re untouchable.

3
0
Purpleone
Purpleone
9 months ago
Reply to  RTSC

As ever, follow the money. It was funny when the last offshore auction attracted zero bids – say what you like about the private sector, they tend not to invest in loss making ventures if they can help it, unlike our lovely government

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

16 May 2025
by Will Jones

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

29

Civil Servants Threaten to Strike Over Trans Ban in Women’s Lavatories

25

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

19

News Round-Up

18

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

27

Trump’s Lesson in Remedial Education

16 May 2025
by Dr James Allan

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

POSTS BY DATE

May 2022
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences