The Chair of the U.K. independent public Covid inquiry, Baroness Heather Hallett, has told the Prime Minister she wants her inquiry to cover vaccine side-effects and fatalities. The Mail has the story.
Very rare yet serious side-effects from the Covid vaccine could be explored in the forthcoming public inquiry into the pandemic.
It may also look into the struggle which affected families have faced in getting compensation.
Probe chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett wrote to the Prime Minister last Thursday outlining the key areas under scrutiny – including pandemic preparedness, lockdowns, testing, PPE and care homes – which he will have to sign off before the inquiry can begin.
The Mail on Sunday has learned that she also asked if her inquiry can cover deaths and life-changing side-effects from the jabs.
While multiple studies have shown Covid vaccines to be safe – with more than 53 million Britons having had at least one dose and nearly 40 million receiving three – a small minority of people suffered serious health problems including blood clots and inflammation in the heart.
In the U.K., medical regulators have reported 438 blood clot cases and 79 deaths linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine.
More than 900 applications have now been filed for compensation over death or injury due to vaccines, with the total claims reaching £110 million. However, not a single payment has been made.
The inquiry seems unlikely to explore this issue properly if only because the data collected and published on it to date are so limited and poor. But it is reassuring at least that the head of the inquiry wants to cover it, and presumably the Prime Minister will not refuse permission. Good also to see pandemic preparedness in there – it will be interesting to see what the inquiry makes of the Government’s performance when assessed against its own plans.
Worth reading in full.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I wish they’d stop calling vaccine injuries ‘very rare’! They are NOT that rare! There are two instances in my family, my nephew who has now had three strokes and is in a wheelchair, my brother who has begun having seizures again, one good friend who was paralysed, and a friend of my son (the lad died the day after his jab, aged 24). This is just MY experience – how many are now seeing people they know suffering or dying? As people start to join the dots a different picture will emerge that the press has kept criminally quiet about.
https://www.bulatlat.com/2019/10/12/vaccination-most-deceptive-tool-of-imperialism/
Everything Is a Rich Man’s Trick – Full Documentary – YouTube
Vaccine side effects very rare?
I would wager that every family in the country has been or will be harmed by these experimental injections.
If she bases her inquiry on the Yellow Card reports, then she will be reviewing only 10% of the cases.
Move along, nothing to see.
So, one of those at the centre of so much criticism about handling of the “pandemic” has to sign off what the “independent” enquiry covers?
They’ll be asking my grandchildren to mark their own homework and exams next!
Even Johnson wouldn’t be so stupid as to try and constrain the terms of the inquiry would he? Ah well maybe if he’s still getting his instructions in bed….
The data on vaccine deaths and injuries are limited and poor? Your own vaccine safety updates show otherwise. Furthermore, see Steve Kirsch: “New UK government data shows the COVID vaccines kill more people than they save.” and his excellent work on the VAERS unreporting factor. Also the wealth of scientific papers on immuno-suppression caused by the vaccines (inter alia quoted by Kirsch – “Three new papers everyone should know about” but also in Igor Chudov’s Substack and in these pages), the big increase in myocarditis, pericarditis, brain hemorrhaging, heart attacks, afasia, shingles, Bell’s palsy etc etc, causing many athletes, pilots, celebrities etc to die or terminate their careers.
Never mind just “Very rare yet serious side-effects”. We need a proper investigation into all side effects. My wife had severe headaches after being vaccinated several months ago and is still suffering otherwise unexplained headaches.
She also tested positive for covid a couple of weeks ago…
Allowing the vaccines to be released before the proper approval process had been followed was seemingly madness but in consideration of the influence of UN policy and the recent power grab by the WHO, one has to wonder what the real intent was.
It’ll be whitewash.
Baroness Heather Hallett had a stellar track record as a Judge. It’s good to see that she is open to inquiry into vaccine related injuries and deaths. It’s good that Baroness Hallett is aware that every aspect of her public inquiry is going to be subjected to the most rigorous, public, and unprecedented forensic scrutiny imaginable. This scrutiny is going to be rigorously effected by a large number of pit bull attack international doctors and scientists who are dedicated to scientific truth and reason, and whose tolerance for the kinds of legal obfuscations, avoidances, Procrustean data frauds, and general bewigged chicanery we have seen recently in relation to so-called ‘Covid’ has now worn paper thin … nevertheless, i have every confidence that Baroness Hallett will remain upright, transparent, and incorruptible, and that she will never succumb to the intellectual and legal treason perpetrated by so many of her professional colleagues in relation to ‘Covid’ …
Sadly, too little, too late. A better plan would be an immediate halt of experimental biologicals, until this woman’s inquiry is completed. I take it she is a highly qualified research scientist?
Garbage in, garbage out, plus a quick flick with the whitewash brush.
“In the U.K., medical regulators have reported 438 blood clot cases and 79 deaths linked to the AstraZeneca vaccine. “
Does anyone believe this is the true extent of the injuries? Is there anyone who doesn’t know at least one person who’s been injured by these vaccines?
It’s absolute bullshit of course. We’ve lost count of the number of very clear adverse events we’ve seen in people we know, and all were known and expected side effects. It’s as clear as day, and anyone denying it is kidding themselves. Probably out of fear.
Magnificent. In the words of the song:-
“Wash me in the water that you washed your dirty daughter in,
And I shall be whiter than the whitewash on the wall.”
It will be a travesty, costing millions, run longer than The Mousetrap and come out with a “nothing to see here” platitudinous verdict. I want to see heads on pikes or faces behind bars; not the baubles, titles, ermines, directorships, emoluments and bunce all round that always stem from these fabricated and predestined “enquiries”.
…presumably the Prime Minister will not refuse permission.
That’s a big presumption…
He’ll likely say it will need a different type of Inquiry at a later date….kick in to the long grass until after the next election and definitely after May 2024 when the WHO treaty is to be signed off. Would world chief vaxxinator Gates want an Inquiry’s findings before he gets his hands on the ‘prescription’ for mass mandatory jabs.
Slightly O/T but, it’s strange that an individual, Bill Gates and his foundation, can be the second largest funder of the WHO after the USA.
And when you think about it, it’s strange that any country should be a bigger donor pro rata than any other.
Would it be considered appropriate if Gates were to fund the MET police, the NHS, or NATO for that matter? If not, why is it considered appropriate that he funds the WHO as an individual?
The opportunity for corruption is obvious but has been ignored by every government on the planet.
More sad news from the cricket world – Andrew Symonds dies in a “single-vehicle crash”. Might be reading more into it than I should.
I just wish that they would also look at the rather frequent yet serious side-effects!
A question for the Dame
Whilst the Pig Dictator and chosen friends partied at Downing Street I and my family were threated with having the police kick in our front door and arrest us if we dared to celebrate our 40th Wedding Anniversary
Meanwhile how come all the cops at Downing Street not see a thing?
They were probably in on it. Perhaps “party to it” is more appropriate.
As this ‘enquiry’ will cost millions and take months, for no money I offer to write the conclusion: Nobody to blame. Lessons will be learned.
Hmm, could I just edit that?
“Nobody to blame except the vile, anti-vaxxer refuseniks: jail and neutering should be a minimum punishment for these anti-social, mostly far-right, racist scum. This lesson HAS now been learned!”
p.s. Just in case anyone should think I am a clone of Unpopular, could I add a sarcasm tag?
I think we all got the sarcasm.
Not really rational, are you?
Joel Smalley laid out this morning out how the highest reporting countries in Europes have under-reported, at a minimum, by a factor of 7.2x.
I wonder if the life insurance companies in The City of London will help the “enquiry” in some way? Plenty of evidence outside the sovereign state too.
The fact that he quoted a minimum factor to an accuracy of 2 significant figures, means you can reject the work.
You will have to educate us all about how you came to that conclusion.
Any idea of how many people die per week as a baseline?
Of course you don’t.
Well it is about 1 in 5000, each week.
Now compare your above post with this and watch your logic vanish in front of your eyes.
Do you get paid double time on a Sunday?
I try to teach you, as a public survice.
So why don’t you look into my 1 in 5000 figure and tell me if this is likely to be true.
If you can find an error, then you have a case.
🫡 Reporting for survice SIR!
Well done for spotting the typo.
Have a go at the factual element now.
I offer this education for free.
Ha ha! I like that you’ve got a sense of humour!
Of course we all do. Whatever has all cause death rate got to do with it. It would be more useful if you could quote the average weekly deaths from vaccine side effects by vaccine type, and the deaths from ill-advised medical interventions.
Try comparing to reported side-effects from any other “vaccine” and there’s obviously a huge problem.
The outcome seems to have been already decided. When you start of from the position that side effects are very rare before you look, it doesn’t promise to be unbiassed.
“Very rare…..” Sure. I know many people who have suffered serious side effects but not one who has died from the virus.
I still don’t know anyone who has had the coof. I really must get out more.
While multiple studies have shown Covid vaccines to be safe – with more than 53 million Britons having had at least one dose and nearly 40 million receiving three – a small minority of people suffered serious health problems including blood clots and inflammation in the heart.
Any honest frontline doctor may care to disagree.
I have seen scores of adverse effects, some severe, with anecdotal evidence of quite a few suspicious deaths shortly after vaccination.
Steve Kirsch suggests no more than 1 in 41 adverse drug effects are reported to VAERS in the USA.
I have seen many as well, and reported them via Yellow Cards. Bell’s Palsy, Central Retinal Vein Occlusions, CVA’s.
I have also noticed the numbers declining sharply as vaccination uptake has fallen.
At work I am treated as an extremist to be humoured.
I have kept the letter threatening me with the sack for refusing the booster.
Absolutely no way any families should receive a penny in compensation. The idiots all signed the waiver and took the jab, these are the consequences
What about those for whom it was get the jab or lose your job?
The real crime there is the politicians that made that policy, they should be hanged. I have sympathy for those who lost their jobs, I lost my income and was given zero aid too….but they still signed the disclaimer and took the jab.
Let them sue their employers. Why should I pay?
They all signed waivers, bloody hell, I didn’t realise that. No wonder many aren’t complaining.
So the pharmaceutical firms are protected due to the ‘non vaccine’ gene therapy drugs being experimental, the government are protected by requiring recipients signing a waiver. The recipients, tricked by the gene therapy drug being called a vaccine are not protected at all, I don’t think so. I would say 53,000,000 people here were misled into believing it was a vaccine. Someone should be sued.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation from the outset. People are familiar with the word ‘vaccine’ and how it is part of childhood and for travelling to certain countries, but, they weren’t familiar with ‘gene therapies’ and their possible long term effects, let alone the short term, almost immediate negative outcomes.
I don’t believe there was a ‘signed waiver’. Plus lies were told so it was all conducted under false pretenses. Other pressures were also applied.
The next question then is, was there a requirement to sign a waiver or not? If there was a waiver, did it include the words ‘Vaccine’ and in what context? this is not a vaccine? If there was no waiver, what exactly were recepients told. Are you suggesting the vaccinators made up their own narrative?
If this was a real inquiry the Dame may want to ask why during the period of mass detentions a GCHQ unit was moved into Downing Street
The unit was to report directly to the dictator
Why?
I suspect the units role was to spy on lockdown dissidents and the political opponents and allies of the dictator
They got rid of Cummings et al by creating the false ‘chatty rat’ story and making them surrender their phones
How did they know where to look?
Just saying
You should be an investigative journalist.
Oh dear I forgot … we don’t have them now.
Still UK Column might be interested in that snpippet. They have a chap there who’s an ex- spook.
What is that smell already? Oh yes fresh Whitewash!
The increasingly powerful Deep State will protect itself from the unvarnished truth.
Look out for “Lessons to be Learned” and ‘no one to blame’. However with ‘bargain basement paints’ the stains always show through and many coats will be required!
They will be getting desperate to quietly ditch the Yellow Card stats.
Perhaps Dorries will have the answer, buried deep in her On-Iine Harms Bill?
After all the stats ‘harm ‘ the Government .
The conclusion should be that The original plan would have worked without even a tweak, the meddling and peddling caused the problems