• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Looking into their Eyes: Covid Narrative Dissidents in Their Own Words

by Raminder Mulla, Amy Willows and Rusere Shoniwa
3 May 2022 9:00 AM

There follows a guest post by Dr. Raminder Mulla, Amy Willows and Rusere Shoniwa, who decided that rather than just listen to the lazy stereotypes of sceptics portrayed in the press, academia and Government, they would go and find out what people actually thought.

“Anti-vaxxers want to kill your babies,” screamed the ‘Fleet Street Fox’ in a September 2021 opinion piece for the Mirror. “These people are terrorists” she added, as if baby killing alone was insufficient to evoke searing hatred against a minority of people whose real crime was merely opting out of a medical treatment – a right codified after the Nuremberg trials to prevent a repeat of the crimes committed by Nazi doctors in World War II German concentration camps.

Such headlines arguably constitute the crime of incitement to violence. After all, if there was a gang of baby killers on the loose, many might justifiably regard it as their civic duty to halt them at all costs. And history teaches us that vigilantism can be highly imaginative and resourceful once the fire has been lit.

Giving an academic veneer to the kind of wild-eyed claims made by the Fleet Street Fox, a January 2021 study by Miguel et al concluded that people who eschewed compliance with Covid containment measures were more likely to display “lower levels of empathy and  higher levels of callousness, deceitfulness, and risk-taking”.

Is there any truth in this? Prompted by a desire to foster genuine understanding between different sides of the Covid camp, a new study led by Dr. Raminder Mulla digs into this question. “Looking Into Their Eyes“, a riposte to the slogan deployed in the Government Covid safety campaign, asks dissidents of lockdown, mask, and vaccine mandate narratives to express their motivations, feelings, and thoughts in their own words.

The Fleet Street Fox will be disappointed with the study’s findings. Unsurprisingly, the authors discovered that this vilified group are anything but baby killers or terrorists. Crucially, they did not evince the stereotypical tropes about ‘anti-vaxxers’ that have been propagated in the mainstream and social media.

Simply put, the participants believe that lockdowns were a state overreach. They oppose lockdowns because of the burden placed on the entire population irrespective of risk, the collateral damage caused, and the imposition on civil liberties and individual freedom. As one participant put it:

What have you got if you haven’t got freedom? What is there? There’s nothing! You’ve got nothing if you’re not free to work, to go out when you want to, to travel. What is there? There is nothing. What is the point of anything without freedom?

Given that freedom was the West’s rallying cry against the tyranny of Communism throughout the entire Cold War, it’s hard for those who opposed the Government’s Covid containment policies to understand how a disease whose risk dependencies were heavily skewed against the frail and elderly could warrant the ongoing house arrest of virtually the entire Western world, with very few exceptions.

Addressing the label of ‘anti-vax’ directly, the study finds that most of its participants were not opposed to vaccination in principle but did express doubts about the rapid development and deployment of the current Covid vaccines and their side effects. None of the study participants subscribed to unusual theories, referencing 5G or nanobots, with which this group is often stereotyped.

Delving into the participants’ values, the study finds that most emphasised personal responsibility and autonomy in health and other affairs and the importance of the maxim to ‘do unto others as you would have them do unto you.’

There was unanimity in the view that death is not something to be avoided at all costs. Instead, there was a clear prioritisation of quality of life over length of life. Participants were of the view that Covid containment policies had not only directly harmed life prospects on so many fronts but that the assault on quality of life was also unjustifiable.

Many participants were not personally inconvenienced in practical ways by the lockdown measures, but some gave accounts of being ostracised from activities owing to their choices on masking and vaccination. A major challenge for most was managing relationships with friends and family who had different views of the situation. This was done through a mixture of arguments and often simply avoiding the subject. Participants expressed frustration at the futility of trying to shift others’ viewpoints through rational discourse.

As a result of their experience over the past two years, participants reported significantly increased levels of mistrust in the state, medical profession, and vaccination as a medical practice. Running parallel to this was an overriding mistrust of their fellow citizens borne out of a sense of disbelief at the ease with which most people had acquiesced to a state of affairs participants regarded as highly abnormal – namely, uncritical compliance with the Covid state. 

Despite the disappointment some interviewees expressed with those who unquestioningly complied with the Covid narrative, they did not wish them harm or inconvenience. In contrast, other studies have shown that this attitude of non-malevolence is not reciprocated by the compliant towards the non-compliant, whom the compliant view as deserving of unemployment, impoverishment and censorship.

We found no evidence to paint Covid narrative dissidents as anti-social misfits lacking in empathy. Instead, what we found was a group of people who had consulted reliable independent media sources and come to their own conclusions independently of the Government and mainstream media narrative. This used to be the bedrock of our democracies. This group had formulated very different, but not unreasonable, views from the majority as to how Covid should have been managed. We do not shy away from the anger these people feel. But ultimately, the most pressing concern of our participants was whether the obsession with extending life had destroyed the experience of being alive:

I’m not scared of dying, I’m scared of not living. That is my thing. It’s what being human is. You can’t have life without death. It wouldn’t have any meaning would it, to be alive if there wasn’t the counter of death. I don’t particularly fear death to the point that it would dictate me hiding myself away from Covid.

Read the full report here.

Tags: Conspiracy TheoriesDiscriminationDissentLockdown ScepticsPropagandaVaccine Sceptics

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Spike in Deaths Concurrent With Vaccinations Must Be Investigated by Authorities, Study Says

Next Post

‘Original Antigenic Sin’ Mentioned in the New England Journal of Medicine

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

188 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 40: Rob Bates on Stopping Britain Becoming Majority-Minority, Tilak Doshi on Trump vs Green Blob and Mario Trabucco on Osborne’s Elgin Marbles Betrayal

by Richard Eldred
13 June 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

17 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17 June 2025
by Will Jones

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

54

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

28

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

20

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

53

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat

16 June 2025
by Toby Young

POSTS BY DATE

May 2022
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

May 2022
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  
« Apr   Jun »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

17 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17 June 2025
by Will Jones

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

54

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

28

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

20

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

53

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat

16 June 2025
by Toby Young

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment