The United States and 60 other countries, including the U.K., Canada, Australia and EU member states, have signed a sweeping “Declaration for the Future of the Internet” which commits to bolstering “resilience to disinformation and misinformation” and somehow upholding free speech rights while also censoring “harmful” content. Reclaim the Net has more.
The White House framed the declaration as something that supports freedom and privacy by focusing on its commitments to protect human rights, the free flow of information, and privacy. The EU put out similar talking points and claimed that those who signed the declaration support a future internet that’s open, free, global, interoperable, reliable, and secure.
However, the commitments in the declaration are vague and often conflicting. For example, the declaration makes multiple commitments to upholding freedom of expression yet also commits to bolstering “resilience to disinformation and misinformation”. It also contains the seemingly contradictory commitment of ensuring “the right to freedom of expression” is protected when governments and platforms censor content that they deem to be harmful.
Furthermore, many of the governments that signed this declaration are currently pushing sweeping online censorship laws or openly supporting online censorship.
For example, just a few days ago, the Biden administration called for private companies to censor online “misinformation” – the latest of many similar calls. The EU also recently passed its Digital Services Act (DSA) which contains requirements to censor “hate speech” and “misinformation.”
Some government officials, including Canadian Minister of Innovation, Science, and Industry François-Philippe Champagne and UK Digital, Culture, Media, and Sport (DCMS) Secretary of State Nadine Dorries, even mentioned their country’s online censorship laws during the live launch of this Declaration for the Future of the Internet.
The new Orwellian definition of ‘free speech’, which involves censorship of ‘misinformation’ – defined as anything that disagrees with the Government – and ‘hate speech’ – defined as anything not deemed sufficiently woke – is gaining ground. The ‘Conservative’ Party in the U.K. seems blissfully unaware that conservative ideas are precisely what the ‘progressives’ pushing this agenda want to censor, and already are.
Worth reading in full.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“The ‘Conservative’ Party in the U.K. seems blissfully unaware that conservative ideas are precisely what the ‘progressives’ pushing this agenda want to censor, and already are.”
Are they THICK or MAD or BOTH?!
Does this mean the end of the Daily Sceptic and the sources of so much valable truth that they do not want us to hear? Any lawyers interested?
It’s depressing that my government wants to do this and even more depressing that the sheeple can’t be bothered to notice (yet).
This is a disaster. So many things about global warming and Covid have proven to be wrong or will be, but would be, or have been censored out by this stupidity. Where can we go to get alternative but often valid views about things? Are we going back to Victorian times where people with non approved views will need to distribute handbills? What anti free speech idiot in our government agreed to this? Somebody please let us have their name(s) so we can vote them out at the first opportunity.
Who is the judge of misinformation? That will be up to the very busy courts to decide when the thousands of lawsuits come rushing in. Boy will the real criminals be happy with that😂🌍😂😂
Governments are losing control of the narrative and the ability to manipulate public opinion and thus control the masses. This is mainly due to the growth of information available through social media and the internet. MSM is unhappy particularly Public Broadcasters because their half truths, misinformation and lies designed to manipulate opinion are more easily exposed. This is not about protecting anyone from hate speech, that is the excuse. Many governments are using advisors from China who are experts in internet censorship and blocking messages that are unfriendly to the government.
Trying to stop this is like whistling in the wind. The amount of support it generates from people not wanting to appear unsympathetic (‘unmutual’) is incredible. Either society is inevitably heading for the dustbin of history at increasing speed or the Tavistock Institute’s NLP program has been incredibly successful. Whatever, there’s a positive feedback loop in operation and the prognosis is not good.
This is world war 3 and only one side is fighting.
I’m re-reading 1984. Orwell had incredible foresight.
We see in COVID and climate change that “misinformation” can be the truth and “settled science” to be misinformation. I don’t hold out much hope for the future.
That’ll be the Guardian and Biased Brainwashing Cult with nothing left to publish.
I bet Sleepy Joe Biden wants to ban all padlocks on cemeteries
Combine this with the UK regime signing the UK up to be the global epicentre of ‘vaccine’ experimentation and development.
Then combine both with the government moving to diminish the power of the court over itself.
Hello Chinese Democracy!
Sixty countries sign up to censorship and vicious repression and there is no
Lockstep.
Yeah right.
Paki shit arse cunt twat chink nigger coon sooty wanker poofter uphill gardener faggot dyke muff diver wog wop spic frog yank kraut sausage jockey chutney ferret
We didn’t start the fire 🙂
LOL
Stop picking on the Tories.
That’ll be “harmful speech” such as Tommy Robinson calling out the Grooming gangs … or “harmful speech” such as presenting the evidence that the Jab was killing people, etc.
The real pushers of lies and dishonesty are the (once)Mainstream Media and the politicians.
Game over.
The West is done.
We need to know:
Who determines what we are allowed to say?
What their qualifications are for this task?
How do we appeal their decisions?
Where and when we can vote for them….
And also where is the definitive list of what we’re not allowed to say? I was thrown off the Telegraph site and nearly this one too for daring to ask how can I understand how moderators subjectively think if they won’t publish their thought processes?
Corruption empowers, and absolute corruption empowers absolutely…
‘The ‘Conservative’ Party in the U.K. seems blissfully unaware that conservative ideas are precisely what the ‘progressives’ pushing this agenda want to censor, and already are.’
Not at all: that is precisely what the current mob of CINOs want!
Just for clarification in the future when Boris denies doing something that he did will it be a illegal for anyone to express doubt or to dispute Boris’ claim?
By way of example if Boris stands up during PMQ and he is clearly being sucked off by a male prostitute (probably an MP wanting a cabinet position) and Boris declares that he is not being sucked off as he speaks is it misinformation for anyone to say otherwise?
Possibly Carrie Antoinette might have a view on that – though the end of her term is surely a ‘when’, not an ‘if’!
If Carrie goes it will be on her terms. She will have so much dirt on Bozo he probably can’t piss without her permission.
We all know that the narrative demands that Putin is the current Hitler and we are all supposed to bang our saucepans on Thursday to prove we hate him, but in reality our own government’s are a far greater threat to us than Putin ever will be.
Yep: unlike our government of corrupt Third World midgets, Putin has never done me any harm.
His recent speech about his views on the west was quite illuminating. Not surprising why it is not widely known here. It was straightforward stuff. Shockingly he believes the role of societal leaders is to look out for the welfare of citizens, ensuring they can buy a house of their own, be left in peace and feel valued by their own society that they are making a contribution no matter how basic.
No wonder they brand him as a Hitler. Dangerous ideas.
To be fair that does sound like Hitler.
The actual Hitler not the propaganda version we were all indoctrinated with.
What, the Hitler who never knew that Jews were being murdered en masse?
Yep – the one who called for the elimination of the Jewish “problem”.
Which other UK government narratives do you believe?
No – it doesn’t. Read Mein Kampf, and check out the speeches.
Good Lord, almost kind of Russian version of Ron deSantis – someone who speaks sense.
As usual, an excellent summing up, Mr Tea……
So, “free speech” has been conveniently, like so much else over the past 2 years, redefined to mean the opposite of what we formerly knew free speech to be.
And it has been signed up to by so many governments across the world, just like the WHO pandemic treaty really.
And there isn’t anything like a New World Order coming into being at all is there?
There isn’t. There is an AMBITION only. But that isn’t how the world works.
Your job is to reject it
Oh, I do. Fully. Every day. Several times a day. But that doesn’t seem to be doing much to stop it.
It seems to be creeping into existence, fact by fact, news story, by news story. And if you actually join the dots you wouldn’t sleep at night.
BTW, FWIW, despite my post in reply seeming facetious, SFAIK we are on the same side.
Let me help with the stiffening of the sinews. Firstly, without your resistance and the resistance of people like you, things would be worse – because authoritarians and tyrants do not control themselves.
Secondly, there is such a thing as critical mass. You seem like you’re losing – until one day ….
Bloody hell I hope you are right AE.
“we protect regulated speech and expression” no freedom of course.
it does feel like there is already a one world government already in place when you consider how similar many countries are now, if 60 countries have signed this thing then the Internet in yrs to come will be nearly the same in all 60 countries if it goes to the powers plans. this also goes onto the same response to the so called virus and also the move by countries into cbdc and also the ID app credit score etc.
There is also not much to pick between say the UK and china these days, considering the Uk passed the policing bill that among other things has the potential to limit protests, the harms bill when passed will further limit speech and also the human rights act which may be messed with and altered for the worse.
This is not true. China is full of the Chinese. The UK has us and our very long tradition of defiance.
Magna Carta did not appear out of nowhere. And that spirit resides within many of us. That’s what they don’t get. That’s what happens when you have a literal elite; they are not of the people and are cut off from the lifeblood of the nation. They misunderstand what makes us tick.
We will prevail.
Perhaps that is part of the reason for relentless mass immigration?
The major factor for mass immigration is to erode the elements that enable a nation-state to function. Foremost is the notion of being a part of the land where your ancestors lived and died. Perhaps they sacrificed much so you could live a better life.
What is key is who emigrates. Those familiar with the biggest groups will be aware most are economic migrants not anglophile enthusiasts. That is important. I know a number of Asians born here who maintain property back in the old country as they don’t expect it to last. This is especially true of the ones who were part of the African sphere, like Priti Patel. An interesting insight into how they think.
Economic migrants don’t integrate, just as we wouldn’t if we worked in Dubai or Saudi Arabia. It is getting harder to hide the parallel societies emerging in the UK.
and after the internet, then what, telepathy?
If you’ve read Orwell you are not far off. The goal of totalitarianism is to control thought.
Don’t worry. The USA has been working on MRI technology on brain scans to show what you are actually thinking.
In part it is fascinating as it seems as though thoughts formulate in the brain before you actually act on them.
I was thinking of natural telepathy, not a thought transmission monitoring system operated by big brother.
Who will “police” the disinformation and who will police the police?
The goal is to get people to police themselves, much as they do now with topics they’ve been taught are sensitive like immigration, cultural differences and gay rights.
The most powerful form of censorship in the Soviet Union was self censorship. All those writers and editors understood what they could and couldn’t write.
Well there’s an organisation called the “Free Speech Union”…
There will be a point when using the Internet will be completely pointless and switching off maybe the only option when everything is controlled absolute, least at the moment their is still room to view “unauthorized” non approved by the state opinions and views, however the point of no return is gathering pace whereby one day anything one sees is just state approved info.
There are a number of alternative internets in ‘production’ as we speak. One by Tim Berners Lee.
Best news I’ve heard since shale gas under Lancashire. If (likewise) it can work.
They will try. But the key characteristic of government is incompetence.
The internet is hard to control. Plus any clampdown will trigger an arms race. That’s what they don’t understand, when you suppress something it doesn’t go away. And it becomes even more attractive to some.
You’re spot on, people will be sick of cyber interference and migrate back to pubs to mingle and chat.
Everything is cyclical. The internet age brought many conveniences but much trouble, it will fall and find its level
Partgate and beergate ‘misinformation’ will now be banned. As will politicians gay dalliances, affairs, accusations of murder, and watching porn on Taxpayers time; probably using equipment we paid for.
How convenient.
It is important we shield the plebs from these upsetting things. Just like the Chinese government believe rural parts of their country aren’t yet ready for the internet. It would upset them. Ignorance is bliss.
I say, didn’t politicians used to get “that sort of thing” on expenses?
I wonder who will be first in front of a bent judge?
Will it be a well known public figure or some poor pleb?
And what will the topic be?
Trans rights? Upsetting a person of colour? Disrespecting the wrong football team? Calling Bozo a traitor?
Are Metalist Kharkiv protected now?
Who are they?
A Ukrainian Football Club, based not surprisingly in Kharkiv.
Hugh may just have outed himself as a Russian bot farm… ;o)
Thanks. I don’t follow football. Hugh’s a decent chap.
They are also reportedly linked to the Azov battalion (if I remember rightly). Like a number of East European clubs, they have a far right element. But since they are now fighting against the “forces of evil”…
Nuff said – that’s whoever they say it is, right?
Anyhow, it sounds like Azov are more or less beaten, at least in Mariupol. But whatever, they were fighting the Russians, and therefore presumably must not be disrespected. Anyway, I’m not sure that I’ve entirely trusted UK justice since Blair’s politicised “supreme court”. I think this is bound to be bad for free speech (and I think back to a certain UK act which was supposed to be for a few hard cases, but inevitably became routine).
Bliar ? Enough said.
IS THERE SOME HOPE THAT DAILY SCEPTIC MIGHT GET TO HIGHLIGHT THE FORTHCOMING WHO PANDEMIC TREATY BEFORE IT IS SIGNED INTO EXISTENCE LATER THIS MONTH?
Fair point. The doo doo will fly when that is nodded through.
But will it HP?
Will MSM even cover the fact that it is being signed – would your ordinary bloke down the pub or on the bus even have a clue what it is about, and understand the implications of it?
And considering the amount of covidianism about, I would imagine that a lot of people would think the WHO pandemic treaty is a “good thing”.
It’s already been highlighted and forgotten about, just like the Canadian truckers’ protest.
I missed it and I follow quite closely.
So does this mean they will be shutting down most of the MSM and government accounts then?