FDA Won’t Release Pfizer Vaccine Data For Another 75 Years

2 min read

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has said that it will take 75 years to process a Freedom of Information Act request relating to the release of important documents associated with the approval of the Pfizer vaccine. The FDA claims that it will take this long because it can only process 500 pages per month and there are tens of thousands of files which need to be reviewed before they are authorised for release, despite the same agency giving the green-light to the Pfizer jab in just over a 100 days after it was given access to those same documents. RT has more.

The FDA has insisted it cannot commit to a faster release of the medical data associated with the approval of the Pfizer vaccine, according to a legal brief filed on Tuesday in response to the Freedom of Information Act request. The agency reiterated that after processing 12,000 pages in about a two-month period, it will only be able to process 500 pages per month going forward. With tens of thousands of additional files up for review, plaintiffs fear the process may drag on two decades longer than the previous 55-year estimate.

Lawyer Aaron Siri sued the FDA on behalf of a group of doctors calling themselves Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency, who had previously complained the FDA wasn’t supplying the data they had requested in a timely fashion. Having pointed out last month that the FDA had looked through Pfizer’s documents in a mere 108 days in order to license the vaccine, Siri questioned why the agency now required a whopping 20,000 days to make the same documents public.

Approximately 451,000 pages regarding the clinical trials for a vaccine millions of Americans are being mandated to take will remain floating in legal limbo for up to 75 years if the agency has its way, Siri warned. He called it “dystopian” for the Government to pay Pfizer billions of dollars, shield it from lawsuits and require citizens to be injected with its product, only to refuse access to the documents used to grant its licensure in the first place.

Worth reading in full.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

68 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Newman20
Newman20
4 years ago

I see that Pfizer is forecast to have income of $36 billion in 2021. No wonder its crook CEO says that annual booster jabs will be necessary.

There’s a great piece in today’s Daily Telegraph about all of the egregious testing of these poisonous jabs.

lorrinet
lorrinet
4 years ago

Well, all the Devil’s spawn involved in this murderous scam will be dead by then. Mind you, if these mad scientists and their acolytes are not stopped, all life, including in the chemically-poisoned soil, may be dead by then. Let’s hope there really is a Day of Judgement waiting for them on the other side.

SimCS
SimCS
4 years ago

It’s pure bovine excrement.

original poster
original poster
4 years ago

Time for a giant Wikileaks upload!

Hester
Hester
4 years ago

presumably that implies the FDA Did not read the data from the trials before giving the go ahead to stuff it into millions of arms. On that basis alone the product trial should be stopped right away. Either they are covering up, or they never read the trial data and signed off a dangerous product, I suspect the answer is they have done both.

Turtlesnapper
Turtlesnapper
4 years ago
Reply to  Hester

It has been reported that Fauci authorised the signing of a deal with Moderna to use the mRNA patents held by NAIAD on a profit sharing basis …. curious thing is that this was signed up some weeks BEFORE the announcement of Covid-19 by the Chinese government on 31st December 2019. Begs the question of Who Knew What and When and why didn’t they tell others??? .. especially so since Fauci had authorised the funding of Gain of Function Research on coronaviruses at Wuhan.

Perhaps NAIAD and FDA had a vested interest in approving mRNA vaccines as fast as possible ?

barrywinn
barrywinn
4 years ago

More horse💩 and more reason not to have this experimental substance injected into your body.

Turtlesnapper
Turtlesnapper
4 years ago

With the Pfizer trial data revealing a roughly 1 in 9 chance of spontaneous abortion, still birth or neo-natal death when vaxxing pregnant women it’s hardly surprising they wanted it kept under wraps for decades.

274 pregnant women were ‘treated’ with the vax in the trial, it resulted in 29 abortions or infant deaths.

This data was released a few days ago under a US Court Order and can be seen at the link below; look at page 12 to see that data for yourself.
https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

Richard Austin
Richard Austin
4 years ago

The FDA is in the pocket of Dr Fauci, the man who made a deal with Bill Gates in 2000 at Gates mansion. Robert F Kennedy’s new book, The Real Fauci, should be mandatory reading for everyone and especially Politicians. This is a typical Fauci cover-up.

amanuensis
amanuensis
4 years ago

How long will it take the UK’s MHRA to release these documents? What about the EU’s EMA?

Or is everyone just going along with whatever the USA says?

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

good questions to ask in the national conversation about mandating covid jabs

LonePatriot
LonePatriot
4 years ago

There Are Now 365 Studies that Prove the Efficacy of Ivermectin and HCQ in Treating COVID-19. Any hospital administrator who mandated the shots to employees to comply with the government mandate for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and who refused to allow alternative treatments to be tried, doctors who pushed their patients to take the EUA drug without giving fully informed consent, anyone who forcefully administered the shot, the AMA, AAP, Boards of Health, CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, scientists who participated in the development, Big Pharma (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, Astra Zeneca, et. al.), anyone who pushed the sick into nursing homes resulting in deaths, all must be arrested, prosecuted, tried and if found guilty sentenced to prolonged imprisonment and fines or death for intentional homicide. Get your ivermectin before it is too late! https://ivmpharmacy.com

Richard Austin
Richard Austin
4 years ago
Reply to  LonePatriot

You should read Kennedy’s book, The Real Fauci, £2.99 on Amazon. It’s a real eye-opener where Ivermectin and HCQ are concerned and that’s just the first two chapters.

twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
4 years ago

What about the UK equivalent document?

James Kreis
James Kreis
4 years ago

Good journalism from RT yet again. They put our media to shame.

Gigavaxxed
Gigavaxxed
4 years ago
Reply to  James Kreis

But RT is russian agency. Why are they so interested in discrediting american company producing vaccines? Maybe because they only care about to sell theirs to the rest of the world?

caipirinha17
caipirinha17
4 years ago

Sounds like the freedom of information request should be modified. Maybe split into much smaller ones and submitted separately. Leave them nowhere to hide.

iane
iane
4 years ago
Reply to  caipirinha17

Yeah, but they would just say, “Your request is very important to us. We are however processing an unusually large number of requests at the moment. Please hold while we find an operator who is free to attend to your request. …. ………… [cue, the Ring Cycle: repeat ad infinitum]”

brachiopod
brachiopod
4 years ago

If anyone is still undecided about these toxic jabs then this is the reason to tell Bourla to take his own medicine before you do.

Liz F
Liz F
4 years ago

So they reckon it’s going to take 75 years to redact 451,000 pages?

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Liz F

don’t they have access to a computer??

BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
4 years ago

Pfizer won’t even be around in 75 years. Especially when enough people find out what their ‘products’ have done to them…

WM
WM
4 years ago

What about other countries? I’m assuming that the NHS got the same date and did their own review. Shouldn’t that analysis be available?

TruthHurts2077
TruthHurts2077
4 years ago

A colleague called me today to say they wouldn’t be at work as they ‘couldn’t feel their arm’. It was booster day the other day, apparently. Asked if anyone else had called in sick after their boosters. “Yeah, err quite a few” I replied. In other words, “yeah f*cking sh*tloads!”.

Noumenon
Noumenon
4 years ago
Reply to  TruthHurts2077

That could be very bad. One thing they rarely mention are injection injuries resulting from the needle itself. There are cases where people have lost use of an arm because of nerve damage from a poorly placed needle.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Noumenon

yet another reason to reject the vaxx

Richard Austin
Richard Austin
4 years ago
Reply to  TruthHurts2077

At work yesterday three people said they lost the use of their arm for up to half a day. Then last night three members of my family said exactly the same thing. I asked if they thought it was normal and completely in line with every other vaccination they have ever had? They declined to answer. These things are killing people.

Rogerborg
Rogerborg
4 years ago

“We know for an absolute certainly that it’s completely safe, we just don’t know why.”

In 2019 that would have sounded like a clumsy satire.

In $CURRENT_YEAR, it’s just the Settled Science.

Squire Western
Squire Western
4 years ago

If it takes 75 years it takes 75 years. But until the documents are released clearly no-one can make an informed decision on whether or not the drug is safe. It is illegal to administer drugs without the informed consent of the patient, so, sadly, this drug will have to be withdrawn for the next 75 years.

Noumenon
Noumenon
4 years ago
Reply to  Squire Western

Why can’t we subject it to an international speed reading competition? Where’s the rain man when you need him?

Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
4 years ago

Imagine your missus goes out for the night with da gelz. They go clubbing. She’s a faithful and harmless woman who would never do the dirty on you. She has always emphasised her faithfulness and her devotion to your safety, your health and your happiness. You implicitly and explicitly trust this woman. 

Over the next few days, weeks and months you hear awful things about your wife and what she got up to at the club. You hear story after story of her behaviour, of event after event, each filling you with horror and disgust. Eventually you have had enough. You trust your woman, but this needs addressing; can all these stories be wrong, an exaggeration, a conspiracy? You go to the source. She’ll put the people straight, and she’ll be mortified at the rumours calling her decency and integrity into question. She is utterly convinced of her uprightness and her effectivess with regard to being a good and faithul wife. She’ll be livid, and she’ll want to clear her name.

You go to her, and she says she’s not willing to address the accusations/charges of infidelity for another 75 years. It would just take too long to give you… Read more »

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago

Yep. An easy to understand analogy but it’s very hard to get through some very thick, empty craniums. Some members of my family will not have a bad word said about their beloved Boris but one today said she was “a little disappointed in him after yesterday’s revelations but we should go easy on him as HE’S just had a baby!”😲🤦

Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
4 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

Someone said to me the other day, ‘You can’t help but love Boris!’ after the odious tyrant appeared on the news.

What?!’ I replied. ‘He’s an evil bastard and he ought to be up on charges for his crimes!’

They were startled by my response, so I rattled off his crimes in order to let them know I had substance to back up my sharp reply and that I’m not some crank. That killed that conversation. Oops.

Thankfully, the person and I are close, and we could move on to more frivolous topics, but I’m absolutely astonished that people still believe Johnson is some clumsy, unkempt, cuddly teddy bear.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago

I’m actually coming round to idea of a very limited christmas this year because I know I just couldn’t cope and remain silent [to keep the peace] having to listen to all the “covid/Omicron/aren’t the vaccines brilliant, when are you getting your booster shot” drivel I would be exposed to

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  HelenaHancart

I had a neighbour tell me what a BRILLIANT job he has done of managing the pandemic. Total bedwetter [apologies to those whom the term offends but it describes her to a T]

Noumenon
Noumenon
4 years ago

Most people have a battered wife/husband mentality.

crisisgarden
crisisgarden
4 years ago

Naked corruption and grounds alone to reject their bullshit gene therapy. May we live to see every scientist, researcher, bureaucrat, lawmaker, doctor and nurse involved with this disgusting assault on humanity discredited and where necessary prosecuted. Enough is enough.

Sforzesca
Sforzesca
4 years ago
Reply to  crisisgarden

Bit optimistic. But one can hope for a Nuremberg 2.
But one never knows.
One thing’s for sure, they will get their just desserts in this world or the next.
If I were them, maybe I’d be a teeny bit worried – should the worm turn even on this earth, they’re toast. Think lamp posts and Mussolini….

If nothing else, it’s a warm thought to hold.

BS665
BS665
4 years ago

Then I won’t be jabbed for 75 years.

Anti_socialist
Anti_socialist
4 years ago

Two points for TY to address in his next shill denial piece.

  1. Why have “conspiracy theorists” got such a high accuracy rate compared to cock-up theory ? Everything TY predicts is invariably wrong.
  2. How is it, governments around the world have managed to work in lock-step to vaccinate billions of people, & locking down entire continents, doubling the wealth of the wealthiest 1%, but you are still wedded to the nonsense politicians are all incompetent fools.

If they are all such useless headless chickens, just think how easy it would be to manipulate them to do elite lobbyists bidding without even realizing they’re being played like a fiddle. Follow the money! Who is profiting from these policies, Handjob with his share’s in genome sequencing companies, the comfortable lifestyle the PM is guaranteed when he leaves public office or Bill Gates who has almost certainly doubled his wealth during the pandemic. It’s not difficult to work out the motive if you want to, you don’t have to believe in grand new world order conspiracies, though undoubtedly the elite do conspire, at the expense of the rest of us, for the sake of their own ego & greed.

I am Spartacas
I am Spartacas
4 years ago

….

carpet.jpg
I am Spartacas
I am Spartacas
4 years ago

And they wonder why conspiracy theories thrive.

Rogerborg
Rogerborg
4 years ago
Reply to  I am Spartacas

They’re just spoilers at this point.

Far too many Branch Covidians still haven’t got it yet though. Maybe when Twatter and Failbook (and Instagram, TikTok and the rest) lock them out of their accounts and demand their vaxpäss ID to tie their opinions to their social credit score, they’ll get it.

Although even that’s optimistic.

Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago

Downing Street flat: Boris Johnson faces fresh questions over revamp costs – BBC News

Is the £15,000 ‘event’ donation in October the same £15,000 that was used to pay for the Pig Dictator and Carries £15,000 holiday to Mustique that New Year?

HelenaHancart
HelenaHancart
4 years ago
Reply to  Cecil B

Perhaps it should be known as Drowning Street?

Julian
Julian
4 years ago

What’s their excuse for needing to review them before releasing them? If it’s to do with confidentiality then surely a company like them would have an embedded process of storing cleaned up versions of documents with personal data omitted as they go along, for precisely this reason.

martinbritnell83
martinbritnell83
4 years ago

Everyone who will be old enough to remember this will be dead. How convenient eh?

masksniffer22
masksniffer22
4 years ago

you can hardly expect Siri to produce a successful, ie counter-narrative, outcome here.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.