Health officials have been forced to change the Covid vaccine consent form being given to children because it wrongly tells them that getting ‘jabbed’ will free them from having to wear face masks and to follow social distancing – despite these rules being the same for all people regardless of vaccination status. The U.K. Health Security Agency (UKHSA) euphemistically referred to this untruth as a “small typo”. The Telegraph has the story.
The “easy read” forms, distributed to children aged 12 to 15, claim having a vaccine will free them from Government rules that apply to the unvaccinated. In fact, the same rules apply to all children regardless of vaccination status. …
Consent letters are being sent to parents and guardians, but children are deemed competent to make their own decision if families do not agree. [Advice on what concerned parents can do to stop this can be found here.]
The “easy read” consent form for children from the UKHSA and NHS says: “You don’t have to keep following the Government’s rules if you have been vaccinated, but they will help you to stay safe. This includes social distancing, wearing a face covering and washing your hands carefully and often.”
Molly Kingsley, from parents’ campaign group Us For Them described the advice as “exceptionally wrong”.
After being contacted by the Telegraph, officials said the form would be corrected to say: “You should keep following the Government’s rules if you have been vaccinated.”
The amendments say such rules include “wearing a face covering and washing your hands carefully and often”. …
While some of the Government’s rules apply differently to adults who have been vaccinated, no such distinctions have been made for children.
Worth reading in full.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
https://odysee.com/@en:a5/PK_Tot-durch-Impfung_english:a
This is a special conference led by Vivaine Fisher from the Corona Committee.
It goes into proper medical detail on what is in these “vaccines” There are slides which show metallic objects moving in the “vaccines” It suggests to me that the “mad” theories about transhumanism could have merit, as some of these objects are clearly engineered nanobot type objects.
The part on the vaccine contents starts at about 1.19.
There is a good presentation from a German surgeon who is working with a group of international doctors to investigate and publicise this.
Much of the conference is hard to follow because of the translation, which is hurried out, due to the importance and urgency of getting this information out as soon as possible, given the need to protect children from being experimented on with these deadly injections..
Can’t believe Whitty who has gone from the majority will not be affected (April 2020) to everyone is in mortal danger, wonder what changed him so drastically or is that a daft question?
The question is anything but daft. We can ask him when he’s on trial for crimes against humanity, can’t we?
Brown Envelopes. Or do they transfer bribes electronically?
What kind of medical information form feels it needs to propagandize about “freedom” that is actually a set of measly prisoners’ privileges.
We need to take note of all this, we need to find the people responsible, we need to put them on trial, and we need to jail them for a very very very long time. And I am not joking at all.
Coerced vaccination of children? Watch out perpetrators. Nuremberg Code is coming to get you for Crimes Against Humanity.
Deuteronomy 32:35 “It is mine to avenge; I will repay. In due time their foot will slip; their day of disaster is near and their doom rushes upon them”
How low can these bastards stoop?
Small typo my arse!
Everything they have done has had the utmost consideration in order to further their aims to get everyone injected. Everything.
These leaflets – particularly the ‘easy reads’ intended for children and people with learning disabilities – will one day be displayed in museums as examples of early 21st Century war propaganda and visitors will gaze in horror at the depths to which human beings can stoop. ‘Never again’, they will say (until the next time some more humans do it again).
When I downloaded this leaflet last week I literally wept. I’m a teacher at of the many schools where this crime will be committed and one of my kids is also a student there. I have expressed to them the criminality of what will be occurring and will shortly be meeting governors in a bid to make them accountable. I have no words to describe the evil at work here but I am also certain that it is indefensible and impossible to make a case for. I can’t stop foolish parents sacrificing their own children at the altar of covid; I can protect my own kids though, and ensure that bureaucrats allowing this to happen will one day pay the price for their own stupidity and credulousness.
Should also say that whilst I have been writing my statement, expressing the danger and insanity has become easier and easier. The FDA hearings last week certainly helped and of course the (limp, pathetic, supine but I don’t say that) recommendation of our own JCVI have made it much easier. There is no case for vaccinating children and that’s the end of it.
If the weak and gullible are willing to sacrifice themselves at the alter of the vaccine gods, who are we to stop them.
I can’t include the children of weak and gullible people in that assessment though.
Children who have faced 0
deaths since schools returned (one of the last to do so) are lied to again so that Pfizer can get their $40/dose. Vaccination is useful for the at risk. For kids, it’s just the cash register ringing. Lies and psychological abuse.
The experimental jabs, with no long-term safety data, are NOT useful for anyone.
“Vaccination is useful for the at risk.”
Perhaps as a talisman, to make them feel safer. But that’s about it.
12 year olds and up from the U.K. are no longer allowed to enter Germany if they’re unvaccinated.
I’m guessing all EU countries will have the same policy.
Inject your kids or you won’t be going on holiday in the EU or the US.
Was this a HoC Debate or a group conformity experiment? Doesn’t a Debate require dissentient viewpoints on fundamentals?
I make it all of… 6 MPs in attendance to debate these petitions.
Relevant documents:
e-petition 586017, Do not vaccinate children against COVID-19 until Phase 3 trials are complete,
e-petition 587380, Reform the VDPA 1979 to improve support for those harmed by covid-19 vaccines, and
e-petition 593410, Do not make Covid-19 vaccination a requirement to physically
attend university.
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-09-20/debates/A52729B6-FB5D-498F-86E4-569024C22623/Covid-19Vaccinations
Putting the con in consent
“While some of the Government’s rules apply differently to adults who have been vaccinated, no such distinctions have been made for children.”
And what *rules* are these exactly?! I’ve been carrying on life just the same and whatever jabbyjabs I’ve had or not haven’t come into it.
Reminder that they supposedly “debated” the following petition in Parliament:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/575801 – Outlaw discrimination against those who do not get a Covid-19 vaccination
Long story short: It was no debate. All the MPs involved were falling over eachother to praise the vaccines. At no point did they discuss medical discrimination. Maybe it’s time to write to our representatives and let them know that we do not approve of their little hand puppet show. It is clear that they have no plan to stop any such discrimination. On the contrary, I think they are relying on it in order to give people no choice.
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2021-09-20/debates/A52729B6-FB5D-498F-86E4-569024C22623/Covid-19Vaccinations
They did mention misinformation, downright lies, and mad conspiracy theories by people with hidden agendas who are in the pockets of well-funded and well-organised anti-vax movements employed to stop others from getting their potentially life-saving vaccine.
Why some well-funded and well-organised political pressure group would want to stop others from getting life-saving vaccines is anybody’s guess. There’s nothing to be gained by that.
Yes the very words, and in Hansard!
Absolutely despicable and the heights of insolent arrogance gilding what appears as literal ignorance. Are they relying on input from HoC researchers without verifying any of what was given them? Topped with the adulation of the rascal Jenner – because he was a “Brit”!
They would do well to read chapter 6 of Professor E.M. Crookshank’s “History and Pathology of Vaccination” (1889) or Ian Sinclair’s “Vaccination: The “Hidden” Facts” (1992/94). Or any of the modern and authoritative books which impartially review the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
And that would just be a good start – since the COVID-19 “jabs” are not even traditional vaccines anyway but genetic therapy approved on an emergency use basis and without lengthy (in terms of years) human testing.
Write to our representatives?
Good lord, I gave up on that idea months ago. Might as well write to Santa, or the tooth fairy. It’ll do about as much good.
Well, feel free to replace that with whichever activity you find most fitting for getting your MP to do something.
I’m thinking about doing this, provided I can come up with a sensible text. I don’t expect it to do much good. But not doing it certainly won’t do any good and debating a petition by reciting (big pharma) boilerplate propaganda while entirely ignoring its topic is a disgrace.
Sars-CoV2-vaccination should be available to anyone who thinks he needs it. But – just as with mask mandates – people who produce stuff some people don’t want to buy (or have) should not go to the government to force it onto the population.
‘In June, the U.S., U.K., EU, Mexico and Canada announced they would form a group to study how to safely reopen international travel.’
This will include eligible kids and adults having to be fully vaccinated to get into the US.
They’ve set the age at 12 (for now). Those that don’t get ‘jabbed’ will be discriminated against. They’re just not telling you how yet.
Evil morons, the lot of them.
Masks, social distancing etc are not ‘rules’, they are guidance only and they are unenforceable. That’s what they should be telling everybody.
In Germany over 40 persons incarcerated in a special venue under 24h surveillance for breaking quarantine.
I didnt realise we’re living in or ruled by Germany, otherwise I don’t really see the point of your comment.
habits die hard.
It should all have been made clear as optional from day one, instead we had coercion and compulsion and lies and irrationality and propaganda. And it’s still going on.
Just a cock-up?
Obtaining consent via a form that contains lies, however unintentional (???…) has to be a criminal offence.
That was what I thought – any kind of fraud, vitiates everything. Presumably this is the same with the vax manufacturers: they at present appear to have a blanket immunity from prosecution, but if that was based on a false premise, such as for example they knew the products would likely be harmful, then all bets are off.
But the judiciary aren’t likely to do anything about it, even if someone manages to get it to court.
If there is a law against something and that law has patently and incontrovertibly been broken, and a criminal charge is brought, the judiciary has to take notice.
Sneaky little fuckers.
These are people playing the tricks of petty criminals – if you were dealing with a market-stall holder you would back away and not return, and they are running the government.
Don’t for a second believe this was an accident, it’s all deliberate.
Utter utter bastards. I am not normally a violent person but I can’t help hoping that retribution for the person who is doing this to our kids will be as nasty and vicious as is possible.
I can only imagine what a ‘big typo’ would consist of…
For any one with the remotest sense of legality, ethics or common decency the consent forms being sent out will be profoundly offensive: they offer false or improper inducements, the do not outline the doubtful benefits or serious known risks, or the unknown risks of products for which there is no long term data. This is not in good faith: the people doing this are behaving with complete immorality and heaven knows what their real motives are.
I will never be jabbed with this stuff, but its worrying reading the negative long term things about it when my son and other relatives have had it, ‘for work’
experimental gene therapy macht frei?
you can’t make this shit up…
Many kids are actually really confused now. At our Rebels at Roundabouts yesterday, a 16 year old came over to talk to us. He’d been jabbed (taken it for his ill mother!) But was now worried. He thought we were the militant ANTI-Vaxxers he’d heard about in MSM! When we explained we weren’t, we are pro-choice, and just trying to inform people of the risks, especially to younger children, and the lies and duplicity this government is generating, he actually listened. He asked lots of questions which we were happy to answer but we were careful not to frighten him because he’d had the jabs, and we stayed positive. He wasn’t aggressive or rude, and I think we opened his mind to break down some of the negative propaganda he’d heard about people who oppose this vaccine programme. Hopefully this will filter back to his peers and family, who knows?
It also shows that most people don’t know the status of gov rules. Where I work all but two people wear masks all day long and believe children must be tested for covid if a school asks. Since the gov NEVER clarifies ‘rules’ people accept them at face value. Of course the gov NEVER openly states that all have the right to reject a vaccine.
But they’re not laws.
Whenever challenged they fold (although the MSM do not seem to report this news .
True. So what we have is tacit dictat via ignorance. The language of rights and freedoms has totally evaporated. People are under peer pressure or just too lazy to check and challenge, making assumptions which aren’t actually valid. Yet the gov can claim they ‘didn’t force anyone’ while not being explicit about the truth. This is a brainwashing agenda.
Throughout this shitshow the government (and others) have deliberately conflated laws and guidance into “The Rules” which people ‘have’ to follow. Only the sufficiently-clued-up minority actually read the legislation (which is itself usually a mess due to repeated amendments) so that they know which bits (i.e. the guidance) can be ignored with impunity.
The original version “You don’t have to keep following the Government’s rules if you have been vaccinated” was misleading, but true in context; it’s also true, at least in principle, for the unvaccinated.
Lying, fucking bastards!