JCVI Recommends Against Jabs For Teens

We've added a Stop Press to our story about the JCVI's announcement. A source within the vaccination programme informs us the Government intends to plough on with vaccinating healthy teens regardless.

3 min read

In a pleasant surprise, the JCVI, the U.K.’s vaccine regulator, has decided not to recommend that healthy 12-15 year-olds get vaccinated due to the risk of side effects. The BBC has more.

The U.K.’s vaccine advisory body has refused to give the green light to vaccinating healthy children aged 12-15 years-old on health grounds alone.

But the JCVI said the Government should consider wider issues including disruption to schools.

Ministers across the U.K. have asked chief medical officers to look at whether that tips the balance.

Meanwhile, an extra 200,000 teens with underlying conditions will now be eligible for two doses.

Doctors identified that children with chronic heart, lung and liver conditions were at much higher risk of Covid than healthy children. A group of 150,000 children with conditions such as severe neurodisabilities, Down’s syndrome and severely weakened immune systems are already eligible.

This is out of a total of three million children in this age group across the U.K.

The decision on healthy children was based on concern over an extremely rare side effect of the Pfizer vaccine which causes heart inflammation.

But as children are at such low risk from the virus, they decided that vaccination would offer only “marginal gain” and, therefore, there was “insufficient” evidence to offer mass vaccination for this age group.

Stop Press: A journalist colleague passed on some information from a source inside the vaccination programme. Sounds grimly plausible. Below is a summary:

  1. An announcement to be made to the public this Sunday confirming that vaccination of healthy 12-15 year-olds WILL go ahead. Likely to be a decision made by Chris Whitty and the other CMOs, given the JCVI’s position and the fact that no senior politician wants to take responsibility for it.
  2. The start date for first jabs in arms has been delayed until September 13th, a week longer that originally planned. The end date by which time we are required to have offered a Pfizer jab to all healthy 12-15 year olds remains November 1st. Uptake of 75% is expected, although I think that’s a little high, particularly in light of today’s JCVI announcement. We have had to complete a planning return setting out numbers of schools and vaccinations planned for the week beginning Sept 13th – there’s going to be a big push to maximise the number of vaccinations given in schools during the first week, consent be damned.
  3. All relevant documents including those relating to consent forms, consent process, national protocols, etc. will only be released to NHS Trusts on Monday Sept 6th, the day after the Whitty announcement is expected. It will be interesting to see how they get around the Green Book consent protocols.
  4. There is some consternation within the programme that NHS trusts only found out from the BBC, not the national team leaders, that the top-up third dose (not the booster) for the immunologically suppressed will go ahead from Sept 6th. The booster programme is still planned to start on Sept 20th with priority for care homes and health and social care staff likely to be first.

Stop Press 2: MailOnline has more on this story – much more.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

120 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
debra
debra
5 years ago

Dr. Michael McDowell: “The Genetic Bioweapon, The Vaccine, And COVID-19”

https://t.me/JustDudeChannel

Less government
Less government
5 years ago

They will do it. Just to humiliate you and your children. They want you to be subjugated, without control over consent for your children. They are disgusting.

brachiopod
brachiopod
5 years ago

Where, if anywhere, did the fact that none of the ‘not a vaccines’ have completed their trials, and won’t until next year at the earliest.
Do any members of the JCVI know what effects resulting from ‘Codon Optimisation’ of the ‘spike protein’ component of the ‘not a vaccines’ (different in each ‘not a vaccine’)were examined during the trials? [It is recorded in the submission for the Pfizer EUA, so both the MHRA and Pfizer knew that there were risks involved in the different refolding of the protein compared to the ‘wild type’ spike but testing was not recorded as having been undertaken.]
Finally, what credibility does the JCVI have left if it ignores the, as yet unknown, long term effects arising from these novel mRNA treatments and bases its advice on only a couple of months of vaccinating the under 30s during which time there has been heavy suppression of reporting of adverse effects by doctors.

Pavlov Bellwether
Pavlov Bellwether
5 years ago

Great Video: worth watching all the way through (approx 21 mins). The fight back is explained from around 17:00 – also available on Youtube (if you still use it) – Fight this on an individual level. Lead. Others will follow…

“It is not for nothing that our age cries out for a redeemer personality – for the one who can emancipate himself from the grip of the collective psychosis and save at least his own soul, who lights a beacon of hope for others, proclaiming that there is at least one man who has succeeded in extricating himself from the fatal identity with the group psyche” CARL JUNG

BITCHUTE VIDEO HERE

ellie-em
ellie-em
5 years ago

“…the top-up third dose (not the booster) for the immunologically suppressed will go ahead from Sept 6th. The booster programme is still planned to start on Sept 20th with priority for care homes and health and social care staff likely to be first…”
what’s the difference between a top up 3rd dose and a booster? I thought it was the same crap in the syringe.

They are planning to inject 500,000 of the vulnerable yet have advance ordered 35 million doses from Pfizer to be delivered the second half of 2022. Ongoing subterfuge and subservience of those who have failed to see what is happening.
Those poor people in the care homes, being subjected to more of the toxic mix. They will be forced to have it under a group admin template, their best interests decided by social workers etc. Another round of killings…

Rudolph Rigger
Rudolph Rigger
5 years ago

This unholy drive to inject kids with an experimental therapy is truly frightening – especially when they are pretty much at negligible risk from the disease itself. I notice that Savage Jabber has urged the JCVI to look again in a broader context. Which is itself an admission that, although kids are at more risk harm from the vaccines than they are from the disease, there is a broader context that makes it all OK!!!!

I notice the non-existence of any “broader context” when considering lockdowns, or masks, or vaccine passports. Let’s just kill a bunch of kids because it’s OK in the broader context shall we?

kids vaccine1.jpg
rayc
rayc
5 years ago
Reply to  Rudolph Rigger

It’s called ritual sacrifice.

iane
iane
5 years ago
Reply to  Rudolph Rigger

Well, let’s be fair: it will reduce school over-crowding!

SteveMol
SteveMol
5 years ago

“The decision on healthy children was based on concern over an extremely rare side effect of the Pfizer vaccine which causes heart inflammation.”
I wonder where the BBC draws the line between “rare” and “extremely rare”

Rudolph Rigger
Rudolph Rigger
5 years ago
Reply to  SteveMol

So that’ll be weighed against the stupendously extremely rare death from covid19 in this age group? Not by the Big Bunch of C-words, it won’t

Dodderydude
Dodderydude
5 years ago
Reply to  SteveMol

Are we to deduce from this that all the other potential side effects, known and unknown, count for nothing?

MaL
MaL
5 years ago
Reply to  Dodderydude

Good point.

Hester
Hester
5 years ago

The stop press and an article in the Terrorgraph this morning would seem to indicate that despite the medical warnings the injections will go ahead. Perhaps Whitty is the front man for this, but he couldn’t do it without the go ahead of Javid and Johnson, and lets not forget that weeks ago there was a massive recruitment campaign for vaccination operatives in all school districts. This alone should have been the confirmation that regardless of what the medical advisors said the Government was going to press ahead with stuffing the product into children. Still no journalist has pinned down any Minister, Johnson or SAGE advisor including Whitty, Valance and Van Tam to ask them WHY?, Why is it so vital that they get this experimental product into Children, why are we as a nation standing for it?

Bella Donna
Bella Donna
5 years ago
Reply to  Hester

Top marks for Terrorgraph!

grob1234
grob1234
5 years ago

And yet the BBC sub headline is “there is a strong case for vaccinating children”.

If this isn’t propaganda I don’t know what is.

RTSC
RTSC
5 years ago

So the Government’s mantra of “following the science” is going to be ditched in favour of “doing whatever we want, regardless of the risk to healthy children.”

MaL
MaL
5 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

No, they will create a new science more fitting to their agenda by invoking social costs and disruptions that will tip the balance in favour of spiking the children.

Bobby Lobster
Bobby Lobster
5 years ago

I guess in this case, the government will go against the science and double-jab kids anyway?

Bella Donna
Bella Donna
5 years ago

This has nothing to do with following the science and everything to do with Gates and Blair pushing for vaccine passports which will lead to being microchipped. Parents should withdraw their children from school. Johnson is a cowardly immoral narcissist.

rayc
rayc
5 years ago
Reply to  Bella Donna

The only microchips that are needed to control you are already installed in your smartphone. What’s missing yet is tying your ID and possibly biometric data to the device (so that it can be cross-checked with the ID contained in “passport” automatically). From then on you do not even have to take out the phone out of your pocket in order to be “authorized” (or not).

MaL
MaL
5 years ago
Reply to  rayc

They even have tracking capability when you return home and put your mobile down on your desk…..people are happily wearing wristwatches that provide tracking…..for what I ask? So Alexa has even more reach?

mojo
mojo
5 years ago

Interesting that the same words and advice to jab the vulnerable is being used as was in 1939/45. Let’s save the vulnerable by killing them off…..

morganlefey
morganlefey
5 years ago

This is a political frippery perpetrated by the JCVI, psychologically designed to give a misleading impression that vaccination approval is subject to rational health considerations for all age cohorts. Reality is that vaccine approval is a political action substantially disconnected from medical reason, in conformity with a NWO / WEF / ‘great reset’ satanic plot to use Covid vaccination as a device to selectively impoverish, enslave, and genocide humanity.

Richy_m_99
Richy_m_99
5 years ago

Yesterday the papers carried a story of a teenager who died of cardiac arrest in the middle of an FA youth cup game. Presumably, the teenager was both fit and healthy if he was playing to that standard.

Yet nobody asks the obvious question, presumably because they don’t want sn answer. Had he been recently vaccinated in the headlong drive to get anybody an everybody to buy into this criminal conspiracy.

There is a fucking great pink elephant in the room, and everyone is trying not to stare at it.

grob1234
grob1234
5 years ago
Reply to  Richy_m_99

I’d imagine they are banned from asking such questions.

SteveMol
SteveMol
5 years ago
Reply to  Richy_m_99

And conversely, in a concerted “this should shut the anti-vax brigade up” moment, virtually all of the msm were falling over themselves to point out that footballer Christian Eriksen had not received the covid vaccine prior to his heart attack.

refusenick
refusenick
5 years ago
Adamb
Adamb
5 years ago
Reply to  refusenick

Yep, follow the science when it says what you want to hear. This really makes me sick.

Quizzical
Quizzical
5 years ago

Lovely. A well deserved “casualty pass” to Mr Whitty.

Trabant
Trabant
5 years ago

I skim read the mail article. It was very long but kept saying the same things over and over again, about five times! Reminds me why I often just read the headline and first paragraph.

Andrea Salford
Andrea Salford
5 years ago
Reply to  Trabant

Read the headline and thought ‘well they would say that wouldn’t they’. B o l l o x.

Andrea Salford
Andrea Salford
5 years ago
Reply to  Andrea Salford

Eg that’s the headline but that, as we know, ain’t what’s gonna happen.

Emerald Fox
Emerald Fox
5 years ago

All of the lies Boris churns out, and all of the ‘U-turns’. And yet people are still willing to believe he’s telling the truth now? Do people really trust what the JCVI says? Really?

realarthurdent
realarthurdent
5 years ago
Reply to  Emerald Fox

they only take the advice of scientists whose opinions they like.

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
5 years ago

Some light relief courtesy of thecounservativetreehouse.com:

https://youtu.be/JKP7NY6z388

DJ Dod
DJ Dod
5 years ago

From the Daily Mail article linked ATL:

‘The JCVI said in July there was a risk of the heart inflammation in about one in 20,000 young people after being fully immunised with Pfizer’s vaccine. 

The Moderna jab, which works in a very similar way, is thought to carry the same risk. 

The JCVI ruled against recommending the vaccine to healthy children then because the risk of dying from the virus for them is lower than one in a million.’

How much clearer can it be that the vaccine is all risk and no benefit for kids?

dpj
dpj
5 years ago

Someone is definitely not happy with this decision

https://twitter.com/NicolaSturgeon/status/1433809436339056640

Majority of comments are very amusing

KidFury
KidFury
5 years ago
Reply to  dpj

Wow those comments are frightening

milesahead
milesahead
5 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

It’s remarkable that some people still can’t seem to wrap their heads around the fact that the experiMENTAL jabs don’t stop people spreading and catching the virus.

KidFury
KidFury
5 years ago
Reply to  milesahead

I know. I don’t even know how to handle such idiocy

CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
5 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

The comments on there show just what sort of mindset we are up against.

Or perhaps lack-of-mindset would be more appropriate as they just seem to be unthinkingly parroting the approved line

Jon Mors
Jon Mors
5 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

Calvinists

186NO
186NO
5 years ago
Reply to  KidFury

You can hear Mengele clapping in approval….

realarthurdent
realarthurdent
5 years ago
Reply to  dpj

I suppose Nicola will be first in the queue to get her children vaccinated.

Oh wait. She doesn’t have any kids, does she?

ellie-em
ellie-em
5 years ago
Reply to  dpj

The tartan Taliban out in force in the comments.

PatrickF
PatrickF
5 years ago

Have a jab. Why? For my health? No. For political reasons.

helenf
helenf
5 years ago

A “vaccine” that they admit causes heart problems in kids (potentially long-term, potentially fatal) recommended to be rolled out to kids with heart problems. You couldn’t make it up.

RW
RW
5 years ago
Reply to  helenf

I thought this myself: This looks a bit like an expensive kids the NHS can do without list.

sophie123
sophie123
5 years ago
Reply to  helenf

My friend had arrhythmia in the past. Under control. Or at least it was until she had the jab, and now it’s very much NOT under control.

Susan
Susan
5 years ago

So, Stop Press. They’re determined to kill us all, after all.

sophie123
sophie123
5 years ago
Reply to  Susan

Is Witty insane? one dead kid and he’s directly to blame. Who will forgive him? nobody

RW
RW
5 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

He will forgive himself. To Witty, we’re all just unecessary social contacts, breeding ground for dangerous viruses, and dangerously unwilling to have our lives scarificed to some greater cause an expert considers more important than us.

Why do you you think he’d care what would happen to other people’s children?

realarthurdent
realarthurdent
5 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

1600+ dead people after vaccination to date suggests he won’t give a toss about a few children, sadly.

sophie123
sophie123
5 years ago
Reply to  realarthurdent

He might do when one of their parents shoots him. I would, if my kid were hurt (not that I’d let them be jabbed in the first instance, but if I WERE the kind of mutton head that allowed them to be, I’d likely be the kind of mutton head who would go banzai with a shotgun)

I’d shoot him in the nuts first, and tell him why I’d done it before going for the knee caps. Then elbows. Then I’d put him out of his misery maybe.

Don’t worry Chris if you’re reading – you & your goons won’t be allowed anywhere near my precious children, so I won’t come after you. Others may though.

helenf
helenf
5 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

Am I right in thinking you’re the same Sophie who works/worked for the pharmaceutical industry? Apologies if I’m wrong.

sophie123
sophie123
5 years ago
Reply to  helenf

Yup

Like anywhere, there are a minority who are immune to fear of a virus, and who can see through the bullshit

186NO
186NO
5 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

S123, Good luck finding his testicles, I have not seen him demonstrating any “balls” throughout this scam scandal.

Susan
Susan
5 years ago
Reply to  realarthurdent

But they will have sadlydied. Wait. No. Extremely-rarely-died, if remarked upon at all.

Lilacblue
Lilacblue
5 years ago
Reply to  sophie123

The people I work with practically worship him, he can do no wrong.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
5 years ago
Reply to  Susan

Oh yes.

Sandra Barwick
Sandra Barwick
5 years ago

Good for them. Some “experts” are located a pair and are drawing a line. Excellent, well done.
Sorry about the mixed metaphor. Sometimes nothing else will do.

CynicalRealist
CynicalRealist
5 years ago

“But the JCVI said the Government should consider wider issues including disruption to schools.”

That looks suspiciously like an intentional loophole, so that the government can decide that in order not to disrupt educaiton they will “regrettably” have to spike the kids.

Of course, if that happens, they (and the media) will ignore the point that the disruption is caused by paranoid testing regimes and sending loads of kids home, which is entirely due to the government, as hardly any kids actually get ill. They will also ignore the inconvenient fact that the stabs don’t prevent people from spreading it anyway, so if kids were going to spread it (which is itself questionable), then they will likely still do anyway after the stabbing, and there will still be loads of “positive” tests.

But inconvenient facts such as these only exist to be brushed under the carpet, and the MSM will no doubt find plenty of brainwashed parents to speak of their ‘relief’ that little Johnny and Jemima can get spiked after all.

charleyfarley
charleyfarley
5 years ago

Prediction:

Healthy teenagers will be given the injections. Bill has decreed it so.

Lilacblue
Lilacblue
5 years ago

Already trying to find a sneaky way round the decision by appealing to the CMOs to take a ‘broader perspective’ This government is vile. I have never felt so repulsed by those in power.

Pavlov Bellwether
Pavlov Bellwether
5 years ago

This is PsyOps. Impure and Simple. If you fall for this then there’s really no hope. This is what they’ve been doing for over 18 months. Carrot. Stick. Have a little carrot… then the big stick in a few weeks time. WAKE THE F*CK UP! – See what’s happening elsewhere, including Australia, NZ, US, Israel and Canada. It’s so f*kin clear to me. Why is no one else seeing this? There is NO common sense. Nothing sensible… and it’s NOT great news. FIGHT. BACK. BETTER. Information, resources and useful links: https://www.LCAHub.org/

RickH
RickH
5 years ago

Couldn’t agree more. Although – I’m reading Himmler’s diaries ATM, and, as the editor points out, that excrescence was genuinely convinced of his own propriety and rectitude as he planned monstrosities. It’s the way mediocre minds work, and why they are a danger if given power.

186NO
186NO
5 years ago
Reply to  RickH

” Mediocre minds” ….So so true, agree wholeheartedly as I spouted earlier; time to remove MP salaries and pay fixed expenses – exactly what have “career” politicians ever done for the UK for the “public good”, apart from enrich themselves?

morganlefey
morganlefey
5 years ago

This is a political frippery perpetrated by the JCVI, psychologically designed to give a misleading impression that vaccination approval is subject to rational health considerations for all age cohorts. Reality is that vaccine approval is a political action substantially disconnected from medical reason, in conformity with a NWO / WEF / ‘great reset’ satanic plot to use Covid vaccination as a device to selectively impoverish, enslave, and genocide humanity.

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
5 years ago

Sadly Pavlov you are speaking to those of us in the know here.

It is trying to get these facts over to the sheeple.

Like many of yu on here I try but I do feel that I am losing the battle.

186NO
186NO
5 years ago
Reply to  Judy Watson

Must keep going, “you are not alone”!

Pavlov Bellwether
Pavlov Bellwether
5 years ago
Reply to  Judy Watson

Great Video: worth watching all the way through (approx 21 mins). The fight back is explained from around 17:00 – also available on Youtube (if you still use it) – Fight this on an individual level. Lead. Others will follow…

“It is not for nothing that our age cries out for a redeemer personality – for the one who can emancipate himself from the grip of the collective psychosis and save at least his own soul, who lights a beacon of hope for others, proclaiming that there is at least one man who has succeeded in extricating himself from the fatal identity with the group psyche” CARL JUNG

BITCHUTE VIDEO HERE

Pavlov Bellwether
Pavlov Bellwether
5 years ago

More useful information, links and resources: https://www.LCAHub.org/

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.