• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Justifications for Lockdown Have Implications That Most People Would Not Accept, Say Philosophers

by Noah Carl
1 September 2021 8:39 AM
Front Green in autumn., exterior

Front Green in autumn., exterior

Although nationwide lockdowns are unprecedented in modern history, there’s been remarkably little public debate about whether they are justified ethically. Vague appeals to ‘protecting the NHS’ will not do, especially since the U.K. Pandemic Preparedness Strategy 2011 says that halting the spread of pandemic influenza virus would be “a waste of public health resources”.  

In a paper due to appear in the Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, Samuel Director and Christopher Freiman examine the two main justifications that have been given for lockdown. And they find both of these justifications wanting. In particular, they argue that each one has implications that most people would not accept.

The first major justification for lockdowns is that we have to minimise lives lost (or perhaps life years lost). In other words: we should adopt whichever policy minimises the total number of deaths, and since lockdown is the policy that achieves that, we should implement lockdowns.

As an example of this justification, the authors quote the former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo, who said, “We’re not going to put a dollar figure on human life. The first order of business is to save lives, period. Whatever it costs.”

Yet upon reflection, this justification makes very little sense. For example, it would imply that governments should drastically reduce speed limits to prevent all road deaths – at the cost of time, convenience and economic efficiency. (Or perhaps they’d have to ban cars altogether.)

As I’ve previously noted: “Society has functions other than simply extending people’s lives for as long as possible. If it did not, we’d spend a much higher fraction of GDP on healthcare, and we’d ban alcohol, smoking and extreme sports.”

The second major justification for lockdowns is that we must defer to experts. In other words: we should adopt whichever policy the experts advocate, and since the experts advocate lockdown, that is what we should do.

Aside from the fact that many experts were against lockdown – not to mention the difficulty of even defining ‘expertise’ in this area – insisting that we must defer to experts has implications that many people would reject.

For example, it would imply that we should adopt free trade, open immigration, legalisation of some drugs, and perhaps even markets in human organs – since these policies all receive support from academic economists. Note: I’m not saying these are all necessarily bad policies; but they can’t be justified purely on the basis of what ‘the experts’ believe. 

According to the authors, the only justification that actually makes sense is that lockdowns have large “net welfare benefits”, i.e., their benefits in terms of lives saved outweigh all the costs they impose on society. However, as a matter of empirical fact, the authors doubt that lockdowns do have large “net welfare benefits”.  

For example, they entertain economist Bryan Caplan’s argument that the reduction in quality of life alone may have offset any lives saved by lockdowns. (Though of course, there’s not much evidence that lockdowns have saved lives in most of the countries where they’ve been tried.)

Director and Freiman’s paper provides a good overview of the debate over the ethics of lockdown, and is worth reading in full.

Tags: EthicsExpertsLockdowns

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Vaccine Safety Update

Next Post

Victoria Playgrounds Were Closed to Stop Parents Meeting, Not to Stop Covid Spreading Among Children

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

67 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 40: Rob Bates on Stopping Britain Becoming Majority-Minority, Tilak Doshi on Trump vs Green Blob and Mario Trabucco on Osborne’s Elgin Marbles Betrayal

by Richard Eldred
13 June 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

17 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17 June 2025
by Will Jones

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

54

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

28

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

20

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

53

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat

16 June 2025
by Toby Young

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

September 2021
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« Aug   Oct »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

17 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17 June 2025
by Will Jones

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

54

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

28

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

20

Establishment in Denial Over Ethnicity of Grooming Gangs, Report Finds

53

Channel Migrants Given Free TV Licences, DOGE UK Audit Finds

17

The Censorship-Industrial Complex Has Now Become Self-Perpetuating

17 June 2025
by Eugyppius

Why is the Civil Service Muslim Network Allowed to Shape Government Policy?

17 June 2025
by David Shipley

The Link Between Asylum Seekers and New Rape Gang Cases Will Fuel Public Anger

17 June 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Big Brother Lives Next Door

16 June 2025
by Matthew Corrigan

Please Give Generously to Keep the Daily Sceptic Afloat

16 June 2025
by Toby Young

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment