The NHS has drawn up plans to start vaccinating 12 year-olds from the first week schools go back. The Telegraph has more.
Health officials have said children would not need parental consent to be jabbed under the programme of vaccination in schools.
On Wednesday, NHS trusts were told to prepare for the “possible rollout of a 12 to 15 year-old healthy child vaccination programme commencing September 6th”. Emails sent by NHS England’s regional offices, seen by the Telegraph, say trusts should draw up plans by 4pm on Friday.
The timetable – with the first jabs administered in less than two weeks – comes despite the fact that the Government’s advisers on vaccination have not so far recommended such a roll-out. On Wednesday night, the Department of Health and Social Care insisted no decision to roll out jabs for 12 to 15 year-olds had been taken.
Until now, Government advisers have said there is insufficient data to support such a move, but further research on the safety of jabs in this age group is about to be published, feeding into their review of the evidence.
In June, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency approved the Pfizer jab for 12 to 15 year-olds in Britain. Last month, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) announced that youngsters between those ages would only receive vaccines if they suffered from particular health conditions.
Jabs are currently being offered to those aged 16 and 17 following a recommendation from the committee earlier this month. They are only being offered one dose, with the JCVI yet to make a decision on whether or when a second should be given.
The caution is linked to concerns over a rare side effect called myocarditis – a type of heart inflammation – which is more likely to be triggered by second doses, and the NHS plans for the rollout to younger children also suggest that only one Pfizer dose should be given.
The emails from one of NHS England and NHS Improvement’s regional offices, sent to trusts on Wednesday, say: “In preparation for the possible announcement of a 12 to 15 year-old healthy child vaccination programme commencing September 6th, we have been tasked by our national team to request some additional detailed planning information from all systems.”
Trusts are asked to provide details of how they could vaccinate at least 75% of children aged 12 to 15 by November 1st.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Telegraph columnists Allison Pearson and Liam Halligan discuss this new development in their latest Planet Normal podcast.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Comment in the Telegraph perfectly describes what’s now happening: FIGHT. BACK. BETTER. – updated useful information, resources and links: https://www.LCAHub.org/
Template letter for parents to decline Covid-19 vaccination of their child in school
https://www.ukmedfreedom.org/resources/template-letters
CRIMINAL!!
Evil knows no bounds it seems.
So Boris and his ‘freedom lovin’ Tories’ are coming for our kids- and sadly we have no one like DeSantis to stand in his way. That this is even being mentioned anywhere is proof of how far we have allowed ourselves to slide into a copy of East Germany, China, etc.
Assaulting children with what is increasingly looking like a bio-weapon – that’s how low the powers that be have sunk. No medical reason. Just marching lock step to the New World Order and its inhuman agenda.
The decision to give one dose only is an admission that the substance – I won’t call it a vaccine – is toxic.
There is no other way of looking at it.
I don’t have sufficient words to express my anger and disgust.
I am totally against this group being pressurised to be vaccinated. Surely the aim of a normal vaccine is to protect the individual concerned. This is not so with the covid vaccine – youngsters are to be given it to protect, or so they say, other members of society. Why should young people ,who have suffered more than most during this insanity, be required to be vaccinated against a virus that has minimal effect on them? This inversion of values just shows how our normal thought processes have been warped by intemperate reactions to this virus. While they’re at it, why not give them the flu jab to protect them against passing that on? This state intrusion into our health has gone too far.
TWO GREAT RESOURCES TO MOUNT A FIGHTBACK:
Anna De Buisseret – Senior UK Human Rights Lawyer – find all of her websites for groups she is linked to and listen to her interviews for tips on what you can do to fight back. Essentially this revolves around putting schools, headmasters and THE VACCINATORS on NOTICE OF LIABILITY that they are in breach of several laws and they will be helping to administer a substance which can kill and maim and that they are not getting informed consent. Listen to what she says it’s just about our only hope of gaining traction and making these people fold – make them feel the pressure of what they are doing – breaking the law – committing WAR CRIMES – committing CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY – battery and potentially murder – YOU ARE LETTING THEM KNOW THEY WILL BE PERSONALLY LIABLE FOR ANY HARMS CAUSED BY THE JABS AS A HUMAN BEING NOT A REP FOR A COMPANY.
https://www.bitchute.com/search/?query=anna%20de%20buisseret&kind=video&sort=new
Doctors For Covid Ethics – Notice Of Liability Letters
https://doctors4covidethics.org/resources-2/
David talks to Anna de Buisseret about the vaxx rollout to 16-17 year olds
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ku3Abhtq10Dy/
Mummy. What’s ‘informed consent’?
No other vaccine has been mandated in this country. Measles is far more contagious and can cause serious injury or death. Rubella less dangerous to the infected person but can be catastrophic in pregnancy. Chicken pox is normally a fairly benign infection for most people, but can cause encephalitis and remains dormant for life. I don’t have the figures at hand, but it would be interesting to see what the IFR (infection fatality rate) is for SARS-CoV-2 in children under 16 compared with the IFR for measles, rubella, chicken pox and influenza.
Hi John,
According to official NHS data, as of 26th August 2021, a total of nine people aged 19 or under with no pre-existing conditions have died in England in hospital with a positive PCR test since the start of the pandemic.
COVID-19 Daily Deaths Scroll down to: ‘Covid 19 total announced deaths 26 August 2021 – weekly file’ > ‘Tab3, COVID-19 deaths by age group and pre-existing condition’
BBC presenter died due to complications caused by AstraZeneca jab
https://mol.im/a/9928939
Worth checking out best rated DM readers comments on this one!
I guess they intend using the Pfizer jab, but even so, to even contemplate jabbing children, to which Covid 19 poses little or no threat is simply reprehensible. I hope that the bastards behind this initiative burn in hell.
They will ultimatively demand that babies must be vaccinated as soon as the umbilical chord has been severed and must not be allowed out of safe hospital isolation stations until two weeks after their second jab, all in the name of protecting Susan Michie et al from their paranoid phantasies.
Surely they start vaccinating sperm cells and eggs next?
Here’s an honest verdict for a change. We still have independent coroners and this one decided that it was indeed a vaccine death
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-58330796
They don’t need to – the biological process for mRNA reverse transcription back into DNA has already been demonstrated for other species. Once the DNA is ‘updated’ to include the spike protein coding sequence in a jabbed woman/man and the woman then gets pregnant, ta-da, the child will have the genetic information for the mass production of spike protein in its genome. I read about this the other day – it will result in ‘super spreader’ children who don’t recognise the spike protein as ‘foreign’ but rather ‘self’.
https://www.nomorelockdowns.uk/sos
https://unherd.com/thepost/bombshell-study-finds-natural-immunity-superior-to-vaccination/
perhaps this has been posted already. But why there was ever any doubt about natural immunity being superior to vaccine is utterly beyond me.
Contrary to popular opinion, what our government wants is a smaller and sicker population.
What are the other side going to do now? They monitor sites like these for the resistance to their policies. Obviously there is a hardcore of parents who will not submit to their children being jabbed. What are they going to do with those who hold out in the first wave of school vaxxination?
Are they going to bring in teams of vaxxers later on in the school year who swoop down on schools without notice and vax the children without parental permission? They need to chip away at the non-compliant.
For God’s sake, parents, copy what is happening in America, take your kids out of school, start your own schools
Hambeast injecting (most likely) healthy young girl with mystery serum. Sums this FUBAR situation up perfectly.
I had hoped that with the double – jabbed getting sick from covid that it would open their eyes. Obviously untrue.
They just keep parroting that they’d have been sicker without it.
I just cannot see how they could possibly know that.
I’m holding on by the skin of my teeth to avoid this jab.
Just waiting it out. Hoping against hope that people wake up.
Vaccinating children en masse who demonstrably don’t need it!
It’s just sick.
If I had kids of school age, I ‘d be getting in there first.
Here’s what I ‘d do:
Pre-emptive strike:
Write to, not text, their school, the local health trust etc informing them that you WILL take action should they vaccinate your child. Take them to court etc. Photocopy it, send the copy to an unopened mail box.
Yes, it is true that parental consent may not be required but nobody wants the hassle of an incensed parent.
Ask them about what legal redress you can expect if your child gets sick from the ‘jab’.
You can only hope that this makes them think twice before plunging this unnecessary vaccine into them.
Get in there first. Be a pain in the… Read more »
It really is simple.
You either side with Mengele or with civilisation.
There is no middle ground.
Every “adult” in any position of authority/influence here who promotes or even acquiesces in this, is guilty of child abuse. So, if there is any justice, you headmasters, teachers, doctors, nurses and parents be warned – you will be pay for this one day. Maybe not on this earth-unless the Lawyers are allowed to get their act together-but certainly the next.
No consolation to the kids who will have to live with being jabbed for the rest of their lives – however affected they may be.
And all done in the name of saving Granny.
Jesus wept.
I have a feeling it’s not even about saving granny any more. Lots of the grannies have already shuffled off, and a lot who haven’t would not want the kids sacrificed to save them. Old people are often quite sanguine about their own mortality.
It’s all those bloody cowardly middle aged wimps who are scared of death and think their own jab doesn’t work so are prepared to throw the kids under the bus to make up the shortfall.
It never was about saving granny, they’d prefer it if grannie snuffed it.
Population reduction via sterility inducing toxic gene therapy clot shots. THIS IS PURE EVIL.
All this outrage! All these months that have gone by and the government steamroller continues to plough on regardless.
My prediction: kids will get jabbed, few will do anything to prevent it. If kids get jabbed regularly, the older people who have refused the ‘vaccinations’ will just be getting older and older and closer to their graves and one day gone. Eventually there will be a society 100% dependent on the jabs to keep their Member of Society Passport up-to-date.
great resource for properly based legal advice around EUA innoculations
https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/
“Vaccines in UK are not mandatory. There is an exemption on evidence of medical reasons and the Supreme Court recognises at common law that denial of free and informed consent is a self certified medical reason. See Montgomery v Lanarkshire [2015] UKSC 11 https://supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2013-0136-judgment.pdf
In R Wilkinson v Broadmoor : [2001] EWCA Civ 1545, Lady Justice Hale, Supreme Court President, confirmed that forced medical procedure without informed consent “may be sued in the ordinary way for the (common law) tort of battery”. https://bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1545.html
In the judgement it was held that acting under statutory authority provides no defence, therefore the Employer will be guilty of coercion on the threat of battery with regards to unlawful dismissal if express evidence of denial of informed consent are unlawfully rejected.
This will result in a breach of contract and also a Tort that can be sued. The above is why mask “mandate” exemptions were self certified. It is unlawful for Doctors to interfere with the process of free and informed consent. Informed consent is defined in Montgomery as follows:
1. That the patient is given sufficient information – to allow individuals to make… Read more »
It would be interesting to further define “sufficient”?
Comment made in haste and wiped.
No idea what this comment is voted down. I want to know what the govt or the courts think “sufficient” is because I bet it’s not what I consider sufficient.
No it’s a good point worth considering KF, however to my knowledge bribery or coercion also violates IC so given the situation I think a strong case could be made on those grounds.
The definition of ‘sufficient’ would be the level of information deemed necessary by the man in the street i.e. does ‘sufficient’ equal reasonable.
https://bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2001/1545.html link fails for me
all very well – in theory – but does anyone really think they are going to be very bothered about the threat of being sued for the tort of battery??? In days of yore, before all this, yes they would, but not now that they have full state [and soon public] backing for everything they do, and when the courts seemingly don’t want to touch such cases with a barge pole.
To demand, coerce and even force, children face potential harm for an illness they essentially don’t suffer from is just evil. It can only be about the £££££ for big Pharma. I very rarely swear, but those pushing this are ******* *********s.
Every now and then I have a day when I just feel totally overwhelmed by the way the world is going; today is one of those days. I just want to scream and fight the c88ts who are
runningruining the country, but see no way forward. Time to nuke the world.What surprises me is the surprise. This is entirely predictable and consistent with everything that has happened thus far. And it makes it very easy to predict what will come.
OF COURSE they’re going to vaccinate children. To draw the line with children would be to admit that there are questions and concerns about the vaccines. And they will NEVER do that.
So, everyone, be prepared, and don’t act surprise. Under 12s are next. And they’ll end up vaxing babies. (They are already vaxing pregnant mothers so they clearly don’t have too many qualms regarding babies.)
What is unclear yet is what will happen to the unvaxxed. How far will they push. This is the real battleground.
OK so the politicians and health care fraternity now consider the age of consent to be 12. Let’s see them legislate for this then as a general principle – no I thought not. I am of course talking in general about previously held beliefs in the age at which children are capable of making independent decisions and NOT about the AoC for sex. Cannot people see the exceptional coercion?
Unethical, amoral, but surely, illegal, if parents do not consent?
A moot point. Most parents have taken it themselves and will have had plenty of time to convince themselves it’s safe and good.
Once you’ve reached the point you think it is safe and good, why wouldn’t you give it to your child?
Parents will consent. And they know it.
Seems strange to have a go at Toby (who has, after all, faithfully produced this newsletter day after day for over a year). Toby’s may not share some of our fears about the evil that is going on but he doesn’t make policy. No. all our outrage should be aimed at those behind this – and probably far beyond our individual governments. I don’t know what documents they’ve signed and with whom (probably Pfizer for one) but they are probably deeply compromised and I expect this has been on the cards since the beginning.
I don’t have young children or even grandchildren but I am absolutely horrified at what is going on. It is the act of evil bullies who have no empathy and care nothing for our rate as a species – every parent must do what they can to stop it.
You mean the parents that meekly submitted themselves? You want them to stop it? Dream on.
I agree with your comments re Toby – bang out of order. He didn’t have to set this site up but thank God he did.
Doubtless if he started putting his opinions on here we would have plenty telling him to button it. So pack in the personal sleights and be grateful we have this site.
Isn’t TY a journalist?
Haven’t we been complaining for the last 18 months that journalists have failed to publish the truth?
Have the people currently running this country lost their minds? If I can do my own research for the facts and the truth then so can they. They must be criminally insane!
Worse. They are criminally sane.
Criminally insane is the correct answer! So what do we do about it because we have a supine justice system.
There is no option but for us to rise up and fight!