We’re publishing an essay today by Dr Noah Carl arguing that the UK’s lockdowns were a mistake. Looking at the Western world, he says, lockdowns have not been associated with substantially fewer deaths from COVID-19, except in geographically peripheral countries that imposed strict border controls at the start. In addition, the increases in mortality associated with COVID-19 – even in the worst-hit Western countries – have been quite small, particularly when compared to the range of mortality between different groups in society. If good governance is about reducing overall mortality, why hasn’t the Government addressed these inequalities? Finally, he argues, the societal costs of lockdowns have been substantial, and preliminary analyses suggest they almost certainly outweighed the benefits.
Here is an extract in which he makes the point about the Government’s inconsistent approach to reducing mortality:
As Simon Wood noted in an article last October, “the gap in life expectancy between the richer and poorer segments of British society amounted to some 200 million life years lost for the current UK population, which is somewhere around 70 times what Covid might have caused”. He added: “Even the firmest believer in laissez-faire would have to concede that some percentage of that loss is preventable.” The fact that the Government never locked down society (or imposed costs of equivalent magnitude) to reduce much larger differences in mortality within Britain calls its coronavirus strategy into serious question.
Lockdown proponents might say this logic doesn’t apply to COVID-19, since lockdowns prevent individuals from harming others, whereas pre-existing differences in mortality are not due to such “externalities”. But I don’t find this argument very convincing. First, it’s not clear that lockdowns do have much impact on mortality over and above that of basic restrictions. Second, some of the pre-existing differences in mortality are caused by other people’s behaviour (e.g. air pollution, road accidents, flu deaths). And third, blanket lockdowns impose costs on people regardless of whether they contribute to the “externalities” of viral transmission (e.g. people who live away from major population centres, those who have already been infected).
Noah is a rigorous, fair-minded analyst who sticks closely to the evidence. His piece is worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
“Finally, he argues, the societal costs of lockdowns have been substantial, and preliminary analyses suggest they almost certainly outweighed the benefits.”
we knew that before the first lockdown
Isn’t that essentially what all the pandemic planners had agreed up until this pandemic? And lockdowns are something never tried before… the quarantine of healthy individuals. This has been a massive international experiment and the conspiracy theorists look like the reasonable ones right now.
It may be that a significant proportion of the support for lockdown is based on a schadenfreude that incorrectly assumes lockdown to be a social ‘leveller’ constraining the ‘exciting’ ‘privileged’ lives that the wealthiest sections of society are believed to have been leading.
Whereas, in point of fact, lockdowns bring economic hardship to those who can least afford it, particularly in the developing world, while those ‘exciting’ ‘privileged’ lives of the most affluent are just as likely to be ended by suicide as those of the poorest.
We will get an indication, 06 May, as to whether the electorate have worked that out for themselves.
If, as seems likely (despite the quite batty polls), they have, where is the Conservative party gong to find any votes?
Spot on Tim, my wife called this months ago ( i think the ladies have a ‘nose’ for these things), she reckons its almost all schadenfreude. Terrible indictment of society.
There is a clear moral issue as well. A death caused by a virus is natural. A death caused by a lockdown is man made and therefore has a culpable criminal cause.
Bill Gates : “You Don’t Have A Choice”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BE518ans5dM
Tony Heller
Bill Gates says “you don’t have a choice.” and he says everyone in the world has to get the injection he is promoting.
Anti Lockdown Newspaper: https://thelightpaper.co.uk/
Well, we needn’t worry because it’ll all be over by the end of 2022 as Dr Gates has told us so