Boris Johnson believes that he handled the response to Covid poorly in the early days… in that the first lockdown did not come soon – or hard – enough. Supporters of the Prime Minister claim that he was let down by his scientific advisers. The Telegraph has the story.
Boris Johnson accepts it was a mistake to delay the start of the first national lockdown, close allies have said, while insisting the Prime Minister was let down by scientific advisers.
Mr Johnson would act “harder, earlier and faster” if he had his time again, supporters say, raising the possibility of a mea culpa moment in a future inquiry into the handling of the pandemic.
As the first anniversary of lockdown approaches, Mr Johnson has rightly won plaudits for the runaway success of Britain’s vaccine rollout, but knows he will eventually have to confront the question of why the UK has suffered the highest death toll in Europe and the fifth-highest in the world.
The Telegraph has learnt that the pivotal moment in imposing lockdown came on March 14th last year – nine days before lockdown started – when Mr Johnson was shown evidence that ministers and scientific advisers had badly miscalculated how quickly the NHS would be overwhelmed.
The Prime Minister was “stunned” to be told by a Number 10 data analyst at a hurriedly-convened Saturday meeting that his “squash the sombrero” policy was not working and that hospitals were as little as three weeks away from being past capacity.
Mr Johnson had, until then, been making decisions based on out-of-date projections provided by Government departments.
But he waited until March 23rd to issue his “stay at home” order, a decision which scientists have claimed doubled the death toll in the first wave.
Ministers and officials involved in the Covid response have said it should not be viewed through the prism of “20-20 hindsight”, but admitted the Prime Minister’s instinct for delaying decisions as long as possible was the “worst” approach in the midst of a pandemic.
In December, Professor Neil Ferguson admitted that the implementation of lockdowns in the West was viewed as being unviable until Italy acted (hard, early and fast).
[China is] a communist one party state, we said. We couldn’t get away with it in Europe, we thought… And then Italy did it. And we realised we could.
The Prime Minister’s confession lays the groundwork for future pandemic responses – that of imposing an even harder lockdown even sooner. Has he learnt nothing?
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Of course Johnson hasn’t learned anything to the good as far as public welfare is concerned. This is him trying to walk down both sides of the street at once while absolving himself of responsibility. His scientific advisors really ought to be worrying about their futures. Scapegoats …
Exactly. Who knows what BoZo actually thinks?
Depressing.
If the only thing Johnson has learned is that we should lock down harder and faster then unless he is removed over the Summer I think we can expect Winter lockdown to occur from about November
Would have locked down harder? So what about lockdowns two or three? He had more chances there. Where are these lessons learned? Sorry, he’s just trying to win votes from the Covid loving leftists.
Ireland has locked down harder than anyone else and still passed more deaths since the vaccine rollout than the entire Covid crisis. Either lockdowns do nothing or….lets not venture into the alternative regarding vaccines. Instead, better to pretend lockdowns do work, come up with some mental gymnastics to explain how and move onward to more lockdowns guaranteed in future.
So all this talk of locking down earlier is just another turn deeper into the rabbit hole.
The entire shitshow needs auditing by someone clever and objective. Like Feynmann for the Challenger disaster. No need asking Imperial if lockdowns work – you know the answer.
I am against lockdowns – but if I try to look objectively at all the data (and ignore models – we don’t need them now we have data) – I can’t see how you can think they are effective