The Prince of Wales has tested positive for COVID-19 and is now self-isolating, Clarence House has said, in spite of being triple-jabbed, religiously observing mask mandates and having had it before. MailOnline has more.
Aides said the prince was found to be positive during a routine test – which suggested he was experiencing no strong symptoms – but they declined to go into further details on his medical condition.
A message on the prince’s official Twitter page read: “This morning The Prince of Wales has tested positive for COVID-19 and is now self-isolating.
“HRH is deeply disappointed not to be able to attend today’s events in Winchester and will look to reschedule his visit as soon as possible.”
Both he and the Duchess of Cornwall have been taking regular tests before engagements and Clarence House said Camilla had a negative test on Thursday. Under current Covid rules, although she lives with Charles, Camilla is not required to self-isolate as she is also fully vaccinated.
A spokesman added: “The Duchess of Cornwall has routinely tested negative today. She is on a separate series of engagements from the Prince of Wales.”
While in the past, Covid rules would have dictated that all those who had come into contact with the prince must self-isolate, it is no longer a requirement.
It comes a day after Boris Johnson announced he plans to axe all virus restrictions in England by the end of the month which would mean even those who have tested positive for the virus will not be required to self-isolate, “provided the current encouraging trends in the data continue”.
Worth reading in full.
Stop Press: Wales’s First Minister Mark Drakeford has also tested positive for coronavirus and is self-isolating, the Welsh government has said. Like Prince Charles, he’s been triple-jabbed and is a fanatical mask wearer. BBC News has more.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
BEV = UXB.
Much of the technology being touted to deliver Net-Zero has been petulantly demanded by politicians to deliver their mad eco policies. Much of this technology has not been properly and fully tested on a trial basis but these eco politicians cannot wait for such niceties as market testing and feasibility studies they have a mad net-zero dream (nightmare?) and like a petulant screaming child are stamping their feet and screaming that this technology must deliver their agenda or else.
Given time and resources I expect technology can, in the future, deliver new transport, heating and energy solutions for society. However, to demand that it delivers it now to the time scale dictated by mad eco-politicians means we will get the ‘or else and it will not be pretty or pleasant.
It’s worse than that- the mad politicians know all about the risks, same as we do, but they go ahead anyway.
There will be a reckoning one day, and millibands head will finish on a spike.
Look up all our Energy ministers degree qualifications, and you will find most will have studied the Arts and Humanities, with many degrees in PPE or some sort of History.
Says it all, really.
politicians and civil servants are maters of circling their wagons. They will have us on spikes before themselves. . That aside what I cannot understand is knowing that these explosions/ fires are happening with an increasing regularity is it not a real hazard allowing electric vehicles on car ferries and the Channel Tunnel carriers?
Yes extremely dangerous
“…this technology has not been properly and fully tested..”
Dang. This rings a bell. Not Net Zero, something else.
Now, what could it be…?
Because it’s an electric car.
A shame actually.
Spratton has one of the best Guy Fawkes displays in the country.
Why couldn’t they have waited?
Lesson of the day for these people: Virtue-signalling can be dangerous.
Lets add in Hydrogen fuel.
Should be good for bonfire night
That garage looks like it’s part of the house. Good job the car wasn’t inside at the time.
Sounds like Korea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vNo9PJP9Qa8
In the “More on this story” below the BBC article is a link to “Electric cars: Lords urge action on ‘misinformation’ in press” in which:
Yeah, how many 2 year old prestige brand petrol cars explode?
It could have been worse; it could have been parked in the garage.
But I was told that electric cars were ‘safe’ and ‘effective’ just like the ‘miracle’ vaccines.
It’s terrible!
Think of the Carbon footprint if the house had burnt down! 🙂
You building insurance will go up if you own an electric car. EVs are the Betamax of the automotive industry. Avoid.
But Betamax was actually superior technology that wasn’t marketed as well as VHS The inverse is true of EV’s.
Commercial property insurers are already refusing to accept liability for fires caused by the charging of electric vehicles. I think they will soon apply this to domestic premises too.
Who needs Guy Fawkes fireworks now we have electric cars? Burning at 2,000 degrees and belching poisonous gases – much better than an old-fashioned bonfire.
Thermal runaway. Violent, very toxic gases, explosions, extremely high temperatures, extremely difficult to extinguish, can reignite when and where you least expect it.
Don’t kill your family and neighbours, stop virtue signalling and vote Reform.